throbber
Filed18July20A9:45
`ChrisDaniel-DistrictClerk
`HarrisCounty
`EA001_145238
`By:AOLIVER
`
`CAUSE NO. 1575404
`
`STATE OF TEXAS
`
`VS.
`
`SEAN ANTHONY DEATON
`
`
`
`
`





`
`IN THE 182ND RIC JUDICIAL
`
`DISTRICT COURT OF
`
`HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`───────────────────────────────────────────────────
`
`STATE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`───────────────────────────────────────────────────
`THE STATE OF TEXAS moves for an order protecting records related to medical
`treatment provided to Sean Anthony Deaton (hereinafter “PATIENT”).
`
`I.
`The State of Texas requests that the Court take judicial notice of the contents of its
`file in the instant case. See TEX. R. EVID. 201(b), (d).
`On July 20, 2018, the State of Texas filed a Motion to Revoke the Defendant’s Bond
`which contained information regarding the Patient’s Mental Health Diagnosis and
`Treatment from the Harris Center for Mental Health and the Southeast Clinic related to the
`treatment of the Patient.
`In deference to the medical privacy rights of PATIENT, the State moves for issuance
`of a protective order governing the use and dissemination of this information.
`
`II.
`The use and dissemination of “protected health information” in judicial proceedings
`without the authorization of the patient is governed by 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1), which
`provides:
`
`A covered entity may disclose protected health information in the course of
`any judicial or administrative proceeding:
`
`. . .
`
`

`

`(ii)
`
`In response to a subpoena, discovery request, or other lawful process,
`that is not accompanied by an order of a court or administrative
`tribunal, if:
`
`. . .
`
`(B)
`
`The covered entity receives satisfactory assurance, as described
`in paragraph (e)(1)(iv) of this section, from the party seeking
`the information that reasonable efforts have been made by
`such party to secure a qualified protective order that meets
`the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section.
`
`45 C.F.R. §164.512(e)(1) (emphasis added). Paragraph (e)(1)(v) provides:
`
`For purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of this section, a qualified protective order
`means, with respect to protected health information requested under
`paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, an order of a court or of an
`administrative tribunal or a stipulation by the parties to the litigation or
`administrative proceeding that:
`
`(A) Prohibits the parties from using or disclosing the protected health
`information for any purpose other than the
`litigation or
`proceeding for which such information was requested; and
`
`(B) Requires the return to the covered entity or destruction of the
`protected health information (including all copies made) at the
`end of the litigation or proceeding.
`
`45 C.F.R. §164.512(e)(1) (emphasis added).
`A proposed order that meets the standards of 45 C.F.R. §164.512(e)(1)(v) is attached
`to this motion.
`
`2
`
`

`

`III.
`Service has been accomplished by facsimile/mail/email/hand-delivery to counsel for
`the defendant on July 20, 2018.
`THEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the State respectfully requests that the
`
`Court grant the attached protective order.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Maritza Sharma_________________
`Assistant District Attorney
`Harris County District Attorney’s Office
`1201 Franklin, Suite 600
`Houston, Texas 77002
`713-274-0739
`
`3
`
`

`

`CAUSE NO. 1575404
`
`STATE OF TEXAS
`
`VS.
`
`SEAN ANTHONY DEATON
`
`
`
`
`





`
`IN THE 182ND RIC JUDICIAL
`
`DISTRICT COURT OF
`
`HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`───────────────────────────────────────────────────
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`───────────────────────────────────────────────────
`On this date, the Court considered the State’s motion for protective order and the
`defendant’s response, if any. The Court GRANTS the State’s motion for a protective order
`and ORDERS as follows:
`
`The parties and their attorneys are hereby authorized to receive, subpoena and
`1.
`transmit “protected health information” pertaining to PATIENT to the extent and subject to
`the conditions outlined herein.
`
`For the purposes of this qualified protective order, “protected health information”
`2.
`shall have the same scope and definition as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103 and 164.501.
`Protected health information includes, but is not limited to, health information, including
`demographic information, relating to either (a) the past, present, or future physical or mental
`condition of an individual, (b) the provision of care to an individual, or (c) the payment for
`care provided to an individual, which identifies the individual or which reasonably could be
`expected to identify the individual.
`
`All “covered entities” (as defined by 45 C.F.R. § 160.13) are hereby authorized to
`3.
`disclose protected health information pertaining to PATIENT to attorneys representing the
`State of Texas and the Defendant in the above-captioned litigation.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Counsel for the parties shall be permitted to use or disclose the protected health
`4.
`information of PATIENT for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action including any
`appeals of this case. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, disclosure to co-counsel,
`experts, consultants, court personnel, court reporters, copy services, trial consultants, and
`other entities or persons involved in the litigation process.
`
`Pursuant to Article 39.14(f), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, counsel for the
`5.
`parties are specifically instructed that a defendant, witness, or prospective witness is allowed
`to view the PATIENT’s protected health information only under the following conditions:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The defendant, witness, or prospective witness may not have copies of the
`PATIENT’S protected health information.
`
`Before allowing the defendant, witness, or prospective witness to view the
`PATIENT’s protected health information, the person possessing the information
`shall redact the address, telephone number, driver's license number, social security
`number, date of birth, and any bank account or other identifying numbers contained
`in the PATIENT’s protected health information.
`
`Prior to disclosing PATIENT’s protected health information to persons involved in
`6.
`this litigation, counsel shall inform each such person that PATIENT’s protected health
`information may not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than this litigation. Counsel
`shall take all other reasonable steps to ensure that persons receiving PATIENT’s protected
`health information do not use or disclose such information for any purpose other than this
`litigation.
`
`5
`
`

`

`7. Within 45 days after the conclusion of the litigation including appeals, the parties,
`their attorneys, and any person or entity in possession of protected health information
`received from counsel pursuant to paragraph four of this Order, shall return PATIENT’S
`protected health information to the covered entity or destroy any and all copies of protected
`health information pertaining to PATIENT, except that counsel are not required to secure
`the return or destruction of protected health information submitted to the Court.
`
`Signed this ______ day of ________________, 2018.
`
`PRESIDING JUDGE
`182ND RIC DISTRICT COURT
`HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket