throbber
CAUSE NO. DC-19-14060
`
`FILED
`8/25/2021 6:41 PM
`FELICIA PITRE
`DISTRICT CLERK
`DALLAS CO., TEXAS
`Darling Tellez DEPUTY
`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT
`
`192nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`COR0GR6OD60DFO?On6On602LOD
`0OnOn60260DGOR80?CDCOD6OnOn602ton
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND
`REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC.,
`and JACKSON C, EHIOGUH,
`Defendants
`
`ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND
`REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`JPMORGANCHASEBANK, N.A.,
`RICHARD G. DAFOE, THOMASM.
`SELLERS, KELLY R. FISHER, SCOTTE.
`HAYES, and MADELEINEC. HAYES, as
`SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`
`NOW COME,All Saints Care
`
`Injury
`
`and Rehabilitation Clinic, Inc. and Jackson C.
`
`Ehioguh, Defendants and file this their Objection
`
`and Response
`
`to Plaintiff's Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment
`
`as to All Claims and Counterclaims, and would
`
`respectfully
`
`show onto the
`
`Court as
`
`follows, to-wit:
`
`I
`
`Objection
`
`to Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`1,
`
`Pursuant to the November 13, 2019 Pretrial Order, “[n]o dispositive
`
`motion will
`
`be heard within 20
`
`ofthe trial date.” See Court’s File. The continuance ofthe trial setting
`
`days
`
`

`

`did not alter the deadline. Plaintiff's Motion is set for hearing
`September 1, 2021. Trial is
`scheduled for September 20, 2020. Also, pursuant to 192"District Court Policy and Procedures,
`
`on
`
`a
`
`party may movefor leave to allow such hearing based upon extenuating circumstances. No
`
`motion for leave to allow such hearing has been filed. Trial has been continued twice since the
`
`issuance of the Pretrial Order. Thus,
`
`no
`
`extenuating circumstance exists. Defendants object
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff's Motion and the
`
`hearing and moveto strike. Plaintiff's Motion is untimely and should
`
`be stricken.
`
`Ze
`
`3,
`
`I.
`
`Introduction and Procedural History
`
`Subject
`
`to Defendants’ objection above, Defendantsfiled this
`
`Response.
`
`Plaintiff is JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (““JPMC’); Defendants are All Saints
`
`Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“All Saints”) and Jackson C.
`
`Ehioguh (“Mr.
`
`Ehioguh’”’)(collectively referred to herein as
`
`“Defendants”).
`
`4.
`
`On September 6, 2019, JPMCfiled suit against All Saints and Jackson Ehioguh
`
`for breach of the Note and Guaranty Agreementrelating
`
`to the real property located at 606-608
`
`Oriole Blvd., Duncanville, Texas 75116
`
`(“Property”).
`
`5.
`
`On December28, 2020, All Saints filed suit against JPMC for breach of the Deed
`
`of Trust contract
`
`relating
`
`to the Property. The suit wasfiled in the County Court at Law No. 4 in
`
`Dallas County, Texas. All Saints requested and paidfortrial by jury.
`
`6.
`
`On January 22, 2021, the County
`
`Court case wastransferred and consolidated into
`
`this case.
`
`7.
`
`On August 3, 2021, JPMC filed its Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`as to All
`
`Claims and Counterclaims (“Motion”). Plaintiff's Motion is set for hearing
`
`on
`
`September 1,
`
`2021,
`
`Defendants’ Objection and Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`8.
`
`9.
`
`This case is set for trial on
`
`September 20, 2021.
`
`Viewing the evidence in the
`
`light
`
`most favorable to Defendants as non-movants,
`
`there are
`
`genuine issues of material fact in the case at bar such that summary judgmentis not
`
`warranted. Accordingly, this Court should deny Plaintiff's Motion.
`
`Ill.
`
`Summary Judgment Evidence
`
`10.
`
`In support of Defendants’ Response
`
`to Plaintiff's Motion, Defendants rely upon
`
`and incorporate herein
`
`by reference the following evidence, which is attached hereto and
`
`incorporated
`
`herein:
`
`Exhibit 1: Affidavit of Jackson Ehioguh with attachments:
`
`Ex. 1A. Warranty Deed with Vendor’s Lien
`Ex. 1B. Note
`Ex. 1C. Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security
`Agreement and Financing Statement
`Ex. 1D. Chase Account
`Activity
`Ex. 1E. December 11, 2020 Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`Ex, 1F. December 12, 2020 PaymentReceipt
`Ex. 1G. January 6, 2021 Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`Ex, 1H. January 19, 2021 Payment Receipt
`January 19, 2021 Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`Ex. 1].
`Ex. 1J. February 12, 2021 Payment Receipt
`
`IV.
`
`Factual Background
`
`11.
`
`All Saints is the rightful
`
`owner of the property located at 606-608 Oriole Blvd.,
`
`Duncanville, Texas 75116 (“Property”). See Ex. 1A.
`
`12.
`
`On or about June 18, 2009, Defendants executed a U.S. Small Business
`
`Administration Note payable
`
`to JPMC. On or about the same
`
`a Deed of Trust to secure the
`
`day,
`
`payment of the Note was executed by Plaintiff. See Exs. 1B, 1C.
`
`13.
`
`Onor about
`
`April 16, 2020, JPMC
`
`paid $47,034.25 for past due taxes. See Plt.’s
`
`Motion, Ex. 1.
`
`to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
`Defendants’ Objection and Response
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`3
`
`Page
`
`

`

`14.
`
`On June 10, 2020, Plaintiff made a
`
`sum
`
`lump
`
`payment to JPMC of $34,140.86
`
`to
`
`be applied
`
`to the taxes
`
`paid. See Ex. 1D.
`
`15.
`
`On or about December 11, 2020, Defendants received a Notice of Foreclosure
`
`Sale. See Ex. 1E. However, Plaintiff was current on his loan payments at the time. In fact,
`
`Plaintiff's payment made on December 22, 2020,
`
`was
`
`accepted by JPMC. See Ex.
`
`IF.
`
`Foreclosure was set for
`
`January 5, 2021. Further, the Notice of Foreclosure was defective in that
`
`the property description
`
`was different than in the Deed of Trust. See Exs. 1C, 1F.
`
`16.
`
`On December 28, 2020, All Saints filed suit against JPMC for breach of the Deed
`
`of Trust contract
`
`relating
`
`to the Property (“County Court Petition”). The suit was filed in the
`
`County Court at Law No. 4 in Dallas County, Texas. The suit contained an
`
`Emergency
`
`Application for
`
`Temporary Restraining Order.
`
`17.
`
`On December 30, 2020,
`
`the
`
`County Court
`
`granted All Saints’ Emergency
`
`Application for Temporary Restraining Order.
`
`18.
`
`On or about January 6, 2021, Defendants received a Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`
`scheduling another foreclosure for
`
`February 2, 2021. See Ex. 1G.
`
`19.
`
`On January 19, 2021, Defendants made a
`
`payment, which was
`
`accepted by
`
`JPMC.
`
`See Ex. 1H.
`
`20.
`
`On or about January 19, 2021, Defendants received a Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`
`scheduling foreclosure for March 2, 2021. See Ex. 11.
`
`21.
`
`On January 22, 2021, the
`
`County Court case was transferred and consolidated into
`
`this case.
`
`22.
`
`On February 12, 2021, Defendants made a
`
`payment, which was
`
`accepted by
`
`JPMC. See Ex. 1K.
`
`Defendants’ Objection and
`Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`23.
`
`On February 22, 2021,
`
`this Court granted All Saints’ request for temporary
`
`injunction. Shortly thereafter, JPMC began refusing Defendants’ payments.
`
`24.
`
`On March 19, 2021, All Saints converted his County Court Petition to a
`
`counterclaim,
`
`andin its place, filed its Counterclaim in thiscase.
`
`V.
`
`Standard of Review
`
`25.
`
` Undera
`
`motion for summary judgment, the movant must establish that
`
`no material
`
`fact
`
`traditional
`issue exists and that it is entitled to
`
`judgment
`
`as a matter of law. Tex. R. Civ. P.
`
`166a(c). In response,
`
`the nonmovant must
`
`only produce
`
`more than a scintilla of probative
`
`evidenceto raise an issue of material fact. Oasis Oil Corp.
`
`v. Koch Ref. Co., 60 S.W.3d 248, 252
`
`(Tex. App.—CorpusChristi 2001, pet denied).
`
`More than a scintilla of evidence exists when the
`
`evidence “rises to a level that would enable reasonable and fair-minded
`
`to differ in their
`
`people
`
`conclusions.” Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v.
`
`Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 711 (Tex. 1997).
`
`26.
`
`In
`
`deciding
`
`whether there is a
`
`disputed
`
`issue of material fact that
`
`precludes
`
`summary judgment, the Court must consider the evidence in the light
`
`most
`
`favorable
`
`to the non-
`
`movant. Limestone Prods. Distribution, Inc. v.
`
`McNamara, 71 S8.W.3d 308 (Tex. 2002); Rhone-
`Steel, 997 S.W.2d 217, 223 (Tex. 1999); Nixon v. Mr. Property Mgmt. Co., 690
`
`Poulenc, Ine. v.
`
`S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985).
`
`27.
`
`Further, the Court must
`
`indulge every reasonable inference and resolve all doubts
`
`in
`
`favor ofthe non-movant. Limestone Prods., 71 S.W.3d at 308; Nixon, 690 S.W.2dat 549.
`
`VI.
`
`Argument
`
`& Authorities
`
`A. Plaintiff’s Breach of Contract claim.
`
`28.
`
`contract:
`
`(1)
`
`Under Texas law, Plaintiff must prove the
`
`following elements of a breach of
`a valid contract existed; (2) Plaintiff performed under the contract; (3) Defendants
`
`Defendants’ Objection and Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`breached the contract; and (4) Plaintiff sustained damages
`v. Christian & Smith, 950 S.W.2d 411, 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [Ist Dist.] 1997,
`
`Wright
`
`as a result of Defendants’ breach.
`
`no
`
`writ).
`
`29.
`
`Defendants do not admit any of the statements or conclusions in Plaintiffs
`
`Motion. But Defendants point
`
`out that JPMC received a
`
`payment of $34,140.86 in June 2020,
`
`as
`
`reimbursementfor the taxesit
`
`paid. See Ex. 1D.
`
`30.
`
`Defendants also point
`
`out that JPMC returned Defendants’ January and February
`
`as
`
`2021,
`
`“overpayments.” See Plt. Exs. 1, 1G, 1E. Thereafter, JPMC refused Defendants’
`
`payments. Defendants’ performance
`
`is excused due to Plaintiffs actions preventing Defendants
`
`from performing the contracts. O'Shea v. IBM
`Corp., 578 S.W.2d 844, 846 (Tex. App.—
`[1* Dist.] 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.); S.K.Y. Inc. v. R.E. Butt Grocery Co., 440 S.W.2d 885.
`
`Houston
`
`889-90 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1969,
`
`no
`
`writ).
`
`31.
`
`Further, Plaintiff breached the contract
`
`by knowingly acting
`
`to make Defendants’
`
`performance of the contractual obligations impossible.
`
`See
`
`Stephenson
`
`v.
`
`Calliham, 60 8.W.2d
`
`805, 807 (Tex. App.—Beaumont1933, writ
`
`ref’d); Arlington Heights Rity, Co. v. Citizens’ Ry. &
`
`Light Co., 160 §.W.1109, 1120 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1913,
`
`no
`
`writ).
`
`32.
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiff?s Motion should be denied.
`
`B. Defendants are entitled to a
`
`jury trial.
`
`33.
`
`To
`
`prepared the
`
`billing
`
`begin with, Plaintiffs Exhibit 3 contains no
`testimony that Mr. Hayes
`statements or that he is a records custodian of Waddell Serafino Geary
`
`Rechner Jenevein, P.C. Therefore, Defendants objects
`
`to the billing records as
`
`hearsay.
`
`34. Without waiving the
`
`foregoing objections, Defendants would show that the Texas
`
`Constitution guarantees the right
`
`to a trial by jury.
`
`Monroe v. Alternatives in Motion, 234 S.W.3d
`
`and Responseto Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
`Defendants’ Objection
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`56, 69 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2007,
`
`no
`
`pet.) (citing Tex. Const. art. I, §§ 10, 15). “The
`
`right
`
`to a
`
`jury trial is one of our most
`
`precious rights, holding
`
`a sacred place in English and
`
`American
`
`history.” General Motors Corp.
`
`v.
`
`Gayle,
`
`951 S.W.2d 469, 476 (Tex. 1997). Under
`
`article one, section 15 of the Texas Constitution, “[t]he right
`
`to trial by jury
`
`shall remain
`
`inviolate" and we
`
`closely
`
`scrutinize any denial of this
`
`important nght
`
`to a
`
`litigant.
`
`See Tex,
`
`Const. art. I, § 15; City of Garland, 969 S.W.2d 548, 558 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1988), aff'd,
`
`22
`
`S.W. 3d 351 (Tex. 2000). The denial of the constitutional right
`
`to a
`
`jury trial constitutes
`
`reversible error. McDaniel v.
`
`Yarborough, 898 S.W.2d 251, 253 (Tex. 1995); Ogu
`
`v. CLA.
`
`Servs., 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 78, *8, 2009 WL 41462 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009).
`a
`In this case, the record reflects that All Saints requested
`jury trial and paid the jury fee.’
`
`Therefore, All Saints is entitled to a
`
`jury trial on the questions of whether the fees are reasonable
`
`and necessary. Fuqua
`
`v. Oncor Elec.
`
`Delivery Co., 315 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex. App—
`
`Eastland 2010, pet. denied)(“[E]ven when declaratory relief has been determined by summary
`
`judgment, the issues of whether attorney’s fees are reasonable and necessary is a
`
`offact
`
`question
`
`for the jury
`
`to determine when the
`
`jury is the trier of fact.”).
`
`35.
`
`Evenif the Court of
`
`Appeals denies Defendants’ right
`
`to a
`
`jury, whether attorneys
`
`fees are reasonable and necessary is a fact issue.
`
`C. Defective Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`
`36.
`
`All Saints’ Defective Notice of Foreclosure Sale is more in line with a breach of
`
`contract claim.
`
`37.
`
`Under Texas law, All Saints must prove the following elements of a breach of
`
`contract:
`
`(1)
`
`a valid contract existed; (2) Plaintiff performed under the contract; (3)
`
`JPMC
`
`'
`
`On April 7, 2021, Defendants filed their Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the Fifth Court of Appeal, seeking
`reversalof this Court’s April 6, 2021 Order Striking Jury Demand. No
`ruling has been issued on thepetition.
`
`to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
`Defendants’ Objection and
`Response
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`as a result of JPMC’s breach. Wright
`breached the contract; and (4) Plaintiff sustained
`damages
`v. Christian & Smith, 950 8.W.2d 411, 412 (Tex. App.—Houston[1st Dist.] 1997,
`
`writ).
`
`no
`
`38.
`
`On or about December 11, 2020, Defendants received a Notice of Foreclosure
`
`Sale (“December Notice”). See Ex. 1F. The December Notice was defective in that the property
`
`description
`
`wasdifferent than in the Deed of Trust. See Exs. 1C, 1F.
`
`39.
`
`with notice conditions, including
`Texas requires strict compliance
`description of the property to be sold at the foreclosure sale. LSR Consulting, LLC v. Wells
`
`an accurate
`
`Fargo Bank, N.A., 835 F.3d 530, 532 (Sth Cir. 2016) (citing
`
`Hous. First Am. Sav. v.
`
`Musick, 650
`
`S.W.2d 764, 768 (Tex. 1983) (“Compliance
`
`with the notice condition contained in the deed of
`
`trust and as
`
`prescribed by law is a
`
`prerequisite
`
`to the
`
`right of the trustee to makethesale.”)).
`
`40.
`
`Thus, JPMC did not
`
`comply
`
`with the notice requirements because the property
`
`was
`
`improperly
`
`described in the December Notice. JPMC, therefore, did not
`
`properly
`
`secure its
`
`to sell the
`
`right
`
`Property in foreclosure. The fact that Plaintiff re-noticed the foreclosure sale for
`
`does not
`
`change that All Saints was forced to
`
`a difference date and corrected the legal description
`as a
`
`seek legal remedy and,
`
`result, All Saints incurred damages.
`
`All Saints incurred court costs
`
`and reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees, of which it seeks recover.
`
`Accordingly,Plaintiff's
`
`Motion should be denied.
`
`VIL
`
`Prayer
`
`WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDER, Defendants
`
`respectfully request
`
`that
`
`Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgmentbe, in all things stricken,
`
`or in the alternative denied,
`
`and, Defendants be awarded such other and furtherrelief to which they
`
`are
`
`justly entitled.
`
`to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
`Defendants’ Objection and Response
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`J.B. Peacock, Jr.
`/s/_
`J.B. Peacock, Jr.
`State Bar No. 15678500
`
`David M. Vereeke
`State Bar No. 20457500
`GAGNON, PEACOCK & VEREEKE, P.C,
`1349
`Empire Central Drive
`Suite 500, Lock Box 56
`Dallas, Texas 75247
`Telephone: (214) 824-1414
`Facsimile:
`(214) 824-5490
`Email:
`attorneys@gapslaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`that on the 25th day of August 2021, the
`foregoing document was served
`This is to
`certify
`via electronic means upon Richard G. DaFoe
`and Scott E. Hayes
`(rdafoe@wslawpc.com)
`(shays@wslawpc.com).
`
`
`J.B. Peacock, Jr.
`/si___
`Of Gagnon, Peacock & Vereeke, P.C.
`
`to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment
`Defendants’ Objection and Response
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation Clinic
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`FOODCO?FO?CON0?6?
`CORC0CO"
`0ORCOR0GO70GODCO?ODLOD40DUO?40DLOO
`
`CAUSE NO. DC-19-14060
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND
`REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC.,
`and JACKSON C. EHIOGUH,
`Defendants
`
`ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND
`REHABILITATIONCLINIC, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
`RICHARD G, DAFOE, THOMAS M.
`SELLERS, KELLY R. FISHER, SCOTTE.
`HAYES, and MADELEINEC. HAYES, as
`SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES
`
`Defendants.
`
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT
`
`192nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
`
`DECLARATION OF JACKSON EHIOGUH
`
`“My
`
`nameis Jackson C. Ehioguh. Mydate
`
`ofbirth is June 20, 1962. My business address
`
`is 606-608 Oriole Blvd., Duncanville, Texas 75116, United States of America. Unless otherwise
`
`stated, every statement made herein is within my personal knowledgeand is true and correct.
`“I am the President of All Saints Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic,
`
`Inc. (“All
`
`Saints”).
`
`“All Saints is the
`
`rightful
`
`owner of the property located at 606-608 Oriole Blvd.,
`
`Duncanville, Texas 75116 (“Property”). See Exhibit A,
`
`a true and correct copy of the Warranty
`
`Deed with Vendor’s Lien.
`
`
`
`

`

`“On or about June 18, 2009,
`
`on behalf of All Saints, I executed a U.S. Small Business
`
`Administration Note payable
`
`to
`
`JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMC”). On the same
`
`day, I
`
`executed a Deed of Trust to secure the payment of the Note was. See Exhibits B and C,a true
`
`and correct copy of the Note and Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security
`
`Agreement and Financing Statement.
`
`“On June 10, 2020, I paid
`
`to JPMC of $34,140.86 for reimbursementof the taxes
`
`paid by
`
`JPMC. See Exhibit D, a true and correct copy of my Account Activity that I obtained online.
`
`“On or about December 11, 2020, I received a Notice of Foreclosure Sale. See Exhibit E,
`
`a true and correct copy of the Notice of Foreclosure Sale. However, I was current on my loan
`
`payments at the time. In fact, I made a
`
`payment
`
`on December 22, 2020, that was
`
`accepted by
`
`JPMC. See Exhibit F,
`
`The notice stated that my Property
`
`a true and correct copy of my receipt.
`wasset for a foreclosure sale on
`
`January 5, 2021. As a
`
`result, I retained counsel.
`
`“On December 28, 2020, All Saints filed suit against
`
`JPMC and an
`
`Emergency
`
`Application for
`
`Temporary Restraining Order. On December 30, 2020, the County Court
`
`granted
`
`All Saints’ Emergency Application for Temporary Restraining Order.
`
`“On or about January 6, 2021, I received a Notice of Foreclosure Sale scheduling another
`
`foreclosure for
`
`February 2, 2021. See Exhibit G,
`
`a true and correct copy of the Notice of
`
`Foreclosure Sale.
`
`“On
`
`January 19, 2021, I made my monthly payment to JPMC, which was
`
`accepted. See
`
`Exhibit H,
`
`a true and correct copy of my
`
`receipt.
`
`“On or about January 19, 2021,
`
`I received a Notice of Foreclosure Sale
`
`scheduling
`
`foreclosure for March 2, 2021. See Exhibit I,
`
`a true and correct copy of the Notice of Foreclosure
`
`Sale.
`
`Declaration of Jackson Ehioguh
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`“On February 12, 2021, I made my monthly payment to JPMC, which was
`a true and correct copy of my
`
`receipt.
`
`Exhibit K,
`
`accepted.
`
`See
`
`“On February 22, 2021, this Court granted All Saints’ request for temporary injunction.
`
`Shortly thereafter, JPMC began refusing my payments.
`
`“T declare under
`
`penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
`
`the foregoing is true and correct.”
`
`Executed in Dallas County, Texas,
`
`on
`
`August 25, 2021.
`
`ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND
`REHABILITATION CLINIC,INC.
`
`By:
`
`g Ela
`
`Jackson C. Ehioguh, President
`
`Declaration of Jackson Ehioguh
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Ww
`
`GF #: FT2AA-97909000520
`
`“or 97909000 SAD -79-FNT
`
`WARRANTYDEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN
`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR
`STRIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM THIS INSTRUMENT BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR
`RECORDIN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL
`NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE
`NUMBER.
`
`oECURIKY
`
`MRO5%
`
`4 PGS
`
`2emsetTsTen
`
`Date: June 12, 2009
`
`Grantor:
`AmerwayLeasing Corporation
`Grantor's Mailing Address (including county):
`703 Little Creek
`Duncanville, Texas 75116
`
`Grantee:
`All Saints Care Injury & Rehabilitation
`Clinic, Inc.
`Grantee’s Mailing Address (including county):
`606 Oriole Blvd,
`Duncanville, Texas 75116
`
`Consideration:
`SEE ATTACHED CONSIDERATION
`
`
`
`Property(including any improvements):
`an addition to the City of Duncanville, Dallas County, Texas,
`Being part of Block A, Fairmeadows No, 10,
`to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 52, Page 1, Map Records, Dallas County, Texas, and being
`according
`more
`particularly described as follows:
`Beginning at a 1/2" iron rod set for corner in the East right-of-way line of Oriole Boulevard at the Soulhwest
`corner of a tract of land described in a Deed to Been Fu Lee of record in Volume 86185, Page 59, Deed Records
`of said county;
`
`a distance of 269,77 feet to a
`Thence North 89° 40' 11" Easl along the South boundary line of said Lee Tract,
`point for corner at the Southeast corner thereof in the West boundary line of Camp Wisdom West Addition, an
`addition to the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 19, Page
`341, Map Records of said county, from which a PK Nail found for reference bears South 89° 40' 11" West a
`distance of 0.74 feet;
`
`Thence South 00° 04' 27" East a distance of 313.11 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set for corner at lhe Northeast corner
`of Lot 7, Block A of said Fairmeadows No. 10;
`
`Thence North 75° 19° 37" West along the North
`lines of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block A of said
`boundary
`a distance of 340.39 feet to a 1/2" iron rod setfor corner in the East Right-of-Way line of
`FairmeadowsNo. 10,
`said Oriole Boulevard at the Northwest cornerof said Lot 10:
`and containing 1 880 acres ofland.
`feet to the Place of
`Beginnig
`NOTE: COMPANY DOES NOT REPRESENT THAT THE ABOVE A
`CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT.
`
`fi
`
`
`
`

`

`reservations, covenants, conditions, oil and gas leases, mineral severances, and otherinstruments, other than
`liens and conveyances, thataffect the property; rights of adjoining owners in any walls and fencessilualed on a
`boundary lines; any encroachments or
`shortages in area or
`boundary; any discrepancies, conflicts or
`common
`overlapping of improvements; all rights, obligations, and taxes for 2009, the payment of which Granlee assumes.
`
`Grantor, for the consideration and subjectto the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty,
`grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances
`thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators,
`successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and
`successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs,
`or to
`executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoeverlawfully claiming
`claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and
`warranty.
`are retained until each note describedis fully paid
`The vendor's lien against and superior title to the property
`according toits terms, al which time this deed shall become absolute.
`nouns and pronouns include the plural.
`When the context requires, singular
`
`KR
`Amerway Leasing Corporation
`By:
`Wilbur Ketterman, President
`
`STATE OF
`OLN
`COUNTYOF
`z
`Le Ve
`before ne
`On_l? “le OF
`romped
`
`;
`
`THE tL bMinhuo
`J
`
`/)
`
`bhKALEVIL
`
`—
`
`Tifle’ofOfficer)
`ekeyD pops
`-
`why.
`
`7
`
`to4ne on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
`personally known to me/(ar proved
`to the within instrument and acknowledgedto me that he/she/they executed the same
`name(s) is /are subscri
`or
`on the instrument the person(s),
`in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)
`the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
`
`WITNESS my hand and official seal.
`
`JUDY Kay F
`Notery Public, Stateor Texas
`My Commissian &
`April 10,
`
`2013
`
`
`(This
`
`area for Notarial Seal)
`
`

`

`GF #: FT2AA-97909000520
`
`CONSIDERATION
`TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
`to Grantor in hand paid by
`Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
`hereby acknowledged and confessed, and for the further
`sum
`consideration of the execution and delivery by said Grantee of one certain promissory note in the principal
`even date herewith, payable
`of $ 675,000.00, bearing
`to the order of JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., hereinafter
`as therein provided, said note being secured by
`a vendor's lien and superior
`called Mortgagee, bearinginterest
`a deed of
`title retained herein in favor of said Grantor and assigned to Mortgagee, and also being secured by
`trust of even date herewith from Grantee to Randall B. Durant, Trustee: and WHEREAS, Mortgagee has, at the
`special instance and request of Grantee, paid to Grantor a
`portion of the purchase price of the property
`hereinafter described, as evidenced by the above described promissory note, said vendor's lien and superior title
`against said property securing the payment of said promissory note are
`hereby assigned, transferred and
`delivered without recourse lo Mortgagee, Grantor hereby conveying to said Mortgagee the said superior title to
`said property, subrogating said Mortgageeto all rights and remedies of Grantor in the premises by virtue of said
`lien,
`
`
`
`

`

`AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO;
`apis, Attorney at Law
`rent
`15 N. Cefar Ridge Drive, Suite 3
`Duncanville] TX 75116
`
`id ¢
`Dust
`OD umcernrhpol
`Judy ob
`
`ar TINY
`bya
`
`ILED AND RECORDED
`
`OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
`
`_F
`TEXAS Dallas County
`
`|
`
`fa—John F. Warren, County Clerk
`
`June 18, 2009
`
`12:25:04
`FEE: $26.00
`
`2
`
`1
`
`is
`
`ah
`Gh.
`sf
`
`:%
`
`\
`
`e)
`
`ex
`
`

`

` THE STATE OF TEXAS
`
`CQUNTY OF DALLAS
`Thoreby certify that tho above and foregoing Isa full, true, and
`calracl photographie copy of the original record now In my
`lawful
`possession,filed on the date stampedthereon and es
`custody
`the same Is recorded In tha Recorder's Racords In myoffice under
`the volume and page orInstrument # stamped thereon.
`\ hareby certify on
`
`JAN 11 2021
`gvaapapy
`Aas
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`US. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
`,
`7
`
`.
`U.S. Small Business Administration
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTE
`
`
`
`= A
`
`June 12, 2009
`
`
`
`
`
`ll Salnts Care injury and Rehabliitation Clinic, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA
`
`
`
`All Saints Caro Injury and Rehabilitatian Clinic, Inc.
`
`
`
`Operating
`Company
`
`1, PROMISE TO PAY:
`in return for the Lean, Borrower promises to pay to the order of Lender the amount of Six Hundred Soventy-five Thousand &
`00/100 Dollars, interest on the unpaid principal balance, and all other amounts required by this Note.
`
`2. DEFINITIONS:
`“Collateral” means any property taken as
`security for payment of this Note or any guarantes of this Note.
`“Guarantor” means each person orantity that Signs
`@ guarantee of payment of this Note.
`“Loan” meansthe loan evidenced by this Note.
`“Loan Documents” maans the documentsrelated to this loan signed by Borrower, any Guarantor, or anyone who pledges
`
`collateral,
`“SBA” means the Small Businass Administration, an Agancy of the Unitad States of Amarica.
`
`3, PAYMENT TERMS:
`Barrower must make all payments at the place Lender designates. The payment terms for this Note ara:
`
`1. Maturity: This Note will mature in 20 years from date of Note.
`2. Rapayment Terms: Theinterest rate on this Note will fluctuate. The initial interest rate is 5.75% par year. Thisinitial
`rata is the LIBOR Base Rate in affect on tha first business day of the month in which SBA received the loan application,
`Plus 2.431%. Theinitial interest rate must remain in effect until the first change period begins.
`Borrower must pay principal and interest payments of $4,771.51 every month, beginning one month from the month this
`Note is dated; payments must be made on the twelfth calendar day in the months they are due.
`SBA FORM 147 (06/03/02) Version 4.1
`
`
`
`

`

`.
`
`PROMISSORY NOTE
`Page 2
`(Continued)
`
`then to
`
`Lender will apply each installment payment first ta pay interest accrued to the day Lender receives the payment.
`bring principal current, then ta pay any late fees, and will apply any remaining balance to reduce principal.
`The interest rate will be adjusted monthly (the “change period”),
`The “LIBOR Base Rate” is the combination of the One Month London Interbank Offered Rate in effect on the first business
`or any interest rate
`day of the month (as published in the Wall Street Journal} in which SBA received the application,
`change occurs, plus an additional 3.0 percentage points. Base Rates will be raunded to two decimal places with .004
`being raunded down and .005 being rounded up.
`The adjusted interest rate will be 2.431% above the LIBOR Base Rate. Lender will adjust the interest rate an the first
`calendar day of each change period, The change in interest rate ts effective on that day whether or not Lender gives
`:
`Borrawer notice of the change.
`Lender must adjust the payment amount at Jaast annually as needed to amortize principal over the remaining term of the
`note.
`lf SBA purchases the guaranteed portion of the unpaid principal balance, the interest rate becomes fixed at the rate in
`[f there is no uncured payment default, the rate becomes fixed
`effect at the time of the earliest uncured payment default.
`at the rate in effect at the time of purchase.
`Loan Prepayment:
`Notwithstanding any provision in this Note to the contrary:
`Borrower may prepay this Note. Borrower may prepay 20% or less of the unpaid principal balance at any time without
`If Borrower prepays more than 20% and the Laan has been sold on the secondary market, Borrower must:
`notice,
`8. Give Lender written natice;
`b. Pay all accrued interest: and
`c. If the prepayment is received less than 21 days from the date Lender receives the notice, pay an amount equal to 21
`days' interest fram the date lender receives the notice,
`fess any interest accrued during the 21 days and paid under
`subparagraph b., above.
`tf Borrower does not prepay within 30 days from the date Lender receives the notice, Borrower must give Lender a new
`notice,
`Subsidy Recoupment Fee. When in any one of the first
`three years from the date of initial disbursement Borrower
`voluntarily prepays more than 25% of the outstanding principal balance of the loan, Borrower must pay ta Lender on behalf
`of SBA a prepayment fee for that year as fallows:
`a. During the first year after the date on which the loan is first disbursed, 5% of the total prepayment amount;
`b. During the second year after the date on which the loanis first disbursed, 3% of the total prepayment amount; and
`c.
`During the third year after the date on which the loanis first disbursed, 1% of the total prepayment amount.
`All remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable 20 years from date of Note.
`If a payment on this Note is mare than 10 days late, Lender may charge Borrowera late fee of up to 5.00%
`Late Charge:
`of the unpaid portion of the regularly scheduled payment.
`
`-
`
`™moaw>
`
`DEFAULT:
`Borroweris in default under this Note if Borrower daes not make a payment when due under this Note, or if Borrower or
`Operating Company:
`.
`Fails to do anything required by this Note and other Loan Dacuments;
`Defaults on any other loan with Lender;
`Does not preserve, or account to Lender's satisfactian for, any of the Collateral or its proceeds;
`Does not disclose, or anyone acting on their behalf does not disclose, any material fact to Lender or SBA;
`Makes, or anyone acting on their behalf makes, a materially false or
`misieading representation to Lender or SBA:
`Defaults on any loan or agreement with another creditor,
`if Lender believes the default may materially affect
`
`.
`.
`
`SBA FORM 147 (06/03/02) Version 4.1
`
`

`

`.
`
`.
`.
`
`PROMISSORY NOTE
`Page 3
`(Continued)
`aS
`Borrower's ability to pay this Note;
`Fails to pay any taxes when due;
`Becomes the subject of a
`proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency law;
`Has a receiver ofliquidator appointed for any part of their business or property;
`Makes an
`assignment for the benefit of creditors;
`Has any adverse change in financial condition or business operation that Lender believes may materially affect
`Borrower's ability ta pay this Note;
`L. Reorganizes, merges, consolidates, or otherwise changes ownership or business structure without Lender's prior
`written consent; oF
`M. Becomes the subject of a civil or criminal action that Lender believes may materially affect Borrower's ability to pay
`this Nate,
`
`ACTIYD
`
`me
`ee
`
`5. LENDER'S RIGHTS IF THERE (S A DEFAULT:
`Without notice or demand and without giving up any of its rights, Lender may:
`A. Require immediate payment of all amounts owing under this Note;
`B. Callect all amounts owing from any Borrower or Guarantor;
`.
`File suit and obtain judgement;
`.
`Take possession of any Collateral; or
`Sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of, any Collateral at public or private sale, with or without advertisement.
`
`moo
`
`6. LENDER‘S GENERAL POWERS:
`
`Without notice and without Borrower's consent,
`may:
`Lender
`A. Bid on or buy the Collateral at its sate ar the sale of another lienholder, at any price it chooses:
`Incur expenses to collect amounts due under this Note, enforce the tarms of this Note or an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket