`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`WILLOW INNOVATIONS, INC.,
`
`Case No. 2:23-cv-00229
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`v.
`
`CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`WILLOW’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Willow Innovations, Inc. (“Willow” or “Plaintiff”) brings this case for willful
`
`patent infringement against Defendant Chiaro Technology Ltd. d/b/a Elvie (“Elvie” or
`
`“Defendant”). Elvie infringes eight patents that cover Willow’s innovative and ground-breaking
`
`wearable breast milk pump. Willow’s product revolutionized this fundamentally important
`
`function of human child rearing, and improved the lives of mothers and babies throughout the U.S.
`
`Elvie’s launch of its infringing product amounts to willful patent infringement, and Willow has
`
`been damaged to the tune of tens of millions of dollars as a result. Willow seeks redress from this
`
`Court and a jury for Elvie’s deliberate and wrongful acts.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Willow Innovations, Incorporated is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 1975 El Camino
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 71 PageID #: 3581
`
`
`
`Real, Suite 306, Mountain View, CA 94040. On October 21, 2020, Willow changed its name from
`
`“Exploramed NC7, Inc.” to “Willow Innovations, Inc.”
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Chiaro Technology Limited is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the United Kingdom, with its principal place of business at 63-66 Hatton Garden,
`
`EC1N 8LE, London, United Kingdom. On the information and belief, Elvie is the trading name
`
`of Chiaro Technology Limited and conducts business, either directly or through its agents, on an
`
`ongoing basis in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`3.
`
`Traditional breast milk pumps were decades overdue for innovation. Enter the
`
`Willow Pump. Founded in 2014, Willow revolutionized the way women pump with the world’s
`
`first spillproof, in-bra wearable breast pump. Selected as one of TIME Magazine’s 25 Best
`
`Inventions, the Willow pump was the first to get rid of the heavy motors, tubes, and electrical
`
`cords—and put moms in control. Traditional pumps required nursing moms to sacrifice hours of
`
`their day connected to an electrical outlet or to a heavy, conspicuous appliance. Pumping in public
`
`required either exposing a breast in public, or relying on a public bathroom or similarly
`
`inconvenient location.1 Willow was the first to make it possible to pump anywhere, giving moms
`
`back their privacy, dignity, and freedom of movement. Since then, Willow has grown into a market
`
`leader, providing moms with industry-leading suction technology. Willow has gradually grown
`
`
`1 The inconvenience of traditional pumps is a factor for many women who abandon breast-feeding.
`The benefits of breast-feeding are widely known, and include reduced risk of disease for infants
`and various health benefits for the mother. See https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/about-
`breastfeeding/why-it-matters.html. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) updated their
`policy statement in July 2022 to support breastfeeding for at least the first two years. See
`https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057988. However, data indicate that only 1 in 4 infants is
`exclusively
`breastfed
`by
`the
`time
`they
`reach
`6 months
`old.
`
`See
`https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/nis_data/results.html.
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 3 of 71 PageID #: 3582
`
`
`
`its array of product offerings, with a primary focus on the U.S.—the world’s largest market for
`
`breast pumps.
`
`4.
`
`Also in 2014, Willow filed for its first United States patent application. It now
`
`holds more than 35 issued U.S. patents covering the functionality and designs of its products, with
`
`additional applications currently pending before the United States Patent Office (“USPTO”). In
`
`addition, Willow holds dozens of international patents in jurisdictions such as Australia,
`
`Singapore, China, Europe, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom. To protect its
`
`hard-earned innovations, Willow provides notice to prospective infringers of its extensive patent
`
`portfolio via its website. https://onewillow.com/about-willow/patents/. This publication also
`
`satisfies the standard for constructive notice under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) for purposes of virtual patent
`
`marking.
`
`5.
`
`Today, Willow is a market leader in “femtech”—a shorthand term used to describe
`
`technology products and services that support women’s health. The femtech industry is projected
`
`to be worth $50 billion by 2025. Willow’s product offerings include wearable pumps, containers,
`
`pumping bras, carrying bags, and other accessories. https://onewillow.com/#. Willow offers for
`
`sale these products via its website and through select retailers and online marketplaces, such as
`
`Target, Best Buy, buybuy Baby, and Amazon.
`
`6.
`
`Elvie is based in the United Kingdom and launched its Elvie Pump system in 2018
`
`at the London Fashion Week. https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/14/kegel-trainer-startup-elvie-is-
`
`launching-a-smaller-smarter-breast-pump/. Later that year, Elvie received clearance from the U.S.
`
`Food
`
`and Drug Administration
`
`to market
`
`the Elvie Pump
`
`in
`
`the U.S.
`
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf18/K181863.pdf. In its pre-market notification
`
`report submitted to the FDA, Elvie admitted that its breast pump is substantially equivalent to the
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 4 of 71 PageID #: 3583
`
`
`
`Willow Pump. See id. (citing product code “HGX” to show the Willow Pump was an FDA-cleared
`
`predicate device to the Elvie Pump).
`
`7.
`
`Elvie has exploited Willow’s patented technology to secure more than $150 million
`
`in funding from investors. Most recently, in 2021, Elvie secured $97 million in its Series C funding
`
`round. https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/07/womens-health-tech-brand-elvie-tops-up-series-c-to-
`
`97m/.
`
`8.
`
`Elvie has leveraged Willow’s patents to establish itself as a major manufacturer and
`
`distributor of consumer breast feeding equipment. Willow brings this suit to protect its
`
`constitutional patent rights against Elvie’s past and continued infringement.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`This is a civil action for patent infringement, false advertising, and unfair
`
`competition arising under the laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 100 et seq. This Court has
`
`jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), and
`
`1367(a).
`
`10.
`
`The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Willow’s unfair competition claim
`
`under Texas common law because it is so related to the federal false advertising claim that it forms
`
`part of the same case or controversy. Namely, Willow’s unfair competition claim derives from
`
`the same nucleus of operative fact as the federal false advertising claim because both claims are
`
`based on Elvie’s false and misleading advertisements in commerce regarding the alleged silence
`
`of the Elvie Pump. Thus, these claims will implicate overlapping facts and evidence.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Elvie at least because it (1) has committed
`
`acts of patent infringement and contributed to and induced acts of patent infringement by others in
`
`this District; (2) regularly did business or solicited business in this District; (3) engaged in other
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 5 of 71 PageID #: 3584
`
`
`
`persistent courses of conduct and derived substantial revenue by its offering of infringing products
`
`and services and providing infringing products and services in this District; and (4) purposefully
`
`established substantial, systematic, and continuous contacts with this District and should have
`
`reasonably expected to be subject to suit here by its offering of infringing products and services
`
`and providing infringing products and services in this District.
`
`12.
`
`Elvie has sold their breast pumps and related products within this District via the
`
`following means:
`
`a. Through its own online store at http://www.elvie.com, customers—including those
`
`in this District and throughout Texas—can purchase Elvie’s suite of products.
`
`Upon information and belief, Elvie uses its agents and distribution partners to direct
`
`infringing products purchased online to customers in this District. Elvie also uses
`
`its website to engage with and support its customers. For example, Elvie provides
`
`instructions for using the Elvie Pump through a variety of publicly-available
`
`resources, including product manuals, answers to common questions, and how-to
`
`videos.
`
`
`
`https://www.elvie.com/assets/manuals/elvie_pump_manual_en.pdf;
`
`https://www.elvie.com/en-us/support/elvie-pump.
`
`b. Elvie has authorized at least nine retailers and distributors to sell its products, as
`
`described at https://www.elvie.com/en-us/partners/b2b-partners. These partners
`
`include major retailers such as Walmart, Amazon, Target, Costco, and Best Buy—
`
`all of which maintain stores, warehouse facilities, and/or distribution centers in this
`
`District. As detailed below, customers in this District may purchase Elvie products
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 6 of 71 PageID #: 3585
`
`
`
`from authorized sellers via (1) the authorized seller’s website; or (2) the authorized
`
`seller’s brick-and-mortar store located within the District:2
`
`Elvie Pump – Hands-Free, Wearable Electric Double Breast Pump, Walmart (last visited May 15,
`
`2023), https://www.walmart.com/ip/Elvie-Pump-Hands-Free-Wearable-Electric-Double-Breast-
`
`Pump/347662224?fulfillmentIntent=In-store&adsRedirect=true (showing Elvie Double Electric
`
`Breast Pump is available for online purchase and also is in stock at Marshall Supercenter in
`
`Marshall, TX).
`
`
`
`
`2 Elvie’s distribution partners, such as Costco and Amazon, also maintain facilities in this
`District. See https://www.costco.com/warehouse-locations/mckinney-tx-1284.html (showing
`Costco warehouse in McKinney, TX); https://hiring.amazon.com/jobDetail/en-US/Amazon-
`Delivery-Station-Warehouse-
`Associate/McKinney/a0R4U00000EP4YeUAL#/jobDetail?jobId=a0R4U00000EP4YeUAL&loc
`ale=en-US&seoIndex=1 (advertising job based at Amazon facility, called “DDX2,” in
`McKinney, TX).
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 7 of 71 PageID #: 3586
`
`
`
`
`
`Elvie Pump – Double Electric Breast Pump, TARGET (last visited May 15, 2023),
`
`https://www.target.com/p/elvie-pump-double-electric-breast-pump/-/A-75662623#lnk=sametab
`
`(showing Elvie Double Electric Breast Pump is available for online purchase and also is in stock
`
`at Target in Longview, TX).
`
`13.
`
`Elvie purposefully avails itself of the benefit of conducting business in Texas by
`
`marketing and selling its products to citizens in the state (including in this District). The United
`
`States is the largest market in the world for breast pump products, and Texas is the second largest
`
`state in the United States by population. Given the size of the market and the significant presence
`
`of retailers, distributors, and other business partners in the state, Elvie has specifically targeted
`
`Texas as a key market for its products. For example, in August 2022, Elvie’s Chief Commercial
`
`Officer, Aoife Zakaras-Nally, provided comments to the Houston Chronicle3 touting the benefits
`
`
`3 The Houston Chronicle’s parent company, the Hearst Corporation, states that the Chronicle has
`“825,000
`daily
`readers
`and
`1.4
`million
`readers
`on
`Sunday.”
`https://www.hearst.com/newspapers/houston-
`chronicle#:~:text=In%20addition%20to%20the%20Houston,million%20unique%20visitors%20e
`ach%20month.
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 8 of 71 PageID #: 3587
`
`
`
`and commercial success of the Elvie Pump. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/lifestyle/renew-
`
`houston/health/article/Breastfeeding-will-never-be-free-But-it-can-be-
`
`17339050.php?cmpid=gsa-chron-result. Houston is a particularly important market for Elvie,
`
`given the size and reach of its medical community. See id. (Dr. Stan Spinner, chief medical officer
`
`of Texas Children’s Hospital based in Houston, describing the benefits of breastfeeding).
`
`14.
`
`In addition, on information and belief, Elvie exercises control over its distributors,
`
`retailers, and other partners that conduct Elvie’s business in Texas. For example, Elvie limits its
`
`product warranty—ranging in duration from 90 days to two years from the date of purchase—to
`
`those products purchased directly
`
`from Elvie and
`
`its authorized
`
`sellers.
`
` See
`
`https://www.elvie.com/en-us/warranty (“[T]his limited warranty applies only to original
`
`purchasers of Elvie Product(s) that were purchased from Chiaro or a Chiaro authorized seller in
`
`the United States, unless otherwise prohibited by law.”). On its website, Elvie provides
`
`instructions for anyone interested in becoming an authorized seller of Elvie products.
`
`https://www.elvie.com/en-us/partners/b2b-partners.
`
`15.
`
`Elvie, directly and through subsidiaries or intermediaries (including distributors,
`
`retailers, and others), has purposefully and voluntarily placed its infringing products into this
`
`District and into the stream of commerce with the intention and expectation that the infringing
`
`products will be purchased for use in Texas and in this District. Elvie has imported, offered for
`
`sale and sold, and continues to import, offer for sale and sell, infringing products for delivery and
`
`use in this District. Thus, Elvie has intentionally targeted Texas, and this District, for its business
`
`activities, and has purposefully availed itself of the benefits of conducting business in Texas such
`
`that it should reasonably anticipate being subject to its laws and the jurisdiction of its courts.
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 9 of 71 PageID #: 3588
`
`
`
`Further, Willow’s infringement allegations arise out of and relate to Elvie’s commercial activities
`
`in Texas.
`
`16.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under at least 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c) and/or
`
`1400(b). Venue is proper with respect to Elvie because it is a foreign entity that has committed
`
`acts of infringement in this District, as detailed throughout this Complaint. Elvie has committed
`
`and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in this District, by, among other things,
`
`directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing products that infringe
`
`one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`THE ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`17.
`
`This action involves seven asserted patents: U.S. Patent No. 10,398,816 (“the ’816
`
`Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 10,434,228 (“the ’228 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 10,625,005 (“the ’005
`
`Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 10,722,624 (“the ’624 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 11,185,619 (“the ’619
`
`Patent”), U.S. Design Patent No. D832,995 (“the ’D995 Patent”), U.S. Design Patent No.
`
`D977,625 (“the ’D625 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 10,688,229 (“the ’229 Patent”) (collectively,
`
`the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`18.
`
`The Asserted Patents recognized multiple problems with then-existing systems and
`
`methods for pumping milk. For example, as the ’624 Patent explains, “[a]lthough a variety of
`
`breast pumps are available, most are awkward and cumbersome, requiring many parts and
`
`assemblies and being difficult to transport.” Exhibit 1 at 1:30-32. Manual breast pumps can be
`
`“onerous” and “painful” to use. Id. at 1:33-34. Some of the available powered breast pumps
`
`“require an AC power source to plug into during use,” while other available battery-powered
`
`pumps “draw down the battery power fairly rapidly as the motorized pump continuously operates
`
`to maintain suction during the milk extraction process.” Id. at 1:36-38. Existing pumps had the
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 10 of 71 PageID #: 3589
`
`
`
`further disadvantages of being “clearly visible to an observer when the mother is using it” and
`
`“expos[ing] the breast of the mother during use.” Id. at 1:38-41. As the ’624 Patent explains,
`
`‘[t]here is a continuing need for a small, portable…wearable breast pump system” that would not
`
`expose the breast of the user, and could be “invisible or nearly unnoticeable when worn.” Id. at
`
`1:42-46.
`
`19.
`
`To address these deficiencies in the art, the Asserted Patents provide a wearable,
`
`inconspicuous, convenient pump. In various embodiments, “the system defines a natural breast
`
`profile” which would “fit comfortably and conveniently into a bra of a user and to present a natural
`
`look.” Exhibit 1 at 2:5-8. The pumping devices and storage containers of the inventions can be
`
`“sized and shaped to be received within a user’s bra.” Id. at 2:24-26. “Pumping of milk from a
`
`breast can occur without creating a change in a total mass and volume of the breast, pump device
`
`and storage container. The storage container can be one or more of flexible, or position around
`
`the breast.” Id. at 2:26-30.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,398,816
`
`20.
`
`On September 3, 2019, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’816 Patent,
`
`entitled “Breast pump system with flange.” A true and correct copy of the ’816 Patent is attached
`
`as Exhibit 2. By assignment, duly recorded with the USPTO, Willow owns all substantial rights
`
`to the ’816 Patent, including the right to sue and recover damages for all infringement. 4
`
`21.
`
`The ’816 Patent generally relates to a breast pumping system where milk is
`
`expressed from the breast under suction, and the milk is moved by the pumping mechanism to a
`
`
`4 Although the Asserted Patents were originally assigned to “Exploramed NC7, Inc.,” that entity
`has since changed its name to “Willow Innovations, Inc.” Ex. 3. Thus, Plaintiff Willow
`Innovations, Inc. is the current assignee and title holder of the Asserted Patents and the owner of
`all rights and interest in the same.
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 11 of 71 PageID #: 3590
`
`
`
`collection container using pressure and all responsive to a controller. See id. at Abstract. The ’816
`
`Patent further provides for a portion of the system that contacts the skin, called the flange, designed
`
`as a “lower profile component” as compared to the prior art. Id. at 20:10-11.
`
`22.
`
`The ’816 Patent recognized a problem with then-existing systems and methods for
`
`pumping milk. As the ’816 Patent explains, “[a]lthough a variety of breast pumps are available,
`
`most are awkward and cumbersome, requiring many parts and assemblies and being difficult to
`
`transport.” Exhibit 2 at 1:23-25. Manual breast pumps can be “onerous” and “painful” to use. Id.
`
`at 1:25-27. Some of the available powered breast pumps “require an AC power source to plug into
`
`during use,” while other available battery-powered pumps “draw down the battery power fairly
`
`rapidly as the motorized pump continuously operates to maintain suction during the milk extraction
`
`process.” Id. at 1:27-31. Existing pumps had the further disadvantages of being “clearly visible
`
`to an observer when the mother is using it” and “expos[ing] the breast of the mother during use.”
`
`Id. at 1:31-34. In addition, “[m]any existing breast pump systems can cause considerable
`
`discomfort to the user over time. One cause of such discomfort is chafing of the nipple against the
`
`nipple flange/housing as the nipple stretches and contracts during the pumping session. There is
`
`a continuing need for a breast pump system that is more comfortable to the user, even over repeated
`
`pumping sessions.” Id. at 1:49-55.
`
`23.
`
`The ’816 Patent describes specific improvements to then-existing systems and
`
`methods for pumping milk. For example, in various embodiments, “the system defines a natural
`
`breast profile” which would “fit comfortably and conveniently into a bra of a user and to present
`
`a natural look.” Id. at 2:14-18. In addition, the claimed system maintains “at least a latch suction
`
`level at all times,” which results in a “more secure and persistent seal to the breast and significantly
`
`reduce[d] potential for leaks.” Id. at 20:3-6. This has several benefits to the user, including “less
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 12 of 71 PageID #: 3591
`
`
`
`friction on the side of the nipple against the flange wall, thereby greatly reducing the risk of
`
`irritation, skin damage, pain, swelling, etc.” Id. at 19:64-67. Additionally, because “the nipple
`
`travels less, this allows for the skin attachment member/flange to be designed as a lower profile
`
`component, as its length can be shorter…” Id. at 20:9-11. This benefit in turn limits the “overall
`
`amount of protrusion of the system from the breast to less than that in the prior art…” Id. at 20:
`
`13-15.
`
`24.
`
`As an example of the improvements in the ’816 Patent over the prior art, Figure 8
`
`provides a flange of an embodiment of the invention, and Figure 9 provides an exemplary prior art
`
`flange:
`
`
`
`25.
`
`The claims of the ’816 Patent capture specific technological improvements. For
`
`example, Claim 1 of the ’816 Patent provides for “a flange attached to the breast pump shell and
`
`configured to receive the breast” with a “rigid nipple receiving portion.” Id., Claim 1, 50:56-61.
`
`Claim 6 of the ’816 Patent adds a limitation to a “control loop [] used to adjust a speed of the
`
`compression member to vary or maintain the suction pressure.” Id., Claim 6, 51:12-16.
`
`26.
`
`The claimed improvements of the ’816 Patent, including the ability to maintain
`
`suction and the corresponding characteristics of the claimed flange, were not routine, conventional,
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 13 of 71 PageID #: 3592
`
`
`
`or well-known. These improvements were advantageous and inventive over the prior art systems
`
`that were cumbersome, difficult to transport, inefficient and/or inconvenient to power, and difficult
`
`to use discreetly. The ’816 Patent recognized the unconventional and advantageous nature of the
`
`claimed small, portable, self-powered, energy efficient, wearable breast pump system. Id. at 1:35-
`
`49. As the ’816 Patent explains, these improvements were advantageous and inventive over the
`
`prior art systems with less comfortable skin contact portions. The ’816 Patent recognized the
`
`unconventional and advantageous nature of achieving a shorter protrusion of the system from the
`
`breast, by providing improved suction and, in turn, the claimed flange. The improved systems and
`
`methods of the ’816 Patent, recited in the claims, provide technological benefits over the prior art.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,434,228
`
`27.
`
`On October 8, 2019, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’228 Patent, entitled
`
`“Breast pump system and methods.” A true and correct copy of the ’228 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit 4. By assignment, duly recorded with the USPTO, Willow owns all substantial rights to
`
`the ’228 Patent, including the right to sue and recover damages for all infringement.
`
`28.
`
`The ’228 Patent generally relates to a breast pumping system where milk is
`
`expressed from the breast under suction, and the milk is moved by the pumping mechanism to a
`
`collection container using pressure. See id. at Abstract.
`
`29.
`
`The ’228 Patent recognized a problem with then-existing systems and methods for
`
`pumping milk. As the ’228 Patent explains, “[w]hen a user has completed the pumping phase of
`
`extracting milk…, it is useful and efficient to purge as much milk that remains…from the tubing
`
`[] and into the milk collection container [].” Id. at 41:8-11.
`
`30.
`
`The ’228 Patent describes specific improvements to then-existing systems and
`
`methods for pumping milk. In particular, the ’228 Patent provides systems with numerous
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 14 of 71 PageID #: 3593
`
`
`
`methods for avoiding loss of milk after extraction from the breast. For example, Figure 38
`
`illustrates events that may be carried out to perform a purge. Id. at 14:37-39. Figures 39A and
`
`39B further provide additional arrangements that may be provided to help prevent loss of milk out
`
`of the system.
`
`
`
`31.
`
`The claims of the ’228 Patent capture specific technological improvements. For
`
`example, Claim 1 provides an automated method of pumping milk, “wherein the milk is pumped
`
`from the breast to the collection container upwardly through the milk flow path relative to a bottom
`
`of the breast contacting structure.” Id. at Claim 1, 50:44-47.
`
`32.
`
`The claimed improvements of the ’228 Patent were not routine, conventional, or
`
`well-known. As the ’228 Patent explains, these improvements were advantageous and inventive
`
`over the prior art techniques without the provided methods of avoiding milk loss. The ’228 Patent
`
`recognized the unconventional and advantageous nature of directing the flow of milk upward. The
`
`improved systems and methods of the ’228 Patent, recited in the claims, provide technological
`
`benefits over the prior art.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,625,005
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 15 of 71 PageID #: 3594
`
`
`
`33.
`
`On April 21, 2020, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’005 Patent, entitled
`
`“Breast pump assembly with remote interface.” A true and correct copy of the ’005 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit 5. By assignment, duly recorded with the USPTO, Willow owns all substantial
`
`rights to the ’005 Patent, including the right to sue and recover damages for all infringement.
`
`34.
`
`The ’005 Patent generally relates to a breast pumping system where milk is
`
`expressed from the breast under suction, and the milk is moved by the pumping mechanism to a
`
`collection container using pressure. See id. at Abstract. The ’005 Patent provides for a remote
`
`user interface system, including user control functionality. Id. at Claim 1, 28:33-34.
`
`35.
`
`The ’005 Patent recognized a problem with then-existing systems and methods for
`
`pumping milk. As the ’005 Patent explains, “[t]here is a continuing need for a small, portable,
`
`self-powered, energy efficient, wearable breast pump that is easy to use, that mimics natural
`
`nursing, and is…nearly unnoticeable when worn.” Id. at 1:54-58. In particular, it would be
`
`desirable to “easily and accurately monitor[] the volume of milk pumped by the system” and to
`
`“track milk volume pumped per session.” Id. at 1:59-67.
`
`36.
`
`The ’005 Patent describes specific improvements to then-existing systems and
`
`methods for pumping milk. For example, a remote user interface system allows for “at least the
`
`session start time, the session end time and total volume of milk extracted from the breast” to be
`
`“stored and tracked.” Id. at 25:15-17. Live data and historical data can be treated differently, and
`
`be downloaded to an external device during or immediately after a session, or downloaded as
`
`multiple session data. Id. at 25:27-46. The remote user interface “can also include specific user
`
`control functionality, and various related easy to understand displays.” Id. at 26:15-16. Figures
`
`30 and 31 provide exemplary aspects of a remote user interface system:
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 16 of 71 PageID #: 3595
`
`
`
`
`
`37.
`
`The claims of the ’005 Patent capture specific technological improvements. For
`
`example, Claim 1 is directed to a breast pump with a wireless transmitter, a “language protocol for
`
`two-way communication between the breast pump and an external device,” and a “remote user
`
`interface including user control functionality” and “an input for the human to adjust the breast
`
`pump with the external device.” Id. at Claim 1, 28:25-41.
`
`38.
`
`The claimed improvements of the ’005 Patent were not routine, conventional, or
`
`well-known. As the ’005 Patent explains, these improvements were advantageous and inventive
`
`over the prior art techniques that did not allow for a remote user interface system. The ’005 Patent
`
`recognized the unconventional and advantageous nature of a wireless system that empowered
`
`nursing mothers to control the operation of the breast pump through an external device. The
`
`improved systems and methods of the ’005 Patent, recited in the claims, provide technological
`
`benefits over the prior art.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,722,624
`
`39.
`
`On July 28, 2020, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’624 Patent, entitled
`
`“Breast pump assembly with breast adapter.” A true and correct copy of the ’624 Patent is attached
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 17 of 71 PageID #: 3596
`
`
`
`as Exhibit 1. By assignment, duly recorded with the USPTO, Willow owns all substantial rights
`
`to the ’624 Patent, including the right to sue and recover damages for all infringement.
`
`40.
`
`The ’624 Patent generally relates to a breast milk pump that uses a pumping
`
`mechanism to expulse milk from a breast and to then store the milk in a milk collection container.
`
`The entire assembly may include both the pump and the storage container. See id. at Abstract.
`
`41.
`
`The ’624 Patent provides for various embodiments of the breast pumping system.
`
`In one example, in order to achieve the desired milk expression, “suction applied to the breast for
`
`expression of milk involves a first suction level, and during expulsing, a second suction level is
`
`maintained against the breast, the second suction level being lower than the first suction level.” Id.
`
`at 1:67-2:4.
`
`42.
`
`As the ’624 Patent explains, “[a]lthough a variety of breast pumps are available,
`
`most are awkward and cumbersome, requiring many parts and assemblies and being difficult to
`
`transport.” Id. at 1:30-32. Manual breast pumps can be “onerous” and “painful” to use. Id. at
`
`1:32-34. Some of the available powered breast pumps “require an AC power source to plug into
`
`during use,” while other available battery-powered pumps “draw down the battery power fairly
`
`rapidly as the motorized pump continuously operates to maintain suction during the milk extraction
`
`process.” Id. at 1:33-37. Existing pumps had the further disadvantages of being “clearly visible
`
`to an observer when the mother is using it” and “expos[ing] the breast of the mother during use.”
`
`Id. at 1:37-40.
`
`43.
`
`The ’624 Patent describes specific improvements to then-existing systems and
`
`methods for pumping milk. For example, in various embodiments, “the system defines a natural
`
`breast profile” which would “fit comfortably and conveniently into a bra of a user and to present
`
`a natural look.” Id. at 2:5-8. Another approach could include “outputting at least one of
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00229-JRG Document 64 Filed 06/21/24 Page 18 of 71 PageID #: 3597
`
`
`
`operational and/or sensed parameters, and modifying at least one operational setting based upon”
`
`the same. Id. at 3:47-49. An operational setting could include “suction level setting, suction
`
`waveform definition, extraction phase time, threshold milk volume estimate per extraction phase
`
`expulsion, pressure, rest phase time, heating temperatures, heating times, vibration frequency and
`
`vibration times.” Id. at 3:50-55. The ’624 Patent provides a system or method that “can further
`
`perform in real-time, or as a feedback loop.” Id. at 3:49-50.
`
`44.
`
`The claims of the ’624 Patent capture specific technological improvements. For
`
`example, Claim 1 is directed to an “automated system for controlling pumping cycles” including
`
`a “sensor which detects when the milk collection container is full” and a controller that
`
`“automatically changes application of suction” based on the phase of milk expression from the
`
`user. Id. at Claim 1, 53:10-54:8.
`
`45.
`
`The claimed improvements of the ’624 Patent were not routine, conventional, or
`
`well-known. As the ’624 Patent explains, these improvements were advantageous and inventive
`
`over the prior art systems th

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site