`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 1 of 6
`
`The Honorable Kymberly K. Evanson
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`STEVEN FLOYD, individually and on behalf
`of all others similarly situated,
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND
`[PROPOSED] ORDER SUSPENDING
`DEADLINE FOR SUBSTANTIAL
`COMPLETION OF DOCUMENT AND
`DATA PRODUCTION
`
`
`NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
`April 2, 2024
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Steven Floyd and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc. (together,
`“Defendants,” and collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel, stipulate as follows:
`1.
`The Parties respectfully submit that good cause justifies a temporary suspension of
`the deadline for substantial completion of document and data productions, and the subsequent
`deadlines in the Court’s class action scheduling order (Dkt. 68), because a motion to amend the
`complaint and multiple discovery disputes are pending and will not be resolved before the
`substantial completion deadline.
`2.
`Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint and to Intervene
`(Dkt. 80) on February 29, 2024. The motion seeks the Court’s permission to add two named
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 1
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`plaintiffs, Jonathan Ryan and Jolene Furdek, to the litigation. Defendants oppose the Motion (Dkt.
`86).
`
`3.
`The parties have met and conferred about the scope of discovery requests for many
`months, and they were able to reach agreements about many disputes without Court intervention.
`However, several disputes remain, and the Parties have asked the Court to resolve them. Plaintiff
`filed a joint statement concerning disputes related to Plaintiff’s discovery requests on March 22,
`2024 (Dkt. 89). Defendants filed a joint statement concerning disputes related to Defendants’
`discovery requests on March 26, 2024 (Dkt. 90).
`4.
`The Court has indicated that it is available to hear argument on Plaintiff’s Motion
`to Amend and all Parties’ discovery disputes on April 30, 2024.
`5.
`The current deadline for substantial completion of the production of documents and
`data is April 3, 2024.
`6.
`Given the pending motion to amend and discovery dispute statements, the Parties
`agree that the substantial completion deadline and subsequent deadlines should be temporarily
`suspended so the Court can resolve these disputes.
`7.
`The parties respectfully request that the Court suspend the deadlines in the class
`action scheduling order (Dkt. 68) pending its decision on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and the
`Parties’ discovery disputes, and that the Parties propose a revised schedule to the Court within 10
`days of the Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and/or the Parties’ discovery disputes,
`whichever is later.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties,
`through their undersigned counsel of record, and the Parties ask the Court to order, that:
`1.
`The deadlines in the class action scheduling order (Dkt. 68) are temporarily
`suspended pending the Court’s rulings on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. 80) and the Parties’
`discovery disputes (Dkts. 89 & 90).
`2.
`The Parties are to jointly propose a new scheduling order (or if agreement is not
`reached, separate proposals accompanied by no more than 5 pages of briefing per side) within 10
`days of the Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Intervene (Dkt. 80) and/or the
`Parties’ discovery disputes (Dkts. 89 &90), whichever is later.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`DATED: April 2, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ Steve W. Berman
`
`Steve W. Berman, WSBA #12536
` /s/ Barbara A. Mahoney
`
` Barbara A. Mahoney, WSBA #31845
`1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Ph: (206) 623-7292; Fax: (206) 623-0594
`Email: steve@hbsslaw.com
`Email: barbaram@hbsslaw.com
`
`Ben M. Harrington (pro hac vice)
`Benjamin J. Siegel (pro hac vice)
`715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 300
`Berkeley, CA 94710
`Telephone: (510) 725-3000
`Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
`benh@hbsslaw.com
`bens@hbsslaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 3
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 4
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`By: /s/ Mark S. Parris
`
`
`
` Mark S. Parris (WSBA No. 18370)
`mparris@orrick.com
`401 Union Street, Suite 3300
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Telephone: +1 206 839 4300
`Facsimile: +1 206 839 4301
`
`
`WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Mark A. Perry
`
`
` Mark A. Perry (Pro Hac Vice)
`2001 M. Street NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: +1 202 682 7000
`mark.perry@weil.com
`
`By: /s/ Eric S. Hochstadt
`
`
` Eric S. Hochstadt (Pro Hac Vice)
`767 Fifth Ave.
`New York, NY 10153-0119
`Telephone: 212 310 8000
`eric.hochstadt@weil.com
`
`By: /s/ Brian G. Liegel
`
` Brian G. Liegel (Pro Hac Vice)
`brian.liegel@weil.com
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: +1 305 577 3180
`
`Attorneys for APPLE INC.
`
`
`By: /s/ John Goldmark
`
` John Goldmark, WSBA #40980
`MaryAnn Almeida, WSBA #49086
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP
`920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
`Seattle, Washington, 98104
`Phone: (206) 622-3150
`Fax: (206) 757-7700
`Email: johngoldmark@dwt.com
`
` maryannalmeida@dwt.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 5 of 6
`
`Chad S. Hummel (pro hac vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Phone: (310) 595-9500
`Fax: (310) 595-9501
`Email: chummel@sidley.com
`
`Jonathan E. Nuechterlein (pro hac vice)
`Benjamin M. Mundel (pro hac vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Phone: (202) 736-8000
`Fax: (202) 736-8711
`Email: jnuechterlein@sidley.com
`bmundel@sidley.com
`
`Attorneys for AMAZON.COM, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 5
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE Document 93 Filed 04/02/24 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`ORDER
`
`
`Dated this ____day of April 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`Kymberly K. Evanson
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`
`STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 6
`Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
