throbber
ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`Applied Radiation and Isotopes
`
`journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apradiso
`
`Studies into radiolytic decomposition of fluorine-18 labeled
`radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography
`
`Peter J.H. Scott a, Brian G. Hockley a, Hank F. Kung b, Rajesh Manchanda c, Wei Zhang c,
`Michael R. Kilbourn a,
`
`a Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
`b Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
`c Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
`
`a r t i c l e i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Radiolytic decomposition of high specific concentration radiopharmaceuticals is an undesired side-
`effect that can hamper development of novel PET tracers. This was particularly evident in a series of
`carbon-11 and fluorine-18 labeled mono- and dimethyl-substituted aryl amines, where rapid
`decomposition was observed in isolation and formulation steps. We tested a number of additives that
`inhibit radiolysis and can be safely added to the synthesis procedures (purification and isolation) and
`reformulation steps to provide suitable clinical formulations. Ethanol and sodium ascorbate are
`established anti-oxidant stabilizers that completely inhibit radiolytic decomposition and are amenable
`to human use. Herein, we also demonstrate for the first time that nitrones are non-toxic radical
`scavengers that are capable of inhibiting radiolysis.
`
`& 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Article history:
`Received 4 December 2007
`Received in revised form
`21 August 2008
`Accepted 26 August 2008
`
`Keywords:
`Tomography
`Emission computed
`Radiolysis
`Stability
`Anti-oxidants
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a rapidly
`growing field of research in which molecules labeled with short-
`lived radionuclides such as carbon-11 or fluorine-18 are utilized to
`non-invasively examine biochemistry in living human subjects.
`As part of a broad program to deliver not only established PET
`radiopharmaceuticals for clinical care (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-
`D-glucose, [18F]FDG) and for clinical research (carbon-11 and
`fluorine-18 labeled radiotracers for brain, heart, pancreas and
`tumor imaging) we have a research program dedicated to the
`development and clinical
`implementation of new PET radio-
`pharmaceuticals. In particular, we and others have significant
`interest in the development of new fluorine-18 labeled PET
`imaging agents for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzhei-
`mer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The application
`of fluorine-18, with a convenient 110 min half-life, will facilitate
`the more widespread distribution and use of such radiopharma-
`ceuticals in clinical populations. During the development of
`radiochemical syntheses of such new fluorine-18 labeled radio-
`pharmaceuticals, including the validation of methods to prepare
`suitably high amounts for potential distribution, we observed a
`
`
`
`Corresponding author.
`E-mail address: mkilbour@umich.edu (M.R. Kilbourn).
`
`0969-8043/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.08.015
`
`distressing occurrence of decomposition of the final formulated
`products. As we suspected this might be due to radiolysis, and
`that it was particularly acute for the types of structures (N-
`methylanilines) common in our recently developed radiotracers,
`we undertook and report here a limited study of the factors
`involved in this decomposition process, examining what chemical
`structures seem particularly susceptible and what steps can be
`taken to effectively prevent decomposition. Radiolysis in radio-
`pharmaceutical preparations is certainly not an unknown phe-
`nomenon, having been implicated originally in the decomposition
`of carbon-14 and hydrogen-3 labeled species (Bayly and Evans,
`1966) and more recently of carbon-11 labeled species (Suzuki
`et al., 1990; Bogni et al., 2003; Fukumura et al., 2003, 2004a, b).
`These studies suggest that the degree of radiolysis of labeled
`compounds depends on the level of radioactivity, the level of
`specific activity, the structure of the radiopharmaceutical and the
`position of the radiolabel. These hypotheses are all supported by
`the results of the current study.
`In contrast to the above studies, radiolytic decomposition has not
`been extensively studied for fluorine-18 labeled compounds,
`although many of the mechanisms are expected to be similar to
`those discussed by Fukumura et al., (2004a, b). One example, a recent
`study of the stability of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), (Fawdry,
`2007) reported a slow but steady decomposition of the radio-
`pharmaceutical to release free [18F]fluoride ion. Similarly, MacGregor
`[18F]-N-methylspiroperidol,
`reported on the decomposition of
`
`Evergreen Ex. 1015
`1 of 7
`
`

`

`ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`P.J.H. Scott et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`89
`
`in which it was shown that rate of radiolysis was proportional to
`specific activity (MacGregor et al., 1987). With the more
`widespread availability of medical cyclotrons capable of produ-
`cing high levels of [18F]fluoride ion coupled with the development
`and implementation of automated synthesis modules, high level
`preparations of fluorine-18 compounds are becoming increasingly
`common. Therefore, the problem of radiolytic decomposition of
`fluorine-18 labeled radiopharmaceuticals needs to be recognized
`and addressed as a part of the overall radiopharmaceutical
`development program.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. General considerations
`
`Fluorine-18 ([18F]fluoride in H2[18O]O) and carbon-11 ([11C]CO2
`in nitrogen gas) radionuclides were generated using a General
`Electric Medical Systems (GEMS) PETtrace cyclotron. Fluorine-18
`labeled radiopharmaceuticals were prepared in a GEMS TRACER-
`lab FX F-N synthesis module and carbon-11 tracers were
`synthesized using a GEMS TRACERlab FX C-Pro synthesis module
`or Bioscan Loop synthesis system. N,N-Dimethylaniline, N-methy-
`laniline, 4-aminophenol and N-tert-butyl-a-phenylnitrone (PBN)
`were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Sodium
`ascorbate (SA) (Cenolates Ascorbic Acid (as SA) Injection, USP,
`500 mg/mL) was purchased from Hospira Inc. and used as
`received. Ethanol (sterile dehydrated alcohol injection, USP) was
`supplied by American Regent Inc. HPLC analysis of radiochemical
`purity was conducted using a Shimadzu LC-2010AHT Liquid
`Chromatograph fitted with UV and Bioscan g-detectors. HPLC
`peaks corresponding to products were identified by co-injection
`with unlabeled reference standards. Gas chromatography (GC)
`analysis used to determine residual levels of organic solvents was
`performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010 Gas Chromatograph.
`
`2.3. Typical carbon-11 radiolabeling procedure
`
`[11C]CO2 (100 GBq) in a nitrogen stream was delivered to the
`TRACERlab FX C-Pro and trapped on molecular sieves. Heating
`(350 1C) under an atmosphere of hydrogen over a nickel catalyst
`reduced the [11C]CO2 to [11C]CH4 and subsequent reaction with
`iodine vapor at 720 1C provided [11C]CH3I. [11C]CH3I was then
`converted to [11C]CH3OTf by passing over silver triflate. Labeling
`reactions were carried out by bubbling methyl triflate through a
`solution of precursor either in the TRACERlab FX C-Pro reactor or
`in a Bioscan Autoloop methylation system.
`In both cases,
`purification by semi-preparative HPLC or Sep-Pak provided
`11C-labeled radiopharmaceuticals as isotonic solutions suitable
`for injection that were released for QC analysis.
`
`2.4. Modified radiopharmaceutical preparation procedures
`incorporating anti-oxidant stabilizers
`
`to radiolytic decomposition
`Radiopharmaceuticals subject
`were prepared following modified versions of
`the general
`procedures described above to allow for incorporation of anti-
`oxidant stabilizers into the manufacturing processes. HPLC
`solvent systems were prepared containing 0.5% w/v (5 g/L) sodium
`ascorbate (SA) (or ascorbic acid depending upon the pH of the
`buffer in question). HPLC fractions were simultaneously collected
`and diluted into aqueous SA (0.5% w/v, 0.25 g in 50 mL sterile
`water). The resulting solution was passed through a C18-light
`Sep-Pak that trapped the product and residual solvents were
`washed away with additional aqueous SA (50 mg in 10 mL sterile
`water). Products were eluted with ethanol (USP, 0.5 mL) and
`diluted with SA (USP, 500 mg/mL, 0.1 mL) in 0.9% saline (USP,
`9.4 mL). This provided formulations (5% v/v ethanol in saline
`containing 0.5% w/v SA) suitable for
`injection that were
`transferred into sterile 10 mL dose vials through Millex 0.22 mm
`sterile filters and released for QC analysis.
`
`2.2. Typical fluorine-18 radiolabeling procedure
`
`2.5. Quality control
`
`[18F]Fluoride in [18O]H2O (37–74 GBq) was delivered to the
`TRACERlab FX F-N synthesis module and collected on a QMA-light
`Sep-Pak. The [18F]fluoride was then eluted from the QMA cartridge
`using aqueous potassium carbonate (3.5 mg in 0.5 mL) and
`transferred into the reactor vessel. Kryptofix-2.2.2 in acetonitrile
`(15 mg in 1 mL) was added and the water–acetonitrile azeotrope
`was evaporated (60 1C for 7 min under vacuum with argon
`stream followed by 120 1C for 5 min under vacuum). Precursors
`(1–1.5 mg) in anhydrous dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 1 mL) were
`added and the reaction was heated to 120 1C for 10 min. Following
`labeling, the reactor was cooled to 50 1C and the reaction
`mixture was diluted with HPLC solvent (3 mL). The crude mixture
`was passed through an alumina-light Sep-Pak and purified by
`semi-preparative HPLC. Those compounds purified using HPLC
`solvent systems suitable for injection (e.g., ethanol and water)
`were diluted with saline and transferred into a sterile 10 mL dose
`vial through a Millex 0.22 mm sterile filter.
`For those compounds purified using solvent systems unsui-
`table for
`injection (e.g., acetonitrile–water), HPLC fractions
`containing desired products were collected, diluted with sterile
`water (50 mL), and the resulting solution was passed through a
`C18-light Sep-Pak. Radiopharmaceuticals remained bound to the
`Sep-Pak whilst residual HPLC solvent was washed away with
`further sterile water (10 mL). Products were then eluted with USP
`ethanol (0.5 mL) and diluted with 0.9% sterile saline (9.5 mL). The
`resulting isotonic solution was passed into a sterile 10 mL dose
`vial through a Millex 0.22 mm sterile filter.
`
`All radiopharmaceuticals prepared for human use undergo
`extensive quality control according to the USP guidelines before
`they are released for use. Formulations are analyzed for chemical
`and radiochemical purity (HPLC); specific activity (HPLC);
`pyrogenicity (Charles Rivers); residual Kryptofix-2.2.2 (TLC);
`residual organic solvents (GC); formulation pH; radionuclidic
`half-life; and sterile filter integrity (bubble-point test). Every
`batch must pass all of these tests before release to the clinic is
`approved.
`
`2.6. Determination of rates of radiolytic decomposition
`
`The radiolytic decomposition of fluorine-18 and carbon-11
`labeled products was monitored as a function of radiochemical
`purity through repeated injections of formulated products on the
`analytical HPLC. Decomposition of unlabeled standard com-
`pounds placed either next to or into a vial containing high
`[18F]fluoride ion was monitored by HPLC
`concentrations of
`coupled with UV detection of the mass peak.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`3.1. Potential PET ligands for imaging AD pathophysiology
`
`We have been involved in two research projects investigating
`new tracers to image AD pathophysiology. The disease is
`Evergreen Ex. 1015
`2 of 7
`
`

`

`ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`90
`
`P.J.H. Scott et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`characterized by the deposition of b-amyloid in plaques and
`formation of neurofibrillary tangles resulting from the abnormal
`aggregation of tau protein (La Ferla and Green, 2007; Pallas and
`Camins, 2006). The ability to determine levels of plaques and
`tangles early enough to allow effective diagnosis and treatment
`represents a major goal in AD therapy and radionuclide imaging
`techniques may play a key role in meeting this need (Nordberg,
`2004; Cohen, 2007; Cai et al., 2007).
`2-(4-([11C]methylamino)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazol-
`Currently,
`([11C]PIB, 3, Fig. 1)
`is the most commonly employed
`6-ol
`radioligand for imaging amyloid pathology (Mathis et al., 2007).
`However, due to the short 20 min half-life of carbon-11, there is
`significant interest in developing fluorine-18 labeled amyloid
`imaging agents: the 110 min half-life of fluorine-18 is advanta-
`geous because it allows for multiple patients to be scanned
`from a single synthetic preparation and provides for possible
`distribution of radiopharmaceuticals to PET imaging centers that
`do not possess cyclotrons or
`the synthetic radiochemistry
`facilities. Numerous structures of potential fluorine-containing
`amyloid binding agents have now been reported, among them
`2-(1-(6-((2-[18F]fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino)naphthalene-2-yl)
`ethylidene)malononitrile ([18F]FDDNP, 5) (Liu et al., 2007; Small
`et al., 2006), stilbenes related to SB-13 ((E)-4-(4-(dimethylamino)
`styryl)phenol 2) (Ono et al., 2003), and styrylpyridines (e.g., (E)-4-
`(2-(6-(2-(2-(2-[18F]fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)pyridine-3-yl)vinyl)
`-N,N-dimethylbenzenamine (Zhang et al., 2007), ([18F]AV-19, 1,
`Fig. 1). Our interests were in the scale-up of the preparation of this
`last compound, [18F]AV-19, to allow initial clinical trials.
`The second project targets neurofibrillary tangles, resulting
`from abnormal aggregation of tau protein, using substituted
`(e.g., N-[11C]methyl-4-(quinolin-2-yl)benzenamine
`quinolines
`(MQB, 4a) and N,N-[11C]dimethyl-4-(quinolin-2-yl)benzenamine
`
`Fig. 1. Structures of representative N-methyl substituted anilines used as PET
`radiopharmaceuticals.
`
`(DMQB, 4b), Fig. 1) (Okamura et al., 2005; Kudo et al., 2004).
`A common structural element in all of the radiopharmaceuticals
`illustrated in Fig. 1, and seen in many drug candidates, is the
`presence of N-methylamine and N,N-dimethylamine substituents
`on the aryl rings. N-Methylamine groups are hydrogen bond
`donors that are able to coordinate to active sites and also allow
`for metabolism and subsequent elimination of drugs by, for
`example, cytochrome P450 mediated oxidative N-demethylation
`(Sheweita, 2000; Uehleke, 1973; Hlavica, 2002) or amine-oxidase/
`monoamine oxidase driven N-oxidation (Tipton et al., 2004;
`Edmondson et al., 2004). However, despite the benefits of
`incorporating amines into potential tracer molecules, it quickly
`became apparent during lead development studies for both the
`amyloid and tau imaging projects that many potential tracers
`containing methylaniline components are prone to radiolytic
`decomposition.
`
`3.2. Radiolytic decomposition of amino-substituted molecules
`
`[18F]AV-19 1 has been evaluated as an imaging agent for
`quantifying levels of amyloid plaques in the brains of AD patients
`(Skovronsky et al., 2008). During initial development of a
`production method for [18F]AV-19 using a TRACERlab FX F-N,
`trial labeling studies were attempted by reacting a tosylated
`precursor in DMSO with 11 GBq of [18F]fluoride. A method was
`developed which routinely provided 1.5 GBq of [18F]AV-19 in
`485% radiochemical purity at end-of-synthesis (Table 1, Entry 1,
`n ¼ 3). However, the product as formulated in a standard 5%
`ethanol : saline formulation was unstable and found to decom-
`pose into four polar radioactive species (having lower retention
`times in the radiochemical HPLC traces) such that after 20 min
`radiochemical purity had decreased to 73%. This decomposition
`was attributed to radiolysis as the corresponding formulations of
`unlabeled reference standard are known to be chemically stable
`for extended times and at elevated temperatures. Unfortunately,
`and in agreement with previous reports (Fukumura et al.,
`2004a, b, MacGregor et al., 1987), the rate of radiolytic decom-
`position greatly increased when the synthesis was scaled up to
`provide high specific concentration formulations suitable for
`imaging multiple patients from a single dose. Full-scale produc-
`tion using 66.6 GBq of [18F]fluoride gave the expected increase in
`yield of [18F]AV-19 (7.4 GBq) but there was a dramatic decrease in
`radiochemical purity (72% at EOS). Repeated analysis of the
`product by HPLC after end-of-synthesis revealed that rapid
`radiolytic decomposition was occurring to the extent that after
`20 min, radiochemical purity had decreased to 37% and radi-
`olabeled decomposition products were the major components of
`the formulation (Table 1, Entry 2). As per previous reports into
`radiolytic decomposition of radiopharmaceuticals (Suzuki et al.,
`1990; Bogni et al., 2003; Fukumura et al., 2003, 2004a, b; Fawdry,
`2007; MacGregor et al., 1987), this decomposition was thought to
`be due to transient reactive species such as hydroxyl radicals
`generated by radiolysis of water or hydrated electrons. In further
`experiments intended to elucidate the mechanism of decomposi-
`tion, a vial containing a solution of [19F]AV-19 standard was
`placed in close proximity (1 cm away) to the TRACERlab FX F-N
`target vial containing 66.6 GBq of fluoride in an aqueous solution.
`Under these conditions [19F]AV-19 was found to be very stable and
`underwent none of the expected decomposition (Table 1, Entry 3).
`This confirmed that decomposition and/or the free-radicals
`suspected of causing radiolysis were not the result of the high
`concentration of gamma rays. Rather, for radiolysis to occur the
`radioactivity had to be in the same vial as the product and this
`was suggestive of decomposition possibly involving short-range
`positrons. Since the range of a fluorine-18 positron in water is
`Evergreen Ex. 1015
`3 of 7
`
`

`

`ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`P.J.H. Scott et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`91
`
`Table 1
`Time-dependent stabilities of selected PET radioligands. All radiochemical products formulated in 8 ml of 5% ethanol in isotonic saline
`
`Entry
`
`Compound
`
`Conditions
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[19F]AV-19 (1)
`[19F]AV-19 (1)
`[11C]PIB (3)
`[12C]PIB (3)
`[12C]PIB (3)
`[11C]MQB (4a)
`[11C]DMQB (4b)
`[12C]DMQB (4b)
`[11C]DASB (6)
`
`1.48 GBq dose
`7.4 GBq dose
`1 cm from vial with 66.6 GBq of [18F]fluoride
`In vial with 66.6 GBq [18F]fluoride
`2.5 GBq dose
`1 cm from vial with 66.6 GBq of [18F]fluoride
`In vial via with 66.6 GBq [18F]fluoride
`1.73 GBq dose
`1.85 GBq dose
`In vial with 11.1 GBq [18F]fluoride
`1.85 GBq dose
`
`Puritya
`
`0 (%)
`
`85
`72
`100
`100
`99
`100
`100
`95
`58
`60
`90
`
`a Radiochemical purity is reported for labeled compounds and UV purity for unlabeled standards.
`b Purity recorded after 1 h to assess long term stability.
`
`10 min (%)
`
`20 min (%)
`
`77
`55
`100
`73
`99
`100
`100
`70
`21
`22
`
`
`73
`37
`100
`
`99
`100
`100
`
`5
`0b
`
`
`2.4 mm and they are unable to penetrate glass (Fowler and Wolf,
`1982), decomposition does not occur when radioactivity is
`isolated in the target vial and separate from the solution of
`[19F]AV-19. As expected, when the [19F]AV-19 standard was
`exposed to 66.6 GBq of [18F]fluoride in solution, rapid decomposi-
`tion occurred (Table 1, Entry 4).
`It is noteworthy that in contrast to the above findings and
`despite similarities in structure, [11C]PIB (3) was very stable in
`high-specific activity formulations prepared from 37 GBq of
`methyl triflate using a GE TRACERlab FX C-Pro and Bioscan
`Autoloop (Table 1, Entry 5). Similarly, when placed into or next to
`a vial containing 66.6 GBq of [18F]fluoride, no decomposition
`occurred (Table 1, Entries 6 and 7). Presumably, the thiazole
`linkage provided formulated [11C]PIB with enhanced stability
`when compared to the alkene linkage found in AV-19.
`Concomitantly with these studies, we have also investigated
`the possibility of radiolabeling quinolines (4) according to a
`literature procedure and using them to image tau pathology in AD.
`Labeling of these compounds was carried out with solutions of the
`corresponding aniline or N-methylaniline and carbon-11 methyl
`triflate (37 GBq)
`in methylethylketone (MEK)
`to provide
`N-methyl-(MQB, 4a) and N,N-dimethyl-labeled (DMQB, 4b)
`tracers, respectively. We were surprised during this work to
`observe similar radiolytic decomposition to that described above
`for the [18F]styrylpyridines. [11C]MQB (4a) was 95% radiochemi-
`cally pure at EOS but this dropped off to 70% after 10 min (Table 1,
`Entry 8). Similar to that found earlier with the fluorine-18 labeled
`compounds,
`the rate of radiolysis was faster for the N,N-
`dimethylamine (DMQB, 4b) than for the N-methylamine (MQB,
`4a). The dimethyl derivative [11C]DMQB (4b) was only 58% pure at
`EOS and by 20 min post-EOS the radiochemical purity had
`dropped to 5% (Table 1, Entry 9). Similar results were obtained
`when unlabeled standards of these compounds were exposed in
`solution to high levels of [18F]fluoride (Table 1, Entry 10). An
`additional drawback is that solutions of
`the corresponding
`unlabelled MQB and DMQB standards are known to be chemically
`unstable, however the process is noticeably slower (weeks to
`months) and is not responsible for the rapid decomposition of the
`labeled species.
`
`3.3. Radiolysis of simple anilines
`
`The results with the amyloid and tau radioligands raised the
`question of whether or not anilines in general are particularly
`prone to radiolytic decomposition. As one potential reaction of
`anilines is the formation of the N-oxide species, that might be
`
`expected to occur with most if not all anilines. Therefore
`three simple anilines (N,N-dimethylaniline, N-methylaniline and
`4-aminophenol) were exposed to high levels of fluorine-18 to test
`this hypothesis. There was no evidence of decomposition when
`any of the three were combined with 66.6 GBq of fluoride-18 in
`aqueous solution, using UV–HPLC analysis after 2 h of exposure. At
`present it is unclear what intrinsic feature of substituted anilines
`may make them more susceptible to radiolysis and further
`investigation is ongoing.
`
`3.4.
`
`Inhibition of radiolysis
`
`All of the potential radiopharmaceuticals described in this note
`have been successfully radiolabeled with carbon-11 or fluorine-
`18. However, to progress any of them into clinical studies required
`inhibition of radiolytic decomposition so that stable formulations
`meeting all of the high radiochemical purity and specific activity
`requirements could be prepared. Therefore we investigated a
`number of means of inhibiting radiolytic decomposition.
`
`3.4.1. Dilution of formulated products
`The radiolytic decomposition of tracers was thought to be
`caused by hydroxyl radicals resulting from the reaction of high
`energy positrons with the aqueous medium. Since the range of a
`fluorine-18 positron in water is 2.4 mm, it followed that radiolytic
`decomposition should be slowed down simply by diluting the
`radiopharmaceutical formulations. Therefore, [18F]AV-19 (7.4 GBq)
`was prepared as described above and formulated in 0.5 mL
`ethanol and 9.5 mL saline. Five mL of this formulation was then
`removed and diluted with additional saline (5 mL) and the rate of
`radiolysis of the parent dose vs. the diluted dose were compared
`(Table 2). Radiolysis occurred in both cases, but decomposition
`was noticeably slower in the diluted formulation, despite the
`lower ethanol concentration. Whilst additional dilution might
`further slow radiolysis occurring during short-term storage of a
`fluorine-18 preparation, large injection volumes would begin to be
`required to obtain levels of
`injected activity necessary for
`successful PET imaging. Furthermore, the initial 60% radiochemi-
`cal purity at
`formulation demonstrated the difficulties in
`preparation of this radiochemical without using some means to
`prevent the decomposition during the synthesis and formulation
`steps.
`
`3.4.2. Addition of anti-oxidant stabilizers
`Since dilution was capable of slowing down radiolysis but not
`completely inhibiting it, incorporation of additional stabilizers
`Evergreen Ex. 1015
`4 of 7
`
`

`

`ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`92
`
`P.J.H. Scott et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`Table 2
`Test of dilution as a method for inhibiting radiolysis of a fluorine-18 labeled N,N-dimethylaniline
`
`Compound
`
`Formulation
`
`Radiochemical purity
`
`1
`
`2
`
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`
`3.7 GBq in 5% EtOH/saline
`(5 mL)
`3.7 GBq in 2.5% EtOH/saline
`(10 mL)
`
`60
`
`60
`
`48
`
`62
`
`21
`
`60
`
`5
`
`52
`
`EOS (%)
`
`10 min (%)
`
`20 min (%)
`
`3 h (%)
`
`Table 3
`Applications of antioxidants (EtOH, PBN and sodium ascorbate) to inhibit radiolytic decomposition of PET radiopharmaceuticals containing N-methylaniline structures
`
`Compound
`
`Formulation
`
`Purity
`
`EOS (%)
`
`10 min (%)
`
`20 min (%)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[18F]AV-19 (1)
`[12C]DMQB (4b)
`[11C]DASB (6)
`
`50 : 50 EtOH saline
`100% EtOH
`5% EtOH in saline + 0.5% w/v PBN
`5% EtOH in saline + 0.5% w/v Na–ascorbate
`11.1 GBq fluoride added to 5% EtOH in saline + 0.5% w/v Na–ascorbate
`5% EtOH in saline + 0.2% w/v Na–ascorbate
`
`60
`66
`92
`96
`100
`99
`
`62
`66
`93
`96
`100
`99
`
`64
`66
`93
`96
`100
`99
`
`Long-term
`stability
`(%)
`
`66 (3 h)
`–
`93 (1 h)
`100 (6 h)
`100 (1 h)
`99 (1 h)
`
`into radiopharmaceutical formulations was considered (Table 3).
`Working on our hypothesis that radiolysis was attributable to
`reactive oxygen species, such as transient free-radicals, addition of
`anti-oxidant stabilizers was considered. Ethanol is noted for its
`anti-oxidant properties and ability to scavange hydroxyl radicals
`in aqueous solutions. Formulating [18F]AV-19 in a solution of 50%
`ethanol : 50% saline or 100% ethanol was found to completely
`inhibit
`radiolytic decomposition of
`the formulated product
`(Table 3, Entries 1 and 2), although it should be noted that the
`product was isolated in poor radiochemical purity after HPLC
`purification (a method for solving this problem is discussed later).
`These results using ethanol as inhibitor agree with Fukumura’s
`results with carbon-11 labelled species (Fukumura et al., 2003,
`2004a, b) and studies of
`the radiolytic decomposition of
`[18F]FDDNP reported in the literature (Liu et al., 2007; Small
`et al., 2006; Klok et al., 2008). [18F]FDDNP contains a mono-
`methylaniline and is stable in neat ethanol but undergoes rapid
`radiolytic decomposition when the ethanol is diluted with water.
`High concentrations of ethanol do not represent a practical
`solution to the problem of radiolysis as 5–10% is the maximum
`amount of ethanol permitted in isotonic solutions formulated for
`injection. As formulating in 5% ethanol was not sufficient to
`prevent radiolysis in formulated products and also could not be
`employed to prevent radiolytic decomposition occurring during
`synthesis, alternative anti-oxidants were considered. A range of
`compounds are known to inhibit decomposition attributable to
`free radicals including ascorbic acid (Chen et al., 2005; Elmore,
`2005; Liu et al., 2003; Werner et al., 1990), potassium iodide
`(Suzuki et al., 1990), nitrones (Reybier et al., 2006; Green et al.,
`2003) and thiourea (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2005). Thiourea is
`highly toxic and unsuitable for clinical formulations and so we
`focused our efforts on ascorbic acid and nitrones as non-toxic
`anti-oxidants amenable for human use.
`N-tert-Butyl-a-phenylnitrone (PBN) is a nitrone widely used as
`a means of trapping and detecting free-radicals in both chemistry
`and biology (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2005), particularly finding
`widespread application in electron spin resonance (ESR) spectro-
`scopy. The ability of PBN to trap reactive oxygen species in vivo has
`also led to extensive investigation as a neuroprotective agent
`(Kotake, 1999; Kim et al., 2007). We have also previously worked
`with PBN and radiolabeled analogs as a means of quantifying
`levels of free-radicals in vivo (Bormans and Kilbourn, 1995). We
`
`were therefore interested in employing PBN to prevent radiolytic
`decomposition by trapping free radicals potentially formed in
`high specific concentration radiopharmaceutical
`formulations.
`[18F]AV-19 (1) was prepared as outlined above but the procedure
`was modified so that the semi-preparative HPLC buffer contained
`PBN (0.1% w/v) and the final product was formulated in 5% ethanol
`in saline containing 0.5% w/v PBN. This provided a high specific
`concentration formulation of [18F]AV-19 which had a radio-
`chemical purity 493%. Incorporation of PBN inhibited radiolytic
`decomposition during synthesis and the high radiochemical
`purity of the formulation remained unchanged for 1 h after end-
`of-synthesis (Table 3, Entry 3). It thus appears that the inclusion of
`a nitrone effectively inhibits radiolytic decomposition; application
`to human studies is feasible as nitrones have been investigated in
`clinical studies as neuroprotective agents in cerebral ischemia
`(Green et al., 2003). This is a preliminary proof-of-concept study
`and further investigations to determine the minimum effective
`level of PBN required to inhibit radiolytic decomposition are
`ongoing and will be reported in due course.
`Ascorbic acid is also a well known anti-oxidant that a number
`of groups have employed to inhibit radiolytic decomposition
`(Fukumura et al., 2004a, b; Chen et al., 2005; Elmore, 2005; Liu
`et al., 2003; Werner et al., 1990). For example, Klok et al., 2008.
`used it to overcome stability problems associated with the
`preparation of [18F]FDDNP (Klok et al., 2008). One disadvantage
`is that addition of ascorbic acid is known to make final
`formulations very acidic (pH2) and outside of physiological
`pH, making them unsuitable for human use without additional
`buffering. However, we have found that SA is a suitable
`alternative. SA has the same excellent anti-oxidant properties as
`the free acid, but its addition to clinical
`formulations has
`negligible affect on pH. However, a drawback of adding SA to
`[18F]-labeled radiopharmaceutical formulations is that it compli-
`cates analysis of residual Kryptofix-2.2.2 in formulations during
`quality control. Kryptofix-2.2.2 is a crown-ether phase transfer
`reagent used to enhance nucleophilic substitution reactions using
`[18F]fluoride. Due to its toxicity, Kryptofix must be removed after
`synthesis and levels in clinical formulations must be quantified
`during quality control. Typically this is achieved using the
`classical iodoplatinate TLC spot-test (Mock et al., 1997). However,
`if formulations containing SA are analyzed using this spot-test
`then bleaching of the iodoplatinate TLC strips occurs and renders
`Evergreen Ex. 1015
`5 of 7
`
`

`

`ARTICLE IN PRESS
`
`P.J.H. Scott et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (2009) 88–94
`
`93
`
`the test subject to false negative results. To overcome this
`problem, we have recently developed an alternative TLC method
`that allows for the analysis of residual Kryptofix in the presence of
`SA (Scott and Kilbourn, 2007).
`The full-scale synthesis of [18F]AV-19 (1) was repeated after
`incorporation of 0.5% w/v SA into the semi-preparative HPLC
`buffer (5 g/L), reformulation flask (250 mg/50 mL water) and
`final formulation (50 mg/10 mL). The result was a high-specific
`concentration formulation of [18F]AV-19 (1) with excellent radio-
`chemical purity (495%, n ¼ 20) that was suitable for injection
`(typical formulation pH ¼ 6.5). As with PBN, SA also inhibited
`radiolysis during and after synthesis. The formulation was stable
`up to 6 h post end-of-synthesis and there was no decrease in
`radiochemical purity as analyzed by HPLC (Table 3, Entry 4).
`Similarly, carbon-11 labeled quinoline compounds (MQB, 4a and
`DMQB, 4b) were stable when formulated with SA in a similar
`fashion (Table 3, Entry 5).
`The representative examples provided here show the worst-
`case scenario of radiolytic decomposition since without addition
`of anti-oxidant stabilizers, the tracers are unusable. However,
`given that SA is very efficient at inhibiting radiolysis, we re-visited
`formulation of other aniline containing radiopharmaceuticals that
`we routinely prepare and consider to be stable. [11C]DASB (3-
`amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl)benzonitrile 6)
`is known to undergo very slow radiolysis and, not surprisingly
`given our previous findings, contains an aniline component.
`Slow radiolysis of a primary aniline is in keeping with the
`apparent trend that the rate of radiolysis increases with substitu-
`tion at the aniline: ArNMe2 4 ArNHMe 4 ArNH2. Seemingly, the
`more electron rich the aniline nitrogen, the more susceptible the
`compound is to radiolysis. Whilst formulation without ascorbate
`does not give an unusable product (radiochemical purity ¼ 90%),
`addition of 0.4% w/v SA to the isolation and formulation steps
`increases radiochemical purity of the formulated product to 99%
`and the product is stable for at least three half-lives of the carbon-
`11 radionuclide with no evidence of any decomposition (Table 3,
`Entry 6).
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`In conclusion we have shown that a number of potential new
`PET ligands as well as some established compounds in hum

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket