throbber
The State of Texas
`V.
`BRYAN PEY‘I‘ON RODGERS
`
`Cause No.
`

`,5

`
`Z73 l328‘S
`In the County (‘rtminal Court
`at Law No.
`i L
`of Harris County. Texas
`
`MAGISTRATE‘S ORDER FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION
`
`.20 ago/request that this court issue a Magistrate's Order for Emergency Protection
`i 2 “’day of ;2 V ’7 C/
`0n the
`against BRYAN PEYTON RODGERS hereafter styled the Defendant was presented to the Court. The Court finds that on
`or about MAY 31, 2020, Defendant is alleged to have corrmtitted the offense of VIOLATION OF PROTECTIVE
`ORDER.
`
`is/are now designated as the protected individuaKs). The Conn finds:
`The Court finds that SONYA PACE
`The Defendant is related to the protected individual by consanguinity or affinity. To-wit: The Defendant is the WIFF
`of the protected individual.
`
`This Court finds that the Defendant and the protected individual are members of the same family or household or were involved
`in a dating relationship as defined in Chapter 7] of the Texas Family Code. This Comt finds that the Defendant has been
`muted for an offense involving family violence as defined in Chapter 71 of the Texas Family Code or of an offense under
`Section 41072 of the Texas Penal Code.
`
`ORDERS
`
`THEREFORE. [T IS HEREBY ORDERED. pursuant to Article 17.292 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that:
`
`the Defendant is prohibited from:
`
`-
`o
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`committing family violence or an assault on the protected indivxdual;
`committing an act in furtherance ofan offense under Section 42.072 ofthe Texas Penal Code involving the protected
`individual;
`communicating directly with a member of the family or household or with the protected individual in a threatening
`or harassing manner;
`communicating a threat through any person to a member of the family or household of the protected individual.
`possessing a firearm. unless the person is a peace officer, as defined by Section 1.07. Penal Code. actively engaged
`in employment as a sworn. full-time paid employee of a state agency or political subdivision.
`going to or near the residence of a member of the family or household or of the protected individual, Specifically,
`within 200 feet of resrdence. to—wit: 4923 WINDY ORCHARD LN. HOUSTON. TX 77084, or at any address the
`protected individual may reside.
`going to or near the place of employment or business of the protected individual, more specifically, within 200 feet
`ofthc place of employment, lovwit:
`. .
`. or at any address the protected individual may be employed.
`
`IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED. pursuant
`FINDING GOOD CAUSE HAS BEEN SHOWN,
`l7.2929{c)(2)((‘) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that the Defendant 15 also prohibited from
`-
`communicating with the protected individual in any manner except through the party's attorney or a person
`appointed by the court.
`-
`communicating with a member of the family or household of the protected person except through the party's
`attontey or a person appointed by the court.
`
`to Article
`
`It'an address above is Confidential. the protected person shall disclose the person's mailing address to the Court and
`designate another person to receive on behalf of the person any notice or documents filed with the Court related in the
`Order. and disclose the designated person‘s mailing address to the Coun.
`
`RECORDER’S MEMORANDUM
`This instrument ls of poor quality
`at the limo 0t musing.
`
`

`

`Where the descriptions of the protected locations states “Confidential". the Magistrate has determined for the safety of the
`person or persons protected by the order that specific descriptions of the locations should be omitted.
`
`The District Court of Harris Comtty. Texas shall:
`e
`strike the mailing address ofthe person protected by the Order from the public records ofthe Court, ifapplicable
`and maintain a Confidential record ofthe mailing address for use only by:
`0
`the Court; or
`
`o
`
`a law enforcement agency for pin-poses ofentering the information required by Section 4| 1.042 (b)
`(6). Government code.
`
`The District Clerk of Harris County. Texas. shall not release the information to the Defendant
`
`The District Clerk ofl-Iarris County. Texas. shall serve a copy ofthis Order on the Defendant in open court; and.
`
`The District Clerk of Harris County. Teuas shall. send a copy of this Order to.
`
`the protected individual;
`the Sheriff of HARRIS County. Texas
`the Child Care Facility described herein. if any.
`the School described herein. if any.
`
`The law enforcement agency holding the Defendant shall make a good faith effort to notify the protected individual, within
`24 hours from the issuance ofthe order. that the order has been issued.
`
`

`

`.—._,
`
`WARNINGS
`
`A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER BY COMMISSION OF AN ACT PROHIBITED BY THE ORDER MAY BE PUNISIIABLF.
`BY A FINE OF AS MUCH AS $4,000 OR BY CONFINEMENT IN JAIL FOR AS LONG AS ONE YEAR OR BOTH. AN ACT
`THAT RESULTS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE OR A STALKING OFFENSE MAY BE PROSECUTED AS A SEPARATE
`MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY OFFENSE. IF THE ACT IS PROSECUTED AS A SEPARATE FELONY OFFENSE. IT IS
`PUNISHABLE BY CONFINEME'NT IN PRISON FOR AT LEAST TWO YEARS.
`
`THE POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY A PERSON,OTHER THAN A PEACE OFFICER. A5 DEFINED BY SECTION l.fl7.
`PEN/u. CODE. ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN EMPLOYMENT AS A PAID FULL-TIME PAID EMPLOYEE OF A STATE
`AGENCY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. WHO IS SUBJECT TO THIS ORDER MAY BE PROSECUTED AS A SEPARATE
`OFFENSE PUNISIIABLE BY CONFINEMENT 0R IMPRISONMENT.
`
`NO PERSON, INCLUDING A PERSON WHO IS PROTECTED BY THIS ORDER. MAY GIVE PERMISSION TO ANYONE
`TO IGNORE OR VIOLATE ANY PROVISION OF THIS ORDER. DURING THE TIME IN WHICH THIS ORDER IS VALID.
`EVERY PROVISION OF THIS ORDER IS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNLESS A COURT CHANGES THE ORDER.
`
`To the extent that a condition imposed by this Order conflicts with an existing court order granting possession of or access to a child
`the condition imposed under this Order prevails for the duration of this Order.
`
`To the intent that a condition imposed by this Order conflicts with a condition imposed by an order subsequently issued under Chapter
`85. Subtitle B. Title 4. Family Code. or under Title 1 or Title 5. Family code‘ the condition imposed by the order issued under the Family
`Code prevails.
`
`To the extent that a condition imposed by this Order conflicts with a condition amused by an order subsequently issued un Chapter 83.
`Subtitle B. Title 4, Family Code. the condition inmosed by this Order prevails unless the court Issuing the order under Chapter ti].
`Family Code
`
`is informed ofthe existence oftlu's Order; and
`(i)
`(2) makes a finding in the order issued undu' Chapter 83, Family Code. that the court is superscding this Order :
`
`This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until the o i“ day after the date of issuance or until the 9t .1.
`day after the date of issuance ifthe offense involves the use ofu deadly wcaport.
`
`Daleofissutmcc:
`
`(Q‘I’ZOZO
`
`
`L
`
`-. .:
`‘,
`
`COLIN AMANN
`larris County Criminal Law
`Hearing Officer
`Harris County. Texas
`
`.r
`Magistrate
`Hams County. Texas
`
`
`
`
`to the protected person(s) and addresqec) named in this order. by
`(court official}.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket