throbber
Abstract
`A number of drugs are sensitive to the presence of oxygen,
`resulting in oxidative degradation and a shortened shelf-life.
`This is usually minimized by either the addition of antioxi(cid:173)
`dants to the formulation or the replacement of headspace air
`with an inert gas, such as nitrogen. A new alternative is pre(cid:173)
`sented and involves the use of an oxygen extractor.
`The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effec(cid:173)
`tiveness of the device in removing oxygen from drug vials .
`Aqueous epinephrine solutions were prepared from deoxy(cid:173)
`genated water. Twenty milliliters of the solution was filled
`into vials to which caps were affixed; some caps contained the
`oxygen extractor and others did not. The oxygen content of
`the headspace was analyzed and the appearance of the solu(cid:173)
`tions was observed over a period of up to 19 days.
`The results showed that the vials with the oxygen extractor
`remained clear for the 19 days' duration with essentially no
`oxygen present; whereas the vials without the unit discolored
`within 24 hours, turning to black, oily films in 15 days. This
`technology may provide compounding pharmacists with a
`method of packaging oxygen-sensitive preparations with en(cid:173)
`hanced stability.
`
`Introduction
`No organic drug is insensitive to oxygen. However, many are
`oxidized at a sufficiently slow rate to be considered stable. Other
`drugs related to the family of catechols, benzamides, thiazines,
`tetracyclines, etc. are oxygen sensitive and have limited shelf(cid:173)
`life. Shelf-life extension is afforded by addition of oxygen scav(cid:173)
`engers (antioxidants) , which are basically more oxygen avid than
`the drug. More recently, preservation of these drugs also includes
`the improvement of drug-container closures and drug processing
`under an inert gas. H owever, in essence, antioxidants are also life
`limited and common processing practices still allow 1 % to 3 % of
`oxygen in the inert processing gas.
`Some extremely oxygen-sensitive drugs, which are essen tially
`oxygen intolerant, require elaborate processing conditions and
`equipment with a tolerance limit of 200 ppm of oxygen. It is need(cid:173)
`less to elaborate on the investment required to achieve such stan(cid:173)
`dards and on the need for oxygen-resistant storage containers for
`these drugs.
`Background
`The basic concept of this technology is to remove oxygen via an
`electrochemical process that consists of applying a voltage avail(cid:173)
`able from a hearing-aid battery, or a button cell, to an electro(cid:173)
`chemical cell; reducing oxygen available within the drug vial and
`releasing oxygen at a counterelectrode, thereby effectively trans(cid:173)
`ferring oxygen out .of the vial. The pra ctical considerations un(cid:173)
`derlying the implementation of such a concept are to provide: (a)
`
`PEER REVIEWED
`
`Use of an Oxygen Extractor
`to Minimize Oxidation
`of Compounded Preparations
`
`Henri J. R. Maget, PhD
`Med-E-Cell
`1063 3 Roselle Street, Suite E
`San Diego, CA 92121-1506
`
`Table 1. Extractor Useful Life.
`
`Battery Q-value
`(mAhour)
`
`Extractor Life Battery Size, mm
`(years)
`(Diameter/Height)
`
`50 - 60
`
`110 - 120
`
`210-220
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5.8/3.6
`
`7 .8/3 .6
`
`7.8/5 .3
`
`an economical solution to the prevention of oxidative degradation
`of drugs in vials, (b) an oxygen-free environment in vials without
`the need to change the vial configuration and geometry, and (c) a
`means for oxygen elimination by incorporating only minor mod(cid:173)
`ifications to the existing conventional vial elastomeric closures.
`The oxygen extractor has only two components, namely, a com(cid:173)
`mercial battery (button cell) selected for the specific purpose to
`be accomplished, generally 5 .8 to 11.6 mm in diameter and 3 .6
`to 5.3 mm high; and an electrochemical cell, which is a mem(cid:173)
`brane fitted with two electrodes, about 0.2 mm thick. Structurally,
`once assembled, these two components can be less than 10 mm
`in diameter and less than 6 mm in elevation. On standby, the ex(cid:173)
`tractor is inactive. It becomes activated by closing the circuit be(cid:173)
`tween the battery and the cell, which can be accomplished by a
`variety of mechanical means, at any time before, during or after
`vial closure .
`The most important variable affe cting the extractor perfor(cid:173)
`mance is the battery storage capacity. It will be used to extract oxy(cid:173)
`gen from the initial air headspace in the vial and to r emove the
`oxygen diffusing back into the vial, mainly through the elas(cid:173)
`tomeric closure (stopper).
`Miniature commercial batteries (button cells) have an oxygen
`extraction capacity of 10 to 50 cc ofoxygen. This capability is ad(cid:173)
`equate t o maintain oxygen-free environments for one to four
`years for most elastomeric closures used for drug vials .
`Oxygen-concentration levels can be achieved and maintained be(cid:173)
`low 200 ppm, representing a thousandfold concentration decrease
`over air-filled vials and a hundredfold decrease over inert-gas(cid:173)
`processed vials.
`Extractor Life Expectancy
`The life in hours of the extractor, T, can be estimated from the
`following correlation:
`- T = (6/R)(Q-V)
`where R is the rate (cc/ hour) of oxygen diffusion from the ambi (cid:173)
`ent air into the vial; Q is the battery storage capacity, in mil-
`
`International Journal of P harmaceuti cal Compounding
`Vo/.3 No.6 November/December 1999
`
`, •
`
`Eton Ex. 1028
`1 of 3
`
`

`

`PEER REVIEWED
`
`Table 2. Extractor Operating Time Required
`for a Twentyfold Reduction in Oxygen Concentration.
`
`Gas Phase
`Volume (cc)
`
`Extractor
`Characteristic K
`
`Time to Achieve
`1 % Oxygen from Air
`
`12
`
`0.7
`
`12
`
`50
`
`50
`
`121
`
`3.2 hours
`
`11.3 minutes
`
`1.3 hours
`
`Table 3. Appearance of Epinephrine
`Solutions, at 60°C, in Absence and Presence
`of the Oxygen Extractor.
`
`21
`20
`
`10
`
`z
`""' "' >
`X
`1 - -- - ---------------
`0
`~ oL-~-- -- - +-::=:==iL_- - ---c---1- -=:---~
`2.00
`2.50
`0.00
`0.50
`3.0
`3.50
`4.00
`0.19
`3.1
`
`TIME, HOURS
`
`Visual Appearance
`of the Reference
`Solution without
`Time
`(Hours) Extractor
`
`Visual Appearance
`of the Vial
`Measure
`with th e
`Oxygen Extractor Oxygen %
`
`Conditions: I. Silver-oxide battery, model 76; V = 21 cc; K = 50 _
`11. Silver-oxide battery, model 76: V = 21 cc; K = 212
`Ill. Zn-Air battery, model 675; V = 0.71 cc; K = 50
`
`0
`
`16
`
`45
`
`88
`
`135
`
`184
`
`280
`
`425
`
`456
`
`Clear
`
`Faint yellow
`
`Light yellow
`
`Clear
`
`Clear
`
`Clear
`
`Light yellow/brown
`
`Clear
`
`Golden brown
`
`Clear
`
`Dark golden brown
`
`Clear
`
`Dark amber brown
`
`Clear
`
`Oily film appears
`
`Clear
`
`Black with oil film
`
`Clear
`
`NM = not measured
`* The sensor is inaccurate below 0.1 %
`
`NM
`
`1.9
`
`0.4
`
`<0.1 *
`
`<0.1 *
`
`<0.1 *
`
`<0 .1 *
`
`NM
`
`NM
`
`liamphours; and Vis the initial gas-phase volume of the vial, cm3.
`For example, if the closure value R is 0.0 3 cc/day of oxygen, and
`V = 15 cc, the extractor's useful life can be estimated, as reported
`in Table 1, which also includes the size of the commercial batteries
`available to perform the extraction task.
`Theory
`Since the rate of oxygen r emoval from the gas phase is propor(cid:173)
`tional to the oxygen content, the oxygen pressure at any time t
`(hours) can be predicted from:
`Po2 = P 0 02 e-kt
`Equation 1
`where P 0 02 is the original oxygen pressure in the vial and k is a
`system constant that depends on the initial gas volume, V cc, and
`a characteristic K of the extractor, such that k = K/V The value(cid:173)
`of K depends principally on the active surface area of the extrac(cid:173)
`tor. Since the extractor current is also proportional to P02, the same
`type of relationship will hold for the battery current, namely:
`Equation 2
`I= I 0 e-kt
`where I 0 is the initial extractor current for P 0 02- These unique
`
`Internationa!Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding
`Vol.3 No .6 Nove11tber/December 1999
`
`Fig . 1. Extractor removing oxygen from containers.
`
`correlations suggest that m easurements of the current becom e
`an indication of the level of oxygen depl etion.
`Equations 1 and 2 are useful in predicting the time required to
`achieve a desired oxygen concentration level. For example, the time
`required to reduce the oxygen pressure from 0.21 to 0.01 atm, (or
`from 0.03 to 0.0015 atm) will be obtained from
`t = (1/k) Ln 21 = 13 .2 (V/K), as illustra ted in Table 2
`These calculated values compare favorably with the experi(cid:173)
`mental results presented in F ig. 1.
`Experiment
`All experiments were conducted with an extractor assembly
`consisting of an electrochemical cell and a small battery. Electrical
`connections were mad e via a series-resistor placed between the
`battery anode and the electrochemical cell cathode. The extrac(cid:173)
`tor was attached to chambers sealed from the environment. In
`some instances, an oxygen sensor, (Microelectrodes, Inc., Bedford,
`NH) amperometric oxygen probe, mod el MI 73 0, and oxygen
`meter model OM-4 were placed in the gas chamber. The sensor
`is only accurate for oxygen concentrations above 0.1 % . This ex(cid:173)
`perimental setup could be used to monitor battery current and oxy(cid:173)
`gen concentration, simultaneously.
`Experiments I and II of the figure were performed with a sil(cid:173)
`ver-oxide button cell, model 7 6 (11.6 -mm diameter/5 .3 5-mm
`height), with the same gas-phase volume, V = 21 cc, but differ(cid:173)
`ent ch aracteristics, K, of the extractor. Experim ent III was
`performed with a model 675 zinc-air battery (11.6-mm diame(cid:173)
`ter/5 .3 5-mm height).
`The oxygen con centration decreases pre dictably. Below 0.1 % ,
`the current progressively decreases to a "mainte-nance" current
`corresponding to the rate of diffusion of ambient oxygen into the
`chamb er or vial. For a diffusion rate of 0.03 cc/day, the mainte(cid:173)
`nance current is approximately 5 µA.
`
`Eton Ex. 1028
`2 of 3
`
`

`

`Oxygen Extraction
`from Drug Vials
`
`Prototype extractors were used to deter(cid:173)
`mine their effectiveness in preventing ox(cid:173)
`id ative degradation of epinephrine, which
`is known to be sensitive t o oxygen. The
`rate of degradation was accentua ted by
`using concentrated aqueous solutions
`(1:1250) at elevated temper ature (60°C),
`in absence of any retardation agents, an(cid:173)
`ti oxidants or stabilizer s. Epin eph rine (as a
`bitartrate) solutions were prepared by us (cid:173)
`ing deoxygen ated water and the system was
`assem bled under a blanket of nitrogen.
`T he 38-mL glass vials were filled with 20
`mL of the solution, adjusted to a pH of 4.
`In the experiment reported in Table 3, the
`extractor included an oxygen probe, de(cid:173)
`scribed previously.
`Results
`The reference solutions, without extrac(cid:173)
`tors, displayed a coloration within 24
`hours, turning to black, oily films in 15
`days; whereas the vial fitt ed with the ex(cid:173)
`tractor remained clear throughout the test
`duration, namely, 19 days. These stabili ty
`results were confirmed by researchers at
`the U niversity of Tennessee by measuring
`the epinephrine concentration over a period
`of 24 days. 1
`Conclusion
`
`This technology allows removal of oxy(cid:173)
`gen and maintenance of an essentially oxy(cid:173)
`gen-free environment in containers, and is
`suitable for drug vials or any other appli(cid:173)
`cation requiring the creation and mainte(cid:173)
`nance of anaerobic environments. It can be
`applied to contained solids, liquids or so(cid:173)
`lutions, including a varie ty of oxygen(cid:173)
`sensitive products, such as cosmetics, food
`and beverages, chemicals, etc.
`
`References
`
`1. Wood G, Aksorntoae N, Thoma L.
`Evaluation of an oxyge n extraction
`device in slowing epinephrine degra(cid:173)
`dation. Presented at th e Parenteral
`Drug Associa tion Annual Meeting,
`Washington, DC, Fall 1998. (cid:127)
`
`PEER REVIEWED
`
`I ·N D E X of
`
`ADVERTISERS
`
`Analytical Research Laboratories . ... 482
`Apothecary Products .. . .... .. ... . ... 451
`Application Design Consultants ...... 446
`B & B Pharmaceuticals, Inc .......... 489
`Chemical and Pharmaceutical
`Industry Co., Inc .. .. ...... ... ....... 438
`Display Options, Inc ...... . .. ....... . 456
`Flavorx .. . . ..... ................... 455
`Gallipot, Inc ..... .. ..... ... 450, 487, OBC
`Gladson & Associates .. . . .. ......... 426
`ISO Tech Design . .. ........... . ..... 485
`Lorann Oils . ... ............... ... ... 486
`Mallinckrodt, Inc ...... ... ... ........ 466
`Medica Instrumentation ........... .. 483
`
`Meridian Chemical. .. . ........... .. . 460
`PK Software . . ...... . .. ... .. . ....... 489
`Paddock Laboratories, Inc .... . . . . .. . . 459
`Pharmaceutical Specialties, Inc ... ... 484
`Pharma-Tek, Inc ..... .. .... . .... . ... 442
`Professional Compounding
`Centers of America, Inc . . 436-437, 465, IFC
`Respiratory Distributors, Inc ... .. . 452-453
`Robert P. Potts & Assoc., Inc .. . . .... .. 495
`Rx Formulator ................. .. ... 502
`Spectrum Quality Products, Inc ....... IBC
`The Compounder's Website .. ....... . 492
`Triple Crown America ............ . .. 440
`
`For advertising information, contact LAUREN BERNICK.
`Address: P. 0. Box 890546 , Houston TX 77289 USA
`Tel: 800 -6 61-4572 Fax: 800-494-4572
`email: lbernick@ijpc.com
`
`STORE PLANNING
`STORE FIXTURES
`& STORE DECOR
`
`Potts & Associates is the firm with the experience to assist pharmacists in
`planning their IV Clean Room , Compounding Laboratory, and developing a
`more professional image for their stores. Call us today for more information.
`SERVING PHARMACISTS SINCE 1954
`
`a Ro&ellt p. potts & assoc.
`
`2722 Fairmont, Dallas, Texas 75201
`(214) 871-8747 • 800-255-5498 • fax: (214) 969-6937
`
`Internationa l Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding 1•
`
`Vol.3 No.6 November/D ecember 1999
`
`Eton Ex. 1028
`3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket