throbber
Occasional survey
`
`Optimising conditions for radiolabelling of DOTA-peptides
`with 90Y, 111In and 177Lu at high specific activities
`
`Wouter A. P. Breeman1, Marion de Jong1, Theo J. Visser2, Jack L. Erion3, Eric P. Krenning1, 2
`
`1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`2 Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`3 BioSynthema, St. Louis, Mo., USA
`
`Published online: 4 April 2003
`© Springer-Verlag 2003
`
`Abstract. DOTA-conjugated peptides, such as [DOTA0,
`Tyr3]octreotide (DOTATOC) and [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreo-
`tate (DOTA-tate), can be labelled with radionuclides
`such as 90Y, 111In and 177Lu. These radiolabelled somato-
`statin analogues are used for peptide receptor radionu-
`clide therapy (PRRT). Radioligands for PRRT require
`high specific activities. However, although these radio-
`nuclides are produced without addition of carrier, con-
`taminants are introduced during production and as decay
`products. In this study, parameters influencing the kinet-
`ics of labelling of DOTA-peptides were investigated and
`conditions were optimised to obtain the highest achiev-
`able specific activity. The effects of contaminants were
`systematically investigated, concentration dependently,
`in a test model mimicking conditions for labelling with
`minimal molar excess of DOTA-peptides over radionu-
`clide. Kinetics of labelling of DOTA-peptides were opti-
`mal at pH 4–4.5; pH <4 strongly slowed down the kinet-
`ics. Above pH 5, reaction kinetics varied owing to the
`formation of radionuclide hydroxides. Labelling with
`90Y and 177Lu was completed after 20 min at 80°C, while
`labelling with 111In was completed after 30 min at
`100°C. The effects of contaminants were systematically
`categorised, e.g. Cd2+ is the target and decay product of
`111In, and it was found to be a strong competitor with
`111In for incorporation in DOTA. In contrast, Zr4+ and
`Hf4+, decay products of 90Y and 177Lu, respectively, did
`not interfere with the incorporation of these radionucl-
`ides. The following conclusions are drawn: (a) DOTA-
`peptides can be radiolabelled at high specific activity;
`(b) reaction kinetics differ for each radionuclide; and (c)
`reactions can be hampered by contaminants, such as tar-
`get material and decay products.
`
`Keywords: DOTA – Radiolabelling – Specific activity
`
`Wouter A. P. Breeman (✉)
`Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam,
`Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`e-mail: w.a.p.breeman@erasmusmc.nl
`Tel.: +31-10-4635317, Fax: +31-10-4635997
`
`Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2003) 30:917–920
`DOI 10.1007/s00259-003-1142-0
`
`Introduction
`
`DOTA-conjugated peptides, such as the stable somatosta-
`tin analogues [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (DOTA-tate) and
`[DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide (DOTATOC), can be readily la-
`belled with radionuclides such as 90Y, 111In and 177Lu. In
`order for these radiolabelled peptides to be successfully
`used in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) [1,
`2, 3, 4, 5, 6], high specific activities (SAs) are required. A
`number of biological factors dictate the need for a high
`SA. First, for in vivo use the amount of (radio)ligand that
`can be administered is limited by affinity and the amount
`of receptors. Above the optimal dose a further increase in
`ligand will increase the competition between unlabelled
`and labelled ligand for the same receptor and thus lower
`the uptake of radiolabel into receptor-positive tissue [4].
`Second, for peptides
`that display pharmacological
`(side)effects, such as DOTA-substance P or DOTA-bom-
`besin, only very small quantities of peptides may be toler-
`ated. For the latter peptide, the amount that can be admin-
`istered intravenously is limited to 0.1 nmol per minute
`[7]. Therefore, a high SA will reduce the total peptide
`amount to be administered. Third, endocytotic mecha-
`nisms that affect the cellular internalisation of peptides
`may become desensitised at high peptide concentrations
`[8], resulting in lower uptake of radiolabel into target tis-
`sue. Additionally, in vitro investigations aimed at measur-
`ing receptor-binding affinities require low concentrations
`of these radioligands (e.g. 10(cid:60)10 M) in order to measure
`receptor–ligand interactions accurately. Unfortunately,
`the need for high SA is often compromised by conflicting
`radiochemical parameters that determine reaction rates
`and yields, i.e. the rate of formation of the metal-DOTA
`complexes increases with pH [9], but the solubility of
`In3+, Y3+ and Lu3+ decreases with pH owing to formation
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Vol. 30, No. 6, June 2003
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1020
`1 of 4
`
`

`

`918
`
`Table 1. Production methods, target materials, decay products, physical constants and maximal SA for the radionuclides considered
`
`Production method
`
`Target
`Decay product
`
`Physical constants
`t1/2 (days)
`pmoles per mCi
`
`Maximal SA (mCi per nmol)
`Theorya
`In practiceb
`
`57Co
`
`Reactor
`(n, pn)
`58Ni
`57Fe
`
`270.9
`2080
`
`0.5
`n.d.
`
`67Ga
`
`90Y
`
`111In
`
`Cyclotron
`(p, 2n)
`68Zn
`67Zn
`
`3.26
`25
`
`40
`10
`
`Generator
`
`90Sr
`90Zr
`
`2.67
`20.5
`
`49
`11
`
`Cyclotron
`(p, 2n)
`112Cd
`111Cd
`
`2.83
`21.5
`
`46
`22
`
`177Lu
`
`Reactor
`(n)
`176Lu
`177Hf
`
`6.71
`51.4
`
`19
`3
`
`Labelling conditions with 57Co and 67Ga were not optimised, but
`taken to be identical to those of 111In: 30 min at 100°C
`SA, Specific activity, expressed as mCi per nmol; n.d., not deter-
`mined
`a Since 1 nmol DOTA can incorporate 1 nmol (radio)nuclide, this
`number indicates the maximal theoretical SA of the radiolabelled
`DOTA-peptides
`
`of hydroxides [10]. Although recently labelling of DOTA
`analogues with 90Y and 177Lu was reported at pH 7–8 [11,
`12], we encountered the above-mentioned solubility
`problems when high concentrations of these radionucl-
`ides were used at pH 7–8. Therefore we decided to per-
`form this study at pH 5 or lower.
`The studies presented here were undertaken to deter-
`mine the optimal conditions for radiolabelling DOTA-
`peptides, using the radionuclides 90Y, 111In and 177Lu and
`DOTATOC and DOTA-tate as model reactants. We in-
`vestigated parameters that influence reaction kinetics
`and radiochemical yields in order to define conditions
`that result in maximal achievable SAs. This report also
`summarises the effects of ever-present contaminants,
`such as nuclides formed by decay of the radionuclides.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Ligands and radionuclides. DOTA-peptides were dissolved in
`0.01–0.05 M acetic acid in Milli-Q water. As the buffer, 25 mM
`sodium ascorbate (quencher) in 50 mM sodium acetate was used.
`90Y was from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Richland,
`Wash., USA) and from MDS Nordion (Fleurus, Belgium). 177Lu
`was from Missouri University Reactor Research (MURR, St.
`Louis, Mo., USA) and from NRG (Petten, The Netherlands).
`57CoCl2 in 0.1 M HCl was from MDS Nordion (Vancouver, BC,
`Canada). 111InCl3 was from Mallinckrodt Medical (Petten, The
`Netherlands). All these radionuclides were delivered in 0.01–0.2 N
`HCl. 67GaCl3 in 0.7–0.8 M HCl was from Mallinckrodt Medical
`(Petten, The Netherlands) and from MDS Nordion (Vancouver,
`BC, Canada) in 0.05 M HCl.
`
`b Highest value achieved; this implies a ratio of DOTA over radio-
`nuclide [practice (b) over theory(a)] of 4, 4 1/2 and 2 1/4 for 67Ga,
`90Y and 111In, respectively
`
`using double-sealed plastic reaction tubes (PCR thermocycler
`tubes, max volume 125 μl, MoBiTec, ITK Diagnostics, Uithoorn,
`The Netherlands). Heating was performed in a temperature-con-
`trolled heating block (Grant, Fisher Scientific, Zoeterwoude, The
`Netherlands). The pH of the reaction mixture was measured after
`the reaction. All experiments were carried at least in duplicate, us-
`ing at least three different production batches of the radionuclides
`from the suppliers mentioned above. All chemicals were pur-
`chased from Aldrich Chemicals (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands),
`and were of the highest analytical grade available. The radiochem-
`ical purity of the radiolabelled DOTATOC and DOTA-tate was
`studied at room temperature in the presence of 4 mM DTPA pH 5.
`High-performance liquid chromatography and instant thin-layer
`chromatography were performed as described previously (see [13]
`and [14] respectively)..
`
`Maximal achievable SA, and effects of contaminants. In order to
`determine the maximal achievable SA ((cid:42) 98% incorporation of
`67Ga, 90Y, 111In or 177Lu), radiolabelling was performed using a
`constant amount of the radionuclides and increasing amounts of li-
`gand. To investigate the effects of the contaminants present, ex-
`periments were performed adding known amounts of contami-
`nants to the reaction vial at the start of the radiolabelling. For all
`radionuclides considered, the target material and the decay prod-
`ucts are summarised in Table 1, and all were tested concentration
`dependently. The starting conditions in the absence of added con-
`taminants were chosen to be critical, using a low mol/mol ratio of
`DOTA over radionuclide.
`
`Results
`
`Reaction kinetics
`
`Reaction conditions: the effects of pH and temperature. The ex-
`periments were performed in small volumes (typically 40–75 μl)
`
`Reaction kinetics with 90Y, 111In and 177Lu were found to
`be optimal at pH 4–4.5, with a steep decrease at lower
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Vol. 30, No. 6, June 2003
`Evergeen Ex. 1020
`2 of 4
`
`

`

`919
`
`Fig. 1. Formation of 177Lu-DOTATOC as a function of pH after
`20 min at 80°C, as measured by the % incorporation of the radio-
`nuclide. Similar results were found with 90Y and with DOTA-tate
`as ligand
`
`Fig. 2. Formation of radiolabelled DOTATOC at pH 4 as a func-
`tion of time of incubation, as measured by the % incorporation of
`the radionuclide. Similar results were found with DOTA-tate as
`ligand. +, 177Lu at 80°C; ▼, 177Lu at 100°C; ■, 90Y at 80°C; ■,
`90Y at 100°C; ●, 111In at 80°C; ❍, 111In at 100°C
`
`pH and a slow decrease at higher pH (Fig. 1). In addi-
`tion, % incorporation of 111In and 177Lu at pH (cid:42)5 became
`non-reproducible: after centrifugation of these reaction
`vials, precipitation was found. The reaction kinetics were
`also found to be time- and temperature-dependent: reac-
`tions were complete with 90Y and 177Lu after 20 min at
`80°C, and with 111In after 30 min at 100°C (Fig. 2). Ta-
`ble 1 shows the highest achieved SAs of 67Ga, 90Y and
`111In, implying a mol/mol ratio of DOTA over radionu-
`clide of 4, 4 1/2 and 2 1/4, respectively. For 177Lu the
`mol/mol ratio was even 1.2 (see also Discussion). We
`were still able to label at high SAs 2 weeks after the pro-
`duction of 177Lu (data not shown).
`
`Effects of contaminants of maximal achievable SA
`
`To validate the test model the effect of the addition of
`unlabelled Y, In and Lu to the corresponding radionu-
`clide was investigated. As expected, the dilution of the
`SA of the radionuclide decreased its incorporation in the
`DOTA-chelator in a concentration-dependent manner
`(Fig. 3, Table 2). The addition of nuclides such as Hf, Zr
`and Sr had no effect on the % incorporation of the radio-
`nuclides, indicating that these nuclides are not competi-
`tors under these reaction conditions. In contrast, the ef-
`
`Fig. 3. Effects of contaminants on the incorporation of 177Lu in
`DOTA-tate by the controlled addition of non-radioactive nuclides
`
`Table 2. Effects of different concentrations of metal ions, as con-
`taminants in the reaction vial, on incorporation of radionuclides in
`DPTA-ligand
`
`0
`
`Ag+
`Hf4+
`Hg2+
`Sr2+
`Zr4+
`
`+
`
`Ga3+
`Y3+
`
`++
`
`Cd2+
`Co2+
`Cu2+
`In3+
`Fe2+
`Lu3+
`Ni2+
`Zn2+
`
`0, (cid:41)10% at 10 μM; +, (cid:42)10% at 1–10 μM; ++, (cid:42)10% at 1 μM
`
`fect of addition of nuclides such as Fe and Cd clearly
`showed that they are strong competitors for the incorpo-
`ration of radionuclide in the DOTA-chelator, as shown in
`Fig. 3 and Table 2. Table 1 also contains data on label-
`ling experiments with 57Co and 67Ga using the same con-
`ditions as those for 111In, 30 min at 100°C. With the
`Mallinckrodt-produced 67Ga, pH was difficult to control
`since the radionuclide is delivered in 0.7–0.8 M HCl.
`More importantly, the [Zn] (Zn is the target and decay
`product of 67Ga, see Table 1) was measured by ICP (data
`not shown) and found to exceed [Ga] frequently by
`>100-fold, with a dramatic effect on achieving high SAs.
`
`Discussion
`
`We recently reported that Cd is a strong competitor for
`111In incorporation in the DOTA-chelator, and since
`111Cd is formed from decaying 111In, the highest SA is
`achieved immediately after the production of 111In [15].
`Analogously, achieving a high SA with 67Ga will be very
`difficult owing to the [67/68Zn], present from target (68Zn)
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Vol. 30, No. 6, June 2003
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1020
`3 of 4
`
`

`

`920
`
`and formed during decay. Even if the [68Zn] is low or ze-
`ro at the end of production of 67Ga, after one half-life of
`67Ga the [67Ga]=[67Zn].
`This study provides insights into the effects of con-
`taminants in daily radiolabelling practice when high SAs
`are required. It also improves the interpretation of the
`concentrations of contaminants as mentioned in the data
`sheet provided by the manufacturer of the radionuclides.
`For instance, the data sheet of 90Y (MDS Nordion) states
`that the maximal concentration of Zn in 90Y will not ex-
`ceed the level of 30 μg per Ci of 90Y. If this is so, howev-
`er, it implies that the mol/mol ratio for Zn will be more
`than 20 times that for Y; achieving a high SA would then
`not be possible.
`In Table 1 the highest achieved SAs of 67Ga, 90Y, 111In
`and 177Lu are presented, and imply a mol/mol ratio of
`DOTA over radionuclide of 4, 4 1/2, 2 1/4 and 6, respec-
`tively. This reflects the reaction conditions, including
`pH, temperature and the use of very pure reactants. From
`Table 2 it can be seen that Hf is not a competitor for
`177Lu under our reaction conditions. This implies that the
`ingrowth of Hf has no consequences for the maximal
`achievable SA. The rate of incorporation is >99%, even
`at a mol/mol ratio (DOTA-peptide over 176+177Lu) of 1.2.
`In addition, a high SA can still be achieved 2 weeks after
`the production of 177Lu, confirming that Hf is not a com-
`petitor for Lu in the incorporation in DOTA. Although
`stability constants of DOTA with many nuclides are
`available in the NIST database [16], data on reaction ki-
`netics are scarce. However, from the data presented here
`it can be concluded that the reaction kinetics of Lu, Y
`and In with DOTA are in the order: Lu>Y>>In.
`In conclusion, DOTA-peptides can be radiolabelled at
`high SA. Reaction kinetics differ for each radionuclide:
`with 90Y and 177Lu, conditions were optimal at pH 4–4.5
`and the reactions were complete after 20 min at 80°C,
`while labelling with 111In was completed after 30 min at
`100°C. Reactions can be hampered by contaminants,
`such as target material and decay products.
`
`Acknowledgements. The technical assistance of Deborah Thoon-
`sen and Erik de Blois is greatly acknowledged.
`
`References
`
`1. Otte A, Jermann E, Behe M, et al. DOTATOC: a powerful new
`tool for receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl
`Med 1997; 24:792–795.
`2. Erion J, Bugaj JE, Schmidt MA, Wilhelm RR, Srinivasan A.
`High radiotherapeutic efficacy of [Lu-177]-DOTA-Y3-octreo-
`tate in a rat tumor model. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:223p.
`3. Krenning EP, Valkema R, Kooij PP, et al. The role of radioac-
`tive somatostatin and its analogues in the control of tumor
`growth. Recent Results Cancer Res 2000; 153:1–13.
`4. Breeman WA, de Jong M, Kwekkeboom DJ, et al. Somatosta-
`tin receptor-mediated imaging and therapy: basic science, cur-
`rent knowledge, limitations and future perspectives. Eur J
`Nucl Med 2001; 28:1421–1429.
`5. Kwekkeboom D, Krenning EP, de Jong M. Peptide receptor
`imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med 2000; 41:1704–1713.
`6. Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, et al. [177Lu-
`DOTA0Tyr3]octreotate: comparison with [111In-DTPA0]octreo-
`tide in patients. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:1319–1325.
`7. Jansen JB, Jebbink MC, Douglas BR, Lamers CB. Effect of
`loxiglumide (CR-1505) on bombesin- and meal-stimulated
`plasma cholecystokinin in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990;
`38:367–370.
`8. Bunemann M, Hosey MM. G-protein coupled receptor kinases
`as modulators of G-protein signalling. J Physiol 1999; 517:5–23.
`9. Szilagyi E TE, Kovacs Z, Platzek J, Radüchel B, Brücher E.
`Equilibria and formation kinetics of some cyclen derivative
`complexes of lanthanides. Inorganica Chemica Acta 2000;
`298:226–234.
`10. Moerlein SM Welch MJ. The chemistry of gallium and indium
`as related to radiopharmaceutical production. Int J Nucl Med
`Biol 1981; 8:2772–2787.
`11. Kukis DL, DeNardo SJ, DeNardo GL, O'Donnell RT, Meares
`CF. Optimized conditions for chelation of yttrium-90-DOTA
`immunoconjugates. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:2105–2110.
`12. Liu S, Cheung E, Ziegler MC, Rajopadhye M, Edwards DS.
`(90)Y and (177)Lu labeling of a DOTA-conjugated vitronectin
`receptor antagonist useful for tumor therapy. Bioconjug Chem
`2001; 12:559–568.
`13. Bakker WH, Krenning EP, Breeman WA, et al. In vivo use of a
`radioiodinated somatostatin analogue: dynamics, metabolism,
`and binding to somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in man J
`Nucl Med 1991; 32:1184–1189 [published erratum appears in
`J Nucl Med 1991; 32:1999] [see comments].
`14. Smith-Jones PM, Stolz B, Albert R, et al. Synthesis and char-
`acterisation of [90Y]-Bz-DTPA-oct: a yttrium-90- labelled oct-
`reotide analogue for radiotherapy of somatostatin receptor-
`positive tumours. Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25:181–188.
`15. Breeman W, Erion JL, Bakker, WH, Visser, TJ, Krenning, EP,
`de Jong, M. Optimizing conditions for radiolabeling of
`DOTA-peptides with90Y, 111In, and 177Lu at high specific ac-
`tivities. Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29:P690.
`16. NIST. NIST critically selected stability constants of metal
`complexes. A.E. Martell, ed.
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Vol. 30, No. 6, June 2003
`Evergeen Ex. 1020
`4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket