throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 39
`Entered: April 7, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ARKEMA INC. and ARKEMA FRANCE,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case PGR2016-00011
`Patent 9,157,017 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, Vice
`Chief Administrative Patent Judges, and MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND,
`Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`PGR2016-00011
`Patent 9,157,017 B2
`
`
`On April 3, 2017, Patent Owner contacted the Board by email seeking
`a conference to discuss Patent Owner’s request for leave to file an
`observation regarding Petitioner’s Reply in this proceeding. Ex. A. Patent
`Owner stated that an observation is necessary “to correct [Petitioner’s]
`mischaracterizations of the evidence and deposition testimony” in this
`proceeding. Id. Patent Owner represented that counsel for the parties had
`met and conferred on the issue, and that counsel for Petitioner opposes such
`a filing.
`A conference with the parties is not necessary. To preserve the issue
`for our consideration when rendering the final written decision in this
`proceeding, Petitioner is authorized to file a short paper as set forth below.
`The parties also may address the issue further during the oral hearing if they
`desire.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file, by close of
`
`business (5 pm EST) on April 12, 2017, a two-page paper that identifies by
`page and line number the alleged mischaracterizations of evidence and
`deposition testimony in Petitioner’s Reply;
`FURTHER ORDERED that arguments, explanation, and other
`statements beyond the identification of page and line numbers are not
`authorized; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that no other papers by either party are
`authorized at this time.
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2016-00011
`Patent 9,157,017 B2
`
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Mark D. Sweet
`Mark J. Feldstein
`Erin M. Sommers
`Charles W. Mitchell
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`mark.sweet@finnegan.com
`mark.feldstein@finnegan.com
`erin.sommers@finnegan.com
`charles.mitchell@finnegan.com
`Arkema_PTAB@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio
`Eugene Goryunov
`Noah Frank
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`glocascio@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`noah.frank@kirkland.com
`HON_PTAB_Service@kirkland.com
`
`3
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`

`From: Frank, Noah S. [mailto:noah.frank@kirkland.com]  
`Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:54 PM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: LoCascio, Gregg F. <glocascio@kirkland.com>; Goryunov, Eugene <egoryunov@kirkland.com>; 
`#HON_PTAB_Service <HON_PTAB_Service@kirkland.com>; Sweet, Mark (mark.sweet@finnegan.com) 
`<mark.sweet@finnegan.com>; Feldstein, Mark (mark.feldstein@finnegan.com) 
`<mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Mitchell, Charles (Charles.Mitchell@finnegan.com) 
`<Charles.Mitchell@finnegan.com>; Sommers, Erin (Erin.Sommers@finnegan.com) 
`<Erin.Sommers@finnegan.com>; Arkema_PTAB (Arkema_PTAB@finnegan.com) 
`<Arkema_PTAB@finnegan.com> 
`Subject: PGR2016‐00011 & PGR2016‐00012 

`Dear Board, 

`Patent Owner Honeywell requests a call with the Board to discuss Honeywell’s request for leave to file 
`an observation on petitioner’s reply in PGR2016‐00011 to correct Arkema’s mischaracterizations of the 
`evidence and deposition testimony in Arkema’s reply. Honeywell initially requested Arkema’s consent to 
`file a focused sur‐reply limited to 10 pages. During a meet and confer on March 23rd, Arkema’s counsel 
`refused to consent to a sur‐reply, but that they would consider consenting to a non‐argumentative filing 
`if they were able to consider an actual draft. On Friday March 31st, Patent Owner sent Arkema’s counsel 
`a draft non‐argumentative observation on Arkema’s reply, to which Arkema again refused 
`consent.  Should the Board desire, Honeywell will provide the draft in advance for consideration on the 
`call.  Honeywell is available for a call with the Board any time on April 5th, April 7th, or any day 
`thereafter. Arkema’s counsel informed Honeywell that they are not available until Monday, April 10th. 
`Honeywell will arrange for a court reporter. 

`Sincerely, 

`Noah Frank
`------------------------------------------------------------
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`655 Fifteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005
`T +1 202 879 5235
`F +1 202 879 5200
`------------------------------------------------------------
`noah.frank@kirkland.com 
`

`
`  
`
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information,
`and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
`Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
`have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email to postmaster@kirkland.com,
`and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket