`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP.
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`CLEAR CHANNNEL OUTDOOR
`HOLDINGS, INC; CLEAR TV MEDIA
`USA, INC.; AND MONSTER VISION,
`LLC D/B/A/ MONSTER MEDIA.
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`v.
`
`AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS,
`INC.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-927-RWS-KNM
`Lead Case
`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-974-RWS-KNM
`
`Case No. 6:16-cv-1029-RWS-KNM
`
`ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
`OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
`
`conclusions and recommendations regarding Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss in each of the above-
`
`captioned cases, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (Case
`
`No. 6:16-CV-927 at Docket No. 83), filed on August 31, 2017, recommended that Defendant AMC
`
`Entertainment Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-1029 at Docket No. 30) be
`
`granted-in-part and denied-in-part. It also recommended that Defendants Regal Entertainment
`
`
`
`Case 6:16-cv-01029-RWS-KNM Document 45 Filed 09/22/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1094
`
`Group’s and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-927
`
`at Docket No. 43; Case No. 6:16-CV-974 at Docket No. 11) be denied. Neither party filed written
`
`objections.
`
`The motions to dismiss regarding 35 U.S.C. § 101 were appropriately denied. Case No.
`
`6:16-CV-927, Docket No. 83 at 14. Regarding 35 U.S.C. § 284, Plaintiff raised a plausible
`
`inference that Defendant Regal engaged in willful infringement. As to Defendant AMC, the
`
`Magistrate Judge appropriately granted Plaintiff leave to amend its Complaint. Case No. 6:16-
`
`CV-927, Docket No. 83 at 19. The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the
`
`Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDERED that Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Case
`
`No. 6:16-CV-1029 at Docket No. 30) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
`
`It is further ORDERED that Defendants Regal Entertainment Group’s and Clear Channel
`
`Outdoor Holdings, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss (Case No. 6:16-CV-927 at Docket No. 43; Case No.
`
`6:16-CV-974 at Docket No. 11) are DENIED.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2017.
`
`