`
`S.D.N.Y. – N.Y.C.
`21-cv-6841
`21-md-3010
`Castel, J.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`FOR THE
`SECOND CIRCUIT
`_________________
`
`
`
`At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
`Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square,
`in the City of New York, on the 4th day of October, two thousand twenty-three.
`
`Present:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dennis Jacobs,
`Richard C. Wesley,
`Beth Robinson,
`Circuit Judges.
`
`
`In re Google LLC,
`
`
`Petitioner.
`
`
`Google LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`The State of Texas, et al.,
`
`Respondents.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. Respondents oppose. Also pending before
`the Court are Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of an applications judge’s denial of its request
`to file a reply, Petitioner’s motion for a stay, and Respondents’ motion to vacate the administrative
`stay issued by an applications judge.
`
`Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the mandamus petition is DENIED because
`Petitioner has not demonstrated that exceptional circumstances warrant the requested relief. See
`Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004). It is further
`ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is DENIED, the administrative stay is LIFTED,
`and the remaining motions are DENIED as moot.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23-910
`
`FOR THE COURT:
`Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
