throbber
REVIEW/COMMENT ARY
`
`Aluminum in Parenteral Products: Analysis, Reduction, and Implications
`for Pediatric TPN
`
`BARRETTE. RABINOW.t., SCOTT ERICSON, and TIM SHELBORNE
`
`Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Round Lake, lllinois
`
`ABSTRACT: Performance and cost of the best available analytical methodology for the measurement of
`aluminum in parenteral products are presented. Typical levels of aluminum in representative solutions are
`summarized. A methodical approach to the minimization of aluminum contamination in the manufacturing
`process is considered in light of aqueous aluminum chemical considerations. Results of long-term clinical
`follow-up studies of infants maintained on currently manufactured TPN solutions indicate no adverse
`pathology arising from aluminum.
`
`the variation among the means was attributed to analyti(cid:173)
`cal problems.
`The analytical methodology has evolved extensively
`since that time. Because of the essential role that the
`analysis plays in implementation of an enforceable stan(cid:173)
`dard, it is well to briefly review the improvements made to
`overcome the wide variability shown by previous investi(cid:173)
`gators during the last decade. The technique that most
`commends itself for our purposes is graphite furnace
`atomic absorption spectrometry. It is specific, can be
`made sufficiently precise, and is automatable. In this
`methodology, Figure 1, a liquid drop of sample is heated
`at various stages, to successively dry the sample, char off
`the organic interferences, and char off the low boiling
`inorganic salts. Finally, the temperature is sharply raised
`to volatilize the aluminum in the sample and atomize it, so
`that it intercepts a beam oflight at the specific wavelength
`of aluminum. This results in the atomic absorption pro(cid:173)
`cess that leads to estimation of mass by reduction of light
`intensity (2).
`
`Atorn,ze
`
`Clean-out
`
`Char
`(inorganic)
`
`3000
`
`2000
`
`TEMP.
`(°C)
`
`1000
`
`Ory
`
`This paper will attempt to present an integrated under(cid:173)
`standing of a number of seemingly unrelated facets of the
`issue concerning levels of aluminum in parenteral solu(cid:173)
`tions. The strides made in the analytical methodology,
`responsible for making routine measurement possible, will
`be shown as will the cost to implement this technology in a
`quality control setting. The aqueous chemistry of the met(cid:173)
`al will be examined to understand the complexity of the
`reactions involved. This is necessary to effectively trouble(cid:173)
`shoot a manufacturing process for the purpose of mini(cid:173)
`mizing the aluminum levels in the product. A survey of
`typical values of aluminum to be expected in some repre(cid:173)
`sentative solutions will be shown. Finally, the results of a
`long-term follow-up study involving over a hundred pedi(cid:173)
`atric patients maintained on TPN over a ten-year period
`will be presented in an attempt to evaluate the likelihood
`of demonstrable pathology accruing from TPN admix(cid:173)
`tures, as currently compounded.
`
`I. Quantitative Methods
`
`Until relatively recently, the acquisition of accurate
`and precise determinations of aluminum was considered
`something of an art. Versieck and Cornelis ( l) have re(cid:173)
`viewed the literature on the estimation of aluminum in
`human plasma or serum. The 17 reviewed papers had been
`published between 1960 and 1979 and showed mean alu(cid:173)
`minum concentrations ranging from 3.72 to 1460 ppb.
`Since electrolyte levels in humans are regulated within
`narrow limits by the kidneys and other systems, most of
`
`[EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the fourth in a series of four presentations
`on "Aluminum in Parenteral Products" from the PDA Annual Meeting,
`Chicago, IL, October 1988. They are being published as a group in this
`issue.]
`Received November 23, 1988. Accepted for publication March 3,
`1989.
`"" Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Barrett E.
`Rabinow, Ph.D., Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter Technology
`Park (WG3-25), Route 120 and Wilson Road, Round Lake, IL 60073.
`
`0
`
`25
`
`50
`
`75
`100
`TIME (sec)
`Figure 1-Typical graphite furnace atomic absorption heating pro(cid:173)
`gram.
`
`125
`
`150
`
`132
`
`Journal of Parenteral Science & Technology
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`~NNTA~:;:Rl~~s~:.......... ............. _..l[. .................. -
`. r··
`
`ABSORBANCE
`
`"
`
`\.: -
`
`Temperature
`
`Absorbance
`
`(C)
`
`Time
`
`Figure 2-Furnace temperature (left) and absorbance (right) vs. time
`profiles, characterizing several modes of instrumental per(cid:173)
`formance: (a), slowly heated furnace tube; (b), slowly heat(cid:173)
`ed furnace tube with L'vov platform; (c), rapidly heated
`furnace tube.
`
`The problems suffered by earlier investigators occurred
`because the heating profiles shown in Figure 2 for the
`furnace temperature were too slow in attaining a plateau
`of stable instrumental performance. The sample alumi(cid:173)
`num atomic cloud, formed during the rapidly changing
`furnace temperature, resulted in large variability of the
`results. The problem was solved in two ways. The heating
`· rate of later model furnaces was increased so as to move
`the onset of stable operating temperature earlier in the run
`cycle. Additionally, the atomization of the sample was
`delayed as shown in Figure 2. The sample is deposited on
`top of a L'vov platform, Figure 3, rather than on the
`bottom of the furnace tube which is what is directly heat(cid:173)
`ed. This delays onset of volatilization until the establish(cid:173)
`ment of equilibrium instrumental conditions (3).
`But the major improvement occurred in background
`correction capability. As depicted in Figure 4, despite
`attempts to remove the matrix earlier in the heating pro-
`
`1500°C . . . . . : . - - - - - -
`
`l&J a:: ::,
`I-"' a::
`
`l&J
`0..
`::::IE
`l&J
`I-
`
`TIME-
`Figure 4-lnterfering absorbance superimposed upon heating profile.
`
`gram, nonspecific absorption will occur during atomiza(cid:173)
`tion due to residual interferences. Earlier optical designs
`permitted too broad a wavelength range around the absor(cid:173)
`bance peak to enter the monochromator. Also, they cer(cid:173)
`tainly could not differentiate between absorption due to
`aluminum and that due to extraneous background absorp(cid:173)
`tion occurring at the apex of the aluminum peak. This
`capability was accomplished with the introduction of the
`polarized Zeeman technique (2).
`As shown schematically in Figure 5, a magnetic field is
`placed around the furnace tube. This causes the absorp(cid:173)
`tion line of aluminum to split into several component lines,
`separated by wavelength. At the same time, the absorp(cid:173)
`tion lines are now polarized; they will absorb light only if
`(in addition to a wavelength match) the light is similarly
`polarized in the same direction with respect to the direc(cid:173)
`tion of the magnetic field. For example, the central line in
`Figure 5 will absorb only light which has its electric vector
`polarized parallel with respect to the magnetic field. To
`take advantage of this, the unpolarized light from the
`analyzing lamp is split into components polarized parallel
`and perpendicular to the magnetic field, by interposing a
`rotating polarizer in the optical path. Only the parallel
`component is absorbed by the sample aluminum, while the
`nonspecific background will absorb both components
`
`Figure 3-L'vov platform.
`
`Vol. 43, No. 3 / May-June 1989
`
`Figure 5-Schematic diagram of polarized inverse Zeeman graphite
`furnace atomic absorption spectrometer.
`
`133
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`TABLE I. GFAAS-Aluminum Assay Validation Composite
`Average for Days 1-3
`Cone. Precision % Recovery
`9.9 ppb Al
`CV(%)
`Sample ppb Al
`
`Instrument
`
`Zeeman 5000
`
`Model603/2100
`
`3.66
`4.7
`1
`6.07
`2.5
`2
`5.3*
`1
`l l.7
`39.3
`2.8*
`2
`* Spike recoveries used to correct sample concentrations.
`
`100.6
`102.7
`63.3
`62.9
`
`equally. This is the principle behind this enhanced back(cid:173)
`ground correction technique (2).
`The improved performance, attendant with polarized
`Zeeman capability, is apparent in Table I (4). (Full ex(cid:173)
`perimental details are found in the reference cited.) Levels
`of aluminum in Dianeal® CAPD solution are analyzed by
`two graphite furnace atomic absorption instruments, one
`with and one without Zeeman (but with deuterium) back(cid:173)
`ground correction. Without Zeeman, a recovery of only
`60% is found for a 10 ppb aluminum spike intentionally
`added to the sample. With Zeeman capability, the recov(cid:173)
`ery is increased to 100%. Techniques that have low recov(cid:173)
`ery usually have variable recovery as well, which leads to
`high coefficients of variation. This is the case here, as a
`C.V. of almost 40% is found for the conventional instru(cid:173)
`ment, but a respectable 6% is found for the Zeeman in(cid:173)
`strument.
`The method developed in our laboratory, Table II, fea(cid:173)
`tures acidification of the sample in nitric acid, and utiliza(cid:173)
`tion of magnesium nitrate, a matrix modifier. This makes
`for a more forgiving method in terms of tolerating widely
`varying sample types ( 5). The performance of the method
`when applied to the analysis of four types of parenteral
`
`TABLE II. Polarized Zeeman Graphite Furnace Atomic Ab(cid:173)
`sorption Spectrophotometric Procedure and Pro(cid:173)
`gram
`
`Sample preparation: Dilution with 4% HNO3/0.4%
`Mg(NO3h
`Instrument = Perkin-Elmer Zeeman 5000AAS with HGA-500
`Graphite Furnace and AS-40 Autosampler
`External Standards= 0, 5, 10, and 20 ng/mL in 4% HN03/
`0.4% Mg(NO3)2
`
`Sample Size = 20 µL
`
`Tube Type = Carbon pyro with
`L'vov Platform
`
`Wavelength= 309.3 nm
`Mode= Abs
`Int. Time = 4.0 sec
`
`Slit= 0.7 nm
`Current = 25 mA
`Signal = Peak Area
`
`Step
`
`Temperature
`(QC)
`
`Ramp Time
`(s)
`
`Hold Time
`(s)
`
`1
`90
`2
`100
`3
`500
`4
`1500
`5 (Read)
`2550
`6
`2600
`7
`20
`Ar Int. Gas Flow= 300 cc/min except for Steps I and 5.
`
`10
`10
`30
`20
`0
`
`10
`25
`10
`10
`5
`4
`5
`
`TABLE III. Comparison of Baxter and Alfrey Methods for
`Determination of Aluminum in Parenteral Solu(cid:173)
`tions
`
`Alfrey
`Baxter
`Mean C.V. Within-Unit Mean C.V.
`(µg/L)
`C.V (%)
`(µg/L)
`(%)
`(%)
`
`5.4
`14.5
`280.0 14.5
`47.8
`6.0
`
`0.4
`2.5
`1.3
`
`13.3 19.4
`317.0 12.2
`50.7
`2.8
`
`<I
`
`<2
`
`10% Travamulsion
`25%Albumin
`Heparin sodium
`(1000 U/mL)
`5% Dextrose
`
`solution is shown in Table III. Also shown for comparison
`are the results of Dr. Allen Alfrey, to whom we sent a
`number of samples from the same lot of each of the four
`solutions. The mean values found by both methods agree.
`The coefficient of variation, representing container to
`container variability is shown in the first set of parenthe(cid:173)
`ses for the Baxter data, and is compared to that for the
`Alfrey method. The second set of parentheses for the
`Baxter data indicates C.V. for repeated determinations
`from a single container, and is indicative of intrinsic vari(cid:173)
`ability in the instrumental and sample preparation.
`These data are comparable to those reported by Koo,
`Table IV (6), who found that LVP's typically contain less
`than 50 ppb and that most of the problem occurs for
`phosphate salts, both sodium and potassium, as well as for
`gluconate. It is clear that in order for any method to be
`useful in determining aluminum levels in clinically impor(cid:173)
`tant solutions, validation work should be designed with
`these matrices in mind. As part of work performed on
`behalf of a PDA task force to evaluate analytical method(cid:173)
`ology for aluminum in parenteral solutions, we compared
`the performance of the method developed in our laborato(cid:173)
`ry to that of one submitted by Dr. Ted Rains of the
`National Institute of Standards and Technology, Table V.
`Phosphate containing solution, as well as amino acids,
`with and without electrolytes, a simple electrolyte solu(cid:173)
`tion, and heparin were subjected to the inter-method
`study. As it was originally submitted, the NIST procedure
`
`TABLE IV. Sources of Aluminum Contamination in Paren(cid:173)
`teral Nutrition Solutions
`
`Product
`
`Number Tested
`Sample/Lot/Mfg.
`
`Al
`(ug/L)
`
`Sterile water
`Dextrose water (5-50%)
`Cryst. amino acids (5-10%)
`Soybean oil emulsion
`S<Xiium chloride
`Sodium acetate
`Sodium phosphate
`Sodium lactate
`Potassium chloride
`Potassium phosphate
`Calcium gluconate
`Calcium chloride
`Magnesium sulfate
`
`7/7/3
`13/13/3
`17/17/3
`4/4/1
`
`3/3/1
`1/1/1
`7/5/2
`2/2/1
`9/9/5
`4/4/2
`11/11/5
`5/4/3
`5/5/3
`
`<5
`<5
`<5-47
`<5
`<5-5
`<5
`<5-2370
`184
`
`<5-17
`90-2300
`1100-5600
`5-19
`
`<5-5
`
`134
`
`Journal of Parenteral Science & Technology
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`TABLE V. Comparison of Baxter and NIST Methods for Determination of Aluminum in Parenteral Solutions
`NIST
`Method of Addition
`(µg/L)
`
`Solution
`
`Mean
`
`Baxter
`(µg/L)
`
`16.0
`
`8.5% Travasol® inj.
`with electrolytes
`8.5% Travasol® inj.
`without electrolytes
`Plasma-Lyte® solution
`1.5
`Heparin lock
`<0.4
`Sodium phosphate
`250.0
`* Dilution factor increased to improve reproducibility.
`
`10.5
`
`SD
`
`1.5
`
`1.7
`
`1.4
`
`1.7
`
`Mean
`
`21.0
`
`9.7
`
`2.4
`<3.6
`302.0
`
`SD
`
`0.2
`
`4.5
`
`4.2
`
`60*
`
`NIST
`External Standards
`(µg/L)
`
`Mean
`
`18.6
`
`9.5
`
`2.3
`<3.6
`193.0
`
`SD
`
`1.2
`
`4.2
`
`4.0
`
`14*
`
`featured a method of addition technique. This is fine for
`imparting a robustness to the method in terms of matrix
`compensation for a wide variety of different solution
`types, but it makes for lower sample throughput. One
`must assay not only each sample, but each sample inten(cid:173)
`tionally spiked with a known addition of aluminum at
`several different levels. To evaluate the capability of the
`NIST method to be run faster, we compared its perfor(cid:173)
`mance utilizing external standards. Comparable results
`were found for the mean values of all three methods for
`the first four solutions, although the NIST methods have
`a somewhat high CV at 4% for repeated injections.
`Irreproducible results were found with the NIST meth(cid:173)
`ods when applied to the phosphate solution. We suspected
`that the acceptable performance from the Baxter method
`arose from the incorporation of the matrix modifier
`MgNO3 in the sample preparation. This reduces sensitiv(cid:173)
`ity of the method to phosphate in the sample matrix (5).
`As stated by Slavin et al., the mechanism of reduction of
`interference effects is attributable to imbedding of the
`aluminum in a matrix of magnesium oxide. This delays
`vaporization of the analyte until the magnesium oxide is
`vaporized. In any event, lacking this modifier in the sam(cid:173)
`ple dilution step, the NIST procedures incurred wide vari(cid:173)
`ability. We attempted to mitigate this problem by increas(cid:173)
`ing the sample dilution factor, in an attempt to dilute out
`the phosphate interference. This was somewhate success(cid:173)
`ful, in that the means now found by the NIST methods did
`not differ statistically from that of the Baxter method,
`although a standard deviation of 60 ppb resulted. The
`lesson here is that even though a method appears to work
`well for the determination of aluminum in four sample
`matrices, there is no guarantee that it will work on the
`fifth.
`Assay variability is particularly a problem with meth(cid:173)
`ods operating at the trace level. Sample contamination,
`adsorbtion to the walls of the sample container, and limi(cid:173)
`tations in sensitivity of the analytical method become
`more onerous as the analyte concentration is decreased.
`To underscore this are the results of an analysis of fifty
`interlaboratory round robin studies conducted by the As(cid:173)
`sociation of Official Analytical Chemists (7), shown in
`Figure 6. Each study involved at least twenty laboratories.
`All different kinds of analytical methods as applied to
`many types of analytes were studied. The major factor
`leading to assay variability was identified as the concen-
`
`tration level of the analyte sought. Precision for the major
`ingredient of a dosage form poses no problem. But as the
`concentration of the substance sought decreases, the inter(cid:173)
`laboratory coefficient of variation increases, following a
`power law. At the ppb level, a C.V. of 40% was found. It is
`clear that especially at trace levels, a careful validation of
`the analytical method is essential.
`The large interlaboratory variability found by the
`AOAC at the ppb level would seem to be at odds with the
`rather close agreement among aluminum levels reported
`in Tables III and V of this work. The minimal interlabora(cid:173)
`tory variability found here is attributable to the select
`nature of the three laboratories whose work is presented.
`Far from representing a random sample of average ana(cid:173)
`lytical outfits, these three laboratories have spent many
`years dedicated especially to the particular analytical con(cid:173)
`cerns associated with the determination of trace levels of
`aluminum. Our laboratory, for example, is continually
`involved with resolution of erroneous results for alumi(cid:173)
`num reported by contract laboratories who analyze paren(cid:173)
`teral solutions infrequently.
`An estimate of the cost to validate a method is summa-
`
`+80
`
`i +30
`C +20
`0 .:
`~ +10 Pharma-
`- 0
`0 ..
`~
`ceutical1
`• u
`C -10
`i -20
`0
`CJ -30
`
`10-'
`Majo,
`Nu1rientl
`
`-60
`
`Concentration
`Figure 6-lnterlaboratory coefficient of variation as a function of
`concentration. [Reprinted with permission from J. Assoc.
`Off. Anal. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 1344-1354 (1980).]
`
`Vol. 43, No. 3 / May-June 1989
`
`135
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`TABLE VI. Aluminum Determination by Atomic Absorption
`Spectrophotometry
`Cost Analysis
`Method Development and Validation for 20 Solutions
`Manpower: 20 man-months
`Cost:
`$160,000
`
`Operating Costs per Manufacturing Site
`Instrumentation
`2 Polarized Zeeman graphite furnace
`atomic absorption spectrometers
`with autosamplers
`Preventative maintenance contracts
`Personnel
`2 Chemists
`Supplies
`Graphite tubes and platforms
`Graphite cones, reagents, labware
`Argon
`
`$136,000
`
`6,500/yr
`
`80,000/yr
`
`16,800/yr
`1,350/yr
`1,200/yr
`$105,850/yr
`
`Total
`
`rized in Table VI. Approximately one man-month per
`solution type is estimated. Using typical overhead expense
`figures, twenty solutions would cost $160,000 for valida(cid:173)
`tion. Capital expenditure would cost almost $140,000,
`assuming one purchased a polarized Zeeman graphite
`furnace atomic absorption spectrometer, as well as a
`backup, for those occassions when the first failed to oper(cid:173)
`ate. This would become necessary if mandatory testing
`were imposed, to prevent shutting down production simply
`because the primary analytical instrument failed. Typical
`operating costs, including maintenance contracts, sup(cid:173)
`plies, and the chemists, skilled in trace metal analysis,
`would run in excess of $100,000 per year.
`
`II. Minimizing Aluminum Levels in the Product
`
`Assuming that one were required to implement testing,
`what are the sample matrices for which validation should
`be performed? To answer this, we analyzed a typical TPN
`admixture to assess the contribution to the total alumi(cid:173)
`num level from each of the components shown in Table
`VII. It was found that the amino acids contributed about
`3% of the total aluminum. While some of the trace metal
`additives had quite high aluminum concentrations, their
`overall contribution was quite low, a few percent, by virtue
`of the small volumes employed in the admixture. Calcium
`gluconate, on the other hand, contributed about 89% of
`the total aluminum found. These figures are in substantial
`agreement with the data reported by Koo (6), who also
`found that less than 3% of the aluminum arose from the
`amino acids, and about 89% resulted from the calcium
`gluconate. Clearly, the largest reduction of aluminum
`levels in TPN admixtures would accrue from addressing
`the most heavily contaminated components.
`We have seen that phosphate salts, gluconate salts, and
`citrate salts as well, carry the highest aluminum burden.
`To understand why this is the case we must understand
`the structure of aluminum in water (8), Figure 7. In
`highly acidic aqueous solutions, aluminum exists as a
`triply positively charged ion, coordinated to six neutral
`water molecules. As such, it has a very high charge densi-
`
`TABLE VII. Component Contributions to Aluminum Level in
`TPN Mixture
`Component Contribution
`toTPN
`Al Cone.
`(µg/L)
`(µg/L)
`
`Percent of
`Contribution
`
`Component
`
`17.6
`10% Amino acids
`1.5
`50% Dextrose
`0
`Sterile water
`223
`Calcium gluconate
`0
`Magnesium sulfate
`0
`Potassium chloride
`0.7
`Sodium acetate
`0
`Sodium iodide
`3.5
`Selenium
`0.5
`Chromium chloride
`1.2
`Copper sulfate
`3.3
`Manganese sulfate
`0.2
`Zinc sulfate
`251.5
`Total
`* <DL means less than a detection limit of 0.4 µg Al/L.
`
`47
`3
`<DL*
`5200
`4
`<DL*
`50
`<DL*
`1170
`960
`462
`471
`60
`
`7.0
`0.6
`0
`88.7
`0
`0
`0.3
`0
`1.4
`0.2
`0.5
`1.3
`0.1
`100.1
`
`ty. It forms quite strong complexes with negatively
`charged oxyanions by electrostatic attraction, especially if
`they are capable of binding at multiple ligand sites about
`this octahedron. Such is the case for phosphate, citrate,
`and gluconate (9). In the process of preparation of raw
`materials made from these anions, complexation with alu(cid:173)
`minum is inevitable, and this is carried through to the
`final dosage form. Precipitation of aluminum salts in
`pharmaceutical preparations, buffered with phosphate,
`have been discussed previously (10, 11, 12).
`As the pH is raised, protons are hydrolyzed off the
`coordinating water molecules, leaving negatively charged
`hydroxide ions in their place. This reduces the overall
`charge on the complexed ion, and hence the coulombic
`repulsion between such species. Mutual approach is facili(cid:173)
`tated, and in fact dimers are formed (8), as two octahedra
`share an edge. As the pH rises still further the positive
`charge decreases, permitting ring structures to form (I 3)
`as each octahedron shares two edges with neighboring
`complexes. With pH in the neutral region, the charge
`decreases to zero. There is no longer repulsion among the
`species, and extended networks develop (13), attaining
`colloidal dimensions, eventually precipitating out of solu(cid:173)
`tion as aluminum oxide, Figure 8. With further rise in the
`
`Figure 7-Schematic representation of aquo-aluminum ion
`Al(H20)e3+.
`
`136
`
`Journal of Parenteral Science & Technology
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`Q Sampling Point
`Aluminum (µg/L)
`
`Figure 10-Analysis of water purification system for aluminum.
`
`clear that one must consider the role of pH at different
`points in the process, possible complexing agents, and
`kinetic aging effects. The first step in the process, howev(cid:173)
`er, would involve assessing aluminum levels in current
`production of the dosage form. For example, we reported
`levels of aluminum in ten lots of Dianeal® CAPD dialysis
`solution examining three units from each lot. The mean
`value was 3.0 ppb. Unit to unit RSD within a batch was
`9.2%, and interbatch RSD was 65%. This seemingly large
`variability implies a standard deviation of only 2 ppb
`between lots. Furthermore, the mean aluminum levels and
`components of variance in the product packaged in poly(cid:173)
`vin ylchloride plastic containers were similar to those de(cid:173)
`termined for the glass-packaged product (4). Up to this
`point in the analysis of the production process, one re(cid:173)
`quires only an analytical method validated for the product
`matrix.
`Examination of the role of the individual intermediate
`steps in manufacturing requires, in addition, a validated
`collection procedure for the acquisition of samples. Nei(cid:173)
`ther contamination from the container, leading to errone(cid:173)
`ously high aluminum levels, nor wall adsorption, resulting
`in false low levels, can be tolerated. One would then be in a
`position to examine the contributions from each of the
`components of the production process for the water for
`injection, Figure l 0, for example. Interestingly, even after
`the ion exchangers, one finds levels of 17 ppb aluminum.
`The glass still for the distillation efficiently removes all
`but 2 ppb, which then appears in the mix tank, the rest
`being flushed to waste from the still. The contribution
`from the water is approximately matched by that from the
`raw materials, as shown in Figure 11. Neither the pump
`nor the filter used contribute further. Upon sterilization,
`
`Figure 8-Schematic representation of network of aluminum hydrox(cid:173)
`ide octahedra (gibbsite structural pattern).
`
`pH, the overall charge becomes increasingly negative, and
`the complex solubilizes. This behavior is summarized in
`Figure 9 (14), which displays the log of the aluminum
`concentration as a function of pH. In either the acidic or
`basic regions, solubility is apparent, but is evidently limit(cid:173)
`ed in the neutral zone. If one attempted to prepare an
`aluminum solution at a concentration of 10-4 Mat a pH
`of 8, for example, the intersection of the solubility curve at
`that pH indicates that most of the aluminum would pre(cid:173)
`cipitate out, leaving less than 10-5 M aluminum solubi(cid:173)
`lized. It has also been determined that a wide range of
`pharmaceutically relevant complexing agents bind to alu(cid:173)
`minum more strongly at pH values close to their pKa
`values (9).
`. The equilibria indicated on this graph are not necessar(cid:173)
`ily attained rapidly. In fact the initially formed precipitate
`is amorphous. Upon aging, the crystallinity increases,
`thus decreasing the concentration of soluble aluminum
`with which it is in equilibrium (14). Such aging effects
`have also been observed in connection with changes in the
`gel filtration pattern of complexes of aluminum with citric
`acid (15).
`To understand a particular manufacturing process,
`from the standpoint of ah1minum contamination, it is
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`pH
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`
`0
`
`·2
`
`~ .4
`J-
`~ -8
`CJ
`0
`...I
`
`-10
`
`-12
`
`-14
`
`[Al (OH)3 (eq)] ?
`
`Al2(0H)+:
`
`Al(OH)~
`
`WATER
`
`RAW
`
`t® •MATERIALS a. ?:::\~ ~ I ~~ -
`
`Figure 9-pH vs. concentration for various monomeric and polymeric
`Al species assumed in equilibrium with freshly precipitated
`Al(OH)3. (Reprinted with permission from Advances in
`Chemistry Series, 67, pp. 1-29. Copyright 1967 American
`Chemical Society.)
`
`0 Samphng Point
`Aluminum (µg/L)
`
`Figure 11-Analysis of process line for aluminum.
`
`Vol. 43, No. 3 I May-June 1989
`
`137
`
`. STERILIZATION
`
`Eton Ex. 1071
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`however, an apparent decrease in aluminum level is found,
`presumably due to adsorption by the container ( 4). Analy(cid:173)
`sis of product, packaged in either plastic or glass, after
`expiry indicated no significant increase in aluminum lev(cid:173)
`els (16).
`
`Ill. Clinical Implications for Pediatric Total Parenteral
`Nutrition
`
`The manufacturing analysis just presented was under(cid:173)
`taken several years ago, when concern over aluminum
`levels in the water used to dilute hemodialysis concentrate
`was first raised. This was a real, demonstrable medical
`concern, and industry responded proactively. The clinical
`necessity for controlling aluminum levels in currently pro(cid:173)
`duced TPN fluids is far less convincing. In a study of the
`heterogeneity of bone histology in parenteral nutrition
`patients, it was found that "abnormalities of bone histolo(cid:173)
`gy were seen in the parenterally fed patient, irrespective of
`whether or not Al deposition was observed .... Further(cid:173)
`more, . . . extensive Al deposition resulted specifically
`from the use of casein hydrolysate" ( 17).
`Contrary to the situation for casein hydrolysate, it has
`been determined that "Aluminum does not accumulate in
`teenagers and adults on prolonged parenteral nutrition
`containing free amino acids" (18). One might wonder
`what happens in the case of a patient on TPN who has
`switched from casein hydrolysate to free amino acids; do
`the bone aluminum levels decrease? The results of such a
`study are shown in Table VIII. Stainable aluminum was
`found upon bone biopsy of a patient maintained on casein
`hydrolysate for 24 months. Thereafter, the patient was
`switched to free amino acids, and underwent subsequent
`bone biopsy after 66 and then at 78 months. Both the
`quantifiable bone aluminum as well as the aluminum
`. stainable tissue surface decrease to zero by the last sam(cid:173)
`pling interval. Concomitant with this is an observably
`increased bone formation rate (19).
`This reversibility in clinical manifestation has also been
`demonstrated in infants maintained on TPN." ... Alumi(cid:173)
`num ... had been identified as an inadvertant contami(cid:173)
`nant of the casein hydrolysate solutions that were used in
`the past ... a recent study in which five of the originally
`described patients again received bone biopsy and bone
`turnover metabolic tests ... showed normal bone turn(cid:173)
`over, compared to previous ones in which aluminum con(cid:173)
`tent in blood and bone was elevated ... " The authors
`conclude, "Metabolic bone disease has not been clinically
`apparent in our patients during the past 8 years" (20).
`
`· TABLE VIII. Bone Characteristics, upon Repeated Biopsy, of
`One Patient on TPN Who Changed Nitrogen
`Source
`
`Aluminum
`Duration
`TPN mm/mm2
`(mos.)
`tissue
`
`(%)
`
`Bone Formation
`Rate
`mm/mm2 tissue/
`d X 10-3
`
`24
`66
`78
`
`2.28
`0.51
`0.00
`
`77
`17
`0
`
`0.006
`0.008
`0.097
`
`Nitrogen
`Source
`
`Casein
`Amino acids
`Amino acids
`
`138
`
`In a review of ten years experience in over a hundred
`pediatric patients, maintained on long-term home paren(cid:173)
`teral nutrition, " ... the only modifications have been a
`change in 1981 from casein hydrolysate as the protein
`source to balanced amino acids ... long-term weight gain
`and growth was best in those who received 90% or more of
`their nutrition parenterally .... Although the average
`patient received HTPN for nearly 2 years, eight have
`received HTPN for more than 5 years, and four for a
`decade. School problems have been limted, and intelli(cid:173)
`gence quotients among the HTPN patients are usually
`normal. Two of the children are mentally gifted and at(cid:173)
`tend special schools because of their advanced capability
`. . . . Of those individuals on TPN for 5 or more years,
`serious liver disease is not present in any of them" (21 ).
`In conclusion, the results of long-term follow-up studies
`of infants on TPN indicate that the aluminum loading
`that has apparently been demonstrated for the premature
`infant, is reversible, leaving no clinically residual prob(cid:173)
`lems. This may very well be a consequence of improved
`renal function as the premature infant increases weight,
`and improves, attendant with TPN.
`
`References
`I. Versieck, J., and Cornelis, R., "Normal levels of trace elements in
`human blood plasma or serum," Anal. Chim. Acta, 116,217 (1980).
`2. Welz, B., Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 2nd ed., VCH, Wein(cid:173)
`heim, 1985.
`3. L'vov, B. V., Pelieva, L.A., and Sharnopolsky, A. I., "Decrease in
`the effect of the base during atomic absorption analysis of solutions
`in tube furnaces by evaporation of samples from a graphite substra(cid:173)
`te," Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk., 27, 395 ( 1977).
`4. McHalsky, M. L., Rabinow, B. E., Ericson, S. P., Weltzer, J. A., and
`Ayd, S. A., "Reduction of aluminum levels in dialysis fluids through
`the development and use of accurate and sensitive analytical metho(cid:173)
`dology," J. Parenter. Sci. Technol., 41, 67 (1987).
`5. Slavin, W., Carnrick, G. R., and Manning, D. C., "Magnesium
`nitrate as a matrix modifier in the stabilized temperature platform
`furnace," Anal. Chem., 54,621 (1982).
`6. Koo, W.W. K., et al., "Aluminum in parenteral nutrition solution(cid:173)
`sources and possible alternatives," J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr., 10,
`591 (1986).
`7. Horwitz, W., Kamps, L. R., and Boyer, K. R., "Quality assurance in
`the analysis of foods for trace constituents," J. Assoc. Off Anal.
`Chem., 63, 1344 ( 1980).
`8. Hem, J. D., "Aluminum species in water," Adv. Chem. Ser., 73, 98
`(I 968).
`9. Hasegawa, K., Hashi, K., and Okada, R., "Physicochemical stabil(cid:173)
`ity of pharmaceutical phosphate buffer solutions II. Complexation
`behavior of Al(III) with additives in phosphate buffer solutions," J.
`Parenter. Sci. Technol., 36, 168 (1982).
`10. Hasegawa, K., Hashi, K., and Okada, R., "Physicochemical stabil(cid:173)
`ity of pharmaceutical phosphate buffer solutions. I. Complexation
`behavior of Ca(II) with additives in phosphate buffer solutions," J.
`Parenter. Sci. Techno/., 36, 128 (1982).
`11. Hasegawa, K., Hashi, K.,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket