throbber
Original Article
`Evaluation of the children with acute acetaminophen overdose
`and intravenous N-acetylcysteine treatment
`Yakup Yesil1, Abdurrahman Avar Ozdemir2
`
`ABSTRACT
`Objective: To evaluate the demographic and clinical features associated with acetaminophen overdose
`and to identify the clinical use of IV (intravenous) N- Acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment in children.
`Methods: This prospective study was conducted in Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
`between August 2016 and August 2017. A total of 59 patients with overdose acetaminophen ingestion were
`
`kg. Rumack-Matthew nomogram was used to evaluate the risk of acute intoxication and to determine the
`decision of using antidote.
`Results: The mean age of the patients was 8.5±6.4 y and 34 of them (58%) were female. The mean time
`from ingestion to admission was 4.3±4.7 h. The mean ingested acetaminophen dose was 142.1±80 mg/kg.
`
`dose, creatinine and INR between antidote and decontamination therapy groups at admission time (p=
`0.00, p= 0.03, p= 0.02, respectively). The complication due to antidote therapy was observed in only 1
`patient.
`Conclusions:
`generally well tolerated in children.
`
`KEY WORDS: Acetaminophen intoxication, N- acetylcysteine, Children.
`
`How to cite this:
`Yesil Y, Ozdemir AA. Evaluation of the children with acute acetaminophen overdose and intravenous N-acetylcysteine treatment. Pak
`J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):590-594. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14937
`
`This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0),
`which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
`
`doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14937
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Acetaminophen is commonly used in children as
`an analgesic and antipyretic. Although its’ safety
`was well established, it is one of the common cause
`of drug poisoning. Repeated supra-therapeutic
`1.
`Yakup Yesil, MD.
`Department of Pediatrics,
`Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital,
`Medical Sciences University, Turkey.
`Abdurrahman Avar Ozdemir
`Department of Pediatrics,
`Medicine Hospital, Biruni University, Turkey.
`
`2.
`
`Correspondence:
`
`Yakup Yesil, MD.
`Department of Pediatrics, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training
`and Research Hospital, Medical Sciences University, Turkey.
`Atakent Mah. Turgut Ozal Cad. No: 46/1 Kucukcekmece,
`Postal Code: 34303, Istanbul, Turkey.
`E-mail: yakyes@hotmail.com
`
` * Received for Publication:
` * Accepted for Publication:
`
`February 25, 2018
`May 16, 2018
`
`dosing and intentional or unintentional overdose
`usage may result in hepatic failure.1
`Acetaminophen is metabolized by glucuronidation
`and sulfation in liver. However, approximately
`5-10% of the drug is metabolized by Cytochrome
`P450 (CYP450) to a toxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-
`benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI). When acetaminophen
`is used at the recommended doses, NAPQI is
`eliminated by conjugation with glutathione. If it is
`used overdose, glutathione stores are depleted and the
`clearance of NAPQI is reduced. As a result, this toxic
`metabolite accumulates and causes hepatocellular
`injury.2 Management of acetaminophen overdose
`includes; gastric lavage, using of activated charcoal
`and N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) as an antidote.1-3
`The aim of this study was to evaluate demographic
`and clinical features associated with acetaminophen
`overdose as well as to identify the treatment applied
`in our Pediatric Emergency Unit.
`
`Pak J Med Sci May - June 2018 Vol. 34 No. 3 www.pjms.com.pk 590
`
`Eton Ex. 1102
`1 of 5
`
`

`

`Yakup Yesil et al.
`
`METHODS
`This prospective study was conducted in Kanuni
`Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
`between August 2016 and August 2017. The
`study protocol was approved by the local ethics
`committee and informed consent was obtained for
`all children from their parents. A total of 59 patients
`who came to Pediatric Emergency Unit with
`overdose acetaminophen ingestion were included
`in this study. The exclusion criteria were refusal
`of treatment or informed consent. Age, gender,
`weight, amount of the ingested acetaminophen, co-
`ingested substances, time elapsed from ingestion,
`method of gastrointestinal decontamination, and
`antidote usage were recorded.
`Amount of ingested acetaminophen was reported
`as milligrams per kilogram and toxic dose for
`
`150 mg/kg.2 Rumack-Matthew nomogram for
`acute acetaminophen intake was used to evaluate
`the risk of acute intoxication and to determine the
`decision of using antidote (NAC).4 Decontamination
`(lavage and activated charcoal) and Intravenous
`(IV) NAC therapy was administered to patients
`who were exposed to toxic dose. Laboratory data
`included serum acetaminophen level, whole blood
`count, aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) level,
`alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, serum urea
`level, creatinine level, Prothrombin (PT) time,
`activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
`and international normalized ratio (INR). Whole
`blood count was measured on the Cobas 6000 CE
`
`(Roche, Germany) and XN-10 (Sysmex, Japan) was
`used to measure ALT, AST, urea and creatinine.
`Blood samples for acetaminophen levels were
`
`and Neurology Training and Research Hospital by
`a multipoint homogeneous immunoassay on the
`Advia 1800 (Siemens, Japan).
`SPSS Statistics 20 was used for data analysis.
`Descriptive statistics were given as mean, standard
`
`2-test for
`qualitative data and Mann-Whitney U test for
`quantitative data. Correlations between quantitative
`data were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation test.
`RESULTS
`During the study period, 137 patients who
`presented for analgesics/antipyretics overdose in
`our hospital and we found that 59 (43%) of them
`ingested the drugs containing acetaminophen.
`The mean age of the patients was 8.5±6.4 y (min-
`max; 1-17) and 34 of them (58%) were female. The
`patients were divided into 2 groups according
`to age; 34 of them (52%) were in 0-8, 25 (48%) of
`them were in 8-17 years age group. There was male
`dominance (30; 88%) in 0-8 age group, whereas
`there was female dominance (21; 84%) in 8-17 age
`group. The mean weight of the patients was found
`as 32.9±22 kg (min-max; 9-80) (Table-I).
`The mean time from ingestion of the drug to
`admission was found as 4.3±4.7 h (min-max; 0.5-
`20); 50 (85%) of patients came in 8 h and all of them
`
`Table-I: Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients.
`Acetaminophen dose
`(mg/kg) (Mean±SD)
`142±80
`163 ± 89
`112.6 ± 53
`
`8.5±6.4
`34 (58%)
`25 (42%)
`
`n (%)
`
`Age (y) (Mean±SD)
`0-8
`
`Gender n (%)
`Male
`Female
`Weight (kg) (Mean±SD)
`
`>25
`Ingested Substance
`Acetaminophen only
`Acetaminophen and additional drug
`Time from ingestion to admission (Mean±SD)
`
` >8 h
`1Mann-Whitney U Test.
`
`34 (58%)
`25 (42%)
`32.9±22.9
`32 (54%)
`27 (46%)
`
`29 (49%)
`30 (51%)
`4.3±4.7
`49 (83%)
`19 (17%)
`
`164±84
`125±73
`
`165±90
`112±52
`
`174± 89
`109±53
`
`142±81
`138±75
`
`Pak J Med Sci May - June 2018 Vol. 34 No. 3 www.pjms.com.pk 591
`
`p
`
`10.06
`
`10.08
`
`10.05
`
`10.008
`
`10,9
`
`Eton Ex. 1102
`2 of 5
`
`

`

`Acetaminophen overdose in children
`
`came to hospital in 24 h. When the admission hours
`were analyzed; 25 of them admitted to hospital
`between 18:00-24:00, 17 of them between 12:00-
`18:00 hours, 9 of them between 00:00-06:00 hours
`and 8 of them between 06:00-12:00 o’clock. Twenty
`nine of them (49%) ingested only acetaminophen
`but others (30, 51%) ingested more than one drug.
`The mean ingested acetaminophen dose was found
`as 142.1±80 mg/kg (min-max; 24-300). There were
`
`gender, weight, admission mean time) in terms
`of ingested acetaminophen dose. However, there
`
`acetaminophen and additional drug groups. (p=
`0.008) (Table-I).
`Acetaminophen concentrations were measured
`from the 22 patients (37%) who ingested more
`than 150 mg/kg. Mean serum acetaminophen level
`was found as 14.3±23 µg/mL (min-max; 0.2-107).
`When the laboratory parameters were evaluated,
`the liver enzymes’ elevation was found in 1 patient
`and INR elevation was found in another patient.
`Also, we analyzed correlations between ingested
`acetaminophen dose and time from ingestion to
`admission, serum acetaminophen level, ALT, AST,
`
`correlation (r: 0.00; p= 0.98, r: 0.11; p= 0.6, r: 0.15; p=
`
`0.95, r: 0.076; p= 0.74, r: 0.32; p= 0.12, r: 0.13; p= 0.59,
`r: 0.18; p= 0.53, r:0.17, respectively).
`Twenty four patients (41%) received IV NAC
`therapy as well as decontamination. Patients
`receiving NAC therapy were compared with
`those receiving only decontamination therapy
`
`acetaminophen dose, creatinine and INR between
`groups at admission time (p= 0.00, p= 0.03, p= 0.02,
`respectively) (Table-II). However, there were no
`
`INR between groups at discharged time (p= 0.9, p=
`0.06, respectively). We observed urticarial reaction
`as a complication due to antidote therapy in only 1
`patient.
`Twenty two (37%) of all patients ingested the
`medicines due to suicide attempt. The mean age
`of these were found as 15.8±1 y (range 12-17) and
`17 of them (77%) were female. The number of
`patients received NAC therapy were found as 12
`(55%). Seventeen (77%) of the patients ingested
`multi drugs for suicide. All of patients who attempt
`suicide were referred to psychiatric service for
`consultation. The total number of the ingested
`additional drugs together with acetaminophen
`were 47; 14 (30%) of them were anti-gripal, 9 (19%)
`of them were gastrointestinal drugs, 7 (15%) were
`
`Table-II: Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients according to treatment methods.
`
`Decontamination
`therapy
`(Mean±SD)
`
`Decontamination
`and NAC therapy
`(Mean±SD)
`
`7.2±5.9
`
`Age (y)
`Gender n (%)
`Male
`Female
`Weight (kg)
`Substance ingested n (%)
`Acetaminophen only Additional drug
`Time from ingestion to admission (h)
`Acetaminophen dose (mg/kg)
`Acetaminophen level (µg/mL)
`Hb (gr/dL)
`ALT (UI/L)
`AST (UI/L)
`Urea (mg/dL)
`Creatinine (mg/dL)
`INR
`Total n (%)
`1 Mann-Whitney U test,
`
`15 (43%)
`20 (57%)
`27.5±20
`15 (43%)
`20 (57%)
`4.3±4.7
`106±53
`13±11
`12.5±0,9
`17.5±8.7
`23.5±9.3
`22.9±8.5
`0.43±0.16
`1.0±0.1
`35 (59%)
`2 Chi-Square Test of Independence.
`
`10±6.7
`
`10 (42%)
`14 (58%)
`39.2±25
`14 (58%)
`10 (42%)
`4.6±4.9
`191±85
`14.7±26
`12.4±1.7
`21±25.8
`21.5±9.7
`24.7±7.4
`0.55±0.2
`1.1±0.09
`24 (41%)
`
`Total
`
`8.5±6.4
`
`25 (42%)
`34 (58%)
`35.1±23
`29 (49%)
`30 (51%)
`4.4±4.8
`142±80
`14.3±23
`12.5±1.4
`19±18
`22.6±9.4
`23.7±8
`0.49±0.2
`1.1±0.1
`58 (100%)
`
`p
`
`10.07
`
`20.85
`
`10.07
`
`20.4
`
`10.8
`10.00
`10.2
`10.8
`10.9
`10.3
`10.2
`10.03
`10.02
`
`Pak J Med Sci May - June 2018 Vol. 34 No. 3 www.pjms.com.pk 592
`
`Eton Ex. 1102
`3 of 5
`
`

`

`Yakup Yesil et al.
`
`were antibiotic, 4 (9%) were antidepressant, 2 (4%)
`were steroid, and 5 (10%) were others.
`When the signs and symptoms of the patients
`were evaluated, nausea and abdominal pain were
`determined in 38 (64%) of the patients. Other
`common symptoms were vomiting, headache
`and fatigue. One patient with neurologic disorder
`had convulsion. However, 21 (36%) of them were
`asymptomatic. Total number of patients admitted
`to inpatient service was 18 and 2 of these admitted
`to pediatric intensive care unit due to additional
`drugs. In follow up, clinical course and laboratory
`parameters of all patients were resolved. None of
`patients died.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Analgesics are the most common substance that
`causes poisoning in all ages. When the child age
`group is evaluated, analgesic intoxication is third
`after the cosmetics and cleaning substances for
`younger than 5 years old children according to the
`2014 annual report of the American Association of
`Poison Control Centers. 5 Similarly, acetaminophen
`was reported as the drug most frequently used in
`self-poisoning in UK and Spain.6,7 Unfortunately,
`national data on intoxications in Turkey is limited.
`The number of deaths in 2016 due to intoxications
`were 855; the drugs were the most frequent
`cause for intoxications and acetaminophen was
`leading agent according to the report of National
`Poison Consultation Center (UZEM) and regional
`studies.8-14
`In our study, 684 patients admitted to our
`emergency unit due to intoxication with drugs.
`Similar
`to previous studies, we
`found
`that
`analgesics/antipyretics were the most frequently
`(20%) ingested drugs and acetaminophen was
`
`of the patients was 8.5±6.4 y and it was higher
`than previous studies.10,12,13 This result may be
`associated with distribution of patients’ ages.
`Because, there were no patients between 7.5-13
`years age in our study. The number of patients
`in the 0-8 age group constituted the majority and
`there was a male predominance. However, there
`was a female predominance in 8-17 age group
`and the most frequent reason for intoxication was
`suicide attempt. Similar data were obtained from
`other studies in our country.11-14 These results may
`
`girls experience during adolescence. We found that
`the rate of multidrug ingestion was 51%. When the
`
`multidrug ingestion was evaluated, the anti-gripal
`drugs accounted for 30% of them. In previous
`studies, the ingestion of multidrug was reported as
`5-19%.12,13,15,16 However, those studies included all
`substance exposures.
`ingestion to hospital
`The mean time from
`admission was found as 4.3 h. and the ingested
`
`patients who ingested only acetaminophen. As
`expected, the ingestion of more than one agent
`reduces the proportion of acetaminophen in the
`total dose. No correlations were determined
`between laboratory parameters and ingested dose.
`This result might be related with all of patients
`admitted to hospital due to acute intoxication,
`shortened admission time and early intervention.
`Early studies showed that NAC is an effective
`therapy for acetaminophen toxicity and it initiated
`
`of hepatotoxicity and usually liver failure does
`not develop. It can be given oral or IV route and
`adverse reactions were uncommon.17,2,3 Although,
`there is no consensus on the duration of treatment,
`if it is initiated within 8 h after poisoning, there is no
`difference between 21 h and the longer treatment.3,18
`In our hospital, we used 21 h protocol for I.V NAC
`treatment. In our study, 41% of the patients received
`IV NAC as well as decontamination therapy.
`Unfortunately, the results of serum acetaminophen
`level were obtained after 1 day because the blood
`samples sent to another hospital laboratory. The
`previous studies in children showed that the risk
`of hepatotoxicity is lower than adult patient and
`late presentation (>24 h after ingestion) or delayed
`therapy are an important risk factors.19-21 Therefore,
`we decided to initiate NAC therapy based on the
`ingested acetaminophen dose and clinical opinion.
`The studies in Turkey have been conducted in
`the adult age group and are limited in number.
`Duran et al. reported that nausea or vomiting were
`determined in 56.6% of the patients and the mean
`time of therapy initiation was 5.8 h. Hepatotoxicity
`developed in 1 patient and complication due to
`NAC therapy (urticarial reaction) was observed in 1
`patient.22 Karaman et al. reported that hepatotoxicity,
`nephrotoxicity or death were not observed in any
`patients.23 In our study, we found that the most
`
`abdominal pain. The mean time from ingestion to
`initiation of NAC therapy was found as 4.6±4.9 h
`and none of the patients developed hepatotoxicity.
`This short admission period may also explain that
`36% of the patients were asymptomatic. Similarly,
`
`Pak J Med Sci May - June 2018 Vol. 34 No. 3 www.pjms.com.pk 593
`
`Eton Ex. 1102
`4 of 5
`
`

`

`Acetaminophen overdose in children
`
`urticarial reaction was observed in one patient.
`When the patients who received NAC and only
`decontamination
`therapy were compared, as
`expected we found the ingested acetaminophen
`dose and serum acetaminophen level were higher
`in patients who received antidote. Some previous
`studies reported that INR values were higher in
`patients with acetaminophen poisoning without
`liver damage but these values reduced after NAC
`therapy.23-25 We found that creatinine and INR
`values were slightly high in patients received NAC
`therapy at admission time. However, there were no
`differences in terms of creatinine and INR between
`groups at discharge.
`There are some limitations that should be
`mentioned in our study. The results of serum
`acetaminophen level were obtained after 1 day and
`this delay might have affected treatment choice.
`
`side effects due to IV NAC therapy are uncommon
`and it is generally well tolerated in children.
`Additionally, we found that anti-gripal drugs are in
`
`to avoid the prescription of such drugs containing
`more than one agent because dosing errors can be
`made easily.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. American academy of pediatrics committee on drugs.
`Acetaminophen
`toxicity
`in
`children.
`Pediatrics.
`2001;108:1020. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.1020.
`2. Ogilvie JD, Rieder MJ, Lim R. Acetaminophen overdose
`in children. CMAJ. 2012;184(13):1492-1496. doi: 10.1503/
`cmaj.111338.
`
`of acetaminophen (paracetamol) toxicity in pediatrics.
`Available: www.who.int/selection_medicines/.../acetylcys
`teine_rev.pdf (accessed 2017 October 6).
`4. Rumack BH, Matthew H. Acetaminophen poisoning and
`toxicity. Pediatrics. 1975;55:871-876.
`5. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Mcmillan N, Schauben
`JL. 2014 Annual Report of the American Association of
`Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System
`(NPDS): 32nd Annual Report. Clin Toxicol. 2015;53(10):962-
`1146. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1102927.
`6. Mintegi S, Fernandez A, Alustiza J, Canduela V, Mongil I,
`Caubet I, et al. Emergency visits for childhood poisoning:
`a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Spain. Pediatr
`Emerg Care. 2006;22(5):334-338.
`Sheen CL, Dillon JF, Bateman DM, Simpson KJ,
`Macdonald TM. Paracetamol toxicity: epidemiology,
`prevention and costs to the health-care system. Q J
`Med. 2002;95:609-619.
`Turkish Statistical Institute. Statistics on child, 2015.
`No:
`21521.
`Avaliable:
`http://www.tuik.gov.tr/
`PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21521 (accessed 22 April 2016).
`9. Ozcan N, Ikinciogullari D. Ulusal Zehir Danisma Merkezi
`2008 Yili Calisma Raporu Ozeti. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg.
`2009;66(ER3):29-58.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`10. Aygin D, Acil H. The study of the intoxiation cases of the
`patients (0-18 years) admitting to pediatric emergency unit.
`Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp. 2014;48(1):27-33. doi: 10.5350/
`SEMB2014480105.
`11. Bicer S, Sezer S, Cetindag F, Kesikminare M, Tombulca
`N, Aydogan G, et al. Evaluation of acute intoxications in
`pediatric emergency clinic in 2005. Marmara Medical J.
`2007;20(1):12-20.
`
`applied to the pediatrics emergency unit. Turk Arch Ped.
`2011;46:234-240. doi: 10.4274/tpa.46.80.
`13. Akin Y, Agzikuru T, Comert S, Atilkan P, Erdag GC, Telatar
`B. Hospitalizations for pediatric intoxication: a study from
`Istanbul. The Turk J Pediatr. 2011;53:369-374.
`14. Ozenir M, Selcuk Duru N, Elevli M, Karakus A, Civilibal
`M. The Familial Factors and Demographic Characteristics
`of Children with Drug Poisoning. Med Bull Haseki.
`2013;51:157-161. doi: 10.4274/Haseki.1165.
`
`Oyman G, et al. An evaluation of the admissions to a tertiary
`hospital pediatric emergency department with intoxication.
`Smyrna Tip Dergisi 2012;41-44.
`16. Turkmenoglu Y, Gumusoglu Aksahin B, Saritas U, Yilmaz
`B, Arat C, Safak E, et al. Update Glance on Childhood
`
`10.5222/otd.2015.082.
`17. Bebarta VS, Kao L, Froberg B, Clark RF, Lavonas E, Qi M, et
`al. A Multi-center Comparison of the Safety of Oral versus
`Intravenous Acetylcysteine for Treatment of Acetaminophen
`Overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48(5):424-430. doi:
`10.3109/15563650.2010.486381.
`18. Williamson K, Wahl MS, Mycyk MB. Direct comparison of
`20-hour IV, 36-hour oral, and 72-hour oral acetylcysteine for
`treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning. Am J Ther.
`2013;20(1):37-40. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318250f829.
`19. Rumack BH. Acetaminophen overdose in young children:
`treatment and effects of alcohol and other ingestants in 417
`cases. AJDC. 1984;138:428-433.
`20. Rivera-Penera T, Gugig R, Davis J, McDiarmid S, Vargas J,
`Rosenthal P, et al. Outcome of acetaminophen overdose in
`pediatric patients and factors contributing to hepatotoxicity.
`J Pediatr. 1997;130:300-304.
`21. Alander SW, Dowd D, Bratton SL, Kearns GL. Pediatric
`acetaminophen overdose risk factors associated with
`hepatocellular
`injury. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
`2000;154:346:350.
`
`Y. Use of Intravenous N-Acetyl Systein in Paracetamol
`Intoxication. JAEM. 2011;10:145-147.
`23. Karaman K, Avcil M, Kantekin B, Ozluer YE, Yasar HE, Avcil
`S, et al. Evaluation of Patients with Paracetamol Intoxication
`Who Admitted to Emergency Service. Meandros Med Dent
`J. 2016;17:11-16. doi:10.4274/meandros.2533.
`24 Whyte IM, Buckley NA, Reith DM, Goodhew I, Seldon
`M, Dawson AH. Acetaminophen causes an increased
`International Normalized Ratio by reducing functional
`factor VII. Ther Drug Monit. 2000;22(6):742-748.
`25. Wasserman GS, Garg U. Intravenous Administration of
`N-Acetylcysteine: Interference with Coagulopathy Testing.
`Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:546-547.
`Authors’ Contribution:
`YY: Designed and did statistical analysis, writing &
`editing of manuscript.
`AAO: Did data collection and manuscript writing.
`
`Pak J Med Sci May - June 2018 Vol. 34 No. 3 www.pjms.com.pk 594
`
`Eton Ex. 1102
`5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket