throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 31
`Entered: April 11, 2024
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TWI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MERCK SERONO SA,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`____________
`
`Before ULRIKE W. JENKS, ZHENYU YANG, and TINA E. HULSE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JENKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER1
`Conditionally Granting Petitioner’s Motions for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Don J. Mizerk
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`

`1 This Order addresses issues common to each captioned case. Thus, we
`enter the same Order in each case. The parties are not authorized to use this
`style caption unless directed otherwise.
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`
`
`On February 28, 2024, Petitioner filed motions requesting pro hac
`vice admission of Don J. Mizerk in each of the above-identified proceedings
`(collectively “Motions”). Paper 26.2 Petitioner also submitted Declarations
`from Don J. Mizerk in support of the Motions (collectively “Declarations”).
`Ex. 1036.3 Petitioner attests that Patent Owner does not oppose the Motions.
`Paper 26, 1.
`For the reasons provided below, Petitioner’s Motions are
`conditionally granted.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize
`counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause,
`subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Unified Patents,
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7)
`(representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”).
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motions and the accompanying
`Declarations, we conclude that Mr. Mizerk has sufficient legal and technical
`qualifications to represent Petitioner in these proceedings, has demonstrated
`sufficient litigation experience and familiarity with the subject matter of
`these proceedings, and meets all other requirements for admission pro hac
`vice. See Ex. 1036. Accordingly, Petitioner has established good cause for

`2 For purposes of expediency, we cite to Papers filed in IPR2023-00049.
`Petitioner filed a similar Motion in IPR2023-00050 (Paper 25).
`3 We cite to Exhibits filed in IPR2023-00049. Petitioner filed a similar
`Declaration in IPR2023-00050 (Ex. 1036).  
`2 
`

`
`

`

`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`
`pro hac vice admission of Mr. Mizerk. Mr. Mizerk will be permitted to
`serve as back-up counsel only. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`Upon review of the record before us, we note that a Power of Attorney
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) has not been submitted for Mr.
`Mizerk. In view thereof, and for the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s
`Motions are conditionally granted, and are to be effective after Petitioner
`files the aforementioned Power of Attorney.
`Petitioner has not filed updated mandatory notices identifying Mr.
`Mizerk as back-up counsel. Therefore, Petitioner must update its mandatory
`notices as required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3), to identify Mr. Mizerk as
`back-up counsel.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Don J. Mizerk are conditionally granted, provided that within ten (10)
`business days of the date of this order, Petitioner submits a Power of
`Attorney for Mr. Mizerk in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) in the
`above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file updated mandatory
`notices identifying Mr. Mizerk as back-up counsel in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the above-identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Mizerk is authorized to represent
`Petitioner as back-up counsel only in the above-identified proceedings;
`

`
`3 
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Mizerk comply with the Patent Trial
`and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide4 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280
`(Nov. 21, 2019)), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in
`Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Mizerk is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`

`4 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`4 
`

`
`

`

`IPR2023-00049 (Patent 7,713,947 B2)
`IPR2023-00050 (Patent 8,377,903 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Philip Segrest
`Nathan Sportel
`Stephen Howe
`HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP
`philip.segrest@huschblackwell.com
`nathan.sportel@huschblackwell.com
`steve.howe@huschblackwell.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Emily Whelan
`Deric Geng
`Cindy Kan
`Asher McGuffin
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
`deric.geng@wilmerhale.com
`cindy.kan@wilmerhale.com
`asher.mcguffin@wilmerhale.com
`

`
`5 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket