`
`Filed 6/22/2020 9:54:00 AM Supreme Court Middle District
`104 MM 2020
`
`IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`MIDDLE DISTRICT
`
`
`
`No. 104 MM 2020
`
`
`THE HONORABLE TOM WOLF,
`GOVERNOR OF THE
`COMMONWEALTH OF
`PENNSYLVANIA,
`
` Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`SENATOR JOSEPH B. SCARNATI,
`III, SENATOR JAKE CORMAN, AND
`SENATE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS
`
` Respondents
`
`
`
`GOVERNOR TOM WOLF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
`RESPONDENT’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT
`ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`On June 19, 2020, Respondents (the Caucus) filed an application for leave to
`
`present oral argument in this matter. Petitioner Governor Wolf respectfully requests
`
`that the Court deny the application.
`
`As this Court stated in In re Bruno, 101 A.3d 635, 671 (Pa. 2014), King’s
`
`Bench jurisdiction exists in order to avoid “the deleterious effect upon the public
`
`interest caused by delays incident to ordinary processes of law, or deficiencies in the
`
`ordinary processes of law making those avenues inadequate for the exigencies of the
`
`moment.” For this reason, unlike cases that reach the Court upon a petition for
`
`allowance of appeal, oral argument in King’s Bench matters is not held as a matter
`
`
`
`of course. Indeed, in Friends of Danny DeVito v. Wolf, 68 M.M. 2020, this Court
`
`denied the petitioners’ request for oral argument and decided the case based upon
`
`the parties’ written briefs. See also, Private Properties, LLC v. Tom Wolf, 90 M.M.
`
`2020.
`
`In their application, the Caucus suggests that the Court should hold oral
`
`argument because this matter presents “urgent and critical statewide issues.” But
`
`that is always the case with King’s Bench jurisdiction. The urgency of King’s Bench
`
`matters is precisely why the Court generally foregoes oral argument. It is also
`
`precisely why, with respect to the issues presented in this instance, the Court should
`
`forego oral argument and decide this matter on the parties’ filings1 as quickly as
`
`possible.2 As the Governor emphasized in his original application,
`
`[t]his conflict between the Legislative and Executive
`branches is causing great confusion among the public as
`to whether the disaster continues and whether certain
`executive orders issued under the Emergency Code remain
`in place. This confusion is life-threatening, as individuals
`look to our government for guidance on how to protect
`themselves and their families from this deadly pandemic.
`
`
`
`
`1
`The Caucus has also applied for leave to file a supplemental brief to its own
`responsive brief. As explained elsewhere, that application, well out of time and at
`the eleventh hour, is improper and should be denied.
`2
`The Caucus understood the importance of an expeditious decision in this
`matter when they filed for expedited summary relief in the Commonwealth Court.
`Their attempt to delay a decision in this matter now that it is before this Court is
`inconsistent with that acknowledgment.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Application for King’s Bench Jurisdiction, at 13. The danger has not lessened.3
`
`The confusion remains, and with it the peril of delay.
`
`Governor Wolf urges the Court not to have oral argument on this matter, as it
`
`will cause undue delay. Unless this Court deems oral argument essential to
`
`rendering a decision, the application should be denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Attorney General
`15th Floor, Strawberry Square
`Harrisburg, PA 17120
`
`Phone: (717) 712-3818
`
`
`DATE: June 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`JOSH SHAPIRO
`Attorney General
`
`/s/ J. Bart DeLone
`J. BART DeLONE
`Chief Deputy Attorney General
`Chief, Appellate Litigation Section
`Pa. Bar # 42540
`
`
` SEAN A. KIRKPATRICK
`Senior Deputy Attorney General
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`“W.H.O. Warns of ‘Dangerous Phase’ of Pandemic as Outbreaks Widen,”
`The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/19/us/coronavirus-new-
`dangerous-phase.html (last visited 06/21/20).
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, J. Bart DeLone, Chief Deputy Attorney General, do hereby certify that I
`
`
`
`have this day served the foregoing response, via PACFile, on the following:
`
`Matthew H. Haverstick, Esq.
`KLEINBARD LLC
`Three Logan Square
`1717 Arch Street, 5th Floor
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`mhaverstick@kleinbard.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ J. Bart DeLone
`
`J. BART DeLONE
`Chief Deputy Attorney General
`
`
`DATE: June 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`