throbber
Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`Applied Radiation and Isotopes
`
`journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apradiso
`
`Application of single-vial ready-for-use formulation
`of 111In- or 177Lu-labelled somatostatin analogs
`Erik de Blois, Ho Sze Chan, Rory de Zanger, Mark Konijnenberg, Wouter A.P. Breeman n
`
`Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Department of Nuclear Medicine, ‘s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`
`H I G H L I G H T S
` Optimal quencher combination: ascorbic- and gentisic acid and ethanol.
` Used quencher concentrations had no effect on pharmacokinetics.
` Purging the reaction mixture with N2 after radiolabelling resulted in 10% higher RCP.
` Quencher mixture stabilize 111In- and 177Lu-labelled SS-analogs during 7 days.
` Enables to store and transport 111In- and 177Lu-labelled SS-analogs in a single-vial.
`
`a r t i c l e i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`For the sake of safety it would be desirable to store and transport the ready-for-use liquid formulation
`(diagnostics and therapeutics) of radiolabelled peptides. The use of ethanol, in combination with a
`mixture of gentisic- and ascorbic acid, has superior effects on stabilizing radiolabelled somatostatin
`analogs. As a consequence, 111In- and 177Lu-labelled somatostatin analogs can be stored and transported
`in a single-vial ready-for-use liquid formulation up to 7 days after radiolabelling.
`& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Article history:
`Received 14 June 2013
`Received in revised form
`4 October 2013
`Accepted 26 October 2013
`Available online 10 December 2013
`
`Keywords:
`Somatostatin
`Quenchers
`Ethanol
`Ascorbic acid
`Gentisic acid
`Radiochemical purity
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`Here we describe the presence of quenchers (de Blois et al.,
`2012) in a single-vial
`liquid pharmaceutical formulation of a
`radiolabelled peptide, in a quantity sufficient to prevent radiolysis
`of the formulation. Radiolabelled peptides are generally stored and
`transported in the form of multi-vial kit formulations. Usually the
`contents of these vials are lyophilized or frozen and should be
`brought into solution subsequently in a mutual reaction to
`produce the intended radiolabelled peptide. For the sake of safety
`it would be desirable to be able to store and transport the ready-
`for-use liquid formulation of the radiolabelled peptide. Then, a
`physician could administer the labelled peptide without a radio-
`chemical reaction, simply by diluting the contents of the vial in a
`radiopharmaceutical liquid that can be administered by injection
`or by infusion (Filice et al., 2012).
`
`n Corresponding author. Tel.: þ31 10 7035317; fax: þ31 10 7035997.
`E-mail address: w.a.p.breeman@erasmusmc.nl (W.A.P. Breeman).
`
`0969-8043/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.10.023
`
`During labeling, storage and transport of the somatostatin
`analogs (further referred as SS-analogs) the peptide is exposed
`to radicals produced by i.e. 177Lu or 111In as radionuclide. Radiolysis
`of aqueous solutions produces reactive species (∙OH, H∙, e
`aq, H2O2)
`that may react with the peptide in the reaction (Garrison, 1987;
`Jay-Gerin and Ferradini, 2000; Jonah, 1995; Swiatla-Wojcik and
`Buxton, 2005). Here we describe how to preserve high radio-
`chemical purity – and thus to increase the storage and transport
`time of radiolabelled SS-analogs – with the use of quenchers. The
`literature reports successful addition of quenchers such as gentisic
`acid (Liu and Edwards, 2001), ascorbic acid (Chen et al., 2008; Liu
`et al., 2001, 2003), methionine (Breeman et al., 2008) and ethanol
`(Chen et al., 2008; Filice et al., 2012; Fukumura et al., 2004;
`Schuessler, 1975; Erion et al., 2008) to the reaction mixtures in
`various combinations and concentrations prior to radiolabelling to
`prevent radiolysis.
`In this study, stability and radiolysis of radiolabelled SS-analogs
`were monitored by HPLC. HPLC methods were optimized to
`distinguish between non-labelled and radiolabelled peptides vs.
`the radiolysed peptides. The effect of quenchers on the stability of
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`1 of 6
`
`

`

`E. de Blois et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`29
`
`radiolabelled SS-analogs, even under therapeutic conditions was
`optimized and monitored up to 7 days after radiolabelling.
`
`2. Methods and materials
`
`2.1. 111In/177Lu labelling of SS-analogs
`
`DOTA-TATE ([DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate), DOTA-NOC ([DOTA0-
`Nal3]octreotide) and DTPA-octreotide ([DTPA0]-octreotide) were
`purchased from BioSynthema, (St Louis, MO, USA). 111InCl3 was
`purchased from Covedien (Petten, The Netherlands) and 177LuCl3
`from IDB Holland (Baarle Nassau, The Netherlands). During opti-
`misation, the typical reaction mixture for radiolabelling consisted
`of 60 MBq of 177Lu- or 111InCl3 in 0.01–0.05 M HCl with 2 nmol
`peptide dissolved in Milli-Q water, sodium acetate as buffer
`(r2 mL of 2.5 M) and 10 mL of quenchers in a final volume of
`0.14 mL (final pH 4–4.5). To inhibit oxidation and radiolysis,
`quenchers were added in various combinations and concentra-
`tions prior to radiolabelling as described in paragraph 2.4.
`Quenchers included ascorbate (Bufa BV, Uitgeest, The Nether-
`lands), gentisic acid (Tyco Health Care, Petten, The Netherlands),
`ethanol
`(Sigma-Aldrich Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) and
`methionine (Fluka Biochemika, Switzerland). Radiolabelling of
`DOTA-TATE and other DOTA-conjugated SS-analogs with 111In or
`177Lu requires heating for 15 min at 80 1C (Breeman et al., 2005).
`DTPA-peptides were incubated for 10 min at room temperature
`(20–22 1C) (Chavatte et al., 2001). After cooling to room tempera-
`ture, quality control of DTPA- and DOTA-peptides was performed.
`Quality control includes incorporation of 111In or 177Lu as mea-
`sured by ITLC-SG (Bakker et al., 1991) and RCP of radiolabelled
`DTPA- and DOTA-peptides as measured by HPLC (de Blois et al.,
`2012). RCP of radiopeptides was determined as function of time
`post radiolabelling at room temperature at regular time intervals.
`In order to avoid false positive quality control results due to
`colloid formation (Breeman et al., 2007a; Liu and Edwards, 2001),
`quality control of DOTA-peptides was assessed after the addition
`of 5 μL 4 mM DTPA post radiolabelling (Breeman et al., 2003a,
`2003b).
`Any non-incorporated 111In or 177Lu will be rapidly captured by
`the addition of DTPA. 111In-DTPA, and 177Lu-DTPA after i.v. admin-
`istration, will be rapidly excreted via the kidneys (Breeman et al.,
`2004, 2003b).
`level (patient's dose)
`DOTA-TATE labelling at therapeutical
`was performed under the kit formulation as previously reported
`(Breeman et al., 2006) in a concentrated form (60 GBq in 3 mL).
`After QC Lu-DOTA-TATE was diluted with saline (100 mL) for
`patient infusion. We investigated the storing conditions of a
`177Lu-labelled DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC patient dose (3.7–
`7.4 GBq) after dilution with saline (5–100 mL)
`to maintain
`high RCP.
`
`2.2. HPLC
`
`HPLC grade methanol and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were
`purchased from Mallinckrodt Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands).
`All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijn-
`drecht, The Netherlands). SS-analogs were analysed with a HPLC
`system (Breeze, Waters, Etten-Leur, The Netherlands), containing a
`1525 binary pump and a UV detector (W2487 Waters Dual λ
`Absorbance Detector). UV absorption was measured at 278 nm.
`A Symmetry C18 column (5 mm  4.6 mm  250 mm, Waters,
`Etten-Leur, The Netherlands) was used with a gradient profile
`as described earlier (de Blois et al., 2011), mobile phase 0.1%
`TFA (A) and methanol (B). Sample injections on the HPLC were
`performed via a Waters 717 autosampler (injection volume
`
`o200 mL). Radioactivity was monitored with a system including
`a NaI detector, digital multichannel analyzer and dedicated soft-
`ware (MetorX B.V, Goedereede, The Netherlands), connected to
`the HPLC system.
`
`2.3. Dosimetry within the reaction vial
`
`In order to investigate the influence of dose (Gy) on the
`radiolysis of SS-analogs, dose in the reaction mixture during
`the labelling procedure and storage was calculated according to
`the spherical geometry dosimetry model
`(Stabin and Konij-
`nenberg, 2000). This model derives the absorbed dose rates in
`the vials used. The complete emission spectrum of the specific
`nuclides (111In and 177Lu) was taken into account used in the
`calculations. Dose was also calculated during storage up to 7 days
`using different volumes (5, 50 and 100 mL) containing a thera-
`peutical amount (3.7 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE.
`
`2.4. Optimizing quencher concentration
`
`To obtain maximum protection of radiolabelled SS-analogs
`and minor effect in pharmacokinetics, quencher concentration in
`reaction mixture was investigated time dependently. DOTA-TATE
`was radiolabelled with 60 MBq 111In or 177Lu in the presence of
`different concentrations of quenchers and 2 nmol of DOTA-TATE
`in a final volume of 0.14 mL. Ascorbic acid and gentisic acid were
`investigated with final concentrations of 1–20 mM, 1–50 mM for
`methionine and 2–20% (v/v) for ethanol.
`
`2.5. Radiolabelled SS-analogs in the presence of quenchers mixtures
`
`Applied quencher concentrations after optimization in reaction
`vial were: 3.5 mM for ascorbic acid and gentisic acid, 10 mM for
`methionine and 7–10% (v/v) for ethanol. Single quenchers and
`combinations of those quenchers were applied and RCP's were
`measured by HPLC up to 7 days after radiolabelling. RCP measure-
`ments were stopped when RCP decreased below 50%.
`
`2.6. Purging labelling mixture with nitrogen (N2) or oxygen (O2)
`
`To investigate any influence of O2 on the formation of radicals,
`which would lower the RCP, the reaction mixture after radiolabel-
`ling was purged for 1 h with N2 or O2 (100 mL/min). We hypothe-
`sized that N2 would decrease the O2 concentration and thereby
`In contrast, purging with O2 would
`positively influence RCP.
`increase the oxygen concentration and thereby influence RCP
`negatively. RCP was measured by HPLC up to 7 days after
`radiolabelling.
`
`2.7. Maintaining RCP and biological activity (receptor affinity)
`
`Autoradiography with stabilized 111In-DOTA-TATE (Fig. 3A) was
`performed as previously reported (de Jong et al., 2001; de Visser
`et al., 2007; Hofland et al., 1999) on rat brain sections up to 7 days
`Internalisation with stabilized 111In-DOTA-
`after radiolabelling.
`TATE was performed using CA20948 somatostatin receptor expres-
`sing cells as described previously (Bernard et al., 2000), also up to
`7 days after radiolabelling.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Dosimetry within the reaction vial
`
`Dose (Gy) within reaction mixture during labelling procedure
`and storage was calculated for 111In- and 177Lu-containing vials.
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`2 of 6
`
`

`

`30
`
`E. de Blois et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`20 μM
`3.5 μM
`1 μM
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`% RCP
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Fig. 2. 111In-DOTA-TATE in the presence of three different concentrations of
`ascorbic acid. X-axis shows time (days); Y-axis RCP (%). Labelling was performed
`with 60 MBq 111In and 2 nmol of DOTA-TATE in a final volume of 0.14 mL. This
`figure shows the effect of quencher concentration over time. Under same condi-
`tions, 177Lu-DOTA-TATE showed similar results.
`
`available kit formulation (OctreoScans) after reaction of their ingre-
`dients; this commercial kit contains a mixture of gentisic- and
`ascorbic acid as quenchers. Addition of ethanol to the gentisic- and
`ascorbic acid containing OctreoScans kit (see instructions for use)
`even improve stability of radiolabelled peptide (Fig. 4A and B).
`The optimal quencher mixtures as described above was tested
`within a broad range of specific activity of 111In-DOTA-TATE (50–
`190 MBq/nmol, Fig. 5A) and activity concentration (0.14–1.4 GBq/
`mL, Fig. 5B). The results were similar to those for RCP (Figs. 3 and 4).
`Fig. 6 shows the optimized storing conditions of 177Lu-DOTA-
`TATE and 177Lu-DOTA-NOC. Comparable results were obtained with
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE at a therapeutical level (3.6–7.4 GBq, see Fig. 7)
`and maintained high RCP after dilution in saline (5–100 mL).
`
`3.4. Purging labelling mixture with N2 and O2
`
`Purging the reaction mixture with N2 after radiolabelling
`resulted in 710% higher RCP after 5 days of storage. Purging with
`O2 resulted in RCP values obtained with traditional storage (data
`not shown).
`
`3.5. Maintaining RCP and biological activity (receptor affinity)
`
`In order to prove the biological activity of the radiolabelled
`SS-analogs, we studied internalisation and autoradiography during
`the 7 days of RCP monitoring (Fig. 4). Results showed a constant
`and specific binding and internalisation of SS-analogs (data not
`shown) (Breeman et al., 2007b).
`
`4. Discussion
`
`4.1. RCP quantification
`
`Since radiolysed radiopeptides often differ in charge and shape
`vs. structure of intact radiolabelled peptides, radiolysis of radi-
`olabelled peptide can be separated by HPLC and quantified by
`radiodetection. Typically, RCP of radiolabelled SS-analogs mea-
`sured by HPLC is expressed as % of radiodetected peak area
`(mV/s1) of the intact radiolabelled peptide vs. all other radio
`peaks measured during the same HPLC-analyses.
`There are no quality criteria within the field of Nuclear
`Medicine to qualify HPLC-separation methods (Breeman et al.,
`
`177Lu
`111In
`
`5 mL
`50 mL
`100 mL
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`5000
`
`4000
`
`3000
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`8000
`
`6000
`
`4000
`
`2000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Dose (Gy)
`
`Dose (Gy)
`
`Fig. 1. Dose calculations
`(Stabin and
`spherical geometry dosimetry model
`Konijnenberg, 2000). X-axis shows time (days); Y-axis dose (Gy). (A) Doses for 111In-
`and 177Lu-containing vials within standardised reaction mixture up to 7 days of storage.
`Reaction mixture containing 60 MBq of 177Lu- or 111InCl3 labelled SS-analog in a final
`volume of 0.14 mL. In comparison to 111In, Therapeutic nuclide 177Lu resulted in a
`5 times higher dose (Gy). (B) Dose calculations using different volumes (5, 50 and
`100 mL) were performed up to 7 days of storage for vials containing 3.7 GBq of 177Lu.
`
`Fig. 1a shows the differences is dose with a factor of 5. Fig. 1b
`shows the calculated dose during storage using different volumes
`(5, 50 and 100 mL) of saline containing a therapeutical amount
`(3.7 GBq) of 177Lu. Maximum dose was obtained (7.5 kGy) in a
`volume of 5 mL saline.
`
`3.2. Optimizing quencher concentration
`
`Quencher concentrations in reaction mixture were investigated
`time dependently by measuring RCP during storage time. Each
`quencher was investigated separately for its minimal concentration
`with maximum quenching effect (Fig. 2). Quencher mixtures were
`optimized to achieve maximum protection using these minimal
`concentrations. Under the experimental conditions the optimal
`quencher concentrations were 3.5 mM for ascorbic and gentisic
`acid, 10 mM for methionine and 10% (v/v) for ethanol. These
`concentrations had no effect on pharmacokinetics, so complete
`incorporations (499%) within described incubation time.
`
`3.3. Radiolabelled SS-analogs in the presence of quencher mixtures
`
`Reaction mixture (60 MBq 111In or 177Lu, 2 nmol DOTA-TATE in
`0.14 mL) containing ascorbic and gentisic acid (3.5 mM) and extra
`addition of ethanol clearly stabilized 111In-DOTA-TATE. Addition of
`ethanol 10% (v/v) stabilize 111In-DOTA-TATE during 7 days; higher
`concentrations (410% (v/v)) have no additional effect (Fig. 3A
`and B). We also investigated the influence of ethanol on the RCP of
`solutions of OctreoScans ([111In-DPTA0]octreotide) during storage.
`The stability of these solutions was compared with a commercially
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`3 of 6
`
`

`

`E. de Blois et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`31
`
`12.525
`
`11.538
`
`12.027
`
`12.483
`
`11.145
`
`12.537
`
`12.968
`
`12.256
`
`gentisic acid, ascorbic acid
`and ethanol
`
`12.925
`
`10.940
`
`ascorbicacid
`
`12.524
`
`12.936
`
`11.683
`
`ethanol
`
`gentisic acid, ascorbic acid and ethanol
`ascorbic acid
`gentisic acid
`ethanol
`methionine
`4x diluted
`no quencher added
`
`11.986
`
`10.676
`
`noquencheradded
`
`4xdiluted
`
`11.553
`
`13.072
`
`12.044
`
`10.707
`
`13.659
`
`11.959
`
`gentisic acid
`
`methionine
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`% RCP
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`Fig. 3. (A) HPLC-chromatograms of 111In-DOTA-TATE and effect of the difference quenchers and mixtures of quenchers 24 h after radiolabelling. Applied quencher
`concentrations after optimization (See paragraph optimizing quencher concentration) in reaction vial were: 3.5 mM for gentisic acid and ascorbic acid, 10 mM for methionine,
`and 7–10% (v/v) for ethanol. HPLC-chromatograms 24 h after radiolabelling can be compared in a relative way and show specific patterns of radiolysed peptide in the
`presence of different quenchers, which indicates that quenchers specifically scavenge different chemical groups and/or formed radicals (B) 111In-DOTA-TATE in the presence
`of quenchers or combinations of quenchers up to 7 days after radiolabelling. This figure shows the effect of quenchers and combination separately. The maximum error of
`inter and intra-observer was o3% and were performed nZ2.
`
`2012). Nevertheless, differences in eluents, gradient, flow, column
`type and length might result in the detection of different degrees
`of impurity, and thus variation in RCP.
`Therefore,
`in our opinion, RCP are actually expressed in
`percentage of arbitrary units (de Blois et al., 2012). Moreover,
`to enable comparison, HPLC runs were performed under standar-
`dized conditions. All HPLC-measurements were corrected for
`background. Even at low activity, the influence of background on
`calculated RCP was o3%.
`
`4.2. Addition of ethanol as a quencher
`
`Adding ethanol during or after labelling procedure could have
`severe side effects in patients with a neuroendocrine carcinoid
`tumor. Intravenous administration of a 177Lu-labelled SS-analogs
`mixture containing ethanol could lead to carcinoid syndrome
`(Adamson et al., 1971). Long et al. (1981) showed that develop-
`ment of a carcinoid syndrome could be blocked by administration
`of somatostatin. Unfortunately there is no standard maximum
`tolerated amount of ethanol which can be administered to these
`patients, since this might depend on tumour mass. A fully
`
`automated system for labelling of different SS-analogs, including
`a C18 separation using 2.5 mL of 50% of ethanol, has been applied
`in many patients world-wide, without reports of carcinoid crisis
`(Petrik et al., 2011). According to Serdons et al. (2008), radi-
`olabelled peptides can safely be used without removal of the
`ethanol after appropriate dilution with normal saline to a con-
`centration of ethanol not exceeding 10% and injection volume
`below 20 mL.
`The ready-for-use liquid formulation of the radiolabelled
`peptide allows physicians to administer
`labelled peptide
`without a radiochemical
`reaction—simply by diluting if
`necessary.
`Users still should be aware that while dilution indeed
`results in lower dose radiation, however this also decreases
`quencher concentration and thus negatively influences RCP
`during further storage. Therefore after dilution radiolabelled
`peptide should be administered as rapidly as possible to
`decrease the influence of radiolysis on radiolabelled peptide.
`To overcome this problem we recommend diluting the liquid
`formulation with quencher added to maintain a constant
`quencher concentration.
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`4 of 6
`
`

`

`32
`
`E. de Blois et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`17.916
`
`19.299
`
`19.450
`
`17.533
`
`20.671
`
`15.709
`
`ascorbic acid and
`gentisic acid
`
`ascorbic acid and
`ethanol
`
`no quencher added
`
`ethanol
`
`gentisic acid, ascorbic acid and ethanol
`gentisic- and ascorbic acid
`ethanol
`no quencher added
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`% RCP
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Fig. 4. (A) HPLC-chromatograms of OctreoScans and effect of the difference quenchers and mixtures of quenchers 24 h after radiolabelling. Applied quencher concentrations
`after optimization as described in paragraph optimizing quencher concentration. HPLC-chromatograms 24 h after radiolabelling show specific patterns as well, as also
`described in Fig. 3A. The two major peaks (17.9–19.2 min) in the HPLC-chromatograms were caused by stereo isomers of the 111In-labelled DTPA (Liu et al., 2001). The two
`major pre-peaks seen after radiolysis were caused by stereo isomers of 111In-DTPA (see HPLC-chromatogram of gentisic and ascorbic acid). (B) OctreoScans in the presence of
`quenchers or combinations of quenchers. X-axis shows time (days); Y-axis % RCP. These figures show the effect of quenchers and combination up to 7 days after
`radiolabelling.
`
`0.14 GBq/mL
`0.6 GBq/mL
`1.4 GBq/mL
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`% RCP
`
`190 MBq/nmol
`80 MBq/nmol
`50 MBq/nmol
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`% RCP
`
`Fig. 5. 111In labelled DOTA-TATE as function of time in the presence of gentisic acid, ascorbic acid and 7% of ethanol (v/v) and the influence of specific activity (50–190 MBq/
`nmol) (A) or by decrease of the concentration of activity (0.14–1.4 GBq/mL) (B). Labelling was performed in a final volume of 0.14 mL and only the peptide amount (1–4 nmol)
`or activity (50–190 MBq) was adjusted. X-axis shows time (days); Y-axis RCP (%). Both figures show the applicability of the quencher mixture within a broad ranch of specific
`activities, thus independent of the peptide mass or activity concentration (MBq/mL).
`
`Moreover sterility is still a matter of concern, there are micro-
`biological implications for 7-day shelf-life. When the ready-for-use
`liquid formulation of the radiolabelled peptide will be used over a
`longer time period sterility should be determined before admin-
`istration, this could be performed by measuring endotoxins in final
`liquid formulation.
`
`5. Conclusion
`
`Our experiments showed that ethanol, in combination with a
`mixture of gentisic- and ascorbic acid has a superior effect in
`stabilizing radiolabelled peptides. This property enables to store
`and transport 111In- and 177Lu-labelled SS-analogs in a single-
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`E. de Blois et al. / Applied Radiation and Isotopes 85 (2014) 28–33
`
`33
`
`DTPA in [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide solutions containing free 90Y3þ. Nucl.
`Med. Biol. 31, 821–824.
`Breeman, W.A., Froberg, A.C., de Blois, E., van Gameren, A., Melis, M., de Jong, M.,
`Maina, T., Nock, B.A., Erion, J.L., Macke, H.R., Krenning, E.P., 2008. Optimised
`labeling, preclinical and initial clinical aspects of CCK-2 receptor-targeting with
`3 radiolabeled peptides. Nucl. Med. Biol. 35, 839–849.
`Breeman, W.A., Kwekkeboom, D.J., de Blois, E., de Jong, M., Visser, T.J., Krenning, E.P.,
`2007a. Radiolabelled regulatory peptides for imaging and therapy. Anti-Cancer
`Agents Med. Chem. 7, 345–357.
`Breeman, W.A., van der Wansem, K., Bernard, B.F., van Gameren, A., Erion, J.L.,
`Visser, T.J., Krenning, E.P., de Jong, M., 2003b. The addition of DTPA to [177Lu-
`DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate prior to administration reduces rat skeleton uptake of
`radioactivity. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30, 312–315.
`Breeman, W.A.P., Melis, M.L., de Blois, E., Mueller, C., De Jong, M., Krenning, E.P.,
`2007b. Effects of quenchers on radiochemical purity and biological activity of
`[In-111-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]-octreotate. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 34 (Supple-
`ment: 2), S337. (S337).
`Chavatte, K., Mertens, J., Terriere, D., Van Den Winkel, P., 2001. Parameters ruling
`optimization of radiolabelling of polyamino polycarboxylated functionalized
`peptide derivatives: a case study report. Nucl. Med. Biol. 28, 745–749.
`Chen, J., Linder, K.E., Cagnolini, A., Metcalfe, E., Raju, N., Tweedle, M.F., Swenson, R.E.,
`2008. Synthesis, stabilization and formulation of [177Lu]Lu-AMBA, a systemic
`radiotherapeutic agent for gastrin releasing peptide receptor positive tumors.
`Appl. Radiat. Isot. 66, 497–505.
`de Blois, E., Chan, H.S., Konijnenberg, M., de Zanger, R., Breeman, W.A., 2012.
`Effectiveness of quenchers to reduce radiolysis of (111)In- or (177)Lu-labelled
`methionine-containing regulatory peptides. Maintaining radiochemical purity
`as measured by HPLC. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 12, 2677–2685.
`de Blois, E., Sze Chan, H., Naidoo, C., Prince, D., Krenning, E.P., Breeman, W.A., 2011.
`Characteristics of SnO2-based 68Ge/68Ga generator and aspects of radiolabel-
`ling DOTA-peptides. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69, 308–315.
`de Jong, M., Breeman, W.A., Bernard, B.F., Bakker, W.H., Schaar, M., van Gameren, A.,
`Bugaj, J.E., Erion, J., Schmidt, M., Srinivasan, A., Krenning, E.P., 2001. [177Lu-
`DOTA(0),Tyr3] octreotate for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide ther-
`apy. Int. J. Cancer 92, 628–633.
`de Visser, M., Bernard, H.F., Erion, J.L., Schmidt, M.A., Srinivasan, A., Waser, B., Reubi, J.C.,
`Krenning, E.P., de Jong, M., 2007. Novel 111In-labelled bombesin analogues for
`molecular imaging of prostate tumours. Eur.
`J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 34,
`1228–1238.
`Erion, J.L., 2008. Use of ethanol for stabilizing a single-vial liquid formulation of a
`radiolabeled peptide. Publication no. WO2008009444. International applica-
`tion no. PCT/EP2007/006404.
`Filice, A., Fraternali, A., Frasoldati, A., Asti, M., Grassi, E., Massi, L., Sollini, M., Froio, A.,
`Erba, P.A., Versari, A., 2012. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogues therapy in
`advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a single centre experience. J. Oncol. 2012,
`320198.
`Fukumura, T., Nakao, R., Yamaguchi, M., Suzuki, K., 2004. Stability of C-11-labeled
`PET radiopharmaceuticals. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 61, 1279–1287.
`Garrison, W.M., 1987. Reaction-mechanisms in the radiolysis of peptides, polypep-
`tides, and proteins. Chem. Rev. 87, 381–398.
`Hofland, L.J., Breeman, W.A., Krenning, E.P., de Jong, M., Waaijers, M., van Koetsveld,
`P.M., Macke, H.R., Lamberts, S.W., 1999. Internalization of [DOTA degrees,125I-
`Tyr3]octreotide by somatostatin receptor-positive cells in vitro and in vivo:
`implications for somatostatin receptor-targeted radio-guided surgery. Proc.
`Assoc. Am. Phys. 111, 63–69.
`Jay-Gerin, J.P., Ferradini, C., 2000. A new estimate of the (OH)-O-center dot radical yield
`at early times in the radiolysis of liquid water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 317, 388–391.
`Jonah, C.D., 1995. A short history of the radiation chemistry of water. Radiat. Res.
`144, 141–147.
`Liu, S., Cheung, E., Rajopadhye, M., Williams, N.E., Overoye, K.L., Edwards, D.S., 2001.
`Isomerism and solution dynamics of (90)Y-labeled DTPA—biomolecule con-
`jugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 12, 84–91.
`Liu, S., Edwards, D.S., 2001. Bifunctional chelators for therapeutic lanthanide
`radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjugate Chem. 12, 7–34.
`Liu, S., Ellars, C.E., Edwards, D.S., 2003. Ascorbic acid: useful as a buffer agent and
`radiolytic stabilizer for metalloradiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjugate Chem. 14,
`1052–1056.
`Long, R.G., Peters, J.R., Bloom, S.R., Brown, M.R., Vale, W., Rivier, J.E., Grahame-
`Smith, D.G., 1981. Somatostatin, gastrointestinal peptides, and the carcinoid
`syndrome. Gut 22, 549–553.
`Petrik, M., Knetsch, P.A., Knopp, R., Imperato, G., Ocak, M., von Guggenberg, E.,
`Haubner, R., Silbernagl, R., Decristoforo, C., 2011. Radiolabelling of peptides for
`PET, SPECT and therapeutic applications using a fully automated disposable
`cassette system. Nucl. Med. Commun. 32, 887–895.
`Schuessler, H., 1975. Effect of ethanol on radiolysis of ribonuclease. Int. J. Radiat.
`Biol. 27, 171–180.
`Serdons, K., Verbruggen, A., Bormans, G., 2008. The presence of ethanol in radio-
`pharmaceutical injections. J. Nucl. Med. 49, 2071.
`Stabin, M.G., Konijnenberg, M.W., 2000. Re-evaluation of absorbed fractions for
`photons and electrons in spheres of various sizes. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 149–160.
`Swiatla-Wojcik, D., Buxton, G.V., 2005. On the possible role of the reaction H-center
`dotþH2O-4H-2þ(center dot)OHin the radiolysis of water at high tempera-
`tures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 210–219.
`
`DOTA-TATE + 7% ethanol
`DOTA-NOC + 7% ethanol
`
`DOTA-TATE
`
`DOTA-NOC
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`% RCP
`
`Fig. 6. Therapeutic labelling of DOTA-TATE and DOTA-NOC containing 3.7 GBq of
`177Lu. X-axis shows time (days); Y-axis in RCP (%). For patient administration,
`labelling mixtures were diluted in saline, final volume 100 mL. Under these
`conditions RCP was monitored up to 7 days after radiolabelling in the presence
`or absence of 7% of ethanol (v/v). Addition of ethanol showed a substantial
`beneficial effect on maintaining the RCP.
`
`3.7 GBq (100 mL) + 7% ethano
`3.7 GBq (5 mL) + 7% ethanol
`7.4 GBq (5 mL) + 7% ethanol
`
`3.7 GBq (100 mL)
`
`3.7 GBq (50 mL)
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (days)
`
`6
`
`100
`
`95
`
`90
`
`85
`
`80
`
`75
`
`% RCP
`
`Fig. 7. Dilution in saline (5, 50 or 100 mL) of a therapeutic dose (3.7or 7.4 GBq) of
`177Lu-DOTA-TATE in the presence or absence of 7% of ethanol (v/v) up to 7 days
`after radiolabelling. X-axis shows time after radiolabelling (days); Y-axis in RCP (%).
`
`ready-for-use liquid formulation up to 7 days after
`vial,
`radiolabelling.
`
`Acknowledgement
`
`We would like to thank Dr. J.L. Erion for fruitful and stimulation
`discussions.
`
`References
`
`Adamson, A.R., Grahame-Smith, D.G., Peart, W.S., 1971. Pharmacological blockade of
`carcinoid flushing provoked by catecholamines and alcohol. Am. Heart J. 81,
`141–142.
`Bakker, W.H., Albert, R., Bruns, C., Breeman, W.A., Hofland, L.J., Marbach, P., Pless, J.,
`Pralet, D., Stolz, B., Koper, J.W., et al., 1991. [111In-DTPA-D-phe1]-octreotide, a
`potential radiopharmaceutical for imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive
`tumors: synthesis, radiolabeling and in vitro validation. Life Sci. 49, 1583–1591.
`Bernard, B.F., Krenning, E., Breeman, W.A., Visser, T.J., Bakker, W.H., Srinivasan, A.,
`de Jong, M., 2000. Use of the rat pancreatic CA20948 cell
`line for the
`comparison of radiolabelled peptides for receptor-targeted scintigraphy and
`radionuclide therapy. Nucl. Med. Commun. 21, 1079–1085.
`Breeman, W.A., de Blois, E., Bakker, W.H., Krenning, E.P., 2006. Radiolabeling DOTA-
`peptides with 90Y and 177Lu to a High Specific Activity, first ed. Taylor & Francis
`Group, New York.
`Breeman, W.A., de Blois, E., Bakker, W.H., Krenning, E.P., 2012. Practical aspects of
`labeling DTPA- and DOTA-peptides with 90Y, 111In, 177Lu, and 68Ga for peptide-
`receptor scintigraphy and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy in preclinical
`and clinical applications. Monograph 16. (LESSON 5).
`Breeman, W.A., de Jong, M., de Blois, E., Bernard, B.F., Konijnenberg, M., Krenning, E.P.,
`2005. Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68Ga. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 32,
`478–485.
`Breeman, W.A., De Jong, M., Visser, T.J., Erion, J.L., Krenning, E.P., 2003a. Optimising
`conditions for radiolabelling of DOTA-peptides with 90Y, 111In and 177Lu at high
`specific activities. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30, 917–920.
`Breeman, W.A., De Jong, M.T., De Blois, E., Bernard, B.F., De Jong, M., Krenning, E.P.,
`2004. Reduction of skeletal accumulation of radioactivity by co-injection of
`
`Evergeen Ex. 1017
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket