PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Patent Owner

PhishMe, Inc.

Petitioner

Wombat Security Technologies, Inc.

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

Wombat Security Technologies, Inc. v. PhishMe, Inc.

PGR2017-00047 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed Aug. 23, 2017

Terminated Dec. 7, 2017

Judges Amber Hagy, Jennifer Bisk, and Joni Chang

Case Type Post Grant Review

Status Terminated-Settled

Challenged Patent 15/138,188

Patent No. 9,591,017 assignments

Tech Center 2400

Art Unit 2497

Inventors Aaron Higbee, Rohyt Belani, Scott Greaux

Last Updated: 1 month, 1 week ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
12/21/2017	12-21-2017-Board	Board Refund Approval 12: Notice of Refund
12/18/2017	12-18-2017-Petitioner	Petitioner Refund Request 11: PETITIONER¿¿¿S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEES
12/7/2017	12-07-2017-Board	Event: Motion to Terminate (Granted) Board Termination Decision Document 10: Termination Decision Document
12/4/2017	12-04-2017-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Motion 8: Joint Motion to Terminate Patent Owner Other (Not for motions) 9: Joint Request to Keep Separate Patent Owner Exhibit 2001: Exhibit 2001
10/9/2017	10-09-2017-Petitioner	Petitioner Notice 7: Petitioner's Updated Notices
10/2/2017	10-02-2017-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Notice 6: PO Updated Mandatory Notices
9/14/2017	09-14-2017-Board	Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition 5: Notice of Accord Filing Date
9/11/2017	09-11-2017-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Power of Attorney 3: Patent Owner's POA Patent Owner Mandatory Notice 4: Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices
8/23/2017	08-23-2017-Petitioner	Petitioner Power of Attorney 1: Power of Attorney Event: Petition Petitioner Petition 2: PETITION FOR POST-GRANT REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 9,591,017 Petitioner Exhibit 1001: US Patent 9,591,017 Petitioner Exhibit 1002: Complaint for Patent Infringement, PhishMe Inc. v. Wombat Security Technologies, Inc., June 16, 2017 Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Complaint for Patent Infringement, PhishMe Inc. v. Wombat Security Technologies, Inc., June 1, 2016 Petitioner Exhibit 1004: First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, PhishMe Inc. v. Wombat Security Technologies, Inc., July 19, 2016 Petitioner Exhibit 1005: Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, PhishMe Inc. v. Wombat Security Technologies, Inc., September 6, 2016 Petitioner Exhibit 1006: Consolidation Order, PhishMe Inc. v. Wombat Security Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-403-LPS-CJB and 17-769-LPS-CJB, June 28, 2017 Petitioner Exhibit 1007: Decision Denying Institution of Post-Grant Review, PGR2017-00009, Patent No. 9,398,038, Paper 7, June 8, 2017 Petitioner Exhibit 1008: Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, PGR2017-00009, Patent No. 9,398,038, Paper 8, June 20, 2017 Petitioner Exhibit 1009: Decision Denying Request for Rehearing, PGR2017-00009, Patent No. 9,398,038, Paper 9, July 20, 2017 Petitioner Exhibit 1010: Declaration of Prof. Rubin Petitioner Exhibit 1011: Application Serial No. 13/765,538, filed February 8, 2013 Petitioner Exhibit 1012: Application Serial No. 13/785,252, filed March 5, 2013 Petitioner Exhibit 1013: Redline comparison between Application Serial No. 13/785,252 and Application Serial No. 13/765,538 Petitioner Exhibit 1014: Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in 7.1 Administrator Guide, December 6, 2010, Cisco Systems, Inc. Petitioner Exhibit 1015: Keno Albrecht, "Mastering Spam: A Multifaceted Approach with the Spamato Spam Filter System," Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2006 Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Fahmida Y. Rashid, "PhishGuru," PC Mag, May 25, 2012 Petitioner Exhibit 1017: Declaration of Kurt Wescoe Petitioner Exhibit 1018: Declaration of Ralph Massaro Petitioner Exhibit 1019: "Leading Computer Science University Takes Multi-Pronged Approach to Combat Phishing; Deploys Wombat Security's Highly Effective Suite of Training and Filtering Products," March 10, 2011 Petitioner Exhibit 1020: "A Multi-Pronged Approach To Combat Phishing," Wombat Security Technology, March 2011 Petitioner Exhibit 1021: File History of U.S. Patent 9,591,017 (Serial No. 15/138,188) Petitioner Exhibit 1022: P. Kumaraguru et al., "Lessons From a Real World Evaluation of Anti-Phishing Training," eCrime Researchers Summit, 15-16 October 2008 Petitioner Exhibit 1023: P. Kumaraguru, "PhishGuru: A System for Educating Users about Semantic Attacks," Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, April 14, 2009 Petitioner Exhibit 1024: Declaration of Alan Himler Petitioner Exhibit 1025: Declaration of Elizabeth Whittington Petitioner Exhibit 1026: Ex parte Schulhauser, Appeal 2013-007847 (PTAB April 28, 2016) Petitioner Exhibit 1027: Redline comparison of claim 11 of U.S. Patent 9,591,017 to claim 1 of U.S. Patent 9,591,017 Petitioner Exhibit 1028: Declaration of Steve Hicks Petitioner Exhibit 1029: U.S. Pub. No. 2012/0124671 A1 to Fritzson et al. Petitioner Exhibit 1030: Application Serial No. 13/763,486, filed February 8, 2013 Petitioner Exhibit 1031: Application Serial No. 13/763,515, filed February 8, 2013 Petitioner Exhibit 1032: Redline comparison of claim 21 of U.S. Patent 9,591,017 to claim 1 of U.S. Patent 9,591,017

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Patent Owner

Petitioner

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

Wombat Security Technologies, Inc. v. PhishMe, Inc.

PGR2017-00047 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases