throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 04/10/20 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`v.
`
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG
`ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0034
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0034
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF STEVEN M. SEIGEL
`
`
`
`Tables of Exhibits
`
`1. Exhibits Attached to March 20, 2020 Declaration in Support of Opening Brief
`
`Ex. Document Description
`1.
` U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941 B1 (Mullor, et al.), dated June 25, 2002
` Exhibits 2 to 6: Excerpts of File History of U.S. Patent App. No. 09/164,777 (’941 Patent)
` March 28, 2002 – Examiner Notice of Allowance, Amendments, and Interview Summary
` Feb. 5, 2002 – Amendments and Response to Jan. 15, 2002 Office Action
` Jan. 15, 2002 – Examiner Non-Final Rejection
` Dec. 6, 2001 – Amendments and Response to June 22, 2001 Office Action
` Nov. 9, 2001 – Examiner Interview Summary
` Declaration of Ian Jestice, Ancora Techs., Inc. v. LG Electronics et al. (W.D. Tex.) (March 19,
`2020)
` Declaration of Ian Jestice, Ancora Techs., Inc. v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal.) (April 30, 2002)
`
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`
`8.
`
`7260073v1/016322
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 04/10/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`9.
`10.
`11.
`12.
`13.
`14.
`15.
`
`16.
`17.
`
` Declaration of Ian Jestice, Ancora Techs., Inc. v. HTC et al. (W.D. Wa.) (Aug. 26, 2019)
` THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS HANDBOOK (1999)
` MICROSOFT PRESS COMPUTER USER’S DICTIONARY (1998)
` MICROSOFT COMPUTER DICTIONARY (4th Ed. 1999)
` ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (4th Ed. 2000)
` PC MAGAZINE
` Ancora’s Opening Markman Brief, Ancora Techs., Inc. v. Toshiba et al. (C.D. Cal) (Jan. 26,
`2009) (excerpts)
` U.S. Patent No. 8,572,597 to Herle et al., assigned to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
` U.S. Patent No. 9,674,578 to Kim et al., assigned to LG Electronics Inc.
`
`2. Exhibits Attached to First Supplemental Declaration in Support of Responsive Brief
`
`19.
`20.
`21.
`22.
`23.
`
`Ex. Document Description
`18.
` Excerpt of File History of ’941 Patent - Beeble Hardware Stamping Technology Overview
`(September 2001)
` Excerpt of File History ’941 Patent - Nov. 14 2001 Remarks Made in Amendment
` Zadok et al., PGMake: A Portable Distributed Make System (1994)
` Zadok et al., On Incremental File System Development (2006)
` Michael B. Jones, Interposition Agent Toolkit (1993)
` Excerpt of File History of ’941 Patent – Aug. 3, 2009 Decision Granting Reexamination
`
`
`Declaration
`
`I, Steven M. Seigel, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney in the law firm of Susman Godfrey, LLP. I am counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Ancora Technologies, Inc. (“Ancora”). I am admitted pro hac vice to practice before this Court, and
`
`I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. If called as a witness, I could and would
`
`testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this First Supplemental Declaration in support of Ancora’s Responsive
`
`Construction Brief.
`
`3.
`
`For the exhibits described below, some exhibits have been highlighted or otherwise
`
`marked for emphasis.
`
`4.
`
`Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of Beeble
`
`Hardware Stamping Technology Overview (September 2001), included as “non-patent literature” in
`
`7260073v1/016322
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 04/10/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`the File History of U.S. Patent Application No. 09/164,777 which matured into the ’941 Patent (the “
`
`’941 File History”).
`
`5.
`
` Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of the
`
`applicant’s Nov. 14, 2001 Remarks Made in Amendment during prosecution of the ’941 Patent.
`
`6.
`
`Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 20 is a true and correct copy of a publication
`
`by Erez Zadok et al., entitled PGMake: A Portable Distributed Make System (1994).
`
`7.
`
`Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 21 is a true and correct copy of a publication
`
`by Erez Zadok et al., entitled On Incremental File System Development (2006).
`
`8.
`
`Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 22 is a true and correct copy of a publication
`
`by Michael B. Jones entitled Interposition Agent Toolkit (1993), which is referenced and cited in
`
`Exhibit 21.
`
`9.
`
`Attached to this declaration as Exhibit 23 is a true and correct copy of the August 3,
`
`2009 Decision Granting Ex Parte Reexamination of the ’941 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Signed this 10th day of April, 2020, at Seattle, WA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Steven M. Seigel
`
`Steven M. Seigel
`
`
`
`
`
`7260073v1/016322
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 50-1 Filed 04/10/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 10th day of April, 2020, with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michelle Wimmer
`Michelle Wimmer
`
`7260073v1/016322
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket