throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GRÜNENTHAL GMBH,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ANTECIP BIOVENTURES II LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`PGR2019-00028
`U.S. Patent No. 10,052,338
`____________
`
`DECLARATION OF CORINNE MILITELLO, ESQ.
`
`Grün. Exh. 1044
`Grünenthal v. Antecip
`PGR2019-00028
`
`

`

`1.
`
`I currently hold the position of Senior Corporate Counsel at Taylor &
`
`Francis Group at Informa PLC (“Taylor & Francis”).
`
`I make this declaration based
`
`on my ownpersonal knowledge and experiences, and if called upon as a witness,
`
`could competently testify to the matters stated herein.
`
`2.
`
`Taylor & Francis publishes more than 2,600 journals and over 5,000
`
`new books eachyear, and is one ofthe world’s leading academic publishing
`
`businesses. Through my work as Senior Corporate Counsel, I am awareof the
`
`Taylor & Francis procedures and general practices related to publication and public
`
`accessibility ofjournalarticles.
`
`3.
`
`lL investigated the publication date ofan article published by Taylor &
`
`Francisentitled Gatti et al., Neridronic Acidfor the Treatment ofBone Metabolic
`
`Diseases, EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM AND TOXICOLOGY, 5(10):1305-
`
`1311 (“Gatti”). A true and correct copy of Gatti is attached here as Exhibit A.
`
`Based on myinvestigation and my personal knowledge, I can confirm that Gatti
`
`wasavailable and accessible to the public by at least September 17, 2009.
`
`4.
`
`Thefirst page of Gatti (attached here as Exhibit A) states that it was
`
`“Published online: 17 Sept 2009.” This date is set automatically by the Taylor &
`
`Francis computer system when a manuscriptis uploaded to the Taylor & Francis
`
`website by the Production Department, and it represents the date that an article was
`
`

`

`actually made publicly accessible by Taylor and Francis. This date cannot be, and
`
`would not be, manually changed by the Production Departmentfor any reason.
`
`5.
`
`Moreover, the date on the first page ofthe article is consistent with
`
`companyprocedures and general practices. On September 16, 2009,the final
`
`pages of Gatti were received by Taylor & Francis from the typesetter. Exhibit B is
`
`a true and correct copy of a screenshot of the Taylor & Francis internal production
`
`system, showing thatthe final pages of the Gatti final manuscript were received
`
`from the typesetter on this date. It was general companypractice at the timethat
`
`final manuscripts be uploaded and made publicly accessible within 24 hours of
`
`receipt.
`
`6.
`
`Thus, based upon mypersonal knowledge and my knowledge of
`
`company procedures and generalpractices, I can confirm that Gatti was publicly
`
`accessible by at least September 17, 2009.
`
`7.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein on my own knowledgeare
`
`true and that all statements made on information andbelief are believedto betrue,
`
`and further, that these statements were made with the knowledgethat willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable byfine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`

`

`Dated: Le Dec. Lol4
`
`Corinne Militello
`Senior Corporate Counsel
`Taylor & Francis Group at Informa PLC
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`Declaration of Corinne Militello
`
`

`

`Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
`
`ISSN: 1742-5255 (Print) 1744-7607 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iemt20
`
`Neridronic acid for the treatment of bone
`metabolic diseases
`
`Davide Gatti, Ombretta Viapiana, Luca Idolazzi, Elena Fracassi & Silvano
`Adami
`
`To cite this article: Davide Gatti, Ombretta Viapiana, Luca Idolazzi, Elena Fracassi & Silvano
`Adami (2009) Neridronic acid for the treatment of bone metabolic diseases, Expert Opinion on Drug
`Metabolism & Toxicology, 5:10, 1305-1311, DOI: 10.1517/17425250903029190
`To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1517/17425250903029190
`
`Published online: 17 Sep 2009.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 135
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles: 5 View citing articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iemt20
`
`Download by: [NIH Library]
`
`Date: 17 December 2017, At: 10:24
`
`

`

`
`
`Downloadedby[NIHLibrary]at10:2417December2017
`
`Expert
`Opinion
`
`Introduction
`
`Preclinical experiences
`2.
`3. Neridronic acid: clinical
`
`development
`
`Safety and tolerability
`4,
`5. Conclusion
`
`6.
`
`Expert opinion
`
`informa
`
`healthcare
`
`Drug Evaluation
`
`Neridronic acid for the treatment
`of bone metabolic diseases
`
`Davide Gatti, Ombretta Viapiana, Luca Idolazzi, Elena Fracassi &
`Silvano Adami‘
`t University ofVerona, Rheumatology Unit, Ospedale di Valeggio, 37067 Valeggio, Verona, Italy
`
`Neridronic acid (6-amino-1-idroxyesilidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate)is a nitrogen-
`containing bisphosphonate licensedin Italy for the treatment of osteogenesis
`imperfecta and Paget's disease of bone. The pharmacodynamic profile is similar
`to that of other nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates andis characterized
`by its high affinity for bone tissue particularly at sites undergoing a process
`of remodeling.
`In growing children affected by osteogenesis imperfect,
`neridronic acid rapidly increases bone mineral density as measured by dual
`X-ray absortiometry and this is associated with a significant decrease in
`fracture cumulative number. Similar results have been obtained also in new-
`borns (< 12 month old) and in adult patients.
`In Paget's disease of bone,
`200 mg intravenous neridronic acid is associated with a 65% rate of full
`remission and a biochemical response (decrease of > 75% of bone turnover
`markers)
`in 95% of the patients. Neridronic acid treatment has been
`reported to be effective also in other skeletal diseases such as osteoporosis,
`algodystrophy, hypercalcemia of malignancy and bone metastasis. Neridronic
`acid has been developed only for parenteral use, and it is the only one used as
`intramuscular injection. This avoids ail the limitations of oral bisohosphonates
`and may be offered for a home treatment with simple nursing assistance.
`
`Keywords: algodystrophy, bisphosphonates, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis,
`paget disease of bone
`
`Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. (2009) 5(10):1305-1311
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Neridronic acid (G-amino-1 -idroxyesilidene-1,1-bisphosphonate) is a nitrogen-containing
`bisphosphonate tested in a numberofclinical conditions and registered in Italy
`for the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and Paget’s disease of bone.
`The pharmacodynamic profile of neridronic acid is similar to that of other
`nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates and is characterized by its high affinity for
`bone tissue particularly at sites undergoing a process of remodeling,
`The pharmacokinetic has been investigated in young healthy subjects of both
`genders after intramuscular (i.m.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration of a single
`bolus of 25 mg andafter iv.
`infusion of 50 and 100 mg neridronic acid. The
`results can be summarized asfollows:
`
`¢ Dose-dependentlinear increases in the pharmacologicaleffects.
`¢ When given i.m., neridronicacid is fully bioavailable with renal excretion profile
`identical to that observedafter i.v. infusion.
`* The early half-life is ~ 7 h.
`¢ Approximately 50% ofthe dose given parenterally is excreted with urine in 24 h.
`* From both pharmacological and clinical studies, the antiresorptive potency of
`neridronic acid is very close to that of pamidronic acid.
`
`
`
`10.1517/17425250903029190 © 2009 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1742-5255
`All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or in part not permitted
`
`1305
`
`
`
`

`

`Neridronic acid
`
`2. Preclinical experiences
`
`Bisphosphonates have been extensively investigated for their
`inhibitory effects on osteoclasts with a mechanism of action
`that is largely known [1,2]. However, from a number of studies
`it seems that these compounds might have relevant extra-
`skeletal activities. Some of these studies were carried out with
`neridronic acid, namely for its action on new angiogenesis,
`on osteoblasts-osteocyte cells and IL-6 production.
`In 2005, Corrado et al. [3] investigated the effects of rising
`concentrations of neridronic acid on the activity of osteoblast
`cells derived from healthy individuals and women with
`osteoarthritis or osteoporosis. At high concentrations, the
`cellular production of osteocalcin was inhibited but at a
`lower concentration (10-6 M) the osteocalcin production
`was stimulated in cells derived from normal or osteoporotic
`subjects but not from those with osteoarthritis.
`Spreafico et al. [4] in 2006 confirmed the positive effect of
`neridronic acid on human osteoblasts cells by measuring the
`production of alkaline phosphatase and type 1 collagen. It
`should be mentioned that no in vivo studies have come out
`to corroborate these findings. A relevant inhibition of the
`synthesis of IL-6, a cytokine playing a crucial role in the
`recruitment and maturation of osteoclasts in vivo, has been
`also reported [4]. According to the authors, this last observation
`might provide the rational for using bisphosphonates, namely,
`neridronic acid in inflammatory conditions associated with
`abnormal bone resorption.
`The potential pharmacological effects of bisphosphonates
`on malignant cell lines have been extensively investigated
`over the past 2 decades [5]. Neridronic acid has been shown to
`inhibit the proliferation of umbilical stem cells and angiogenesis
`stimulated by fibroblast growth factor-2 [6].
`Muller et al. [7] evaluated the effects of three different
`nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates
`(alendronic
`acid,
`pamidronic acid and neridronic acid) on a cell line derived
`from squamocellular vulvar cancer, which is characterized
`by overproduction of EGFR, a cytokine with strong
`effects on proliferation and diffusion of tumoral cells.
`All three bisphosphonates were able to significantly suppress
`cell proliferation.
`
`3. Neridronic acid: clinical development
`
`type 1 collagen (bone, dentin, tendons, ligaments, endothelium)
`could be affected, with a variety of clinical manifestations.
`The hallmark of all OI types is the presence of severe qualitative
`and/or quantitative alterations of bone tissue.
`Skeletal growth is impaired and this, associated with
`recurrent skeletal fractures, may lead to severe deformities
`affecting life expectancy.
`Bone turnover is almost invariably abnormally high [8,9] and
`this represents the best rational for the use of bisphosphonates.
`The first experiences in the use of bisphosphonates in
`patients with OI comes from the Montreal group [10-12]
`using i.v. pamidronic acid in growing children and with
`clinical evidence of significant decrease in fracture incidence
`also in children aged < 3 years [13].
`The efficacy of bisphosphonates has been reported in a
`number of other small uncontrolled studies [14-16].
`Neridronic acid has been extensively investigated in
`patients with OI. In growing children, bone mineral density
`(BMD) as measured by dual X-ray absortiometry rapidly
`increases and this is associated with a significant 64%
`decrease in fracture numbers during the prospective study
`period (Figure 1) [17].
`Similar results have been obtained also in newborns
`(< 12 month old) with some evidence of improvement in
`the rate of skeletal growth [18].
`Neridronic acid has also been tested in adults with OI
`with evidence of efficacy in lowering fracture rate [19]. This
`decrease in the fracture rate seems to be greater than that
`expected from the changes in BMD. Thus, non-vertebral
`peripheral fracture decreased by 84% while spine BMD rose
`by 4%, which is the increase expected in premenopausal
`women [19]. This observation gave rise to the hypothesis that
`neridronic acid treatment is associated in these patients with
`structural bone changes not detected by dual X-ray absorti-
`ometry. For example, in a study using peripheral quantitative
`tomography, neridronic acid treatment in patients with OI
`was associated with the expected large increases in volumentric
`trabecular density but also with 7.2% increase in the cross-
`sectional area of the proximal radius with a mean expansion
`of the bone diameter of 0.56 mm [20]. This effect was
`explained by an increase in the level of mineralization of the
`periosteum rather than an anabolic effect on the bone laid
`down on the periosteal surface.
`
`Bisphosphonates developed for human use have been typically
`tested in metabolic bone disease characterized by focal and/or
`generalized excess bone reabsorption. A number of studies
`have been published on the use of neridronic acid in
`metabolic bone diseases both focal and systemic. However,
`neridronic acid has been licensed so far in Italy only for the
`treatment of OI and Paget’s disease of bone.
`
`3.1 Osteogenesis imperfecta
`OI is an inherited group of conditions of altered production
`or abnormal structure of type 1 collagen. All tissues containing
`
`3.2 Paget’s disease of bone
`Paget’s disease is characterized by focal increase in bone
`remodeling with consequent disruption of the normal
`lammelar structure of the bone tissue. The initial event
`seems to be an alteration of osteoclast size, number and
`activity, and these osteoclasts seem to be adequately responding
`to bisphosphonate therapy. Thus, bisphosphonates still
`represent the first-line treatment of Paget’s disease. The
`response to treatment has been based on the changes in
`bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) and variably defined by the
`full normalization of bAP or a decrease by > 75 or > 50%.
`
`1306
`
`Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. (2009) 5(10)
`
`Downloaded by [NIH Library] at 10:24 17 December 2017
`
`

`

`Gatti, Viapiana, Idolazzi, Fracassi & Adami
`
`basis of large studies designed to demonstrate a decrease
`in fracture rate. With this evidence, bisphosphonates are
`the treatment of choice for postmenopausal, male and
`glucocorticoid osteoporosis.
`Most bisphosphonates have to be taken orally under fasting
`conditions and the patient has to stand for at least half an
`hour after dosing. These administration rules make the use
`of bisphosphonates rather cumbersome for many patients
`and inaccessible to patients compelled to bed. The registration
`of i.v. formulations for zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid
`has partially circumvented these problems although their
`administration requires medical or hospital assistance.
`Neridronic acid has been developed only for parenteral
`use, both i.v. and i.m. which avoids all the limitations of the
`oral bisphosphonates and may be offered for a home treatment
`with simple nursing assistance. However, it should be
`pointed out that antifracture efficacy has been documented
`only in patients with OI and that no clinical trials are available
`for male osteoporosis and glucocorticoid osteoporosis. Thus,
`neridronate treatment is justified in patients with postmeno-
`pausal osteoporosis only when all other treatments are either
`controindicated or are not available.
`In an early pilot randomized-controlled study in 78 women
`with postmenopausal osteoporosis [25], 50 mg neridronic
`acid was given i.v. once every 2 months over 2 years. The
`changes in BMD were 7.4 and 5.8% at the lumbar spine
`and femoral neck, respectively. During the third year of
`observation without
`treatment, spine BMD remained
`unchanged while hip BMD slightly decreased, maintaining
`highly significant the differences versus baseline.
`Similar results have been obtained in another pilot study
`in 40 postmenopausal women [26] by using 25 mg neridronic
`acid monthly i.m. The densitomentric changes were 6.6 and
`4.2% at the spine and hip, respectively.
`Neridronic acid was more recently tested in a dose-finding
`clinical, multicenter trial in 188 postmenopausal osteoporotic
`women randomized to i.m. treatment with 25 mg neridronic
`acid every 2 weeks, neridronic acid 12.5 or 25 mg every 4 weeks,
`or placebo [27]. The patients were treated over 12 months
`with a 2-year posttreatment follow-up. After 12-months of
`treatment, all three doses were associated with significant
`BMD increases at both the total hip and spine. A significant
`dose–response relationship over the three doses was observed
`for the BMD changes at the total hip but not at the spine
`(Figure 2). bAP decreased significantly by 40 – 55% in
`neridronic acid-treated patients, with an insignificant dose–
`response relationship. Serum type I collagen C-telopeptide
`decreased by 58 – 79%, with a significant dose–response
`relationship (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). Two years after treatment
`discontinuation, BMD declined by 1 – 2% in each dose
`group, with values still significantly higher than baseline at
`both the spine and the total hip. Bone turnover markers
`progressively increased after treatment discontinuation, and
`on the second year of follow-up, the values were significantly
`higher than pretreatment baseline. These results indicate
`
`RR = 0.36 (0.15 – 0.87)
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`prospective study period
`
`Number of fractures occurred during
`
`Placebo group
`(22 patients)
`
`Active group
`(42 patients)
`
`Figure 1. Reduction of fractures occurred in active and placebo
`groups during the prospective study period in growing
`patients with OI [17].
`OI: Osteogenesis imperfecta.
`
`Although almost all bisphosphonates developed for human
`use have been tested in Pagetic patients, at the moment only
`three have been licensed for this indication (zoledronic acid,
`risedronic acid and neridronic acid). Zoledronic acid is given
`as a 1 day 5 mg i.v. infusion and is widely available
`in Europe, and was found to be superior to risedronic
`acid 30 mg daily over 2 months in terms of proportion of
`full remission [21].
`Neridronic acid is licensed in Italy for the treatment of
`Paget’s disease at the dose of 100 mg dissolved in 250 ml of
`saline solution given i.v. for 2 consecutive days.
`The registration was achieved after a Phase II-III multi-
`center clinical trial testing four different doses: 25, 50, 100 and
`200 mg [22]. The highest dose was the most effective and was
`associated with a 65% rate of full remission and a biochemical
`response (decrease of > 75%) in 95% of the patients.
`Neridronic acid therapy (100 mg i.v. over 2 days) was
`found to be effective in decreasing bAP by > 50% also in
`patients who had an inadequate response (bAP falling by < 50%)
`to i.v. clodronate [23].
`Pagetic patients with an inadequate response to one or
`two treatment courses with pamidronic acid (30 mg i.v. for
`2 consecutive days) were randomized to treatment with
`either neridronic acid (100 + 100 mg i.v.) or zoledronic acid
`5 mg i.v. The rate of adequate response and of full remission
`was comparable with the two treatments, 93 and 80%, respec-
`tively, for neridronic acid and 83 and 94%, respectively, for
`zoledronic acid [24].
`
`3.3 Postmenopausal osteoporosis
`A number of bisphosphonates have been thoroughly
`investigated for osteoporosis treatment (alendronic acid,
`risedronic acid, ibandronic acid, zoledronic acid) and they
`have been registered worldwide for this indication on the
`
`
`
`Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. (2009) 5(10)
`
`1307
`
`Downloaded by [NIH Library] at 10:24 17 December 2017
`
`

`

`12.5 mg
`
`25 mg
`50 mg
`
`25 mg
`
`12.5 mg
`50 mg
`
`Bone alkaline phosphatase
`
`Placebo
`
`Serum CTX
`
`Placebo
`
`40
`30
`20
`10
`0
`-10
`-20
`-30
`-40
`-50
`-60
`
`40
`30
`20
`10
`0
`-10
`-20
`-30
`-40
`-50
`-60
`-70
`-80
`-90
`
`Changes (%)
`
`50 mg
`25 mg
`12.5 mg
`
`50 mg
`
`25 mg
`12.5 mg
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18
`Months
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`Neridronic acid
`
`Spine BMD
`
`Placebo
`
`Total hip BMD
`
`0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`Placebo
`
`18
`Months
`
`7.0
`
`6.0
`
`5.0
`
`4.0
`
`3.0
`
`2.0
`
`1.0
`
`0.0
`
`-1.0
`
`5.0
`
`4.0
`
`3.0
`
`2.0
`
`1.0
`
`0.0
`
`-1.0
`
`Changes (%)
`
`Figure 2. Sequential changes in BMD and in bone turnover markers in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The
`different monthly doses of neridronate or placebo are shown in the figure. Blind treatment was given over 12 months with a posttreatment
`follow-up of 24 more months. The changes of BMD and bone turnover markers observed during the treatment are all significant versus
`placebo and baseline [27].
`BMD: Bone mineral density.
`
`that the 25 mg i.m. neridronic acid monthly administration
`is the dose providing the maximum effects. At this dose,
`neridronic acid treatment seems to be somewhat the most
`effective among registered bisphosphonates in lowering bone
`turnover markers and in terms of BMD changes.
`Neridronic acid has also been tested in two studies in
`patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. The
`adopted dose was 25 mg once a month. The first study by
`Benucci et al. [28] in 62 patients with a variety of rheumatic
`disease was mostly devoted to urinary bone marker changes:
`after 6 months, hydroxyproline fell by 42%, urinary deoxy-
`pyridinoline by 35% and cross-linked N-telopeptide of type
`I collagen by 51%. In the second study [29] in 46 patients,
`neridronic acid treatment for 1 year was associated with
`significant increases in both spine and femoral BMD.
`Neridronic acid 25 mg i.m. monthly is also effective in
`fully preventing the changes in bone turnover markers
`and BMD associated with androgen deprivation therapy for
`prostatic cancer [30,31].
`Neridronic acid is under investigation in patients with
`osteoporosis associated with thalasemia, mastocytosis and
`cystic fibrosis.
`None of the above mentioned trials were designed to test
`the efficacy of neridronic acid in decreasing fracture risk.
`
`3.4 Reflex sympathetic syndrome or algodystrophy
`Intravenous high doses of bisphosphonates are increasingly
`used for the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy
`syndrome or algodystrophy [32,33]. In a Phase II trial, we
`have shown (unpublished results) that the most effective
`dose is 100 mg diluted in 250 ml of saline solution given
`intravenously over 4 days. With this treatment regimen, the
`proportion of patients experiencing rapid (in 7 – 12 days)
`> 70% symptomatic improvements is close to 80%.
`The efficacy was assessed by visual analogue scale for
`spontaneous pain and tenderness and by an arbitrary score
`(from 0 = normal to 4 = worst finding) of motion as
`assessed by physicians as we used in a previous study [32].
`On the basis of these preliminary observations, the first formal
`registrative randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing
`400 mg neridronic acid to placebo in patients with foot
`or forearm algodystrophy syndrome has been designed and
`is underway.
`
`3.5 Other conditions
`Neridronic acid treatment has been reported to be effective also
`in other focal conditions, such as the transient osteoporosis
`of proximal hip, avascular bone necrosis [34,35] and tuberculous
`spondylodiscitis [36].
`
`1308
`
`Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. (2009) 5(10)
`
`Downloaded by [NIH Library] at 10:24 17 December 2017
`
`

`

`Gatti, Viapiana, Idolazzi, Fracassi & Adami
`
`In 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a single i.v.
`infusion of 25 mg neridronic acid was associated with a
`significant decrease for both erythrocyte sedimentation
`rate (21%) and C-reactive protein (35%) in 3 weeks. Inter-
`estingly, this effect could not be seen by doubling the dose
`to 50 mg [37].
`
`3.6 Malignant conditions
`In seven patients with over bone lesions for multiple
`myeloma, 100 mg neridronic acid i.v. monthly over a year
`was associated with significant increases in spine BMD and
`decrease in bone turnover markers [38].
`In patients with hypercalcemia owing to solid metastaic
`tumors, 125 mg neridronic acid dissolved in 500 ml of saline
`solution and infused i.v. over 4 h was able to significantly
`decrease serum calcium with a nadir after 7 days and
`normalization of serum calcium in 65% of the patients [39].
`
`4. Safety and tolerability
`
`Neridronic acid is generally well tolerated and remains the
`only bisphosphonate widely used in children even under
`3 years of age.
`Flu-like symptoms occur in a large proportion of the patients
`after the first infusion, as with other nitrogen-containing
`bisphosphonates [40], particularly at high doses (100 mg),
`but it is rather common also after the first administration
`of 25 mg.
`is
`The
`i.m. administration 25 mg neridronic acid
`associated with local pain, disappearing almost invariably in
`a few minutes. Higher i.m. doses have never been tested.
`As for all other bisphosphonates, doses higher than 25 mg
`should be infused by slow i.v. (generally not > 100 mg/h).
`No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw [41], atypical sub-
`trochateric fractures [42] or persitent muscular pain [43] have
`ever been
`reported during clinical
`trials, but
`these
`three long-term complications should be taken into consid-
`eration for neridronic acid as with any other type of
`nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate.
`
`5. Conclusion
`
`In conclusion, neridronic acid is a nitrogen-containing
`bisphosphonate with pharmacological characteristics very
`similar to pamidronic acid or alendronic acid. It is licensed
`only in Italy for the treatment of OI and Paget’s disease of
`bone. Neridronic acid is the only available bisphosphonate
`licensed for the use in children that can be administered
`intramuscularly. This may represent a unique advantage for
`some of the patients who cannot take oral bisphosphonates.
`This is the case for patients compelled to bed, with serious
`esophageal diseases, gastrointestinal malabsorption or unable
`to fast. In these patients, the i.v. infusion is the typical alter-
`native, but i.m. neridronate might be used when the access
`to hospital services for i.v. infusions is either cumbersome or
`too expensive.
`
`6. Expert opinion
`
`The chemical structure of neridronic acid is very close to
`that of pamidronic acid and alendronic acid, sharing most
`of the pharmacological properties. Its potency is somewhat
`close to that of pamidronic acid for the biochemical response
`in Paget disease of bone. Neridronic acid has been fully
`developed and then licensed only for the treatment of OI
`and Paget’s disease. Neridronic acid has three peculiarities of
`some clinical value: i) it is the only registered treatment for
`OI; ii) it can be given intramuscularly, and this may be of
`remarkable practical value in some conditions and iii) it is
`the only bisphosphonate licensed for the treatment of bone
`diseases in growing individuals. Of some interest is also the
`continuing randomized clinical trial
`in algodystrophy,
`and this is likely to make shortly neridronic acid the only
`registered therapy for this condition.
`
`Declaration of interest
`
`S Adami has received a research grant from Eli-Lilly and is
`a speaker for Roche, Eli-Lilly and Abiogen.
`
`
`
`Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. (2009) 5(10)
`
`1309
`
`Downloaded by [NIH Library] at 10:24 17 December 2017
`
`

`

`Neridronic acid
`
`Bibliography
`1. Nancollas GH, Tang R, Phipps RJ,
`et al. Novel insights into actions of
`bisphosphonates on bone: differences in
`interactions with hydroxyapatite. Bone
`2006;38:617-27
`
`2.
`
`Luckman SP, Hughes DE, Coxon FP, et al.
`Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates
`inhibit the mevalonate pathway and
`prevent post-translational prenylation
`of GTP-binding proteins, including Ras.
`J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:581-9
`
`3. Corrado A, Cantatore FP, Grano M,
`Colucci S. Neridronate and human
`osteoblasts in normal, osteoporotic and
`osteoarthritic subjects. Clin Rheumatol
`2005;24:527-34
`
`4.
`
`Spreafico A, Frediani B, Capperucci C,
`et al. Anabolic effects and inhibition of
`interleukin 6 production induced by
`neridronate on human osteoblasts.
`Reumatismo 2006;58(4):288
`
`5. Clezardin P. Anti-tumour activity of
`zoledronic acid. Cancer Treat Rev
`2005;31(Suppl 3):1-8, 134s-6230s
`
`6. Ribatti D, Nico B, Mangieri D, et al.
`Neridronate inhibits angiogenesis
`in vitro and in vivo. Clin Rheumatol
`2007;26(7):1094-8
`
`7. Muller S, Migianu E, Lecouvey M, et al.
`Alendronate inhibits proliferation and
`invasion of human epidermoid carcinoma
`cells in vitro. Anticancer Res
`2005;25(4):2655-60
`
`8. Cepollaro C, Gonnelli S, Pondrelli C, et al.
`Osteogenesis imperfecta: bone turnover,
`bone density, and ultrasound parameters.
`Calcif Tissue Int 1999;65(2):129-32
`
`9.
`
`Braga V, Gatti D, Rossini M, et al.
`Bone turnover markers in patients
`with osteogenesis imperfecta. Bone
`2004;34(6):1013-6
`
`10. Glorieux FH, Bishop NJ, Plotkin H,
`et al. Cyclic administration of
`pamidronate in children with severe
`osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med
`1998;339:947-52
`
`11. Munns CFJ, Rauch F, Travers R,
`Glorieux FH. Effects of intravenous
`pamidronate treatment in infants
`with osteogenesis imperfecta: clinical
`and histomorphometric outcome. J Bone
`Miner Res 2005;20:1235-43
`
`12. Land C, Rauch F, Munns CF, et al.
`Vertebral morphometry in children and
`adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta:
`
`effect of intravenous pamidronate
`treatment. Bone 2006;39:901-6
`
`13. Plotkin H, Rauch F, Bishop NJ, et al.
`Pamidronate treatment of severe
`osteogenesis imperfecta in children
`under 3 years of age. J Clin
`Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1846-50
`
`14. DiMeglio LA, Peacock M. Two-year clinical
`trial of oral alendronate versus intravenous
`pamidronate in children with osteogenesis
`imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res
`2006;21:132-40
`
`15. Chevrel G, Schott A, Fontanges E, et al.
`Effects of oral alendronate on BMD in
`adult patients with osteogenesis imperfecta:
`a 3-year randomized placebo-controlled
`trial. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:300-6
`
`16. Rauch F, Munns C, Land C, et al.
`Risedronate in the Treatment of Mild
`Pediatric Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A
`Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.
`J Bone Miner Res 2009
`[Epub ahead of print]
`
`17. Gatti D, Antoniazzi F, Prizzi R, et al.
`Intravenous neridronate in children with
`osteogenesis imperfecta: A randomized
`controlled study. J Bone Miner Res
`2005;20:758-63
`
`18. Antoniazzi F, Zamboni G, Lauriola S,
`et al. Early bisphosphonate treatment in
`infants with severe osteogenesis imperfecta.
`J Pediatr 2006;149:174-9
`
`19. Adami S, Gatti D, Colapietro F, et al.
`Intravenous neridronate in adults
`with osteogenesis imperfecta.
`J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:126-30
`
`20. Gatti D, Viapiana O, Lippolis I, et al.
`Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy
`increases radial width in adults
`with osteogenesis imperfecta.
`J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1323-6
`
`21. Hosking D, Lyles K, Brown JP, et al.
`Long-term control of bone turnover in
`Paget’s disease with zoledronic acid and
`risedronate. J Bone Miner Res
`2007;22:142-8
`
`22. Adami S, Bevilacqua M, Broggini M,
`et al. Short-term intravenous therapy
`with neridronate in Paget’s disease.
`Clin Exp Rheum 2002;20:55-8
`
`23. Filipponi P, Cristallini S, Policani G,
`et al. Paget’s disease of bone: benefits of
`neridronate as a first treatment and in cases
`of relapse after clodronate. Bone
`1998;23:543-8
`
`24. Merlotti D, Gennari L, Martini G, et al.
`Effetti della terapia endovenosa con
`zoledronato o neridronato in pazienti affetti
`da malattia ossea di Paget non-responders al
`pamidronato. Clin Cases Min Bone Metab
`2006;3:379-80
`
`25. Braga V, Gatti D, Colapietro F, et al.
`Intravenous intermittent neridronate in
`the treatment of postmenopausal
`osteoporosis. Bone 2003;33:342-5
`
`26. Cascella T, Musella T, Orio F, et al. Effects
`of neridronate treatment in elderly women
`with osteoporosis. J Endocrinol Invest
`2005;28:202-8
`
`27. Adami S, Gatti D, Bertoldo F, et al.
`Intramuscular neridronate in
`postmenopausal women with low
`bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int
`2008;83(5):301-7
`
`28. Benucci M, Dolenti S, Saviola G,
`Manfredi M. Modificazioni dei marcatori
`di rimodellamento osseo in pazienti trattati
`con neridronato per osteoporosi indotta da
`glucocorticoidi. Recent Progr In Med
`2006;97:24-7
`
`29. Saviola G, Benucci M, Baiardi P, et al.
`Effects of monthly intramuscular
`neridronate in rheumatic patients in
`chronic treatment with low-dose
`glucocorticoids. Clin Exp Rheumatol
`2009 In press
`
`30. Morabito N, Gaudio A, Lasco A, et al.
`Neridronate prevents bone loss in patients
`receiving androgen deprivation therapy
`for prostate cancer. J Bone Miner Res
`2004;19:1766-70
`
`31. Magno C, Anastasi G, Morabito N, et al.
`Preventing bone loss during androgen
`deprivation therapy for prostate cancer:
`early experience with neridronate.
`Eur Urol 2005;47(5):575-80
`
`32. Adami S, Fossaluzza V, Gatti D, et al.
`Bisphosphonate therapy of reflex
`sympathetic dystrophy syndrome.
`Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56(3):201-4
`
`33. Varenna M, Zucchi F, Ghiringhelli D, et al.
`Intravenous clodronate in the treatment of
`reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. A
`randomized, double blind, placebo
`controlled study. J Rheumatol
`2000;27:1477-83
`
`34. La Montagna G, Malesi D, Tirri R,
`Valentini G.Successful neridronate
`therapy in transient osteoporosis of the
`hip. Clin Rheumatol 2005;24(1):67-9
`
`35. Corrado A, Quarta L, Errico S, Cantatore FP.
`Successful

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket