`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ADVANCED INSTITUTE OF
`TECHNOLOGY, SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`VISUAL DISPLAY DIVISION,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00038-JRG
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), Samsung Display
`
`Co., Ltd. (“SDC”), Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Visual Display Division’s (collectively, “Samsung”)
`
`Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
`
`and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 14.) SEC and SDC, foreign
`
`entities, agree to waive service under the Hague Convention in exchange for an extension of time
`
`to respond to Plaintiff Nanoco Technologies Ltd.’s (“Nanoco”) Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) for all the
`
`Samsung entities named as defendants in this case. Accordingly, the Court finds that SEC
`
`and SDC have waived service of process under the Hague Convention. Having considered the
`
`Motion in view of the aforementioned waiver, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should
`
`be and hereby is GRANTED.
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00038-JRG Document 16 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 364
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that the deadline for all Samsung entities named as defendants
`
`in this case to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Monoco’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is hereby
`
`extended up to and including August 31, 2020.
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of May, 2020.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
