PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Patent Owner

Gree, Inc.

Petitioner

Supercell Oy

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

Supercell Oy v. Gree, Inc.

PGR2020-00063 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed May 8, 2020

Judges Hyun Jung, Lynne Browne, and Richard Marschall

Case Type Post Grant Review

Status Institution Denied

Challenged Patent 15/196,410

Patent No. 10,406,432 assignments

Tech Center 3700

Art Unit 3715

Inventors Masashi Watanabe

Last Updated: 3 weeks, 3 days ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
9/17/2021	09-17-2021-Board	Board Notice: refund approved 15: Notice: refund approved
9/9/2021	09-09-2021-Petitioner	Petitioner Refund Request 14: Petitioner Supercell Oy's Request for Refund of Post Grant Review Post-Institution Fees Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 42.15(b)
8/19/2021	08-19-2021-Board	Board Order Conduct of Proceeding 13: Order Conduct of Proceeding
8/18/2021	08-18-2021-Petitioner	Petitioner Motion 12: Petitioner's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Request for Rehearing
12/14/2020	12-14-2020-Petitioner	Petitioner Rehearing Request - in re Petition Institution Decision Denied 11: Petitioner's Request for Rehearing Under 37 C.F.R. Section 42.71 Petitioner Exhibit 1018: Exhibit 1018: Decision, GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 19-1864 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)
11/12/2020	11-12-2020-Board	Event: Petition Institution (Denied) Board Decision Denying Institution 10: Decision - Denying Institution of Post-Grant Review
9/17/2020	09-17-2020-Board	Board Order 9: ORDER Conduct of Proceeding
8/12/2020	08-12-2020-Patent_Owner	Event: Preliminary Response Patent Owner Preliminary Response 8: Patent Owners Preliminary Response Patent Owner Exhibit 2001: Declaration of Michael Shamos Patent Owner Exhibit 2002: USPTO 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance Patent Owner Exhibit 2003: USPTO October 2019 Update Patent Owner Exhibit 2004: USPTO Memorandum on Changes in Examination Procedure Patent Owner Exhibit 2005: USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Examples Patent Owner Exhibit 2006: U.S. Patent No. 9,021,390 to Pidhajecky Patent Owner Exhibit 2009: Changes to the Claim Construction Standard Patent Owner Exhibit 2010: Terzioglu_Immersion and Identity in Video Games Patent Owner Exhibit 2011: Ortqvist_Immersion and Gameplay Experience Patent Owner Exhibit 2012: Song_Continuous Body and Hand Gesture Recognition Patent Owner Exhibit 2013: Manetta_Glossary of Virtual Reality Technology Patent Owner Exhibit 2014: Gree v. Supercell_2-19-cv-00070
5/20/2020	05-20-2020-Board	Board Notice 7: Notice of Accepting Corrected Exhibit
5/19/2020	05-19-2020-Petitioner	Petitioner Other (Not for motions) 6: Petitioner's Submission of Corrected Exhibit 1016 Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Corrected Exhibit 1016: Declaration of Guang Y. Zhang for Ex. 1015
5/14/2020	05-14-2020-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Power of Attorney 4: Power of Attorney Patent Owner Mandatory Notice 5: Patent Owners Mandatory Notice
5/13/2020	05-13-2020-Board	Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition 3: Notice of Accord Filing Date
5/8/2020	05-08-2020-Petitioner	Petitioner Power of Attorney 1: Supercell Oy's Power of Attorney Event: Petition Petitioner Petition 2: Petition for Post Grant Review of U.S. Patent 10,406,432 Petitioner Exhibit 1001: Exhibit 1001: U.S. Patent No. 10,406,432 to Watanabe Petitioner Exhibit 1002: Exhibit 1002: Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 10,406,432 Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Exhibit 1003: Declaration of Joseph J. LaViola, Ph.D. Petitioner Exhibit 1004: Exhibit 1004: U.S. Patent No. 9,392,212 to Ross Petitioner Exhibit 1005: Exhibit 1005: Chris Lankford., Nov. 2000, "Effective eye-gaze input into Windows," In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications Petitioner Exhibit 1006: Exhibit 1006: U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 20160093105 to Rimon Petitioner Exhibit 1007: Exhibit 1007: "Unify Community" - Unity Game Engine Wiki - "Object Label" Article Petitioner Exhibit 1008: Exhibit 1008: U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 20150153913 to Ballard Petitioner Exhibit 1009: Exhibit 1009: Bowman, D. A., Poupyrev, I., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J. (2005), 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice Petitioner Exhibit 1010: Exhibit 1010: Robert Jacob, April 1990, "Eye Movement-Based Interaction Techniques" Petitioner Exhibit 1011: Exhibit 1011: Linda Sibert et al., April 2000, "Evaluation of Eye Gaze Interaction" Petitioner Exhibit 1012: Exhibit 1012: LaViola, J., "3D Gestural Interaction: The State of the Field" Petitioner Exhibit 1013: Exhibit 1013: Invalidity Chart - Primary Reference: Ross Petitioner Exhibit 1014: Exhibit 1014: Invalidity Chart - Primary Reference: Ballard Petitioner Exhibit 1015: Exhibit 1015: Internet Archive Copy of Ex. 1007 dated Feb. 16, 2015 Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Exhibit 1016: Declaration of Guang Y. Zhang for Ex. 1015 Petitioner Exhibit 1017: Exhibit 1017: Curriculum Vitae of Joseph J. LaViola, Ph.D.

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Patent Owner

Petitioner

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

Supercell Oy v. Gree, Inc.

PGR2020-00063 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Event:

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases