throbber
ARTICLE
`
`Effects of Two Different Doses of Amino Acid
`Supplementation on Growth and Blood Amino Acid
`Levels in Premature Neonates Admitted to the
`Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized,
`Controlled Trial
`
`Reese H. Clark, MDa, Donald H. Chace, PhD, MSFSb, Alan R. Spitzer, MDa, for the Pediatrix Amino Acid Study Group
`
`aPediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida; bPediatrix Analytical, Bridgeville, Pennsylvania
`
`Financial Disclosure: Drs Clark, Chace, and Spitzer are employees of Pediatrix Medical Group, which owns Pediatrix Screening, a company that offers newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism and
`hearing loss.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`OBJECTIVES. The goal was to measure the effects of 2 distinct strategies for parenteral
`nutrition on neonatal growth and blood amino acid profiles.
`METHODS. In a multicenter trial (n ⫽ 11 sites), we randomly allocated premature
`(23–29 weeks and 6 days of gestation) neonates to 1 of 2 approaches to intrave-
`nous amino acid administration. In one group, amino acid supplementation was
`started at 1.0 g/kg per day and advanced by 0.5 g/kg per day to a maximum of 2.5
`g/kg per day (2.5 g/kg per day group). The other group received amino acids
`starting at 1.5 g/kg per day and advancing by 1.0 g/kg per day to a maximum of
`3.5 g/kg per day (3.5 g/kg per day group). Filter paper blood spots were obtained
`from each infant on the day of random assignment and on days 7 and 28 of age,
`to monitor blood amino acid levels.
`
`RESULTS. We enrolled 122 neonates (64 in the 3.5 g/kg per day group and 58 in the
`2.5 g/kg per day group). There were no differences in demographic or baseline
`characteristics between the 2 treatment groups. There was no significant difference
`in growth by day 28 after birth (median weight gain: 12.9 and 11.4 g/kg per day
`for the 3.5 and 2.5 g/kg per day groups, respectively), and the incidences of
`secondary morbidities were similar in the 2 groups. On day 7, blood levels of
`several amino acids and the serum urea nitrogen level were higher in the 3.5 g/kg
`per day group, compared with the 2.5 g/kg per day group; none of the amino acid
`levels were lower.
`
`CONCLUSIONS. Higher doses of amino acid supplementation did not improve neonatal
`growth and were associated with increased blood amino acid and urea nitrogen
`levels.
`
`www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/
`peds.2007-0545
`doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0545
`
`This trial has been registered at www.
`clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT00120926).
`
`Key Words
`neonates, parenteral nutrition, amino
`acids, acylcarnitines, nutrition
`
`Accepted for publication Jun 12, 2007
`
`Address correspondence to Reese H. Clark,
`MD, Pediatrix Medical Group, 1301 Concord
`Terrace, Sunrise, FL 33323-2825. E-mail:
`reese㛭clark@pediatrix.com
`PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005;
`Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2007 by the
`American Academy of Pediatrics
`
`1286
`
`CLARK et al
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020www.aappublications.org/news
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`STUDIES HAVE INDICATED that premature neonates of-
`
`ten develop severe nutritional deficits during the
`first weeks after birth,1–5 and inhibited growth during the
`early postnatal period has been associated with poor
`long-term outcomes.2,5,6 Variations in dietary intake may
`account for 45% of the variations in growth.7,8 As a
`result, efforts have focused on determining whether nu-
`tritional deficiency and growth restriction in premature
`infants can be prevented through better nutritional in-
`take.6,9,10
`On the basis of animal studies that showed high levels of
`in utero amino acid flux during the later phases of gesta-
`tion, several authors have suggested that higher doses of
`amino acid supplementation may minimize extrauterine
`growth restriction and enhance the outcomes of very low
`birth weight infants.9–11 Although standard doses of amino
`acids may be inadequate to promote normal growth,
`higher doses may lead to elevated blood amino acid levels
`and increased toxicity. Given the limited metabolic capac-
`ity of very low birth weight infants, excess administration
`of amino acids (protein) may result in saturation of both
`catabolic and anabolic pathways of protein metabolism,
`leading to larger amino acid pools for longer periods of
`time. Through the implementation of a multicenter ran-
`domized trial and tandem mass spectrometric analysis of
`key amino acids from dried filter paper blood spots, the
`effects of 2 distinct strategies for amino acid supplementa-
`tion on amino acid profiles and growth in premature in-
`fants were evaluated.
`
`METHODS
`
`Study Subjects
`Eligible infants had estimated gestational ages between
`23 weeks 0 days and 29 weeks and 6 days, were inborn,
`and had parental consent for participation in the study.
`Patients were approached for random assignment during
`the first 48 hours after birth and were excluded if they
`were ⬎48 hours of age or had a major congenital anom-
`aly. Investigational review boards of each hospital (n ⫽
`11) approved the protocol.
`
`Random Assignment and Blinding
`We used an electronic system to assign a randomized code,
`which was delivered to the health care provider responsi-
`ble for preparing parenteral nutrition. That individual used
`the random assignment code to determine the treatment
`assignment and mixed the parenteral solution according to
`study and pharmacy protocols. The parenteral nutrition
`solution was labeled “study AA,” and the concentrations of
`amino acids were not indicated on the bag. A pharmacy log
`tracked the amounts of amino acids in the solution for each
`patient. This approach blinded the clinical care staff mem-
`bers to the amount of amino acid supplementation that
`each neonate received. Random assignment was stratified
`according to site.
`
`Treatment
`For the group with a maximal dose of 2.5 g/kg per day
`(2.5 g/kg per day group), amino acid supplementation
`was started at 1.0 g/kg per day and advanced 0.5 g/kg
`per day to a maximum of 2.5 g/kg per day on day 4 of
`treatment. For the group with a maximal dose of 3.5
`g/kg per day (3.5 g/kg per day group), amino acid sup-
`plementation started at 1.5 g/kg per day of amino acids
`and advanced 1 g/kg per day to a maximum of 3.5 g/kg
`per day on day 3 of treatment.
`When enteral feedings were started, parenteral sup-
`plementation of amino acids continued, with the goal of
`delivering the maximal dose of amino acids allowed by
`the protocol. As feedings were advanced, intravenous
`fluids were decreased accordingly, to keep total fluids at
`ⱕ150 mL/kg per day. Parenteral nutrition was mixed to
`provide the maximal amount of protein allowed by the
`protocol. As feedings were advanced, the total amount
`of protein per kilogram per day increased as a result of
`the protein in the enteral feedings. When the parenteral
`nutrition was being administered at a rate of ⬍70 mL/kg
`per day, the amount of amino acids that could be added
`to the parenteral nutrition decreased (limited by the
`solubility of the elements in the parenteral nutrition).
`Therefore, when feedings reached 80 to 100 mL/kg per
`day, we decreased amino acid supplementation to 1 g/kg
`per day for the 2.5 g/kg per day group and to 2.0 g/kg per
`day for the 3.5 g/kg per day group. For both groups,
`amino acid supplementation was stopped when feedings
`reached 100 to 130 mL/kg per day. When enteral nutri-
`tion was at the level of 100 to 130 mL/kg per day, the
`patient was considered to have completed treatment.
`Subsequent parenteral nutrition was administered at the
`discretion of the health care team.
`
`Nutritional Support Guidelines
`We recommended starting parenteral lipid administra-
`tion at the same time that the study amino acid supple-
`mentation was started, beginning at a rate of 0.5 g/kg per
`day and advancing 0.5 g/kg per day to a maximum of 3.5
`g/kg per day.12–14 We discouraged the use of insulin and
`recommended limiting the glucose infusion rate to 8 to
`12 mg/kg per minute as tolerated. Although the quantity
`and quality of enteral nutritional support were not struc-
`tured in this trial, we offered the following feeding
`guidelines, in an attempt to maintain consistency: small-
`volume (⬍10 mL/kg per day) feedings should begin
`within the first week of life; low-dose dopamine treat-
`ment (defined as ⬍5 ␮g/kg per minute) was not consid-
`ered a contraindication for trophic feedings; feedings
`could be initiated even if umbilical catheters were in
`place; feedings could be advanced at a rate of as much as
`30 mL/kg per day and were not to be advanced at a rate
`of ⬍10 mL/kg per day; and 150 mL/kg per day, with
`consistent weight gain of 20 to 30 g/kg per day, was
`considered adequate nutrition.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`PEDIATRICS Volume 120, Number 6, December 2007
`
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020www.aappublications.org/news
`
`1287
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`Study End Points
`Our primary outcome measure was growth, assessed as
`changes in weight, length, and head circumference over
`the first 28 days after birth. Weight gain was calculated as
`weight gain (in grams per kilograms per day) ⫽ (weight at
`28 days ⫺ birth weight) divided by birth weight divided by
`28 days. We also assessed length and head growth changes
`in centimeters per week, as (measurement at 28 days ⫺
`measurement at birth) divided by 4 weeks.
`Secondary outcome measures included blood amino
`acid profiles and incidence of major morbidities during
`the first 28 days after birth. Blood amino acid profiles
`were obtained on the day of random assignment (usu-
`ally day 1) and on day 7 (parenteral phase of nutrition)
`and day 28 (enteral phase of nutrition) of life.
`
`Data Collection and Monitoring
`All information was collected by using an Internet-based
`case report form that could not be finalized until all re-
`quired fields were completed. Site visits were conducted to
`monitor the accuracy of data collection and adherence to
`the International Conference on Harmonization of Techni-
`cal Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for
`Human Use good clinical practice guidelines.
`Study logs of amino acid contents in the parenteral
`nutrition were maintained for each subject for the first
`28 days of life, by pharmacy personnel. Amino acid
`contents were recorded each day that the subject re-
`ceived either study or nonstudy parenteral nutrition.
`Pharmacy logs and source documents were monitored to
`validate each of the growth measurements and the
`amount of amino acid supplementation that was re-
`corded on the case report form of each subject.
`
`Measurement of Amino Acid and Acylcarnitine Levels
`Amino acid and acylcarnitine profiles were analyzed
`from dried blood spots by using tandem mass spectrom-
`etry, as described by Chace and Kalas.15 All quantitative
`results were provided to study investigators and were
`reported as micromoles per liter.
`To provide “normal” reference values (reference values
`in Fig 1), we calculated the median and the 10th and 90th
`percentiles for each metabolite by using 1000 normal term
`newborn values (from samples obtained in the first 7 days
`after birth). These values were derived from samples sent
`to our laboratory for screening for inborn errors of metab-
`olism. The values represent our internal normal newborn
`control values (reference values). To try to identify the
`amino acid and acylcarnitine values that were commonly
`(⬎50% of the patients) abnormal, relative to our internal
`reference newborn levels, we calculated the proportion of
`patients with values greater than the 90th percentile (high
`levels) and the proportion of patients with values less than
`the 10th percentile (low values) for the overall study pop-
`ulation and each treatment group.
`
`Statistical Analyses and Sample Size Calculation
`Our hypothesis was that the higher-dose group would
`have a growth velocity (13.0 g/kg per day) 3 g/kg per
`day more than that of the lower-dose group (10 g/kg per
`day). On the basis of previous work with premature
`neonates,6 we calculated that a sample size of 108 pa-
`tients (54 patients in each group) would allow us to
`detect a difference of 3.0 g/kg per day in weight gain
`between the 2 treatment groups (␣ ⫽ .025, power ⫽
`80%, assuming SD ⫽ 5.0 g/kg per day). The ␣ level was
`set at .025 on the basis of a 2-sided, 2-sample t test. We
`anticipated a 10% dropout rate resulting from morbidity
`and death; therefore, we enrolled 122 subjects.
`We performed an intent-to-treat analysis. Categorical
`variables were evaluated by using a 2-tailed ␹2 test and
`Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared by
`using a 2-tailed t test for parametrically distributed data and
`Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for nonparametrically
`distributed data. Rank data were assessed by using a
`2-tailed, Mann-Whitney, nonparametric test. Analysis of
`variance for repeated measures was used to evaluate the
`changes in all laboratory values over time, from the day of
`random assignment to days 7 and 28 of age. Both time and
`treatment groups were evaluated. To evaluate the influ-
`ence of covariates (gestational age, birth weight, gender,
`and postnatal exposure to steroids) on our study results, we
`performed a linear regression analysis. Our goal was to
`determine the treatment-influenced weight gain when
`these covariates were included in the regression model.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Enrollment
`Between September 1, 2005, and June 1, 2006, site logs
`showed that 230 neonates were screened and 122 neo-
`nates (53%) were enrolled from 11 sites, 64 in the 3.5
`g/kg per day group and 58 in the 2.5 g/kg per day group.
`The 2 reasons for nonenrollment were parent refusal
`(n ⫽ 57) and missed opportunities for obtaining consent
`(n ⫽ 51). The median enrollment per site was 11 pa-
`tients (range: 3–16 patients).
`
`Report on Patients Who Did Not Complete the Study
`Of the 122 patients enrolled, 11 patients did not complete
`the study. Three patients died before 28 days. Five patients
`were withdrawn from the study (3 in the 3.5 g/kg per day
`group and 2 in the 2.5 g/kg per day group). One patient
`was considered by the attending neonatologist to be too
`sick to continue in the study, and 2 patients were trans-
`ferred out of the study facility before 28 days. Follow-up
`laboratory assessments were not available for those pa-
`tients. The primary reason for a patient being withdrawn
`from the study was a serum urea nitrogen level of ⬎50
`mg/dL (n ⫽ 4). Two of the 11 patients who did not com-
`plete the study did not receive study parenteral nutrition.
`Removal of the 11 patients who failed to complete the
`
`1288
`
`CLARK et al
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020www.aappublications.org/news
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`75th
`Median
`25th
`
`2.5day28
`
`3.5day28
`
`2.5day7
`
`3.5day7
`
`2.5day1
`
`3.5day1
`
`Reference
`
`75th
`Median
`25th
`
`2.5day28
`
`3.5day28
`
`2.5day7
`
`3.5day7
`
`2.5day1
`
`3.5day1
`
`75th
`Median
`25th
`
`2.5day28
`
`3.5day28
`
`2.5day7
`
`3.5day7
`
`2.5day1
`
`3.5day1
`
`90th
`
`10th
`
`Reference
`
`90th
`
`10th
`
`Reference
`
`40
`35
`30
`25
`20
`15
`10
`
`05
`
`0.45
`0.40
`0.35
`0.30
`0.25
`0.20
`0.15
`0.10
`0.05
`0.00
`
`160
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`B
`
`BloodUreaNitrogen(mg/dL)
`
`D
`
`Isovalerylcarnitine
`
`F
`
`Tyrosine
`
`3.5 g/kg group
`2.5 g/kg group
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
`Days since birth
`
`75th
`Median
`25th
`
`2.5day28
`
`3.5day28
`
`2.5day7
`
`3.5day7
`
`2.5day1
`
`3.5day1
`
`75th
`Median
`25th
`
`2.5day28
`
`3.5day28
`
`2.5day7
`
`3.5day7
`
`2.5day1
`
`3.5day1
`
`90th
`
`10th
`
`Reference
`
`90th
`
`10th
`
`Reference
`
`4.0
`3.5
`3.0
`2.5
`2.0
`1.5
`1.0
`0.5
`0.0
`
`A
`
`Averageparenteralproteindose,
`
`g/kg per d
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`C
`
`Leucine-isoleucine
`
`350
`300
`250
`200
`150
`100
`50
`0
`
`E
`
`Alanine
`
`FIGURE 1
`A, Mean ⫾ SE of the dose of amino acids over time for neonates receiving a maximal dose of 3.5 g/kg per day and neonates receiving a maximal dose of 2.5 g/kg per day. B, Median and 25th and
`75th percentile values for changes in serum urea nitrogen levels over time. C–F, representative changes in levels of key amino acids and acylcarnitines over time (C, leucine/isoleucine; D, isovaleryl
`carnitine; E, alanine; F, tyrosine). All values are reported in micromoles per liter. Statistical details are presented in Table 3. Graphs represent median and 25th and 75th percentile values for
`measured values and median and 10th and 90th percentile values for reference values. 3.5 indicates 3.5 g/kg per day group; 2.5, 2.5 g/kg per day group.
`
`study protocol did not change our results, and we report
`only the intent-to-treat analysis.
`
`support or the total number of days of any parenteral
`nutrition (Table 1).
`
`Protocol Experience
`Fifty percent of the patients were enrolled during the
`first 24 hours after birth, and there was good separation
`of the 2 treatment groups regarding the amounts of
`amino acids delivered after random assignment (Fig 1A).
`By design, from day 1 to day 28, neonates in the 3.5 g/kg
`per day group received a larger dose of amino acids than
`did those in the 2.5 g/kg per day group (Fig 1). There was
`no difference in the number of days of study amino acid
`
`Demographic Data and Primary and Secondary Morbidity
`Outcomes
`We used an intent-to-treat approach, and all tables re-
`flect all enrolled infants, categorized according to treat-
`ment group. There were no significant differences in the
`demographic or baseline characteristics of the 2 treat-
`ment groups (Table 1). On day 7, there were no differ-
`ences in weight, length, head circumference, or degree
`of nutritional support (Table 1). Similarly, there was no
`
`Downloaded from
`
`PEDIATRICS Volume 120, Number 6, December 2007
`
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020www.aappublications.org/news
`
`1289
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`TABLE 1 Demographic Characteristics
`
`N
`EGA, median (IQR), wk
`Birth weight, median (IQR), g
`Birth length, median (IQR), cm
`Birth head circumference, median (IQR), cm
`1-min Apgar score, median (IQR)
`5-min Apgar score, median (IQR)
`Prenatal steroid use reported, n (%)
`Cesarean section, n (%)
`Male gender, n (%)
`Product of multiple gestation, n (%)
`Race, n (%)
`Asian
`Black
`Hispanic
`Other
`White
`Surfactant use reported, n (%)
`Age at random assignment, median (IQR), d
`Type of amino acid, n (%)
`Aminosyn
`TrophAmine
`Carnitine added to parenteral nutrition, n (%)
`Received protein before study enrollment, n (%)
`Total parenteral amino acid dose during first 7 d, median
`(IQR), g/kg
`Total parenteral amino acid dose during first 28 d,
`median (IQR), g/kg
`Time on treatment protocol, median (IQR), d
`Total time on parenteral amino acid support, median
`(IQR), d
`Day 7 growth parameters
`Weight, median (IQR), g
`Length, median (IQR), cm
`Head circumference, median (IQR), cm
`Day 7 nutritional support
`Glucose infusion, median (IQR), g/kg per d
`Lipids, median (IQR), g/kg per d
`Receiving some feedings, n (%)
`Enteral feedings, median (IQR), mL/kg per d
`Intravenous fluids, median (IQR), mL/kg per d
`Total fluids, median (IQR), mL/kg per d
`Day 7 laboratory data
`Serum bicarbonate level, median (IQR), mEq/L
`Serum blood urea nitrogen level, median (IQR), mg/dL
`Serum creatinine level, median (IQR), mg/dL
`Serum total bilirubin level, median (IQR), mg/dL
`EGA indicates estimated gestational age; IQR, interquartile range.
`
`Maximal Dose of
`3.5 g/kg per d
`64
`27 (26–28)
`961 (780–1187)
`35.5 (33.5–37.5)
`25 (23.1–26.5)
`5 (4–7)
`8 (7–8)
`53 (82.8)
`39 (60.9)
`38 (59.4)
`17 (26.6)
`
`1 (1.6)
`20 (31.3)
`8 (12.5)
`4 (6.3)
`31 (48.4)
`50 (78.1)
`1 (0.5–1.4)
`
`5 (7.8)
`59 (92.2)
`24 (37.5)
`42 (65.6)
`21.5 (19.5–21.5)
`
`Maximal Dose of
`2.5 g/kg per d
`58
`27 (25–28)
`918 (788–1231)
`35 (32–38)
`24.5 (23–27)
`5 (3–7)
`7 (6–8)
`49 (84.5)
`39 (67.2)
`32 (55.2)
`17 (29.3)
`
`4 (6.9)
`17 (29.3)
`5 (8.6)
`4 (6.9)
`28 (48.3)
`51 (87.9)
`1 (0.5–1.4)
`
`3 (5.2)
`55 (94.8)
`26 (44.8)
`38 (65.5)
`14.5 (13.5–15.4)
`
`51 (28–74)
`
`34.5 (22.5–58)
`
`15 (10–22)
`18 (11.8–25)
`
`14.5 (10–25)
`17.5 (11.8–26)
`
`910 (760–1092)
`36 (33.5–37.8)
`24.5 (22.9–26)
`
`11.3 (8.6–13.7)
`2.3 (1.6–2.9)
`44 (68.8)
`12.8 (0–57)
`127 (98.6–153.6)
`151 (134–171)
`
`22 (19–24)
`27 (20–36)
`0.9 (0.7–1)
`5.6 (4.5–7.3)
`
`880 (768–1105)
`35 (32.1–37.7)
`24.5 (23.1–26.5)
`
`11.2 (8.5–13.1)
`2.4 (1.7–2.9)
`40 (69)
`12.9 (0–34)
`140 (123–160.3)
`158 (147–174)
`
`22 (20–25)
`21.5 (12.8–30)
`1 (0.73–1.18)
`5.5 (4.1–6.6)
`
`P
`
`.8
`.99
`.6
`.9
`.4
`.1
`.8
`.6
`.7
`.7
`.7
`
`.2
`.8
`
`.7
`.7
`.37
`.9
`.01
`
`.01
`
`.5
`.6
`
`.99
`.7
`.5
`
`.8
`.7
`.99
`.2
`.4
`.99
`
`.24
`.01
`.04
`.26
`
`significant difference in growth (or any growth param-
`eter) on day 28 (Table 2). The incidences of morbidities
`were similar for the 2 treatment groups (Table 2). Mul-
`tivariate regression analysis showed that gestational age,
`birth weight, and postnatal exposure to steroids each
`had an independent influence on weight gain. The ne-
`onates with the poorest weight gain were small neonates
`who were gestationally immature and who were ex-
`posed postnatally to dexamethasone. In multivariate
`analyses, treatment group did not influence growth or
`
`the occurrence of the patient’s weight being below the
`10th percentile for weight at 28 days of age.
`
`Changes in Amino Acid Levels
`
`Differences in Levels According to Treatment Group
`There were no differences in amino acid levels on the day
`of random assignment (Table 3). On day 7 (parenteral
`phase of nutrition), blood levels of several amino acids
`(alanine, arginine, glutamate, leucine/isoleucine, methio-
`
`1290
`
`CLARK et al
`
`Downloaded from
`
`www.aappublications.org/news
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`5 of 13
`
`

`

`TABLE 2 Outcomes to 28 Days
`
`Maximal Dose of
`3.5 g/kg per d
`
`Maximal Dose of
`2.5 g/kg per d
`
`P
`
`.99
`.9
`.99
`.9
`.6
`.6
`.6
`.6
`.6
`
`.8
`.99
`
`.2
`.9
`.8
`
`.3
`
`.6
`
`.7
`.99
`.051
`.5
`
`.2
`
`.6
`
`.6
`
`1170 (973–1559)
`27 (24.6–29.4)
`37.2 (35–41)
`310 (162–448)
`2 (1.1–2.9)
`3 (1.5–4.2)
`11.4 (7.2–14.9)
`0.5 (0.3–0.7)
`0.8 (0.4–1.1)
`
`49 (84.5)
`145 (102–155)
`
`12 (20.7)
`6 (10.3)
`11 (19)
`
`20 (34.5)
`7 (12.1)
`25 (43.1)
`6 (10.3)
`
`8 (13.8)
`4 (6.9)
`1 (1.7)
`6 (10.3)
`19 (32.8)
`7 (12.1)
`4 (6.9)
`
`0 (0)
`2 (3.4)
`1 (1.7)
`3 (5.2)
`55 (94.8)
`44 (75.9)
`
`1 (1.7)
`17 (29.3)
`39 (67.2)
`1 (1.7)
`5 (8.6)
`
`1276 (1079–1629)
`27.5 (25–28.5)
`38 (35.9–41)
`317 (241–443)
`2 (1.2–3)
`3 (1.9–3.5)
`12.9 (9.4–14.9)
`0.5 (0.3–0.8)
`0.8 (0.5–0.9)
`
`55 (85.9)
`145 (104–155.2)
`
`Primary outcome measure, growth
`Weight, median (IQR), g
`Head circumference, median (IQR), cm
`Length, median (IQR), cm
`Weight change, median (IQR), g
`Length change, median (IQR), cm
`Head circumference change, median (IQR), cm
`Weight gain, median (IQR), g/kg per d
`Head growth, median (IQR), cm/wk
`Length growth, median (IQR), cm/wk
`Secondary outcomes at 28 d of age
`Receiving some feedings, n (%)
`Amount of enteral feedings, median (IQR), mL/kg per day
`Steroids used in first 28 d, n (%)
`Dexamethasone
`Hydrocortisone
`Positive blood or CSF culture, n (%)
`PDA, n (%)
`No PDA reported
`PDA reported but no report of treatment
`PDA treated with indomethacin
`PDA ligated
`Intracranial hemorrhage, n (%)
`Subependymal
`Intraventricular
`Intraventricular with dilation
`Intraparenchymal
`Any hemorrhage
`Severe (grade 3 or 4)
`Cystic periventricular leukomalacia
`Bowel disease, n (%)
`Isolated intestinal perforation
`Necrotizing enterocolitis, medical
`Necrotizing enterocolitis, surgical
`Any bowel disease
`None reported
`Received blood transfusion, n (%)
`Status at 28 d, n (%)
`Missing data
`Alive without oxygen therapy
`Alive with oxygen therapy
`Died
`Cholestasis (direct serum bilirubin level of ⬎5 mg/dL at
`any time in first 28 d), n (%)
`PDA indicates patent ductus arteriosus; IQR, interquartile range; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
`
`7 (10.9)
`5 (7.8)
`15 (23.4)
`
`30 (46.9)
`9 (14.1)
`18 (28.1)
`7 (10.9)
`
`8 (12.5)
`6 (9.4)
`5 (7.8)
`3 (4.7)
`22 (34.4)
`8 (12.5)
`0 (0)
`
`1 (1.6)
`5 (7.8)
`2 (3.1)
`8 (12.5)
`56 (87.5)
`47 (73.4)
`
`0 (0)
`24 (37.5)
`38 (59.4)
`2 (3.1)
`8 (12.5)
`
`nine, ornithine, phenylalanine, serine, tyrosine, and va-
`line) were higher in the 3.5 g/kg per day group than in the
`2.5 g/kg per day group. On day 28 (enteral phase of nutri-
`tion), tyrosine levels were higher for the neonates in the
`3.5 g/kg per day group, compared with those in the 2.5
`g/kg per day group. None of the amino acids levels was
`lower in the 3.5 g/kg per day group, compared with the 2.5
`g/kg per day group, on either day 7 or day 28.
`
`(day of random assignment, day 7, and day 28), gluta-
`mate, glycine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine levels de-
`creased. Arginine, aspartate, ornithine, and serine levels
`increased. Alanine and citrulline levels were relatively
`constant. Histidine, leucine/isoleucine, methionine, and
`valine levels increased and then decreased back to base-
`line (day of random assignment) levels. There was no
`treatment group/sample time interaction.
`
`Changes Over Time
`There were significant changes over time in most of the
`blood amino acid levels, and these changes were similar
`for the 2 treatment groups (Table 3). In the 3 samples
`
`Differences From Our Reference Sample of Normal Term
`Newborns
`In the study population, blood alanine and glutamate
`levels were commonly (⬎50% of the patients) low
`
`Downloaded from
`
`PEDIATRICS Volume 120, Number 6, December 2007
`
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020www.aappublications.org/news
`
`1291
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`TABLE 3 Serum Amino Acid and Acylcarnitine Levels
`Daya
`Level, Median (IQR), mol/L
`
`Pb
`
`Maximal Dose of
`3.5 g/kg per d
`
`Maximal Dose of
`2.5 g/kg per d
`
`Kruskal-Wallis
`Test Between
`Groups
`
`Repeated-Measures
`Analysis of Changes
`Over Time
`
`Days Compared in
`Repeated-
`Measures Analysis
`
`Direction of
`Change
`
`Normal Newborn Level, mol/L
`
`10th
`Percentile
`
`50th
`Percentile
`
`90th
`Percentile
`
`Amino acids
`Alanine
`Alanine
`Alanine
`Arginine
`Arginine
`Arginine
`Aspartate
`Aspartate
`Aspartate
`Citrulline
`Citrulline
`Citrulline
`Glutamate
`Glutamate
`Glutamate
`Glycine
`Glycine
`Glycine
`Histidine
`Histidine
`Histidine
`Leucine/isoleucine
`Leucine/isoleucine
`Leucine/isoleucine
`Methionine
`Methionine
`Methionine
`Ornithine
`Ornithine
`Ornithine
`Phenylalanine
`Phenylalanine
`Phenylalanine
`Serine
`Serine
`Serine
`Tyrosine
`Tyrosine
`Tyrosine
`Valine
`Valine
`Valine
`Acylcarnitines
`Acetyl (C2)
`Acetyl (C2)
`Acetyl (C2)
`Butyryl (C4)
`Butyryl (C4)
`Butyryl (C4)
`Free carnitine
`Free carnitine
`Free carnitine
`Glutaryl (C5DC)
`Glutaryl (C5DC)
`Glutaryl (C5DC)
`Isovaleryl (C5)
`Isovaleryl (C5)
`Isovaleryl (C5)
`3-Hydroxyisovaleryl
`(C5OH)
`3-Hydroxyisovaleryl
`(C5OH)
`3-Hydroxyisovaleryl
`(C5OH)
`Linoleyl (C18:2)
`Linoleyl (C18:2)
`Linoleyl (C18:2)
`Oleyl (C18:1)
`Oleyl (C18:1)
`Oleyl (C18:1)
`Palmitoyl (C16)
`Palmitoyl (C16)
`Palmitoyl (C16)
`Palmitoleoyl (C16:1关N-7兴)
`Palmitoleoyl (C16:1关N-7兴)
`Palmitoleoyl (C16:1关N-7兴)
`Propionyl (C3)
`Propionyl (C3)
`Propionyl (C3)
`
`1292
`
`CLARK et al
`
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`
`133.7 (98.2–191.1)
`160.8 (117.9–199.1)
`159.5 (129.9–196.8)
`9.9 (7.6–14.3)
`17.6 (13.6–28.4)
`12.5 (8.8–16.3)
`13.5 (10.2–18.7)
`15.6 (13.3–19.2)
`20.9 (15.3–26.2)
`9.1 (6.8–10.7)
`8.36 (6.97–12.09)
`8.5 (6.8–10.7)
`145.1 (120.4–176)
`131.7 (109.7–156.1)
`141.1 (115.3–164)
`143.7 (113.9–176.3)
`120.3 (101.4–145.6)
`116.2 (87.3–145)
`32.5 (28.6–42.4)
`41.8 (34.4–53.6)
`29.7 (22.5–43)
`128.6 (104–169.5)
`179.1 (152.5–203.9)
`135.3 (108.5–166.9)
`21.3 (13.9–33.1)
`29.9 (23.4–37.8)
`25 (18.2–33.2)
`32.1 (24.9–40.5)
`51.5 (41.4–69.4)
`44.6 (30.9–63)
`59.1 (50.1–72.8)
`59.6 (48.6–69.5)
`38.8 (32.7–49.1)
`104.4 (76.2–134.2)
`120.3 (94.5–155.7)
`122.6 (89.1–162.6)
`78.3 (54.3–110.5)
`59.8 (42.8–75)
`77.1 (53.8–103.9)
`90.1 (70.8–111.5)
`118.7 (96.7–142.7)
`80.6 (61.7–101)
`
`136.7 (109.5–180.7)
`132.5 (96.5–160.7)
`149.8 (107.8–193.5)
`8.8 (6.2–13)
`11.9 (8.8–16.3)
`11.1 (8.1–17.6)
`12.4 (9.7–17.1)
`14.2 (11.1–18.1)
`18.7 (14.9–26)
`8.9 (6.9–11.4)
`8.22 (6.51–9.75)
`10.2 (6.9–13.2)
`148.7 (124.1–195.7)
`115 (98.3–137.1)
`128 (96.9–154.6)
`146.7 (113.8–173.6)
`111.6 (88.1–129.7)
`108.7 (89.8–132.5)
`35.7 (25.8–44.7)
`39.7 (32.1–45.5)
`29.1 (21.5–36.4)
`126.7 (106.6–160.8)
`154.7 (133.3–167.2)
`130.5 (103–154.9)
`20.7 (15.7–29.4)
`27.2 (20.8–31.2)
`25.4 (16.3–29.7)
`30.5 (24.1–43.4)
`41 (36.5–51.1)
`44 (32.9–57.8)
`57.4 (48.1–67.3)
`51.5 (44.5–60.1)
`39.4 (33.4–46.6)
`104.7 (87.3–133.6)
`104.3 (77.9–137.6)
`126.6 (94.5–155.2)
`85.6 (56.9–136.4)
`42.8 (28.9–64.7)
`66.2 (41.3–78.6)
`85.1 (68.1–108.1)
`94.3 (83.2–110.2)
`81.5 (66–95.9)
`
`20.7 (15.6–26.5)
`21.8 (16.2–28.6)
`1
`11.3 (8.6–16.5)
`13 (10.3–17.4)
`7
`12.3 (9.1–19.2)
`15.2 (10.7–21.5)
`28
`0.375 (0.299–0.523)
`0.391 (0.328–0.487)
`1
`0.265 (0.192–0.395)
`0.296 (0.235–0.423)
`7
`0.201 (0.149–0.262)
`0.195 (0.153–0.253)
`28
`23.3 (17.2–29.9)
`24.6 (19.1–32.5)
`1
`14.4 (8.7–30.9)
`18.9 (12.2–29.8)
`7
`21.8 (13.2–30.4)
`21.1 (16.3–35.8)
`28
`0.021 (0.017–0.0285) 0.0195 (0.015–0.034)
`1
`7 0.0245 (0.019–0.044) 0.0235 (0.015–0.037)
`28 0.0268 (0.019–0.036) 0.0243 (0.016–0.034)
`1
`0.262 (0.193–0.34)
`0.252 (0.185–0.321)
`7
`0.307 (0.235–0.427)
`0.244 (0.183–0.37)
`28
`0.156 (0.113–0.198)
`0.157 (0.117–0.194)
`1
`0.136 (0.108–0.159)
`0.117 (0.101–0.153)
`
`7
`
`0.169 (0.12–0.208)
`
`0.136 (0.108–0.177)
`
`28
`
`0.13 (0.113–0.173)
`
`0.127 (0.1–0.174)
`
`0.109 (0.079–0.167)
`0.121 (0.079–0.184)
`1
`0.526 (0.366–0.716)
`0.61 (0.423–0.835)
`7
`0.231 (0.136–0.365)
`0.251 (0.176–0.383)
`28
`0.475 (0.368–0.611)
`0.501 (0.385–0.742)
`1
`0.584 (0.405–0.731)
`0.661 (0.476–0.847)
`7
`0.351 (0.24–0.575)
`0.439 (0.291–0.643)
`28
`0.96 (0.77–1.35)
`1.14 (0.74–1.5)
`1
`0.595 (0.44–0.76)
`0.651 (0.46–1.0)
`7
`0.419 (0.31–0.62)
`0.519 (0.36–0.68)
`28
`0.091 (0.067–0.14)
`0.105 (0.08–0.14)
`1
`0.0365 (0.029–0.049)
`7 0.0465 (0.03–0.07)
`28 0.0448 (0.029–0.064) 0.0328 (0.025–0.056)
`1
`2.41 (1.84–2.99)
`2.49 (1.6–3.03)
`7
`0.94 (0.65–1.39)
`0.72 (0.51–1.08)
`28
`0.73 (0.49–1.29)
`0.56 (0.37–1.16)
`
`.6
`.004
`.2
`.2
`.0001
`.7
`.7
`.051
`.5
`.9
`.08
`.2
`.5
`.016
`.1
`.9
`.07
`.3
`.8
`.1
`.4
`.6
`.0001
`.4
`.99
`.029
`.9
`.7
`.0001
`.9
`.3
`.002
`.99
`.5
`.018
`.8
`.3
`.011
`.039
`.7
`.0001
`.9
`
`.4
`.09
`.07
`.8
`.1
`.99
`.3
`.09
`.4
`.99
`.2
`.4
`.6
`.044
`.7
`.3
`
`.023
`
`.3
`
`.5
`.2
`.4
`.2
`.09
`.1
`.4
`.2
`.1
`.3
`.034
`.09
`.8
`.010
`.08
`
`.4
`.4
`.4
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`.21
`.21
`.21
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`.05
`.05
`.05
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`.005b
`.005b
`.005b
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`.94
`.94
`.94
`.05
`.05
`.05
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`.10
`
`.10
`
`.10
`
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`
`No change
`No change
`
`Increasing
`Increasing
`
`Increasing
`Increasing
`
`No change
`No change
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Increasing
`
`Increasing
`
`Increasing
`
`Increasing
`Increasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Increasing
`Increasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Increasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`No change
`No change
`
`Increasing
`
`Increasing
`Decreasing
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`Increasing
`Decreasing
`
`Increasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`Decreasing
`Decreasing
`
`154
`154
`154
`4.2
`4.2
`4.2
`10.5
`10.5
`10.5
`5.9
`5.9
`5.9
`147
`147
`147
`92
`92
`92
`28.1
`28.1
`28.1
`89.7
`89.7
`89.7
`16.4
`16.4
`16.4
`18.8
`18.8
`18.8
`40.6
`40.6
`40.6
`71.6
`71.6
`71.6
`48.6
`48.6
`48.6
`62.9
`62.9
`62.9
`
`17.2
`17.2
`17.2
`0.129
`0.129
`0.129
`14.5
`14.5
`14.5
`0.016
`0.016
`0.016
`0.054
`0.054
`0.054
`0.077
`
`0.077
`
`0.077
`
`0.101
`0.101
`0.101
`0.919
`0.919
`0.919
`1.671
`1.671
`1.671
`0.10
`0.10
`0.10
`1.1
`1.1
`1.1
`
`216
`216
`216
`7.8
`7.8
`7.8
`15.1
`15.1
`15.1
`8.3
`8.3
`8.3
`195
`195
`195
`143
`143
`143
`39.8
`39.8
`39.8
`120.2
`120.2
`120.2
`21.9
`21.9
`21.9
`29.0
`29.0
`29.0
`51.5
`51.5
`51.5
`116.7
`116.7
`116.7
`74.7
`74.7
`74.7
`82.2
`82.2
`82.2
`
`25.9
`25.9
`25.9
`0.218
`0.218
`0.218
`21.8
`21.8
`21.8
`0.039
`0.039
`0.039
`0.093
`0.093
`0.093
`0.124
`
`0.124
`
`0.124
`
`0.201
`0.201
`0.201
`1.396
`1.396
`1.396
`2.716
`2.716
`2.716
`0.2
`0.2
`0.2
`1.8
`1.8
`1.8
`
`312
`312
`312
`17.2
`17.2
`17.2
`23.5
`23.5
`23.5
`12.1
`12.1
`12.1
`259
`259
`259
`209
`209
`209
`61.2
`61.2
`61.2
`166.6
`166.6
`166.6
`29.4
`29.4
`29.4
`44.9
`44.9
`44.9
`66.5
`66.5
`66.5
`220.5
`220.5
`220.5
`119.8
`119.8
`119.8
`111.3
`111.3
`111.3
`
`38.9
`38.9
`38.9
`0.387
`0.387
`0.387
`33.4
`33.4
`33.4
`0.074
`0.074
`0.074
`0.16
`0.16
`0.16
`0.201
`
`0.201
`
`0.201
`
`0.407
`0.407
`0.407
`2.093
`2.093
`2.093
`4.129
`4.129
`4.129
`0.33
`0.33
`0.33
`2.9
`2.9
`2.9
`
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`28
`28
`1, 7
`
`7, 28
`1
`1
`7, 28
`1
`1
`7
`1, 28
`7
`7
`1, 28
`7
`7
`1, 28
`7
`7, 28
`1
`1
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`28
`28
`1, 7
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`
`7, 28
`1
`1
`28
`28
`1, 7
`
`7
`1
`
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`7
`1, 28
`7
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`7, 28
`1
`1
`7, 28
`1
`1
`
`Downloaded from
`
`www.aappublications.org/news
`
` at Reprints Desk on May 8, 2020
`
`Eton Ex. 1046
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`TABLE 3 Continued
`
`Daya
`
`Level, Median (IQR), mol/L
`
`Pb
`
`Maximal Dose of
`3.5 g/kg per d
`
`Maximal Dose of
`2.5 g/kg per d
`
`Stearoyl (C18)
`Stearoyl (C18)
`Stearoyl (C18)
`Succinyl (C4DC)
`Succinyl (C4DC)
`Succinyl (C4DC)
`
`1
`7
`28
`1
`7
`28
`
`0.553 (0.437–0.724)
`0.611 (0.387–0.709)
`0.549 (0.426–0.714)
`0.553 (0.416–0.744)
`0.31 (0.205–0.375)
`0.302 (0.203–0.384)
`0.0683 (0.057–0.098)
`0.066 (0.058–0.092)
`0.08 (0.053–0.1318) 0.0925 (0.059–0.149)
`0.116 (0.076–0.141)
`0.114 (0.086–0.165)
`
`Kruskal-Wallis
`Test Between
`Groups
`.9
`.8
`.99
`.9
`.3
`.3
`
`Repeated-Measures
`Analysis of Changes
`Over Time
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`⬍.001
`
`Days Compared in
`Repeated-
`Measures Analysis
`28
`28
`1, 7
`7, 28
`1, 28
`1, 7
`
`Direction of
`Change
`
`Normal Newborn Level, mol/L
`
`10th
`Percentile
`
`50th
`Percentile
`
`90th
`Percentile
`
`0.62
`0.62
`0.62
`0.067
`0.067
`0.067
`
`0.96
`0.96
`0.96
`0.128
`0.128
`0.128
`
`1.47
`1.47
`1.47
`0.219
`0.219
`0.219
`
`Decreasing
`
`Increasing
`Increasing
`
`DC indicates dica

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket