throbber
J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`DOI 10.1007/s10967-013-2894-z
`
`Preparation of DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC freeze-dried kits
`for formulation of patient doses of 177Lu-labeled agents and their
`comparison for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy application
`
`Tapas Das • Mohini Bhadwal • Sharmila Banerjee •
`H. D. Sarma • Ajit Shinto • K. K. Kamaleshwaran
`
`Received: 8 August 2013 / Published online: 4 January 2014
`Ó Akade´miai Kiado´, Budapest, Hungary 2014
`
`Abstract The objective of the present work is to prepare
`freeze-dried DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC kits for the easy
`and convenient preparation of patient doses of 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, respectively at the hospital
`radiopharmacy and to compare the radio-peptides with respect
`to their radiochemical and biological behaviors. Freeze-dried
`kits of DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC, comprising a lyoph-
`ilized mixture of 200 lg of DOTA-peptide, 80 mg of gentisic
`acid and 13.9 mg of ammonium acetate were prepared.
`Therapeutic doses of 177Lu-labeled peptides (up to 200 mCi,
`7.4 GBq) were prepared using these kits and 177Lu, produced
`in-house, with[99 % radiochemical purity and high stability
`following an easy and convenient protocol. Comparative
`pharmacokinetic behavior of the radio-peptides was studied
`by carrying out biodistribution studies in normal Wistar rats
`
`T. Das (&) M. Bhadwal S. Banerjee
`Isotope Applications and Radiopharmaceuticals Division,
`Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085,
`India
`e-mail: tdas@barc.gov.in
`
`M. Bhadwal
`e-mail: mohini@barc.gov.in
`
`S. Banerjee
`e-mail: sharmila@barc.gov.in
`
`H. D. Sarma
`Radiation Biology and Health Sciences Division, Bhabha
`Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
`e-mail: hdsarma@barc.gov.in
`A. Shinto K. K. Kamaleshwaran
`Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Kovai Medical Centre
`and Hospital, Coimbatore 641 014, Tamil Nadu, India
`e-mail: ajitshinto@gmail.com
`
`K. K. Kamaleshwaran
`e-mail: dr.kamaleshwar@gmail.com
`
`which revealed higher retention of activity in several major
`organs and slower renal clearance for 177Lu-DOTA-NOC
`compared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE. Preliminary phar-
`macokinetic studies, carried out in limited number of patients
`suffering from cancers of neuroendocrine origins, showed
`lower accumulation of activity in vital organs and faster
`renal clearance of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to that of
`177Lu-DOTA-NOC.
`Keywords Freeze-dried DOTA-TATE kit
`Freeze-dried DOTA-NOC kit 177Lu-DOTA-TATE
`177Lu-DOTA-NOC PRRNT Neuroendocrine cancers
`
`Introduction
`
`Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) employing
`radiolabeled somatostatin analogue peptides has become an
`established procedure for the treatment of patients suffer-
`ing from inoperable neuroendocrine cancers over-express-
`ing somatostatin receptors (SSTR) in the last decade [1–6].
`The use of several radiolabeled peptides such as, 90Y-
`DOTA-TATE
`(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-
`tetraacetic acid coupled Tyr3-octreotate), 90Y-DOTA-TOC
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE,
`(DOTA coupled Tyr3-octreotide),
`177Lu-DOTA-TOC and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC (DOTA cou-
`pled Nal3-octreotide) have been documented for this pur-
`pose [1–11]. Amongst the 177Lu-labeled peptides, 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-TOC have been used
`more frequently for treating the neuroendocrine cancer
`patients while only limited use of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC have
`been reported [12]. In India, 177Lu-DOTA-TATE is regu-
`larly used in several nuclear medicine centers for providing
`radiotherapeutic treatment to the patients suffering from
`various types of inoperable neuroendocrine cancers [13,
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`1390
`
`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`14]. However, recent non-availability of DOTA-TATE and
`DOTA-TOC due to intellectual property right issues has
`created inconvenience to the patients who are undergoing
`radiotherapeutic regimen as well as for the new patients
`who are scheduled to undergo PRRNT using 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE. This necessitated studying other DOTA coupled
`somatostatin analog peptides for labeling with 177Lu. The
`availability of DOTA-NOC coupled with the fact that it has
`the highest affinity towards SSTR-3 and SSTR-5 and high
`affinity towards SSTR-2 among all the somatostatin ana-
`logs considered [12, 15, 16], has prompted us to radiolabel
`it with 177Lu and also to carry out a comparative study
`between 177Lu-DOTA-NOC and 177Lu-DOTA-TATE in
`biological systems.
`The success of PRRNT, along with several other factors,
`primarily depends on the availability of the radiolabeled
`peptide with adequately high specific activity, so that
`required therapeutic efficacy can be achieved without satu-
`rating the limited number of receptors available on the target
`lesions [17–19]. This in turn directly depends on the specific
`activity of the radionuclide at the time of preparation of the
`agent. Therefore, 177Lu-DOTA-TATE, the agent which is
`most commonly used in India for treating neuroendocrine
`cancer patients, is prepared in the hospital radiopharmacy
`just prior to its administration in patients [13, 14, 20]. This
`ensures preparation of the agent with maximum possible
`therapeutic efficacy depending on the specific activity of
`177Lu available at the time of preparation. However, suc-
`cessful preparation of the agent following this methodology
`is largely dependent on the availability of the trained per-
`sonnel at the respective nuclear medicine centers, as this
`procedure requires stringent adjustment of certain parame-
`ters prior to incubation [20]. A small deviation from the
`standard procedure may lead to failure of the batch and
`consequently loss of expensive peptide and radionuclide.
`Moreover, this may adversely affect the treatment schedule
`of the patients. However, all these problems can be cir-
`cumvented if the freeze-dried kits, which will enable the
`preparation of the radiolabeled peptide in an easy and single-
`step, could be developed. The use of kits is also expected to
`reduce the exposure of the personnel working in the hospital
`radiopharmacy as well as number of batch failures.
`Working in this direction, we have developed freeze-dried
`DOTA-NOC kits which can be utilized to prepare thera-
`peutic doses of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC using 177Lu having a
`certain minimum specific activity at the time of preparation
`of the agent. A similar attempt was also made to prepare
`freeze-dried DOTA-TATE kits, suitable for the preparation
`of patient doses of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE, in order to make a
`comparison between these two agents. It is worthwhile to
`mention that the use of freeze-dried DOTA-TATE kits for
`the formulation of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE have already been
`documented in the literature [21, 22]. However, none of these
`
`123
`
`articles describe the detailed methodologies of formulation of
`such kits and merely mention their use for the formulation of
`patient dose of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE. Moreover, no information
`is available regarding the rationale behind taking certain amount
`of DOTA-TATE, shelf-life of the kits and most importantly,
`about the maximum dose that can be prepared using a single kit
`vial. Apart from this, none of these kits have been utilized for
`the preparation of usually administrated therapeutic dose of
`5.55–7.4 GBq (150–200 mCi) 177Lu-DOTA-TATE.
`In the present paper, we describe the detailed method-
`ologies of preparation of freeze-dried DOTA-TATE and
`DOTA-NOC kits, whose one kit vial is sufficient for the
`preparation of up to 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) patient dose of
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, respectively.
`Herein we also report a comparative study of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the
`respective kits, in terms of their radiochemical and bio-
`logical behaviors in animal models. Our experience of
`using these kits to treat limited number of neuroendocrine
`cancer patients is also documented in the present paper.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`DOTA-TATE acetate and DOTA-NOC acetate were obtained
`from ABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds (Germany).
`Gentisic acid (2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid) and ammonium
`acetate were procured from Aldrich Chemical Company
`(USA). Lutetium oxide (82 % enriched in 176Lu, spectro-
`scopic grade,[99.999 % chemically pure) was obtained from
`Centre for Molecular Research (Russia). High purity supra-
`pure water and supra-pure HCl were obtained from Merck
`(Germany). All other chemicals and solvents used were of
`analytical reagent (AR) grade and supplied by reputed local
`chemical manufacturers. Radionuclidic purity of 177Lu was
`ascertained by high resolution gamma ray spectrometry using
`a HPGe detector (EGG Ortec/Canberra detector, USA) cou-
`pled to a 4K multichannel analyzer (MCA) system after
`radiochemical processing. All other radioactivity measure-
`ments were carried out by using well-type NaI(Tl) scintillation
`counter (Electronic Corporation of India Limited, India),
`unless mentioned otherwise, by keeping the baseline and
`window at 150 and 100 keV, respectively; thereby utilizing
`the 208 keV gamma photon of 177Lu. Lyophilization was
`done by using the Labocene CoolsafeTM 55-4 freeze-drier
`(Denmark). Paper chromatography (PC) strips were pur-
`chased from Whatman (UK). The high performance liquid
`chromatography (HPLC) system (PU 1580) was obtained
`from Jasco (Japan). The elution profile was monitored by
`detecting the associated radioactivity signal using a well-type
`NaI(Tl) detector (Jasco, Japan) coupled with the HPLC sys-
`tem. All the solvents used for HPLC were degassed and fil-
`tered prior to use and were of HPLC grade.
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`2 of 10
`
`

`

`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`1391
`
`Animal experimentations were carried out in normal
`Wistar rats which were bred and reared in the laboratory
`animal facility of our Institute under standard management
`practice. Radioactive counting associated with the animal
`studies were carried out using a flat-type NaI(Tl) scintil-
`lation counter (Electronics Corporation of India Limited,
`India) fixing the baseline at 150 keV and keeping a win-
`dow of 100 keV. All the animal experiments were carried
`out in strict compliance with the relevant national laws
`relating to the conduct of animal experimentation.
`Clinical studies with 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding freeze-
`dried kits, were carried out by administering the prepara-
`tion to the patients suffering from inoperable or metasta-
`sized cancers of neuroendocrine origin. The patients
`showed somatostatin receptor positive disease in somato-
`statin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) carried out with 99mTc-
`HYNIC-TOC (hydroxynicotinamide coupled Tyr3-octreo-
`tide), prepared using in-house HYNIC-TOC kit, one month
`prior to the therapy. All the patients exhibited significantly
`higher uptake of activity in the tumors and metastatic
`lesions compared to that in liver in SRS study. Aminoven
`10 % intra-venous infusion, an injectible solution of the
`mixed amino acids, was obtained from Fresenius Kabi
`(Austria). Post-therapy whole-body scans and SPECT-CT
`(SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography,
`CT: computed tomography) acquisitions of the abdomen
`area were performed using the dual-head gamma camera
`(Symbia T-200) procured from Siemens (Germany). The
`necessary ethical clearances for administration of
`the
`agents in human patients were obtained from the competent
`authority and written consents were collected from the
`patients prior to the administration of the agents.
`
`Experimental
`
`Formulation of freeze-dried DOTA-TATE and DOTA-
`NOC kits
`
`Freeze-dried DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC kits (ten
`numbers in each batch) were prepared following the protocol
`mentioned below. A solution of gentisic acid in buffer was
`prepared by dissolving 800 mg of gentisic acid in 18 mL of
`0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5) by gentle warming
`under aseptic conditions. A solution of the peptide, prepared
`by dissolving 2 mg of the DOTA-TATE or DOTA-NOC in
`2 mL of high purity supra-pure water, was added with the
`buffer solution containing gentisic acid. The resultant solu-
`tion was thoroughly mixed and its pH was adjusted to *5.

`The solution was subsequently passed through Millipore
`(0.22 l) filter paper and aliquoted into ten sterile glass vials,
`each vial containing 2 mL of the solution. All
`these
`
`preparative steps were carried out under aseptic conditions.
`The vials were incubated for a period of 24 h at -4 °C fol-
`lowed by another 24 h at -40 °C. Finally, the vials were
`freeze-dried in a lyophilizer for *8 h, whereby the kits were
`obtained. The kits were stored at -4 °C temperature.
`
`Production and radiochemical processing of 177LuCl3
`
`Lu-177, which is regularly produced in our laboratory for the
`commercial deployment to various nuclear medicine centers
`[23], was used for the preparation of patient doses using the
`kits developed in-house. Typically, 200 lg of isotopically
`enriched Lu2O3 target (82 % in 176Lu) was irradiated at a
`thermal neutron flux of *9 9 1013 n cm-2 s-1 for a period
`of 21 days in our Institute’s reactor. The irradiated target was
`dissolved in 0.01 M supra-pure HCl by gentle warming. The
`resulting solution was evaporated to near dryness and
`reconstituted with supra-pure water. The evaporation and
`volume reconstitution steps were repeated two to three times
`in order to obtain 177LuCl3 in the pH range of 3–4. The
`radioactive solution was allowed to attain room temperature

`(0.22 l)
`and subsequently passed through the Millipore
`filter paper in order to obtain 177LuCl3 in the sterile condi-
`tion. 177LuCl3, thus obtained, was directly used for the
`preparation of therapeutic doses of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and
`177Lu-DOTA-NOC.
`The total 177Lu radioactivity produced and its radionu-
`clidic purity were determined following the procedure
`mentioned in the literature [24].
`
`Preparation of therapeutic dose of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE
`and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC using the freeze-dried kits
`
`Therapeutic dose of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE or 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC was prepared by adding the required volume of
`177LuCl3 [200–400 lL, up to 200 mCi (7.4 GBq)] with the
`kit material dissolved in water for injection and subse-
`quently incubating the reaction mixture at 85–90 °C for a
`period of 45 min. Dissolution of the kit material was car-
`ried out using water such that the total volume of the
`preparation, after the addition of 177LuCl3, becomes 2 mL.
`When the radiochemical preparation attained room tem-
`perature, an aliquot was withdrawn and used to ascertain
`the radiochemical purity of the preparation using the
`quality control procedures mentioned below.
`
`Quality control studies
`
`The radiochemical purity of the complex was determined
`by PC and radio-HPLC. In PC, a small drop of the reaction
`mixture was spotted at 1.5 cm from one end of the chro-
`matography paper
`strip (10 9 1 cm). The strip was
`developed using 50 % aqueous acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) as the
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`1392
`
`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`solvent, dried, cut into 1 cm segments and the activity
`associated with each segment was recorded using NaI(Tl)
`detector.
`HPLC was carried out using a dual pump HPLC unit
`with a C-18 reversed phase HiQ-Sil (5 lM, 25 cm 9
`0.46 cm) column. Water (A) and acetonitrile (B) mixtures
`with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid were used as the mobile
`phase and the following gradient elution technique was
`adopted for the separation (0–4 min 95 % A, 4–15 min
`95 % A to 5 % A, 15–20 min 5 % A, 20–25 min 5 % A to
`95 % A, 25–30 min 95 % A). Flow rate was maintained at
`1 mL/min.
`
`Radiochemical studies
`
`In order to optimize the amount of DOTA coupled peptides
`required to be used in the kits, so that the radio-peptides
`could be prepared with adequately high radiochemical
`purity; attempt was made to prepare kits with different
`metal: DOTA-peptide molar ratios. While calculating the
`metal: DOTA-peptide molar ratios, it was considered that
`the kits will be used only when 177Lu will have a specific
`activity of C20 mCi/lg (740 MBq/lg). Freeze-dried kits,
`thus prepared with different amount DOTA coupled pep-
`tide were labeled with 177Lu and the corresponding radio-
`chemical purity of the preparation was determined by the
`quality control methods described above. All the radiola-
`beling experiments were carried out by incubating the
`ingredients at
`the reported optimized conditions i.e. at
`85–90 °C for a period of 45 min to 1 h [17, 19, 20]. The
`final pH of the reconstituted kit vial was automatically
`adjusted to the desired value i.e. *5, prior to incubation.
`
`Stability of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC prepared using the freeze-dried kits
`
`The stability of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC, prepared using the corresponding kits, was checked
`by storing the preparations at
`room temperature and
`determining the radiochemical purities of the preparations
`at different time intervals following the quality control
`procedures mentioned above.
`
`Biodistribution studies
`
`animals were used. The animals were sacrificed by over-
`dose of CO2 at 3 h, 1 d, 2 d and 7 d post-administration.
`Subsequent to sacrifice, the organs were excised, washed
`with saline, dried, weighed in a weighing balance and
`radioactivity associated with each organ was measured
`using a flat-type NaI(Tl) counter. Blood was collected
`immediately after sacrifice through cardiac puncture and
`counted in the same counter for determining the associated
`blood activity. The percentage of injected activity (%IA)
`accumulated in various organs/tissue was calculated from
`the above data. Total activity accumulated in the blood,
`muscle and bone was determined by considering the blood,
`muscle and bone weight to be 7, 40 and 10 % of the total
`body weight, respectively [25, 26]. The activity excreted
`was indirectly determined from the difference between
`total injected activity (IA) and %IA accounted for all the
`organs.
`
`Clinical studies
`
`Therapeutic doses of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC (up to 200 mCi, 7.4 GBq) were prepared
`following the protocol described above and administered to
`the patients, suffering from cancers of neuroendocrine
`origin. About 1,000 mL of mixed amino acid solution
`(aminoven 10 %, composition:
`isoleucine 5 g,
`leucine
`7.4 g, lysine acetate 9.31 g, methionine 4.3 g, phenylala-
`nine 5.1 g; threonine 4.4 g, tryptophane 2 g; valine 6.2 g,
`arginine 12 g, histidine 3 g, alanine 14 g, glycine 11 g,
`proline 11.2 g, serine 6.5 g, tyrosine 0.4 g, taurine 1 g) was
`infused to each patient 4 h prior to administration of radio-
`peptides and continued for another 24 h after administra-
`tion to reduce the uptake in the kidneys. Post-therapy
`whole-body scans (1024 9 256 matrix size, scan speed
`15 cm/min) and SPECT-CT acquisition of the abdomen
`(128 9 128 matrix size, 20 s/projection, 16 projections)
`were performed using a dual-head gamma camera with
`high-energy-general-purpose collimators using the energy
`window centered on 113 and 208 keV photo-peaks of
`177Lu with a window width of ±20 %.
`
`Results and discussion
`
`Biological behaviors of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding freeze-
`dried kits, were studied by carrying out biodistribution
`studies in normal Wistar rats each weighing 225–250 g.
`The radiochemical preparations were diluted with normal
`saline prior to administration in animals and each animal
`was injected with *3.7 MBq (100 lL, 100 lCi) of the
`preparation through the tail vein. For each time point, five
`
`Formulation of freeze-dried DOTA-TATE and DOTA-
`NOC kits
`
`Radiochemical studies carried out by labeling the kits
`having different molar ratios of DOTA coupled peptides
`and Lu showed that these two ingredients should be taken
`in at least 2:1 molar ratio in order to obtain 177Lu labeled
`peptides with [98 % radiochemical purity. This indicates
`that minimum 163 lg of DOTA-TATE or 165 lg of
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`1393
`
`0
`
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`Distance from the point of spotting (cm)
`(a)
`
`7
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`% Complexation
`
`% Complexation
`
`0
`
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`Distance from the point of spotting (cm)
`(b)
`
`7
`
`Fig. 1 PC profile of a 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and b 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC, prepared using the corresponding freeze-dried kits
`
`activity C20 mCi/lg (740 MBq/lg). Typical HPLC pro-
`files of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, pre-
`pared using the cold kits, are shown in Fig. 2a, b,
`respectively.
`
`Stability of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC prepared using the freeze-dried kits
`
`The stability of 177Lu-labeled peptides, prepared using the
`corresponding freeze-dried kits, was studied by storing the
`preparations at room temperature and determining the
`radiochemical purity of the preparations at different time
`intervals using the standard quality control
`techniques
`mentioned above. It was observed that both the complexes
`maintained their radiochemical purity of [99 % till 3 days
`post-preparation, up to which the study was continued.
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`5 of 10
`
`DOTA-NOC has to be used in the kit in order to obtain
`177Lu labeled peptides with adequately high radiochemical
`purity when labeled with 177Lu having a minimum specific
`activity of 20 mCi/lg (740 MBq/lg). Therefore, each kit
`was formulated using 200 lg of DOTA-coupled peptide.
`Each kit vial actually comprises a lyophilized mixture of
`either 200 lg of DOTA-TATE or DOTA-NOC along with
`80 mg of gentisic acid and 13.9 mg of ammonium acetate.
`The kit vials were stored at -4 °C immediately after
`lyophilization. The vials were allowed to attain room
`temperature before the preparation of therapeutic doses of
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE or
`177Lu-DOTA-NOC for human
`administration.
`
`Production of 177Lu
`
`The kits were evaluated using the 177Lu obtained from dif-
`ferent batches having specific activities in the range of
`24.3 mCi/lg (899.1 MBq/lg) to 32.1 mCi/lg (1,187.7 MBq/
`lg). Lu-177m was found to be the only other radionuclide
`present in the processed 177Lu. After three weeks of irradiation
`at a thermal neutron flux of *9 9 1013 n cm-2 s-1, it was
`found that only 0.15 lCi (5.55 kBq) of 177mLu was present in
`per mCi (37 MBq) of 177Lu at the end-of-bombardment
`(EOB) [24]. This indicates that 177Lu was produced with
`[99.98 % radionuclidic purity at EOB. The radioactive
`concentration of the processed 177Lu was maintained between
`500 mCi/mL (18.5 GBq/mL) and 1 Ci/mL (37 GBq/mL)
`while the pH was between 3 and 4.
`
`Quality control studies
`
`In PC, carried out using 50 % aqueous acetonitrile (1:1,
`v/v) as the eluting solvent, it was observed that the activity
`corresponding to 177Lu-DOTA-TATE or 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC moved towards the solvent front (Rf = 0.7 - 1),
`while uncomplexed 177Lu remained at the point of spotting
`(Rf = 0 - 0.1) under identical conditions. However, there
`exists a small difference between the Rf values exhibited by
`these two agents. While 177Lu-DOTA-NOC moved almost
`up to the solvent front (Rf = 0.8 - 1), 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE exhibited Rf value in the range of 0.7 - 0.9. The
`typical PC patterns of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC are shown in Fig. 1a, b, respectively. Similar
`difference was also observed in the retention time of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC in radio-HPLC
`studies. It was observed that 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and
`177Lu-DOTA-NOC exhibit retention times of *18 and
`*20 min, respectively, while uncomplexed 177Lu was
`eluted from the column at *4 min. Radiochemical purity
`of 177Lu-labeled peptides was determined by employing
`the above two techniques and was found to be[99 % when
`radiolabeling was done by using 177Lu having specific
`
`

`

`1394
`
`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`Fig. 2 HPLC profile of a 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and b 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding freeze-dried kits
`
`Fig. 3 Stability of a 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and b 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding freeze-dried kits, 3 days after preparation
`
`HPLC profiles showing the radiochemical purity of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC after 3 days of
`storage at room temperature are shown in Fig. 3a, b,
`respectively.
`
`Biodistribution studies
`
`The comparative pharmacokinetic behavior of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC was studied by
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`6 of 10
`
`

`

`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`1395
`
`Table 1 Biodistribution pattern of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE, prepared using the freeze-dried DOTA-TATE kit, in normal Wistar rats
`
`Organ/tissue
`
`Injected activity per organ/tissue
`
`3 h
`
`1 d
`
`2 d
`
`7 d
`
`Blood
`
`Liver
`
`GIT
`
`Kidneys
`
`Stomach
`
`Heart
`
`Lungs
`
`Skeleton
`
`Muscles
`
`Spleen
`Excretiona
`
`0.57 ± 0.09
`
`0.80 ± 0.12
`
`3.92 ± 0.95
`
`4.46 ± 0.95
`
`0.24 ± 0.03
`
`0.02 ± 0.00
`
`0.11 ± 0.02
`
`2.18 ± 0.30
`
`1.71 ± 0.55
`
`0.03 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.54 ± 0.08
`
`4.21 ± 1.09
`
`4.98 ± 0.88
`
`0.40 ± 0.12
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.03 ± 0.00
`
`0.05 ± 0.02
`
`0.62 ± 0.00
`
`0.02 ± 0.01
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.24 ± 0.01
`
`0.50 ± 0.15
`
`1.43 ± 0.16
`
`0.04 ± 0.03
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.04 ± 0.01
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.26 ± 0.03
`
`0.15 ± 0.04
`
`0.20 ± 0.00
`
`0.02 ± 0.01
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.07 ± 0.06
`
`86.66 ± 1.55
`
`89.21 ± 2.16
`
`97.75 ± 0.79
`
`98.11 ± 0.31
`
`Figures in the parentheses represent standard deviations. At every time point, three animals have been used
`a Excretion has been calculated by subtracting the activity accounted in all the organs from the total activity injected
`
`Table 2 Biodistribution pattern of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the freeze-dried DOTA-NOC kit, in normal Wistar rats
`
`Organ/tissue
`
`Injected activity per organ/tissue
`
`Blood
`
`Liver
`
`GIT
`
`Kidneys
`
`Stomach
`
`Heart
`
`Lungs
`
`Skeleton
`
`Muscles
`
`Spleen
`Excretiona
`
`3 h
`
`1.25 ± 0.30
`
`10.68 ± 1.28
`
`20.29 ± 0.76
`
`2.46 ± 0.48
`
`2.77 ± 0.71
`
`0.05 ± 0.01
`
`0.17 ± 0.03
`
`0.59 ± 0.28
`
`1.24 ± 0.02
`
`1.57 ± 0.27
`
`1 d
`
`0.26 ± 0.16
`
`8.62 ± 2.73
`
`14.04 ± 4.47
`
`2.91 ± 0.52
`
`1.40 ± 0.29
`
`0.01 ± 0.01
`
`0.19 ± 0.13
`
`0.96 ± 0.25
`
`0.75 ± 0.32
`
`1.00 ± 0.47
`
`2 d
`
`0.11 ± 0.02
`
`10.09 ± 0.78
`
`8.87 ± 2.40
`
`2.30 ± 0.20
`
`1.87 ± 0.57
`
`0.01 ± 0.01
`
`0.08 ± 0.02
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`1.08 ± 0.51
`
`1.03 ± 0.48
`
`7 d
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`3.16 ± 0.33
`
`1.94 ± 0.29
`
`2.31 ± 0.34
`
`0.09 ± 0.04
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`0.07 ± 0.02
`
`0.00 ± 0.00
`
`1.07 ± 0.55
`
`0.11 ± 0.02
`
`58.41 ± 1.16
`
`69.84 ± 7.00
`
`74.71 ± 2.55
`
`85.91 ± 0.44
`
`Figures in the parentheses represent standard deviations. At every time point, three animals have been used
`a Excretion has been calculated by subtracting the activity accounted in all the organs from the total activity injected
`
`carrying out biodistribution studies in normal Wistar rats.
`The results of the biodistribution studies of 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC are shown in Tables 1 and 2,
`respectively. The studies revealed that there exist significant
`differences in the retention and clearance pattern of IA
`between 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC. It
`was observed that the retention of activity in liver and gas-
`trointestinal track is significantly higher in case of 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC compared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE at all
`the time points studied. After 7 d post-administration,
`3.16 ± 0.33 and 1.94 ± 0.29 %IA were retained in the liver
`and gastrointestinal track, respectively in case of 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC; while the corresponding retentions were only
`0.26 ± 0.03 and 0.15 ± 0.04 %IA for 177Lu-DOTA-TATE.
`
`The retention of activity in stomach and spleen were also
`observed to be higher in case of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC com-
`pared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE. 177Lu-DOTA-TATE
`showed lesser retention and faster clearance of blood activity
`than that of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC. The activity from the blood
`was completely cleared within 1 d post-administration in
`case of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE while retention of activity,
`though insignificant (0.11 ± 0.02 %IA), was observed in
`case 177Lu-DOTA-NOC even after 2 d post-administration.
`Renal clearance of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE was also found to be
`much faster compared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC in all
`the time points studied. The marginally higher kidney uptake
`exhibited by 177Lu-DOTA-TATE in the initial time points
`was probably due to the much higher renal clearance shown
`
`123
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`7 of 10
`
`

`

`1396
`
`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`Fig. 4 Whole-body scintigraphic images of patients treated with
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE and b 200 mCi
`a 200 mCi
`(7.4 GBq) of
`(7.4 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding
`freeze-dried kits and recorded 6 h post-administration
`
`by this agent compared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC.
`However, activity was observed to be retained for the longer
`time period in the kidneys in the case of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC
`(2.31 ± 0.34 %IA at 7 d p.i.) as compared to that of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE (0.20 ± 0.00 %IA at 7 d p.i.).
`
`Clinical studies
`
`In order to evaluate the comparative biological distribution
`of the radio-peptides, prepared using the kits,
`limited
`number of metastatic neuroendocrine cancer patients were
`administered 200 mCi (7.4 GBq) of the preparations. Post-
`therapy whole-body scans at different time points were
`recorded using the gamma camera and compared with the
`pre-therapy images obtained in the same patients using
`99mTc-HYNIC-TOC. Figure 4a represents whole-body
`scan of a patient (male, 40 years), suffering from recurrent
`pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with recurrent inoperable
`pancreatic mass, recorded 6 h post-administration of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE. On the other hand, Fig. 4b represents sim-
`ilar time point post-therapy scan recorded with 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC in a patient (female, 51 years), suffering from
`hepatic metastasis in a known case of neuroendocrine
`tumors. In both the cases higher uptake of the radiotracer in
`the cancerous lesions or metastatic sites was observed
`compared to liver or background on qualitative analysis.
`
`123
`
`Fig. 5 SPECT, CT, fusion and MIP images of the liver, acquired
`15 h after administration of 200 mCi (7.4 GBq) of a 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE and b 177Lu-DOTA-NOC, prepared using the corresponding
`freeze-dried kits
`
`Moreover, it was observed that the distribution of the tracer
`in the post-therapy images was comparable for both the
`agents with that obtained in the pre-therapy images recorded
`with 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC. However, qualitative comparison
`between the images clearly indicate higher retention of
`activity in the blood, gastrointestinal track and kidneys in
`case of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC compared to that of 177Lu-
`DOTA-TATE, thereby corroborating the results obtained in
`the biodistribution studies. Figure 5a, b represent SPECT,
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1022
`8 of 10
`
`

`

`J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2014) 299:1389–1398
`
`1397
`
`CT, Fusion and MIP (Maximum Intensity Projection) ima-
`ges of the abdomen of patients injected with 200 mCi
`(7.4 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC,
`respectively, acquired 15 h post-administration. In both the
`cases, CT shows multiple hepatic lesions; while SPECT and
`fusion images demonstrate intense localization of the radio-
`peptides in the lesions. MIP images also exhibit intense
`hepatic uptake in both the cases. However, while only renal
`and splenic accumulation of activity was observed in case of
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE, accumulation of activity in bowel,
`kidneys and background soft
`tissue was additionally
`observed in case of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC.
`
`Conclusions
`
`Methodologies for the preparation of freeze-dried DOTA-
`NOC and DOTA-TATE kits, suitable for the formulation of
`therapeutic doses of 177Lu-DOTA-NOC and 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE, respectively, have been developed. The cold kits were
`successfully utilized for the preparation of up to 200 mCi
`177Lu-labeled radio-peptides
`(7.4 GBq) of
`for human
`administration in a single and convenient step at the hospital
`radiopharmacy. Comparative biological evaluation of the two
`agents carried out in normal Wistar rats exhibited higher
`retention of activity in liver, gastrointestinal track and spleen;
`longer blood retention and slower renal clearance for 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC compared to 177Lu-DOTA-TATE. Although
`both the radio-peptides exhibited accumulation in the can-
`cerous lesions, qualitative analyses of the scans showed higher
`retention and slower clearance of activity in case of 177Lu-
`DOTA-NOC compared to that of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE. Fur-
`ther studies are warranted to establish the use of 177Lu-DOTA-
`NOC in patients for treating neuroendocrine tumors.
`
`Acknowledgments The authors (T. Das, M. Bhadwal and S.
`Banerjee) are thankful
`to Dr. Gursharan Singh, Head,
`Isotope
`Applications and Radiopharmaceuticals Division (IA & RPhD) and
`Associate Director, Radiochemistry and Isotope Group, Bhabha Atomic
`Research Centre (BARC) for his support and interest. The authors are
`grateful
`to Dr. M.R.A. Pillai, former Head, Radiopharmaceuticals
`Division (presently known as IA & RPhD) BARC for the critical
`evaluation of the manuscript. The authors thankfully acknowledge the
`help received from the staff members of the animal house facility of
`BARC during the course of animal studies. The help rendered by the
`staff members of Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital while carrying out
`the human stud

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket