throbber
A Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-Controlled, Single-, Ascending-, Oral-Dose Safety, TolerabHity and Pharmacok1netk
`Study of SP-3041n Healthy Adult Human Male and Female Volunteers
`Kunwar Shailubhai, Ph.D., William Gerson, D.O., Craig Talluto, Ph.D., Gary Jacob, Ph.D.
`
`~ge,jteDiseaseWeek,SailllE110: 10(),!
`
`Purpose:SP·304isasyntl1eticanalogofureguanylin,a
`natriurelichormonell1atregulal!s~nandfluidtransportin
`the GI tract. The compound is a new member of a novel
`class of non-systemk drugs for treabnent of chronk
`constipation (CC), initable bowel syndrome with
`constipation(IBS-C)andotherGldiseases.Oral~
`administeredSP.304bindstoandactivatesguan~ate
`cydaseC(GC-C),expressedontheepithelialcellsliningll,e
`GI mucosa. Activation of Gc-C slimulal!s intracellu~r cydic
`GMPsynthesis,resumnginactivationofcysticfibrosis
`transmembrane conductance regu~r (CFTR), whid1 leads
`to an augmented flow of dlloride and water into the lumen
`of the gut to facilitate bowel movement, In animal mode~,
`oral administration of SP-304 promotes inl!stinal secretion
`andamelioratesgastrointeslinalinflammat~n.Thepurpose
`oftl1isstudywastocharacterizethesafely,tolera~lity,
`pharmacoijnetic(PK)andpharmacodynamic(PD)effectsof
`SP·304inhealll,yvolunteers.
`
`Metl1ods:Adouble-blind,placelbo-controlled,randomized
`singl~ oral, ascending dose (0,1 mg to 4&6 mg) study was
`performed in 71 healthyvoluntee~. Subjects were
`evaluatedforsafety,to~rability,PKandPDeffectsof
`SP· 304, Adverse events (AE) were evaluated using Common
`Tennino~gy Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3,
`Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated by the time to
`firsistoolandbythe7-pointBristolStoolFonnScale(BSFS)
`to monitor stool consistency,
`
`Results:SP·304waswell-toleratedatalldoseleve~andno
`SAEs were observed throughout the study, No measurab~
`1't51e111icabsolption of oral~ administered SP-304 ocamed
`atalldoselevelsstudied(O,lmgto48.6mg;validated
`SP-304 serum assay sensitive down to 10 ng/ ml), Alll,ough
`11,is trial was not powered for statistical significa~ SP-304
`appeared to decrease the time to first bowel movement and
`elicitedanincreaseinthepost-doseBSFSvellUSp~b~
`
`Condusions: SP-304 was well-to~rated at all doses studied
`(0.1 mg to 48.6 mg) and exhibited pharmacodynamic
`activity in healthy voluntee~ with no detectable systemic
`absorpt~n.Theseclinicaldatasupportadvancingtl1isnovel
`analogofureguan~inforfurtherclinicaldeve~pmentto
`treat patients will, CC and IBS-~
`
`Uroguan~in NaturalHormone
`
`• 16-maranalogofuroguan~in
`NDOCELCVHVAC1GCJ.
`.. Singlekeyaminoacidchange
`~
`.. udedintostableai:tive
`confonner
`
`'1
`
`SP-304 Urofllln/inAna,g
`
`NDECELCVNVACTGCL
`
`~ ,,
`
`GC-C Receptor
`
`Single!ell!rsdeootedifferen!amiiio
`aci!ls Col.m<!inesdeno+.ed~~philla
`
`.,.
`
`eCompactstablemolecule
`• Th•moandacidstablellOOC,pH
`2),highresistancetoproteases
`• Behaveslikeasmallmolec,ledrug
`.. Morepotentthanthenatural
`llonnone
`
`, Thepurposeofthiswastodlaracterizethesafety,
`tolerabilily, phannacokinet~ (PK) and pharmacodynamic
`(PD) effects of SP-304 in healthy voluntee~
`
`, Healthy ma~ or female, between 18 and 64 yean of age
`with a body mass index (BM!) between 18 and 29 kg/ ml
`, Negativetestfordrugsofabuse,hepatitisBandCand
`HIV
`, Abstainfromcaffeinatedbeverages,alcoholandnicotine
`foraper~dof36hou~pre-dosethrough48-hou~
`post-dose
`, Abstainfromandhavenoclinicalneedforsupp~mental
`fiber30dayspriortostudyentry
`
`, Any pre-existing medical condlt~n considered dinically
`significantbythePrincipallnvestigator(PQ
`, Cinicallysignificantabnonnallaboratoryresullsat
`Screening
`, Partkipationinaclinicallrialusinganinvestigat~nal
`drugwitl1in30daysofthe5creeningvisit
`1 lngested,injected,orappliedanypresaiplion,OTC,or
`herbal medications within 30 days pr~r to Day I dosing
`, Receivedanytreabnentagents,herns,orfoods(e,g,,
`grapefnlitjuice) known to inhibit or induce enzymes
`withinthecytod1romeP4SOsystem,witl1in7daysprior
`to Day I dosing
`, Takenanyclassofphosphodiesteraseinhibito~witl1in3
`dayspriortoDayldosing
`, Any e~sode of abnonnal bowel habit ( e.g., constipation
`ordiarrhea)witl1in30daysofDayl
`, Failure to com~ete the Screening bow~ movement diary
`aa:uratelyandcomplete~for7conserutivedays(during
`thel4daySaeeningperiod)priortoDayldosing
`, Donation of blood ~I ~nt) witl1in 8 weeks, donation of
`plasma witl1in 2 weeks prior to the Screening visi~ or
`receipt of blood products witl1in 8 weeks prior to Day I
`
`, Subjectsmm~eted a7-daybowa movement diary during
`the14-dayscreaiingperiod
`17consecutivedays
`, BrlstolStooIFromSca~(BSFS)usedloilS!ISconsisto,cy
`of bowel movements
`1Subjectsd1eckedintothePhaselunltldaypriortodosing
`, Pre'ilose lab b!Sl5 wae performed to confirm ~igibility
`(hematology, blood chemisby, urinalysi~ fecal OCOJlt ~ood
`exam,drugsofaoose)
`, Randomized6:2(adive:p~cebo)
`, Subjectswaedosedat9:DOam(fasling)
`, PK blood draws we~ taken pre-dose and 0,5, I, 1.5, ~ 3, 4,
`6,8,1~2~36and48hounpost-dose
`, All post-dose bowel movements were reported to Phase I
`unltstall
`, Olnsistencyofthes1Dolwasgradedbytl1ePhaselunit
`staffusingBSFSandwasreconledinadiary
`
`, Cohortl:SP-3040.lmgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort2:SP-3040,3mgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort3:SP-3040,9mgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort4:SP-3042,7mgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort5:SP-3045,4mgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort6:SP-3048,tmgonceormab:hing~acebo
`, Cohort7:SP-3041Umgonceormab:hingplacelbo
`, Cohort8:SP-3042t3mgonceormab:hingplacelbo
`, Cohort9:SP-30448.6mgonceormab:hingplacelbo
`
`Subject Characteristics
`
`!Im+!!
`Ii\~
`
`..
`...
`••
`"'""'
`
`lt,111:M~III
`lklilpfflrlJli!o
`
`41.l+IU!
`
`-~,
`
`''"'1
`l!li.aJ
`
`'~~
`ll"'
`
`'~~
`11"'1
`
`BristolScoreoffintBowelinvmnt
`Follov.ingaSingoli<lleofSP-304
`
`SP-3041mprovesstoolconslsteocy
`Sl'-lll45ing/e-Dosellata
`
`~~·!dffi1l!00!/a,llllllllllllll'DO!i!llli)!lib!f(~art!ffi,f!llllll'DI
`
`SP-l04improvesstoolcon;,tency
`S/-304Smgle-Dcsella1'
`
`, Common Tenninology Criteria for Adverse Events
`(CTCAE), ve~~n 3.0, was used to assess all adverse
`events
`• 12outof63suijects(l9%)reportedmi~AEs
`, AIIAEsresolvedwitl1in2houraofdosing
`1 All AES resolved will,in 24 hou~ of being reported
`, Per CTCAE criteria, diarrhea is defined as an inaease in
`the number of bowel movements per day compared to
`baseline
`, NotbasedonchangesinconsistencyaspertheBristol
`StoolfonnScale(BSFS)
`
`Number of AEs Reported with an Assigned Relationship to
`SP-304
`
`SP-304 Sl~o<Ole data In ~lunleeo
`Allrajl'rillle!G/il!IOOll'ft!IIOl'!lnlliruu!IIUl!rpait-!ilst
`
`.
`,.
`F, !,
`l
`
`'
`
`IIIO,IH11lDJll"U1UIUU
`
`!·~··• ..... _
`
`* Dianhea is defined as an increase in the number of bowel
`movements pe,- day compared to baseline
`
`, SP-304 was safe and well-tolerated aaoss all doses
`I NoSAEs
`, Noseveredianheaevenatveryhighdoses
`, NosystemicabsorptionoforallyadministeredSP.304
`, SP-304 decreased the time to first bowel movement and
`increasedtheBristol(BSFS)score
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2003, Page 1 of 1
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-01104
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket