`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00038-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement (the
`
`“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Nanoco Technologies Ltd. (“Nanoco”) and Defendants Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No.
`
`281.) In the Motion, Nanoco and Samsung notify the Court that they have settled, in principle, all
`
`matters in controversy in the above-captioned action between the parties. Accordingly, the parties
`
`jointly move the Court to stay any and all unreached deadlines in this action for thirty (30) days in
`
`order to file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Id. at 1.)
`
`Having considered the Motion, and in light of its joint nature, the Court finds that it should
`
`be and hereby is GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that all deadlines in the above-captioned case
`
`are STAYED for thirty (30) days, by which time appropriate dismissal papers must be filed with
`
`the Court.
`
`
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of January, 2023.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
