throbber

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`ENSIGN US SOUTHERN DRILLING LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`C&M OILFIELD RENTALS, LLC
`D/B/A C-MOR ENERGY SERVICES
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPR2023-00804
`
`Patent 10,976,016
`_____________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`GENNADIY T. LOZNEV PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2023-00804
`Patent 10,976,016
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 (c), Patent Owner C&M Oilfield Rentals, LLC
`
`
`
`d/b/a C-MOR Energy Services (“Patent Owner”) hereby submits this motion for
`
`Gennadiy T. Loznev to appear pro hac vice in this proceeding. Patent Owner
`
`respectfully requests the Board to recognize Mr. Loznev as counsel pro hac vice
`
`during this proceeding and demonstrates good cause for doing so as shown below.
`
`Patent Owner conferred with Petitioner, and Petitioner confirmed that it does not
`
`oppose this Motion.
`
`I.
`
`AUTHORIZATION FOR THIS MOTION
`This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
`
`(“Notice”) (Paper 5) in the IPR and is made no sooner than twenty-one (21) days
`
`after service of the Petition.
`
`II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS
`Pursuant to the Notice, the following statement of facts shows that good
`
`cause exists for the Board to recognize Mr. Loznev pro hac vice.
`
`Lead counsel for this proceeding, Dion M. Bregman, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Registration No. 45,645).
`
`Mr. Loznev joined Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP as an intellectual
`
`property litigation attorney in October 2022. Ex. 2005 ¶ 9. While at Morgan,
`
`Lewis & Bockius LLP, Mr. Loznev primarily focused his practice on patent
`
`litigation. Id. Mr. Loznev has experience conducting technical infringement and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`validity analyses, working with technical experts to prepare reports on
`
`Case IPR2023-00804
`Patent 10,976,016
`
`
`infringement and validity issues, briefing and preparing for hearing on claim
`
`construction issues, and preparing for and assisting in patent litigation trials across
`
`the country before district courts and the United States International Trade
`
`Commission. Id.
`
`Ms. Loznev is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`California. Id. at ¶ 2. He is admitted to practice before the Northern and the
`
`Central Districts of California. Id.
`
`Mr. Loznev has not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. He has never had any application for admission to
`
`practice denied, and he has never had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed
`
`against him. Id. at ¶ 3-6.
`
`Mr. Loznev has obtained substantial familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. Id. at ¶ 10. He has reviewed in detail and is familiar with
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,976,016, the Petition, and all exhibits relied upon by Petitioner
`
`in this proceeding. Id.
`
`Mr. Loznev has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37
`
`of the Code of Federal Regulations. Id. at ¶ 7-8. Mr. Loznev acknowledges and
`
`agrees to be subject to the USPTO’s Code of Professional Conduct as set forth in
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`Case IPR2023-00804
`Patent 10,976,016
`
`
`11.19(a). Id.
`
`In the last three (3) years, Mr. Loznev has not appeared pro hac vice before
`
`this administrative body. Id. at ¶ 5. However, Mr. Loznev will also apply to
`
`appear pro hac vice in Case No. IPR2024-00005. Id.
`
`Because Mr. Loznev is an experienced litigation attorney and has established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding, Patent Owner
`
`respectfully submits that it has shown good cause for the Board to recognize Mr.
`
`Loznev as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`III. DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO APPEAR
`This Motion is accompanied by the Declaration of Gennadiy T. Loznev.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board
`
`admit Gennadiy T. Loznev pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 11, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
` / Dion M. Bregman /
`Dion M. Bregman, Reg. No. 45,645
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2023-00804
`Patent 10,976,016
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4), lead counsel for Patent Owner hereby
`
`certifies that on December 11, 2023, a copy of this PATENT OWNER’S MOTION
`
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF GENNADIY T. LOZNEV was served to
`
`the email correspondence address of record for Petitioner’s counsel of record:
`
`Gregory L. Porter
`gregporter@HuntonAK.com
`Daniel Shanley
`danshanley@HuntonAK.com
`Neil Kelly
`neilkelly@HuntonAK.com
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
` / Dion M. Bregman /
`Dion M. Bregman, Reg. No. 45,645
`
`
`Dated: December 11, 2023
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket