throbber
11013—194 SUR (Costs + wo+ Ret Costs)
`
`THE STATE OF TEXAS
`
`vs.
`
`DESIREE ROSE GOMEZ AKA DESIREE GOMEZ, ET
`AL
`
`CAUSE NO: 1599873-A
`
`Filed 19 March 05 P12:31
`
`Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk
`Harris County
`2.20.2019
`EA001_256028
`By: S JOHNSON
`

`

`

`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT
`
`OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`228TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
`
`On this day, came to be heard the above—captioned cause wherein the State of Texas is Plaintiff, DESIREE ROSE
`GOMEZ AKA DESIREE GOMEZ is Defendant—Principal, and ACCREDITED SURETY & CASUALTY CO., INC.
`(AGENT: ANTHONY MUHARIB) is Defendant—Surety; Defendant—Principal was duly notified of the forfeiture, but
`failed to answer or appear, and has wholly defaulted; Defendant—Surety answered; and the Court, after considering the
`pleadings and evidence herein, finds: no sufficient cause was shown for the Defendant—Principal’s failure to appear on
`OCTOBER 11, 2018; that the Judgment of Forfeiture heretofore rendered against the Defendants should be made final; and,
`pursuant to:
`
`X TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 22.13 interest shall accrue at the interest rate provided by law from the
`
`date of forfeiture to the date of Defendant—Principal’s incarceration on OCTOBER 12 2018; and
`
`El TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 22.16 interest shall accrue at the interest rate provided by law from the
`date of forfeiture to the date of final judgment herein; and
`
`remittitur of all of the amount of the bond after deducting the costs of court , the interest accrued on the bond amount, and
`the cost of returning the Defendant—Principal to custody in Harris County, Texas, is appropriate.
`
`It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Judgment of Forfeiture is hereby made final
`and the State of Texas shall have and recover from DESIREE ROSE GOMEZ AKA DESIREE GOMEZ, Defendant
`
`Principal, and ACCREDITED SURETY & CASUALTY CO., INC. (AGENT: ANTHONY MUHARIB), Defendant—
`Surety, jointly and severally, the costs of court and interest as described herein above at the interest rate provided by law on
`the bond amount, $40,000.00 (DOLLARS), and the cost of returning the Defendant—Principal to custody in Harris County,
`Texas, namely $1,453.50 (DOLLARS) for all of which let execution issue. The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the
`Judgment of Forfeiture and Bond in the Clerk’s record for the above—captioned cause. All relief not expressly granted herein
`is denied.
`
`Signed this
`
`day of
`
`Approved as to form:
`
`Signed: 72$”! W
`3/6/201 9
`
`, 20
`
`JUDGE PRESIDING
`
`ASSIS i ANTDISTRICTATTORNEY
`
`
`
`ATTORNEY/DEFENDANT—SURETY
`
`In accordance with Rule 239A of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, I hereby certify to the District Clerk of Harris County, Texas, that
`the last known mailing address of the party against whom the Default Final Judgment is taken in Scire Facias No. 1599873-A in the 228TH
`District Court of I Iarris County, Texas, is as follows:
`
`DEFENDAN’P
`PRINCIPAL:
`
`DESIREE ROSE GOMEZ AKA DESIREE GOMEZ
`HOMELESS
`
`Signed thism day of W , ZOJq
`
`-
`
`
`
`(1W
`
`AS IS ANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY
`
`HARRIS C()UN’1Y,TICXAS
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket