`
`9/9/2019 2:55:33 PM
`
`Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk
`Harris County
`Envelope No: 36641748
`By: RAMEY, MERCEDES M
`Filed: 9/9/2019 2:55:33 PM
`
`Pgs-2
`
`SBSRX
`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
`
`HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`§
`
`§ §
`
`§ §
`
`§
`§
`§
`
`BEST COMMERCIAL GLASS, LLC.
`Plaintiff
`
`V
`
`TROJAN GROUP CONTRACTOR, INC
`Defendant
`
`ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ’8 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE SERVICE OF PROCESS
`
`On this day came on for consideration the Plaintiff’s Motion for Substitute Service Under
`
`Rule 106(b), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`It appears to the Court that Plaintiff has attempted
`
`but failed to personally serve Defendant, TROJAN GROUP CONTRACTOR, INC., through its
`
`registered agent, Dagoberto Saldana, at the last known usual place of abode or business. It further
`
`appears to the Court that the manner of service ordered herein will be reasonably effective to give
`
`said defendant notice of the lawsuit.
`
`It is therefore, ORDERED that the Motion for Substitute Service is GRANTED.
`
`It is further, ORDERED that service of process may be made upon the Defendant through
`
`their registered agent at the last known usual place of abode or business at 3200 Wilcrest, Suite
`
`380, Houston Texas, 77082, either: (1) by leaving a true copy of the citation, with a copy of the
`
`Petition and this Order authorizing substituted service attached, with anyone over sixteen (16)
`
`years of age at the above address; or (2) by firmly affixing a true copy of the citation, with a copy
`
`of the Petition and this Order authorizing substitute service attached, to the front door at the above
`
`address.
`
`It is further ORDERED that the service made by the above method shall not be deemed
`
`perfected unless it also complies with the following provisions:
`Best Commercial Glass, LLC v. Trojan Group Contractor, Inc.
`Motion for Substituted Service
`
`Page I of 2
`
`
`
`(a) a copy of the citation, Petition, and this Order shall be mailed by BOTH certified
`mail, return receipt requested, AND by regular mail to the defendant at the same
`address at which service is authorized above.
`
`(b)
`
`the return of service shall not be made until 30 days after mailing or until the process
`server receives back the green cards from the post office, whichever date is earlier;
`
`(c)
`
`the return of service shall include a statement setting out the date of mailing and
`the result of the mailing by certified mail, and the date of mailing and result of same
`by regular mail (i.e., whether the envelope was returned by the post office, the green
`card came back signed, etc.); and
`
`(d)
`
`a copy of any envelope or green cards returned by the post office shall be attached
`to the return of service.
`
`It is further ORDERED that the return of service of the person executing service pursuant
`
`to this Order shall otherwise be made in accordance with Rule 107, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`It is further ORDERED that service of process will be deemed complete upon compliance
`
`with this Order, regardless of whether defendant signs the certified mail receipt.
`
`Signed
`
`Signed: @%/
`9/10/2019
`MQO
`
`Presiding Judge
`
`Best Commercial Glass, LLC v. Trojan Group Contractor, Inc.
`Motion for Substituted Service
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
