throbber
Case 6:16-cv-01029-RWS-KNM Document 45 Filed 09/22/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1093
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP.
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`CLEAR CHANNNEL OUTDOOR
`HOLDINGS, INC; CLEAR TV MEDIA
`USA, INC.; AND MONSTER VISION,
`LLC D/B/A/ MONSTER MEDIA.
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS,
`INC.
`






`








`






`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-927-RWS-KNM
`Lead Case
`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-974-RWS-KNM
`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-1029-RWS-KNM
`
`ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
`OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
`
`conclusions and recommendations regarding Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss in each of the above-
`
`captioned cases, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (Case
`
`No. 6:16-CV-927 at Docket No. 83), filed on August 31, 2017, recommended that Defendant AMC
`
`Entertainment Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-1029 at Docket No. 30) be
`
`granted-in-part and denied-in-part. It also recommended that Defendants Regal Entertainment
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01029-RWS-KNM Document 45 Filed 09/22/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1094
`
`Group’s and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-927
`
`at Docket No. 43; Case No. 6:16-CV-974 at Docket No. 11) be denied. Neither party filed written
`
`objections.
`
`The motions to dismiss regarding 35 U.S.C. § 101 were appropriately denied. Case No.
`
`6:16-CV-927, Docket No. 83 at 14. Regarding 35 U.S.C. § 284, Plaintiff raised a plausible
`
`inference that Defendant Regal engaged in willful infringement. As to Defendant AMC, the
`
`Magistrate Judge appropriately granted Plaintiff leave to amend its Complaint. Case No. 6:16-
`
`CV-927, Docket No. 83 at 19. The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the
`
`Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDERED that Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Case
`
`No. 6:16-CV-1029 at Docket No. 30) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
`
`It is further ORDERED that Defendants Regal Entertainment Group’s and Clear Channel
`
`Outdoor Holdings, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-927 at Docket No. 43; Case No.
`
`6:16-CV-974 at Docket No. 11) are DENIED.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2017.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket