throbber
ALUMINUM NEUROTOXICITY IN PRETERM INFANTS RECEIVING INTRAVENOUS-FEEDING SOLUTIONS
`
`ALUMINUM NEUROTOXICITY IN PRETERM INFANTS RECEIVING
`INTRAVENOUS-FEEDING SOLUTIONS
`
`NICHOLAS J. BISHOP, M.D., RUTH MORLEY, M.B., B.CHIR., J. PHILIP DAY, PH.D., AND ALAN LUCAS, M.D.
`
`ABSTRACT
`Background Aluminum, a contaminant of com-
`mercial intravenous-feeding solutions, is potentially
`neurotoxic. We investigated the effect of perinatal ex-
`posure to intravenous aluminum on the neurologic
`development of infants born prematurely.
`Methods We randomly assigned 227 premature in-
`fants with gestational ages of less than 34 weeks and
`birth weights of less than 1850 g who required in-
`travenous feeding before they could begin enteral
`feeding to receive either standard or specially consti-
`tuted, aluminum-depleted intravenous-feeding solu-
`tions. The neurologic development of the 182 surviv-
`ing infants who could be tested was assessed by
`using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 18
`months of age.
`Results The 90 infants who received the standard
`feeding solutions had a mean (⫾SD) Bayley Mental
`Development Index of 95⫾22, as compared with
`98⫾20 for the 92 infants who received the aluminum-
`depleted solutions (P⫽0.39). In a planned subgroup
`analysis of infants in whom the duration of intrave-
`nous feeding exceeded the median and who did not
`have neuromotor impairment, the mean values for
`the Bayley Mental Development Index for the 39 in-
`fants who received the standard solutions and the 41
`infants who received the aluminum-depleted solu-
`tions were 92⫾20 and 102⫾17, respectively (P⫽0.02).
`The former were significantly more likely (39 percent,
`vs. 17 percent of the latter group; P⫽0.03) to have a
`Mental Development Index of less than 85, increasing
`their risk of subsequent educational problems. For all
`157 infants without neuromotor impairment, increas-
`ing aluminum exposure was associated with a reduc-
`tion in the Mental Development Index (P⫽0.03), with
`an adjusted loss of one point per day of intravenous
`feeding for infants receiving the standard solutions.
`Conclusions
`In preterm infants, prolonged intra-
`venous feeding with solutions containing aluminum
`is associated with impaired neurologic development.
`(N Engl J Med 1997;336:1557-61.)
`©1997, Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`A
`
`LUMINUM toxicity occurs in adults and
`children with renal insufficiency who are
`treated by dialysis with aluminum-con-
`taminated solutions or oral phosphate-
`binding agents that contain aluminum.1-7 The clin-
`ical manifestations of aluminum toxicity include
`hypochromic, microcytic anemia; bone disease3,5,8-10;
`and progressive dementia with increased concentra-
`tions of aluminum in the brain.7,11,12
`
`Aluminum accumulates in the body when protec-
`tive gastrointestinal mechanisms are bypassed, renal
`function is impaired, and exposure is high. These
`conditions are met in intravenously fed preterm in-
`fants, whose renal function is frequently compro-
`mised during their initial course; some have had
`high plasma aluminum concentrations.13-17 We previ-
`ously reported on a preterm infant who died unex-
`pectedly and whose brain aluminum concentration
`was similar to that of adults who died with alumi-
`num intoxication.18
`We hypothesized that increased aluminum expo-
`sure in this vulnerable population would probably
`have detrimental effects on neurologic development
`in the long term. We undertook this prospective study
`in preterm infants to compare the effect on the in-
`fants’ subsequent neurologic development of stand-
`ard intravenous-feeding solutions, similar to those
`used in routine practice in the United States and Eu-
`rope, and solutions whose aluminum content had
`been reduced.
`
`METHODS
`
`Subjects
`We enrolled 227 infants from the neonatal intensive care unit
`of Rosie Maternity Hospital, in Cambridge, United Kingdom,
`from May 1988 to January 1991. The criteria for entry into the
`study were a clinical decision to initiate intravenous feeding, a
`birth weight of less than 1850 g, and a gestational age of less than
`34 weeks. Infants whose mothers were not residents of the Unit-
`ed Kingdom and infants with major congenital malformations
`were excluded from the study.
`Each infant entering the study was randomly assigned by the
`pharmacy according to a multiple permuted-block method to re-
`ceive either the standard or the aluminum-depleted intravenous
`solutions. Investigators and attending staff were unaware of the
`assignments, and no investigator served as an attending physician.
`The study was approved by the relevant ethics committees, and
`parental consent was obtained for each infant.
`
`Feeding Policy
`Intravenous feeding was introduced (typically on postnatal day
`2 or 3) and stopped at the discretion of members of the senior
`attending clinical staff. The proportion by volume of amino acid
`solution (Vamin Infant, Kabi Vitrum, now Pharmacia, Stockholm,
`Sweden) was increased at one- or two-day intervals from 15 per-
`cent to 30 percent in increments of 5 percent. Intravenous fat in-
`
`From the Medical Research Council (MRC) Dunn Nutrition Unit and
`University of Cambridge Department of Paediatrics, Cambridge (N.J.B.);
`the MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health,
`London (R.M., A.L.); and the University of Manchester Department of
`Chemistry, Manchester (J.P.D.) — all in the United Kingdom. Address re-
`print requests to Dr. Bishop at the Genetics Unit, Shriners’ Hospital for
`Crippled Children, 1529 Cedar Ave., Montreal, QC H3G 1A6, Canada.
`
`Volume 336 Number 22
`
`ⴢ 1557
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 2, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`1
`
`EXELA 2003
`Eton Pharmaceuticals v. Exela Pharma Sciences
`PGR2020-00086
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`take (Intralipid 20 percent, Kabi Vitrum) was increased from
`0.5 g per kilogram of body weight per day to 3 g per kilogram
`per day as the infant’s clinical condition allowed. The volumes of
`calcium and phosphate solution administered depended on the
`amino acid concentration of the feeding solution. For solutions
`that contained 15 or 20 percent amino acids by volume, the cal-
`cium and phosphate contents were 36 and 18 mg per deciliter,
`respectively. For solutions that contained 25 or 30 percent amino
`acids by volume, the calcium and phosphate contents were 44 and
`25 mg per deciliter, respectively.
`In 19 infants, the decision to initiate intravenous feeding was
`reversed immediately after randomization on clinical grounds (typ-
`ically, metabolic instability or improvement eliminating the need
`for parenteral feeding), and therefore none was given. These in-
`fants remained in the study and their results at the follow-up ex-
`amination are included in the appropriate groups.
`Enteral feeding was increased gradually to 180 ml per kilogram
`every 24 hours, according to tolerance. Mothers were encouraged
`to provide breast milk. If the mother provided no breast milk or
`an insufficient amount, a standard preterm formula was used (Far-
`ley’s Health Products, Kendal, United Kingdom).
`
`Intravenous Solutions
`The compositions of the two types of solution were identical
`except that the aluminum-depleted solutions contained less alu-
`minum and more chloride, reflecting the use of calcium chloride
`instead of calcium gluconate (Table 1). The use of a mixed sodium–
`potassium phosphate solution in place of potassium acid phosphate
`minimized this increase in chloride.
`
`Data Collection
`We collected data on the neonatal course of each infant, includ-
`ing data on intravenous fluid intake and the total volume and type
`of fluid given. Plasma concentrations of sodium, potassium, urea,
`creatinine, glucose, and calcium and acid–base status were meas-
`
`
`OF
`
` A
` C
`
` C
`
` 1.
`T
`LUMINUM
`AND
`OMPOSITION
`ONTENT
`ABLE
` S
`
` A
`-D
` I
`
`THE
`TANDARD
`AND
`LUMINUM
`EPLETED
`NTRAVENOUS
`F
` S
`.
`EEDING
`OLUTIONS
`
`S
`OLUTION
`
`*
`
`S
`TANDARD
`
`VOLUME
`(ml)
`
` S
`OLUTIONS
`ALUMINUM
`CONTENT
`(
`g)
`m
`
`50
`Vamin Infant
`15
`Intralipid 20%
`1
`Vitlipid
`1
`Solivito
`1.6
`Neotrace
`1.3
`Potassium acid phosphate
`—
`Polyfusor phosphate
`8.0
`Calcium gluconate
`—
`Calcium chloride
`Dextrose, sodium, potassium 102
`Total aluminum intake
`45
`at 180 ml/kg/day
`
`m
`
`1.5
`0.1
`0.3
`0.1
`⬍
`1.2
`2.8
`—
`38.8
`—
`1.0
`⬍
`g/kg/day
`
`-D
`A
`EPLETED
`LUMINUM
`S
`OLUTIONS
`
`
`
`VOLUME
`(ml)
`
`50
`15
`1
`1
`1.6
`—
`14.4
`—
`2.1
`102
`4.0–5.0
`
`ALUMINUM
`
`CONTENT
`(
`g)
`m
`
`⬍
`
`1.5
`0.1
`0.3
`0.1
`1.2
`—
`0.3
`—
`0.5
`1.0
`g/kg/day
`
`⬍
`
`m
`
`*Vamin Infant contained essential amino acids without added electro-
`lytes. Intralipid 20% was a fat emulsion containing 20 g of fatty acids per
`deciliter. Vitlipid contained fat-soluble vitamins, and Solivito contained wa-
`ter-soluble vitamins. Neotrace was an in-house preparation containing cop-
`per and zinc only. Vamin Infant, Intralipid 20%, Vitlipid, and Solivito were
`manufactured by Kabi Vitrum.
`
`1558
`
`ⴢ
`
`May 29, 1997
`
`ured daily, and plasma chloride weekly. Cranial ultrasonography
`was performed weekly. Extensive social, demographic, and ob-
`stetrical data were collected from the mothers by trained research
`nurses unaware of treatment-group assignments. Social class was
`coded according to the British Registrar General’s Classification of
`Occupations, on the basis of the occupation of the income-provid-
`ing parent or the father’s occupation if both parents were earning.
`The mother’s education was coded according to her formal educa-
`tional attainment (1 for mothers with no certificates to 5 for those
`with a university degree or similar educational level).
`
`Neurodevelopmental Assessments
`All the surviving children were invited to have a follow-up ex-
`amination at the post-term age of 18 months. The examination
` and an evaluation
`consisted of a standard neurologic assessment
`19
`of development by a single experienced investigator unaware of
`the children’s group assignments, using the Mental Scale of the Bay-
` from which the Mental De-
`ley Scales of Infant Development,
`20
`velopment Index was derived (mean [
`SD] for normal children,
`⫾
`100
`16; possible range, 50 to 150).
`⫾
`A diagnosis of neuromotor impairment was made if the physi-
`cal examination revealed abnormalities of tone or of the move-
`ment of limbs, trunk, head, or neck. The reference ranges used
` Since any
`were from the schema of Amiel-Tison and Stewart.
`19
`degree of impairment can influence the assessment of develop-
`ment with the Bayley Mental Scale (which depends heavily on
`age-appropriate fine-motor skills), the severity of the impairment
`was not taken into account in the analyses.
`
`Measurement of Aluminum
`The aluminum content of the intravenous-feeding solutions
`was measured by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrome-
`try, with the use of Zeeman-effect background correction (model
`Z3030, Perkin Elmer, Beaconsfield, United Kingdom). Analyte
`materials were diluted appropriately (with a minimum of a four-
`fold dilution) with 0.1 percent Triton X-100 and 0.1 M nitric
`acid (BDH AnalaR and Aristar grade, respectively) and calibrated
`by using a standard solution of aluminum (1 mg per liter) in 0.1
`M nitric acid (coefficient of variation, 6 to 8 percent). All meas-
`urements were performed in quadruplicate.
` Multiple batches of
`21
`calcium gluconate (from four manufacturers) and calcium chlo-
`ride (two manufacturers) were analyzed; concentrations of alumi-
`num were consistently high for gluconate (4810
`440
`g per
`⫾
`m
`liter) and low for chloride (210
`10
`g per liter). All other compo-
`⫾
`m
`nents were analyzed on multiple occasions; the values shown in Ta-
`ble 1 are the mean values. Aluminum intake (component volume
`times component aluminum concentration) was calculated daily
`for each infant.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`Our primary hypothesis was that neurologic development would
`be better in infants receiving the aluminum-depleted solutions.
`However, two factors were likely to confound the analysis: the dif-
`ficulty of accurately assessing mental development in children with
`neuromotor impairment and the variation in the duration of in-
`travenous feeding and hence in aluminum intake.
`The Bayley Mental Scale, like most tests of mental ability in
`young children, requires age-appropriate fine-motor skills; there-
`fore, scores do not usually reflect the level of intellectual ability of
`children with neuromotor impairment. For this reason, the main
`analyses were performed as reported previously
` and as planned
`22
`here by using Student’s t-test, excluding the 25 children with ev-
`idence of neuromotor impairment at the time of testing. However,
`data on these infants were included in a separate analysis, in which
`children with neuromotor impairment arbitrarily received a score
`of 50 points and the data were analyzed as randomized by the
`Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. Two infants could not be tested,
`because one was blind and the other completely uncooperative.
`We also planned stratified analyses to take into account the
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 2, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALUMINUM NEUROTOXICITY IN PRETERM INFANTS RECEIVING INTRAVENOUS-FEEDING SOLUTIONS
`
`duration of aluminum exposure — since once randomized, some
`infants would receive little intravenous feeding — and to seek
`threshold effects. The simplest stratification envisaged was to sub-
`divide each group into two according to the duration of paren-
`teral feeding (longer or shorter than the overall median), neces-
`sarily decreasing group numbers but maintaining similar numbers
`in each group. The effect of other variables known to influence
`developmental outcome was evaluated by multiple regression
`analysis.
`
`RESULTS
`The characteristics of the infants in each group are
`shown in Table 2; daily aluminum intake was sub-
`stantially greater in the infants receiving the standard
`solutions than in those receiving the aluminum-
`SD], 19
`8 vs. 3
`1
`g
`depleted solutions (mean [
`⫾
`⫾
`⫾
`m
`per kilogram per day; P
`0.001). The numbers of
`⬍
`deaths, handicapped survivors, and children lost to
`follow-up are shown in Table 3.
`Among the infants with no neuromotor impair-
`ment, the mean (
`SD) Mental Development Index
`⫾
`values for the groups receiving the standard and alu-
`minum-depleted solutions were 98
`20 and 101
`18,
`⫾
`⫾
`respectively (Table 4). The Mental Development In-
`dex values for all the groups of infants who received
`intravenous feeding for 10 days (median duration of
`exposure) or less were similar. However, for the
`
`group of infants receiving the standard solutions for
`more than 10 days, the Mental Development Index
`was 10 points less than for those receiving the alu-
`minum-depleted solutions (P
`0.02). This difference
`⫽
`was reflected in the significantly greater proportion
`of infants who received the standard solutions for
`more than 10 days and whose Mental Development
`Index values were below 85 points — 15 of 39 (38
`percent) as compared with 7 of 41 (17 percent,
`P
`0.03).
`⫽
`The corresponding analyses, including the chil-
`dren with neuromotor impairment, are also shown
`in Table 4. The results are weakened by the difficulty
`of obtaining realistic measurements of mental devel-
`opment in children with neuromotor impairment.
`Such children were thus given nominal scores of 50
`points. When the results for the infants receiving in-
`travenous feeding for more than 10 days were then
`compared by a nonparametric Mann–Whitney–Wil-
`coxon test, the difference between the groups was
`statistically significant (P
`0.04).
`⫽
`In a further, explanatory analysis to assess the in-
`dependent contribution of aluminum intake to the
`developmental outcome, multiple regression analysis
`with the Bayley Mental Development Index as the
`
` G
`
` P
`
` D
` C
`
` I
`
`
`T
` 2.
`THE
`IN
`THE
`OF
`EMOGRAPHIC
`HARACTERISTICS
`RETERM
`NFANTS
`ROUPS
`ABLE
`R
` S
`
` A
`-D
` F
` S
`.*
`EPLETED
`ECEIVING
`TANDARD
`AND
`LUMINUM
`EEDING
`OLUTIONS
`
`C
`HARACTERISTIC
`
`I
`NFANTS
`
` R
`ANDOMIZED
`
`
` T
`I
`ESTED
`NFANTS
`N
`EURODEVELOPMENTALLY
`
`Total no.
`Sex (M/F)
`Birth weight (g)
`Gestation (wk)
`Mechanical ventilation (days)
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Birth weight (no.)
`Appropriate for gestation
`Small for gestation
`Intraventricular hemorrhage
`Total
`Parenchymal
`Periventricular leukomalacia
`Parenteral nutrition (days)
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Aluminum intake (mg)†
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Mother’s expressed breast milk
`(% of enteral intake)
`Preterm formula (% of enteral intake)
`
`STANDARD
`SOLUTIONS
`
`112
`55/57
`299
`1227
`⫾
`29.1⫾2.3
`
`-
`
`ALUMINUM
`DEPLETED
`SOLUTIONS
`
`115
`63/52
`1216
`318
`⫾
`28.9⫾2.3
`
`STANDARD
`SOLUTIONS
`
`90
`42/48
`
`1260⫾294
`29.1⫾2.2
`
`4.5
`2–8
`
`89
`23
`
`28
`6
`4
`
`9
`5–15
`
`187
`70–350
`31
`
`45
`
`5
`2–8
`
`92
`23
`
`32
`8
`7
`
`10
`6–16
`
`28
`11–49
`32
`
`45
`
`4
`2–8
`
`75
`15
`
`18
`4
`3
`
`9.5
`5–15
`
`194
`82–360
`31
`
`44
`
`-
`
`ALUMINUM
`DEPLETED
`SOLUTIONS
`
`92
`50/42
`1234⫾295
`29.1⫾2.0
`
`5
`2–7.5
`
`73
`19
`
`21
`1
`2
`
`10
`6–16
`
`32
`14–48
`32
`
`45
`
`SD.
`*Plus–minus values are means
`⫾
`†There was no statistically significant difference (P
`⬍
`ence in aluminum intake (P
`0.001).
`⬍
`
`0.05) among the groups except for the differ-
`
`Volume 336 Number 22
`
`ⴢ
`
`1559
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 2, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`dependent variable was carried out for the group of
`157 infants with no evidence of neuromotor impair-
`ment at 18 months of age. The independent vari-
`ables entered were birth weight, gestational age, sex,
`maternal educational attainment, social class, dura-
`tion of intravenous feeding (days), duration of ven-
`tilation (days), aluminum intake (micrograms per
`kilogram), and the presence or absence of intraven-
`tricular hemorrhage (and whether parenchymal or
`not). The variables not significantly associated with
`the Mental Development Index in the model were
`removed stepwise. The duration of intravenous feed-
`ing was entered into the final analysis so that alu-
`minum exposure did not become a proxy for the
`duration or severity of illness. Maternal educational
`attainment (P⬍0.001), birth weight (P⫽0.01), alu-
`
`TABLE 3. NUMBERS OF INFANTS IN THE GROUPS
`RECEIVING THE STANDARD AND ALUMINUM-
`DEPLETED FEEDING SOLUTIONS AT STUDY ENTRY
`AND AT THE TIME OF TESTING FOR THE BAYLEY
`MENTAL DEVELOPMENT INDEX.
`
`INFANTS
`
`SOLUTIONS
`ALUMINUM-
`DEPLETED
`
`STANDARD
`
`Total
`Died
`Lost to follow-up
`Untestable*
`Neurologically impaired
`Never received intravenous feeding†
`With normal neuromotor function,
`tested for Bayley Mental Develop-
`ment Index
`
`112
`14
`8
`0
`12
`8
`78
`
`115
`14
`7
`2
`13
`11
`79
`
`*One child was blind, the other completely uncooperative.
`†These infants entered the study but were found not to
`need intravenous feeding. They were tested developmentally.
`
`minum exposure (P⫽0.02), and sex (advantage for
`female sex, P⫽0.02) were the factors that, in com-
`bination, most strongly predicted the Bayley Mental
`Development Index. There was no interaction be-
`tween aluminum intake and the other factors. Thus,
`the apparent effect of aluminum was unrelated to
`birth weight or sex; that is, for a given level of intake,
`the effect on the Mental Development Index was
`the same in large and small infants. Gestational age,
`duration of ventilation, and the presence or absence
`of intraventricular hemorrhage were not significantly
`associated with the Mental Development Index.
`We estimate that for infants receiving full intrave-
`nous feeding with a mean aluminum intake of 45 mg
`per kilogram per day, the expected reduction in the
`Bayley Mental Development Index would be, on av-
`erage, one point per day of intravenous feeding.
`There was no significant difference in clinical
`course or plasma biochemical results between the two
`groups. Despite the increased chloride load attend-
`ant on the use of the aluminum-depleted solutions,
`there were no episodes of hyperchloremia among in-
`fants receiving these solutions. There was no differ-
`ence in the number of episodes of extravasation re-
`sulting in cutaneous damage between the two groups.
`No infant required flushing of, or surgery on, an ex-
`travasation site.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The results of this study suggest that aluminum
`intake in preterm infants is associated with reduced
`developmental attainment at the corrected post-
`term age of 18 months. The infants who received
`the standard intravenous feeding solutions (provid-
`ing 25 mg of aluminum per deciliter) had a lower
`mean Bayley Mental Development Index than those
`who received aluminum-depleted solutions (provid-
`ing 2.2 mg of aluminum per deciliter), although this
`difference did not reach statistical significance. How-
`
`TABLE 4. VALUES ON THE BAYLEY MENTAL DEVELOPMENT INDEX FOR INFANTS WITHOUT NEUROMOTOR
`IMPAIRMENT AND FOR ALL INFANTS ACCORDING TO THE DURATION OF INTRAVENOUS FEEDING.*
`
`GROUP
`
`STANDARD
`SOLUTIONS
`
`VALUES FOR
`INFANTS WITHOUT NEUROMOTOR IMPAIRMENT
`ALUMINUM-
`DEPLETED
`SOLUTIONS
`
`DIFFERENCE
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`VALUES FOR ALL INFANTS
`ALUMINUM-
`DEPLETED
`SOLUTIONS
`
`DIFFERENCE
`
`STANDARD
`SOLUTIONS
`
`As randomized
`
`⭐10 days TPN
`
`⬎10 days TPN
`
`98⫾20
`(n⫽78)
`105⫾19
`(n⫽39)
`92⫾20
`(n⫽39)
`
`101⫾18
`(n⫽79)
`101⫾20
`(n⫽38)
`102⫾17
`(n⫽41)
`
`2.9
`
`⫺3.9
`
`9.9
`
`0.34
`
`0.36
`
`0.02
`
`95⫾22
`(n⫽90)
`99⫾23
`(n⫽50)
`90⫾21
`(n⫽40)
`
`98⫾20
`(n⫽92)
`100⫾20
`(n⫽47)
`96⫾21
`(n⫽45)
`
`2.7
`
`1.0
`
`5.4
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`0.39
`
`0.83
`
`0.24
`
`*Values are given as means ⫾SD. TPN denotes total parenteral nutrition. Ten days was the median duration of total
`parenteral nutrition for the whole population as randomized (see Table 2).
`
`1560 ⴢ May 29, 1997
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 2, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`4
`
`

`

`ALUMINUM NEUROTOXICITY IN PRETERM INFANTS RECEIVING INTRAVENOUS-FEEDING SOLUTIONS
`
`ever, a substantial number of infants received little or
`no intravenous feeding after randomization, and ex-
`planatory analysis showed that the effect of alumi-
`num exposure was dose-related. Aluminum exposure
`from the standard intravenous solutions was calculat-
`ed to be associated with a mean loss of one point on
`the Bayley Mental Development Index per day of
`full intravenous feeding, after adjustment for poten-
`tially confounding factors. In infants fed intravenous-
`ly for 10 or more days, those receiving the standard
`solutions had a major (10 point) deficit in their Men-
`tal Development Index and were twice as likely to
`have a Mental Development Index below 85. These
`results provide support for our hypothesis that in-
`travenous aluminum may have neurotoxic effects,
`with longer-term consequences for neurologic de-
`velopment.
`Aluminum is the most common metallic element
`in the earth’s crust23 but has no clear biologic role.
`When intake is not controlled, aluminum causes se-
`vere neurotoxic effects in adults and children with
`renal failure.6,7,11,12 Previous studies of aluminum ex-
`posure in preterm infants revealed increased plasma
`concentrations or urinary excretion of aluminum,
`and those who died had high tissue aluminum con-
`centrations.13-18,24-26 Our findings are therefore plau-
`sible in the light of the previous work on aluminum
`neurotoxicity and on the deposition of aluminum in
`tissues, including the brain, of preterm infants.
`We chose to carry out a randomized study because
`in a nonrandomized study it would have been diffi-
`cult to identify any effects of aluminum among the
`many other factors that could influence neurologic
`development in preterm infants. Indeed, manifesta-
`tions of aluminum toxicity — anemia and bone dis-
`ease — arise frequently in premature infants for rea-
`sons other than aluminum exposure. In our previous
`studies of preterm infants we found that by 18
`months of age, cognitive performance on the Bayley
`Mental Development Index has some value in pre-
`dicting the later intelligence quotient. However, the
`correlation is considerably greater for group mean
`scores than for individual infants (⬎0.9 rather than
`⬎0.5, unpublished data). Whether exposure to alumi-
`num affects intelligence later in life is unknown.
`In conclusion, aluminum has no known biologic
`role and is potentially neurotoxic. Some degree of
`aluminum exposure in preterm infants fed intrave-
`nously seems unavoidable; the duration of such ex-
`posure is necessarily uncertain. Our findings suggest
`that the use of aluminum-depleted solutions for in-
`travenous feeding in these infants may result in im-
`proved neurologic development.
`
`Supported by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council and the
`Wellcome Trust.
`
`We are indebted to the nurses and doctors of the Rosie Maternity
`Hospital neonatal intensive care unit; to Ms. Sarah Churchill, Ms.
`Penny Lucas, and Ms. Corina Adams for data collection; and to the
`pharmacy staff, particularly Ms. Naval Vyse.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Bettinelli A, Buratti M, Elicio T, Colombi A, Aghemio A, Edefonti A.
`Aluminum loading in children on chronic hemofiltration. Int J Artif Or-
`gans 1987;10:131-2.
`2. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Aluminum
`toxicity in infants and children. Pediatrics 1986;78:1150-4.
`3. Faugere MC, Arnala IO, Ritz E, Malluche HH. Loss of bone resulting
`from accumulation of aluminum in bone of patients undergoing dialysis.
`J Lab Clin Med 1986;107:481-7.
`4. Gruskin AB. Aluminum: a pediatric overview. Adv Pediatr 1988;35:
`281-330.
`5. Koo WW, Kaplan LA. Aluminum and bone disorders: with specific ref-
`erence to aluminum contamination of infant nutrients. J Am Coll Nutr
`1988;7:199-214.
`6. Nathan E, Pedersen SE. Dialysis encephalopathy in a non-dialysed
`uraemic boy treated with aluminium hydroxide orally. Acta Paediatr Scand
`1980;69:793-6.
`7. O’Hare JA, Callaghan NM, Murnaghan DJ. Dialysis encephalopathy:
`clinical, electroencephalographic and interventional aspects. Medicine (Bal-
`timore) 1983;62:129-41.
`8. Boyce BF, Fell GS, Elder HY, et al. Hypercalcaemic osteomalacia due to
`aluminium toxicity. Lancet 1982;2:1009-13.
`9. Salusky IB, Goodman WG. Renal osteodystrophy in dialyzed children.
`Miner Electrolyte Metab 1991;17:273-80.
`10. Ward MK, Feest TG, Ellis HA, Parkinson IS, Kerr DN. Osteomalacic
`dialysis osteodystrophy: evidence for a water-borne aetiological agent,
`probably aluminium. Lancet 1978;1:841-5.
`11. Sedman AB, Wilkening GN, Warady BA, Lum GM, Alfrey AC. En-
`cephalopathy in childhood secondary to aluminum toxicity. J Pediatr 1984;
`105:836-8.
`12. Alfrey AC, LeGendre GR, Kaehny WD. The dialysis encephalopathy
`syndrome: possible aluminum intoxication. N Engl J Med 1976;294:184-
`8.
`13. Bougle D, Bureau F, Voirin J, Neuville D, Duhamel JF. A cross-sec-
`tional study of plasma and urinary aluminum levels in term and preterm
`infants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992;16:157-9.
`14. Koo WW, Kaplan LA, Krug-Wispe SK, Succop P, Bendon R. Response
`of preterm infants to aluminum in intravenous feeding. JPEN J Parenter
`Enteral Nutr 1989;13:516-9.
`15. Koo WW, Krug-Wispe SK, Succop P, Bendon R, Kaplan LA. Sequen-
`tial serum aluminum and urine aluminum: creatinine ratio and tissue alu-
`minum loading in infants with fractures/rickets. Pediatrics 1992;89:877-
`81.
`16. Robinson MJ, Ryan SW, Newton CJ, Day JP, Hewitt CD, O’Hara M.
`Blood aluminium levels in preterm infants fed parenterally or with cows’
`milk formulae. Lancet 1987;2:1206.
`17. Sedman AB, Klein GL, Merritt RJ, et al. Evidence of aluminum load-
`ing in infants receiving intravenous therapy. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1337-
`43.
`18. Bishop NJ, Robinson MJ, Lendon M, Hewitt CD, Day JP, O’Hara M.
`Increased concentration of aluminium in the brain of a parenterally fed pre-
`term infant. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:1316-7.
`19. Amiel-Tison C, Stewart A. Follow up studies during the first five years
`of life: a pervasive assessment of neurological function. Arch Dis Child
`1989;64:496-502.
`20. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychologi-
`cal Corporation, 1969.
`21. McGraw M, Bishop N, Jameson R, et al. Aluminium content of milk
`formulae and intravenous fluids used in infants. Lancet 1986;1:157.
`22. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, et al. Early diet in preterm babies and
`developmental status at 18 months. Lancet 1990;335:1477-81.
`23. Wills MR, Savory J. Aluminum and chronic renal failure: sources,
`absorption, transport, and toxicity. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:
`59-107.
`24. Koo WW, Kaplan LA, Bendon R, et al. Response to aluminum in par-
`enteral nutrition during infancy. J Pediatr 1986;109:877-83.
`25. Moreno A, Dominguez C, Ballabriga A. Aluminum in the neonate re-
`lated to parenteral nutrition. Acta Paediatr 1994;83:25-9.
`26. Puntis JW, Hall K, Booth IW. Plasma aluminium and prolonged par-
`enteral nutrition in infancy. Lancet 1986;2:1332-3.
`
`Volume 336 Number 22
`
`ⴢ 1561
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on October 2, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket