throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ARKEMA AND ARKEMA FRANCE
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case No.: PGR2016-00011
`Patent No.: 9,157,017
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBSERVATIONS ON
`
`STATEMENTS IN PETITIONER’S REPLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order (Paper 39), Patent Owner submits these
`
`observations on statements in Arkema’s Reply (Paper 31).
`
`Mischaracterization of Mexichem White Paper as Discussing Automobile Air
`
`Conditioning in 1997
`
`At page 2 lines 2-11 of its Reply Arkema mischaracterizes the Mexichem
`
`White Paper (Ex. 2071).
`
`Mischaracterization of Its Own Patent Application as Unrelated to
`
`Automobile Air Conditioning Stability
`
`At page 16 line 10 through page 17 line 8 of its Reply Arkema
`
`mischaracterizes the prosecution history of its patent application (Ex. 2069).
`
`Mischaracterization of Dr. DesMarteau as Not Considering End-Capping
`
`At page 14 line 15 through page 15 line 6 of its Reply Arkema
`
`mischaracterizes Dr. DesMarteau’s declaration (Ex. 2161 ¶ 41) and deposition
`
`testimony (Ex. 1178 at 42:18-22; 43:13-19).
`
`Mischaracterization of Dr. DesMarteau’s Testimony as Expecting Short
`
`Free-Radical Lifetimes
`
`At page 15 lines 14-17 of its Reply Arkema mischaracterizes Dr.
`
`DesMarteau’s deposition testimony (Ex. 1178 at 45:10-50:7).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Mischaracterization of Dr. DesMarteau’s Testimony Regarding Dimerization
`
`At page 15 line 18 through page 16 line 6 of its Reply Arkema
`
`mischaracterizes Dr. DesMarteau’s declaration (Ex. 2161 ¶ 31) and deposition
`
`testimony (Ex. 1178 at 12:11-12:2; 28:23-29:11).
`
`Mischaracterization of the Banks Article
`
`At page 19 lines 3-9 of its Reply Arkema mischaracterizes the Banks article
`
`(Ex. 1169).
`
`Mischaracterization of Dr. Whittaker as Not Being a POSITA
`
`At page 20 lines 16-18 of its Reply Arkema mischaracterizes Dr.
`
`Whittaker’s deposition testimony (Ex. 1176 at 93:16-95:7).
`
`Mischaracterization of Dr. DesMarteau’s Expertise
`
`At page 13 lines 5-10 of its Reply Arkema mischaracterizes Dr.
`
`DesMarteau’s expertise (Ex. 1178 at 5:23-7:3; 36:10-37:11).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Date: April 12, 2017
`
`Eugene Goryunov (Reg. No. 61,579)
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, Illinois 60654
`Telephone: (312) 862-2000
`Fax: (312) 862-2200
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C.
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (Reg. No. 55,396)
`Noah Frank (Reg. No. 67,279)
`glocascio@kirkland.com
`noah.frank@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`655 Fifteenth Street, NW
`Suite 1200
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 879-5200
`Fax: (202) 879-5200
`
`Attorneys For Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Observations on Statements in Petitioner’s Reply on April 12, 2017, via
`
`electronic mail directed to counsel of record for the Petitioners:
`
`Mark D. Sweet
`Mark J. Feldstein
`Erin M. Sommers
`Charles W. Mitchell
`
`
`mark.sweet@finnegan.com
`mark.feldstein@finnegan.com
`erin.sommers@finnegan.com
`charles.mitchell@finnegan.com
`Arkema_PTAB@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C.
`Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket