throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 1 of 7
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`October 04, 2024
`
`Jennifer Clark
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 2 of 7
`
`collectively to claims • The Asserted Claims refers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1, 3, 4, and 12 of the
`
`claim 5 of theclaims '497 Patent; I, 2, 3, 6, and 7 of the '008 Patent;
`
`
`
`'895 Patent; and claim I of the '948 Patent.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 3 of 7
`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 3 of 7
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS,
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS
`PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM
`
`PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND ENSURE THAT YOUR VERDICT.
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND ENSURE THAT YOUR VERDICT
`COMPLIES WITH THEM
`COMPLIES WITH THEM
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 4 of 7
`
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`Directions: In answering Question l below, please answer either "Yes" or "No" for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each listed claim.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`QUESTION 1: Has Identity Security proven by a preponderance of the evidence
`
`
`
`that Apple infringed the following claims of the Patents-in-Suit? "Yes" is a finding
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for Identity Security. "No" is a finding for Apple.
`
`The '497 Patent
`
`Claim J: Yes No
`No
`Claim 3: Yes No N(2
`Claim 4: Yes No NO
`Claim 12: Yes No NO
`
`The '008 Patent
`
`Claim I: Yes No
`NO
`Claim 2: Yes No
`No
`Claim 3: Yes No \JO
`Claim 6: Yes No
`NO
`Claim 7: Yes No NO
`
`The '895 Patent
`
`Claim 5: Yes No No
`
`The '948 Patent
`
`Claim 1: Yes No \\.)6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 5 of 7
`
`VALIDITY
`
`
`
`Directions: In answering Question 2 below, please answer either "Yes" or "No" for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each listed claim.
`
`
`
`
`
`QUESTION 2: Has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that the
`
`
`
`
`
`following claims are invalid? "Yes" is a finding for Apple. "No" is a finding for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Identity Security.
`
`The '497 Patent
`
`Claim I: Yes No "-10
`
`Claim 3: Yes No
`ND
`Claim 4: Yes No NO
`
`Claim 12: Yes No
`NO
`
`The '008 Patent
`
`Claim I: Yes No �l
`Claim 2: Yes No NO
`Claim 3: Yes No NO
`
`Claim 6: Yes No NO
`
`Claim 7: Yes No NO
`
`The '895 Patent
`
`Claim 5: Yes No
`NO
`
`The '948 Patent
`
`Claim I: Yes No NO
`
`
`
`Before proceeding to the next page, please review questions 1-2 above to ensure
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that all questions have been answered unanimously.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 6 of 7
`
`DAMAGES
`
`Directions:
`
`
`
`
`
`Only answer Question 3 if you found one or more Asserted Claim(s)
`
`
`
`both infringed and not invalid, which means you answered:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I ; andin response to Question (I)"YES" to at least one claim of one patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(2)"NO" for those same claim(s) of the same patent(s) in response to Question 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`If you did not find any Asserted Claim to be both infringed and not invalid, do not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`answer Question 3. Instead, proceed to the FINAL PAGE.
`
`
`
`QUESTION 3: If you found any Asserted Claim both infringed and not invalid,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Security what amount of reasonable royalty damages has Identity proven by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preponderance of the evidence for Apple's infringement?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Answer in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`$ __________________ _
`
`
`
`Please proceed to the FINAL PAGE.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00058-ADA Document 302 Filed 10/04/24 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Fonn and should review it to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done,
`
`
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Fonn and bring it when the jury is brought back
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`this 4 day of October,
`2024.
`Signed
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket