throbber
THE EFFECT OF PYRUVIC ACID ON THE ESTIMATION
`OF CYSTINE AND CYSTEINE
`BY M . X. SULLIVAN A .ND W. c. HESS
`(From the Chemo-Medical Research Institute, Georgetuwn University,
`Washington)
`
`(Received for publication, Augll8t 24, 1937)
`
`In a study of the reaction of aldehydes and ketones with thiol
`acids Schubert (1, 2) found that cysteine reacts with various
`aldehydes to form condensation products with the loss of water.
`The probable structure of the complex formed he gives as
`
`CH,S"-
`"-cHR
`1
`CHNH/
`I
`COOH
`
`Independently, Ratner and Clarke (3) found that formaldehyde
`reacts with cysteine to form thiazolidinecarboxylic acid and that
`formaldehyde and aminoethyl mercaptan give thiazolidine, and
`described the compounds in detail.
`Since aldehydes such as formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methyl(cid:173)
`glyoxal and keto acids such as pyruvic acid are possible metabolic
`products of proteins, carbohydrates, and fats, and as such might
`occur more or less in biological solutions, blood and urine, con(cid:173)
`siderable study has been made in this laboratory on their effect
`on the determination of cystine and cysteine.
`In previous work (4, 5) it was shown that in cystine or cysteine
`determination the various aldehydes have little effect in low molar
`ratios and dilute solutions. With increasing concentration of
`cysteine and aldehyde and decreasing acidity, on the other hand,
`new compounds no longer reacting like cysteine arc formed.
`These compounds, derivatives of thiazolidinecarboxylic acid,
`described by Schubert and by Ratner and Clarke, do not yield
`11
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`12
`
`Pyruvic Acid, Cystine, and Cysteine
`
`cysteinc readily either by the action of zinc and hydrochloric acid
`or by dilute acid hydrolysis and are negative in the various reac(cid:173)
`tions for cysteine.
`In his early work Schubert (2) considers that cysteine and
`pyruvic acid, on the other hand, make a simple addition compound
`with a probable structure of
`
`CHa"
`
`OH /
`
`/COOH
`C
`"-s-cH2- CHNH2- COOH
`
`but in more recent work (personal communication) he questions
`his early conclusions and considers that the complex between
`cysteine and pyruvic acid may also be a thiazolidine derivative.
`Without prejudice as to the nature of the pyruvic acid-cysteine
`complex, in the present paper we deal with the effect of pyruvic
`acid on cystine and cysteine determinations by various methods
`and also with the possibility of liberating cysteine from the
`complex by simple means.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`Pyruvic Acid and Cystine- Solutions of cystine and pyruvic
`acid in 0.1 N HCI were made so that 5 cc. contained 1 mg. of cystinc
`and increasing amounts of pyruvic acid: (A) 0.3 mg., (B) 3.0 mg.,
`and (C) 5.0 mg. of pyruvic acid. Within 30 minutes of mixing,
`these solutions were analyzed for cystine by the Sullivan (6),
`the Okuda (7), and the Folin-Marenzi (8) procedures. The
`cystine was estimated practically quantitatively by all three
`methods, even in Solution C, with a molar ratio of pyruvic acid
`In fact, with 24 hours contact,
`to cystine of approximately 14: 1.
`100 per cent of the cystine was recovered colorimetrically in
`Solution C. Likewise, with relatively concentrated solutions
`of cystine (1 mg. in 1 cc. of 0.1 N HCl and proportions of pyruvic
`acid as given above) there was little if any effect on the deter(cid:173)
`mination of cystine even in 24 hours standing of the mixture.
`Thus with 14 moles of pyruvic acid to I of cystine, the cystine
`findings were 97 per cent of the theoretical.
`Experiments were also carried out at pH 6.8, the pH of the
`distilled water, and in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, the solutions
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`M. X. Sullivan and W. C. Hess
`
`13
`
`being so made that each 5 cc. contained 1 mg. of cystine and 0. 73
`mg. of pyruvic acid (2 moles). After 18 hours standing of the
`reactants, with the controls respectively in distilled water and
`buffer at pH 7.4, colorimetric estimation on 5 cc. samples indi(cid:173)
`cated 92 per cent of the theoretical cystine at pH 6.8 and 89 per
`cent at pH 7.4.
`At pH 6.8 and 7.4 the solubility of cystine in the presence of
`pyruvic acid is questionable, so the results were interpreted to
`indicate little if any effect of pyruvic acid on the estimation of
`cystine; in short, no combination such as occurs between cysteine
`and pyruvic acid, presently detailed.
`Pyruvic Acid and Cysteine, Dilute Solution- Mixtures were
`made of cysteine hydrochloride and pyruvic acid so that each 5 cc.
`contained 1.0 mg. of cysteine and 0.73 mg. of pyruvic acid, that is
`mole for mole, with the solutions adjusted to pH 1, 2, and 3 re(cid:173)
`spectively. Analyzed by the Sullivan cysteine (9) procedure, at
`intervals up to 24 hours, the cysteine was recovered quantitatively
`within the limits of error, at all three pH ranges. The minimum
`finding of cysteine even after 24 hours standing of the pyruvic
`acid and cysteine at pH 1, 2, and 3 respectively was 95 per cent
`of the theoretical. The Folin-Marenzi method run as for cystine
`showed marked falling off at the end of 6 hours at pH 2.0 (84
`per cent return) and at pH 3.0 at the end of 6 hours (80 per cent
`return).
`Pyruvic Acid and Cysteine, Concentrated Solutions-Mixture-s
`were made of cysteine hydrochloride and pyruvic acid so that 2.5
`cc. of solution contained 20 mg. of cysteine weighed as the hydro(cid:173)
`chloride and 15 mg. of pyruvic acid, adjusted respectively to pH
`I, 2, and 3. Analyzed by the Sullivan method at the end of 6
`hours, 70 per cent, 63 per cent, and 59 per cent of the cysteinc
`were recovered at pH 1, 2, and 3 respectively and at 24 hours the
`results were practically the same. Less rcacti ve cysteine was
`found by the Folin-Marenzi procedure without sulfite than by the
`Sullivan procedure. At the end of 2 hours standing the respective
`percentage recoveries of cysteine at pH 1, 2, and 3 were, Sullivan,
`84, 80, and 76; Folin-Marenzi, 75, 60, and 53. The Okuda method
`without reduction at the end of 24 hours showed 60, 50, and 50
`per cent recovery at pH I, 2, and 3 respectively. However, when
`the Okuda cystine procedure, reduction with zinc and hydro-
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`14
`
`Pyruvic Acid, Cystine, and Cysteine
`
`chloric acid, was employed, 100 per cent return of the cysteinc was
`obtained even at the end of 24 hours contact of the reactants at
`each pH. The Okuda values indicated several possibilities:
`either the phenomenon was due to greater oxidation of cysteine
`in the presence of pyruvic acid or the pyruvic acid-cysteine com(cid:173)
`plex was split by the action of zinc and hydrochloric acid or by the
`acid alone.
`In order to determine just which of these possibili(cid:173)
`ties was correct the cysteine-pyruvic acid complex was prepared
`according to the method of Schubert (2).
`Cysteine-Pyruvic Acid Complex-The crystalline compound
`melted at 149-151° uncorrected and gave a negative nitroprusside
`reaction with dilute ammonia, while the addition of aqueous
`sodium cyanide slowly produced a faint color, as did the addition
`of dilute sodium hydroxide. For quantitative work 17.2 mg. 1 of
`the compound were dissolved in 50 cc. of 0.1 N HCl, making a
`solution equivalent to 200 parts per million of cysteine. The
`Sullivan cysteine reaction on this solution was very faintly posi(cid:173)
`If the cystine reaction was used (2.0 cc. of 5 per cent NaCN
`tive.
`in N NaOH, 10 minutes contact) and the solution compared with a
`200 parts per million cysteine solution similarly treated, a color
`was obtained indicating a liberation of 44 per cent of the cysteine.
`This experiment was repeated but with an increase of the contact
`time of the sodium cyanide from 10 to 30 minutes. Complete
`splitting of the complex resulted and a colorimetric estimation of
`100 per cent of the cysteine. Substituting 2.0 cc. of N NaOH for
`the sodium cyanide and giving 30 minutes contact gave a return of
`77 per cent of the cysteine. Heating 5 cc. of the.pyruvic acid(cid:173)
`cysteine complex (equivalent to 1 mg. of cysteine) at 60° for 10
`minutes with 2 cc. of 5 per cent NaCN in N NaOH completely
`liberated the cysteine and gave 100 per cent matching of 5 cc of
`cysteine (1 mg.) similarly heated, both being cooled to room
`temperature before
`the colorimetric determination. Heating
`with 2 cc. of 4 N NaOH similarly gave 100 per cent return of the
`cysteine by the Sullivan cysteine procedure when matched against
`a cysteine standard similarly treated with both standard and
`pyruvic acid complex run without any sodium cyanide.
`
`1 Later work showed the presence of 8.15 per cent potassium chloride,
`so the actual amount of ash-free material weighed out was 15.8 mg . See
`"Addendum."
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`M. X. Sullivan and W. C. Hess
`
`15
`
`The Okuda method without reduction gave a negative reaction
`with the cysteine-pyruvic acid product. Application of the
`Okuda method after reduction with zinc and HCl or simply
`boiling for 15 minutes with 2 per cent HCI .gave 100 per cent
`return of the cysteine.
`The complex can thus be split either by relatively long contact
`with NaCN and NaOH or by heating with weak acid or relatively
`strong alkali. By use of 5 per cent NaCN in alkali, cystine, if
`present, would be estimated and such estimation for the present
`purpose was undesirable. Accordingly, a more satisfactory
`procedure for splitting the complex into cysteine and pyruvic acid
`was used; namely, boiling the material with dilute hydrochloric
`acid, 2 per cent, and estimating the cysteine by the Sullivan
`cysteine procedure without cyanide. The procedure used is as
`follows: 25.9 mg. of cysteine-pyruvic acid complex were dissolved
`in 75 cc. of distilled water. To 10 cc. was added 0.5 cc. of concen(cid:173)
`t rated HCl and the mixture boiled 10 minutes on the hot-plate,
`cooled, and neutralized by adding 5 N Na.OH dropwise with
`stirring to pH 3.5 and made to 10 cc. with water. 5 cc. were used
`for colorimetric work as follows: To 5 cc. add 1 cc. of a 1 per cent
`aqueous solution of 1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sodium sulfonate,
`shake for 10 seconds, and add 5 cc. of 10 per cent N&2SO3 in 0.5 N
`NaOH, mix, and wait 30 minutes. Then add 1 cc. of 2 per cent
`N&2f¾O, in 0.5 N NaOH. Match against a cysteine standard
`(1 mg. in 5 cc. of 0.1 N HCl) similarly treated. By this procedure
`cysteine only is estimated. A cystine solution containing 1 mg.
`in 5 cc. of 0.1 N HCl was negative in this procedure. The recovery
`of cysteine was 95.4 per cent of the theoretical.
`Complete Combining of Pyruvic Acid and Cysteine-As previ(cid:173)
`ously mentioned, cysteine and pyruvic acid, mixed mole for mole
`and kept for 24 hours at pH 1, 2, and 3, did not become negative
`in the Sullivan reaction for cysteine. Accordingly the effect of
`higher pH and higher amounts of pyruvic acid was tried. Thus
`20 mg. of cysteine and 15 mg. of pyruvic acid were dissolved in 2.5
`cc. of phosphate buff er at pH 6. After 3 hours contact at room
`temperature, 28- 30°, and suitable dilution with 0.1 N HCI for
`colorimetric work, 59 per cent of the cysteine was found by the
`Sullivan cysteine method and the same finding obtained after 24
`hours contact of the reactants, Solution A. When the pyruvic
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`16
`
`Pyruvic Acid, Cystine, and Cysteine
`
`acid, however, was increased 10-fold (150 mg.), that is approxi(cid:173)
`mately 10 moles of pyruvic acid to 1 of cysteine, practically no
`cysteine reactive in the Sullivan procedure was left after 1 hour,
`Solution B.
`Complete Dissociation- In both cases the cysteine can be readily
`and completely liberated. Thus 0.3 cc. of each solution was
`diluted to 10.3 cc. with water and 0.5 cc. of 35 per cent HCI was
`added and the solutions were boiled for 10 minutes, cooled, neu(cid:173)
`tralized carefully, and diluted to 15 cc. with 0.1 N HCI. When 5
`cc. of diluted Solution A were matched colorimctrically against a
`fresh cysteine standard (1 mg. of cysteine) without use of sodium
`cyanide, 95 per cent of the theoretical cysteine was found.
`In the case of Solution B similarly treated, 96 per cent of the
`throretical cysteine was found colorimetrically when matched
`against a fresh cysteine standard. On the other hand, when the
`eysteine standard (1 mg. in 5 cc. of buffer at pH 6) was set side by
`side with the pyruvic acid-cysteine mixture, 101 per cent of the
`theoretical cysteinc was recovered.
`For complete combination of cysteinc and pyruvic a<·iJ, till'
`pyruvic acid must be in considerable cxc<·ss. Tiu~ combining
`reaction is favored by low acidity.
`Thiazolidiuecarboxylic acid is not dissociated by lioili ng with
`dilute acid but can be dissociated by other means.
`Preliminary studies of a part day sample of urine tested by the
`Sullivan and Okuda cysteinc methods showed no rysteine in the
`urine as voided and little if any of a material comparable to the
`cysteine-pyruvic acid complex. With the cysteine-pyruvic acid
`compound added to the urine and put through a short heating
`period with 2 per cent HCI, 94 per cent of the added cysteine in
`the complex was found by the Sullivan cysteine procedure.
`
`SUMMARY
`Pyruvic acid added to cystine has little if any effect on the
`colorimetric estimation of cystine either in dilute or in relatively
`concentrated solutions and with long contact.
`In dilute solutions of cysteine, molar quantities of pyruvic acid
`have little effect at pH 1, 2, and 3 on cysteine estimation.
`In concentrated solutions the amount of reactive cysteine
`decreases more rapidly the higher the pH and the greater the
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`M. X. Sullivan and W. C. Hess
`
`17
`
`pyruvic acid content, owing to the formation more or less of a
`non-reactive complex of cysteine and pyruvic acid. At pH 6
`the reaction is very rapid.
`Unlike the complex formed between cysteine and formaldehyde
`the pyruvic acid compound is readily dissociated into its compo(cid:173)
`nents by contact with alkali or acids.
`The most satisfactory procedure for dissociating the cysteine(cid:173)
`pyruvic acid compound, with practically quantitative yields of
`cysteine, is by boiling for 10 minutes with 2 per cent HCl.
`
`Addendum-Prompted by correspondence with Dr. Schubert, we made
`an analysis of the cysteine-pyruvic acid complex which by virtue of its
`and S content seemed to be an addition product. However, t he com(cid:173)
`plex contained 8.15 per cent potassium chloride. Correction for the mois(cid:173)
`ture and ash indicates that the complex is a thiazolidine derivative, tts
`finally concluded by Schubert. The cysteine found colorimctriral!y is
`then the cysteine delivered by a substance of the formula
`CH3
`I
`CH,8 ,
`I
`'c
`CHNH/ I
`I
`( 'OOH
`('OOH
`
`BIBLIOGRAPHY
`1. Schubert, M. P., J . Biul. Chem., 111, 671 (1935).
`2. Schubert, M. P ., J. Biul. Chem., 114, 3-H (1936).
`3. Ratner, S., an<l Clarke, A. T., J . Am. Che1n. Soc., 69, 200 (1937) .
`4. Sullivan, M. X., and Hess, W. C., J. Biol. Chem., 120,537 (1937).
`5. Hess, W. C., and Sullivan, M. X ., J. Biol. Chem., 121, 323 (1937).
`6. Sullivan, M. X., Pub. Health Rep., U.S . P . H. S ., suppl. 78 (1929) .
`7. Okuda, Y., J. Biochem., Japan, ~. 217 (1925).
`8. Folin, 0., and Marenzi , A. D., J. Biol. Chem., 83, 103 (1929).
`9. Sullivan, M. X ., P'Ub. Health Rep., U.S. P . H. S., 44, 1-121 (1929).
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`7 of 8
`
`

`

`THE EFFECT OF PYRUVIC ACID ON
`THE ESTIMATION OF CYSTINE AND
`CYSTEINE
`M. X. Sullivan and W. C. Hess
`
`1937, 122:11-17.J. Biol. Chem.
`
`Access the most updated version of this article at
`http://www.jbc.org/content/122/1/11.citation
`
`Alerts:
`
`When this article is cited•
`
`When a correction for this article is posted•
`
`
`
` to choose from all of JBC's e-mailClick here
`alerts
`
`This article cites 0 references, 0 of which can be
`accessed free at
`http://www.jbc.org/content/122/1/11.citation.full.ht
`ml#ref-list-1
`
`Eton Ex. 1023
`8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket