throbber

`
`GREE, INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SUPERCELL OY,
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`The Honorable Rodney Gilstrap
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00071-JRG-RSP
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`§§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`EXPERT REPORT OF MARK CLAYPOOL, PH.D.
`
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`2.
`
`Mastermind
`
`112. Mastermind combines a post titled “Mastermind’s In-Game Builder Idea (with
`
`LOADS of pictures!)” and a post titled “Mastermind’s In-Game Builder Post” both made on
`
`September 11, 2013 to a community forum for Clash of Clans by a user using the name
`
`“Mastermind.” I will refer collectively to these forum posts as “Mastermind” or “Mastermind’s
`
`In-Game Builder Idea.” The forum was hosted by Supercell and the postings made thereon were
`
`publicly available on the Internet. Mastermind would thus would have been available to the
`
`public prior to the effective filing date of the ‘594 patent. I understand the version of the posts I
`
`reviewed faithfully represents the posts as they existed before the effective filing date of the ‘594
`
`patent. Mastermind’s In-Game Builder Post was archived by the Internet Archive on September
`
`15, 2013. Mastermind at 10, 12. I further understand that the author of the posts has
`
`authenticated the images shown in the archive of the post on Internet Archive. I understand that
`
`34
`
`REDACTED
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`164.
`
`In addition, it is my opinion that a diligent, skilled researcher engaged in a
`
`reasonable search for prior art would not have found Mastermind as a prior art reference even
`
`with the benefit of GREE’s infringement contentions before the filing of the Petition for Post-
`
`Grant Review. A diligent, skilled researcher would not spend time sifting through the
`
`suggestions provided on Internet message boards, as they would normally not include useful or
`
`sufficiently detailed suggestions.
`
`58
`
`REDACTED
`
`REDACTED
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`or information produced by the parties in this litigation, information set forth in any
`
`supplemental reports or declarations submitted by either party, and the Court’s construction of
`
`the patent claim terms.
`
`247.
`
`If called to testify, I will as needed explain the principles and terminology referred
`
`to in this report, as well as the materials referenced herein. I also expect that I will illustrate my
`
`testimony through the use of demonstrative exhibits, as needed.
`
`92
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket