... 23 Page: 2 Filed: 10/10/2023 2 GOLDEN v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Larry Golden appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing his antitrust, patent infringement, ...
The district court inter- preted the complaint, which included nearly 1,200 pages of attachments, as alleging (1) patent infringement, (2) anti- trust violations, and (3) unjust enrichment.
Because Golden appeals the district court’s dismissal as to each of his (1) patent infringement, (2) antitrust vio- lation, and (3) unjust enrichment claims, we discuss each issue in turn. I Regarding patent infringement, although a plaintiff ...
Golden argues that the claim charts in this complaint are enough to adequately plead patent infringement be- cause they “mirror” a claim chart presented in a previous case, Golden v. Apple Inc., No. 2022-1229, 2022 WL 4103285 (Fed. ...
Case: 23-1818 Document: 23 Page: 6 Filed: 10/10/2023 6 GOLDEN v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED the district court that “[Golden] fails to plausibly or ade- quately plead patent infringement.” Decision at *2.
Although Golden’s complaint seems to refer- ence patent infringement as the purported injury in this way, we have determined that Golden failed to properly plead patent infringement, supra.
III Based on Golden’s failure to state a claim for patent infringement, the district court held that he also failed to state a claim for unjust enrichment.
Because Golden failed to ade- quately plead patent infringement, we agree with the dis- trict court that he also failed to state plausible a claim for unjust enrichment.