throbber
Received 6/22/2020 9:54:19 AM Supreme Court Middle District
`
`Filed 6/22/2020 9:54:00 AM Supreme Court Middle District
`104 MM 2020
`
`IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`MIDDLE DISTRICT
`
`
`
`No. 104 MM 2020
`
`
`THE HONORABLE TOM WOLF,
`GOVERNOR OF THE
`COMMONWEALTH OF
`PENNSYLVANIA,
`
` Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`SENATOR JOSEPH B. SCARNATI,
`III, SENATOR JAKE CORMAN, AND
`SENATE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS
`
` Respondents
`
`
`
`GOVERNOR TOM WOLF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
`RESPONDENT’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT
`ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`On June 19, 2020, Respondents (the Caucus) filed an application for leave to
`
`present oral argument in this matter. Petitioner Governor Wolf respectfully requests
`
`that the Court deny the application.
`
`As this Court stated in In re Bruno, 101 A.3d 635, 671 (Pa. 2014), King’s
`
`Bench jurisdiction exists in order to avoid “the deleterious effect upon the public
`
`interest caused by delays incident to ordinary processes of law, or deficiencies in the
`
`ordinary processes of law making those avenues inadequate for the exigencies of the
`
`moment.” For this reason, unlike cases that reach the Court upon a petition for
`
`allowance of appeal, oral argument in King’s Bench matters is not held as a matter
`
`

`

`of course. Indeed, in Friends of Danny DeVito v. Wolf, 68 M.M. 2020, this Court
`
`denied the petitioners’ request for oral argument and decided the case based upon
`
`the parties’ written briefs. See also, Private Properties, LLC v. Tom Wolf, 90 M.M.
`
`2020.
`
`In their application, the Caucus suggests that the Court should hold oral
`
`argument because this matter presents “urgent and critical statewide issues.” But
`
`that is always the case with King’s Bench jurisdiction. The urgency of King’s Bench
`
`matters is precisely why the Court generally foregoes oral argument. It is also
`
`precisely why, with respect to the issues presented in this instance, the Court should
`
`forego oral argument and decide this matter on the parties’ filings1 as quickly as
`
`possible.2 As the Governor emphasized in his original application,
`
`[t]his conflict between the Legislative and Executive
`branches is causing great confusion among the public as
`to whether the disaster continues and whether certain
`executive orders issued under the Emergency Code remain
`in place. This confusion is life-threatening, as individuals
`look to our government for guidance on how to protect
`themselves and their families from this deadly pandemic.
`
`
`
`
`1
`The Caucus has also applied for leave to file a supplemental brief to its own
`responsive brief. As explained elsewhere, that application, well out of time and at
`the eleventh hour, is improper and should be denied.
`2
`The Caucus understood the importance of an expeditious decision in this
`matter when they filed for expedited summary relief in the Commonwealth Court.
`Their attempt to delay a decision in this matter now that it is before this Court is
`inconsistent with that acknowledgment.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Application for King’s Bench Jurisdiction, at 13. The danger has not lessened.3
`
`The confusion remains, and with it the peril of delay.
`
`Governor Wolf urges the Court not to have oral argument on this matter, as it
`
`will cause undue delay. Unless this Court deems oral argument essential to
`
`rendering a decision, the application should be denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Attorney General
`15th Floor, Strawberry Square
`Harrisburg, PA 17120
`
`Phone: (717) 712-3818
`
`
`DATE: June 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`JOSH SHAPIRO
`Attorney General
`
`/s/ J. Bart DeLone
`J. BART DeLONE
`Chief Deputy Attorney General
`Chief, Appellate Litigation Section
`Pa. Bar # 42540
`
`
` SEAN A. KIRKPATRICK
`Senior Deputy Attorney General
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`“W.H.O. Warns of ‘Dangerous Phase’ of Pandemic as Outbreaks Widen,”
`The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/19/us/coronavirus-new-
`dangerous-phase.html (last visited 06/21/20).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, J. Bart DeLone, Chief Deputy Attorney General, do hereby certify that I
`
`
`
`have this day served the foregoing response, via PACFile, on the following:
`
`Matthew H. Haverstick, Esq.
`KLEINBARD LLC
`Three Logan Square
`1717 Arch Street, 5th Floor
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`mhaverstick@kleinbard.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ J. Bart DeLone
`
`J. BART DeLONE
`Chief Deputy Attorney General
`
`
`DATE: June 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket