throbber
letters to the editor
`
`© The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
`
`See pages 661 and 843
`Treatment of Chronic
`Lymphocytic Leukemia
`With Genetically Targeted
`Autologous T Cells: Case
`Report of an Unforeseen
`Adverse Event in a Phase I
`Clinical Trial
`
`To the editor:
`Most patients with B-cell malignan-
`cies will die from their disease or are
`incurable. For this reason, innovative
`therapeutic approaches are direly needed.
`Patient T cells may be genetically modi-
`fied to target antigens expressed on tumor
`cells through the expression of chimeric
`antigen receptors (CARs), which are
`antigen receptors designed to recognize
`cell surface antigens in a human leu-
`kocyte antigen–independent manner.1
`CD19, which is expressed on most B-cell
`malignancies—including most non-
`Hodgkin’s lymphomas, acute lymphoblas-
`tic leukemias, and chronic lymphocytic
`leukemias (CLLs)—is an attractive antigen
`for this approach.2 It is present on normal
`B-lineage cells from the early pre–B-cell
`stage until plasma cell differentiation.
`In a model of CD19+ acute lymphoblas-
`tic leukemia, we found that that a CAR
`termed 19-28z, which comprises the
`CD28 cytoplasmic domain in addition to
`that of the CD3 ζ-chain,3 induced better
`responses than a ζ-chain-based receptor.4
`In preclinical in vitro studies, we demon-
`strated that human T cells that express
`CD19-specific CARs efficiently lyse
`human CD19+ tumor cell lines and that
`CLL patient–derived T cells effectively lyse
`autologous tumor cells.2,4 These results,
`and others,5 supported a phase I clinical
`trial treating refractory CLL patients with
`autologous T cells modified by retroviral
`gene transfer of the 19-28z CAR.
`We have thus far enrolled six patients
`in this clinical trial. The cohort of subjects
`treated with modified T cells alone at the
`first dose level of T cells tolerated therapy
`well without dose-limiting toxicities. How-
`ever, the first subject (subject 4) enrolled
`in the second cohort of patients, in whom
`cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting
`
`chemotherapy was administered before
`infusion of the same T-cell dose, devel-
`oped a syndrome of hypotension, dyspnea,
`and renal failure following T-cell infusion.
`Subject 4 died 4 days after administra-
`tion of cyclophosphamide and modified
`T cells. Herein we describe the chronology
`of his treatment and report the findings of
`an extensive postmortem analysis.
`
`Clinical trial design
`Subject 4 was treated in a phase I clinical
`trial (IRB no. 06-138, NIH-RAC no.
`0507-721, NCT00466531) designed to
`assess the safety of infusing autologous
`T cells modified to express the CD19-
`targeted CAR 19-28z in subjects with
`relapsed or purine analog–refractory
`CLL. For 2–3 days following T-cell infu-
`sion, the subjects are closely monitored
`for tumor lysis and unforeseen adverse
`events. If stable, subjects are discharged
`and subsequently closely followed in the
`outpatient clinic setting.
`This phase I clinical trial has a three-
`step design (Table 1). In the first step,
`subjects are treated with dose level 1 of
`modified T cells (1.2–3.0 × 107 CAR+
`T cells/kg) without prior lymphodepleting
`chemotherapy. The subject of the current
`report was enrolled in cohort 1 of step 2
`and treated with 1.5 g/m2 of cyclophos-
`phamide followed 2 days later by infusion
`of modified T cells at dose level 1. The
`enrollment thus far is summarized in
`Table 1.
`
`Case report
`Subject 4 was a 69-year-old man with
`refractory CLL who was enrolled in clini-
`cal trial IRB no. 06-138. At the time of
`enrollment, three previous subjects had
`been treated on this protocol without sig-
`nificant adverse events in the first planned
`cohort, receiving the lowest planned dose
`
`of modified T cells alone. Subject 4 was
`the first to receive lymphodepleting che-
`motherapy with cyclophosphamide (1.5
`g/m2) followed 2 days later by infusion of
`modified T cells at the same dose tolerated
`earlier by the first three subjects enrolled
`in cohort 1 of this trial.
`Subject 4’s CLL treatment history.
`Subject 4 was initially diagnosed with CLL
`8 years before treatment on this protocol,
`when he was noted to have an elevated
`lymphocyte count on a routine complete
`blood count in the context of lymphade-
`nopathy. The subject had a significant past
`medical history of myocardial infarction,
`coronary artery disease, hypertension, and
`chronic renal insufficiency. Two years after
`diagnosis, because of progressive symp-
`tomatic abdominal lymphadenopathy
`and a rapidly doubling peripheral blood
`lymphocyte count, he was treated per
`Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center
`(MSKCC) IRB protocol no. 98-080 with
`sequential fludarabine (25 mg/m2) daily
`for 5 days every 4 weeks for six cycles,
`followed by high-dose cyclophos phamide
`(3 g/m2) given once every 3 weeks for
`three cycles, followed by rituximab (375
`mg/m2) given weekly for 8 weeks. He
`achieved a durable partial response. Five
`years later, he developed evidence of
`progressive disease as shown by increasing
`lymphadenopathy, increasing peripheral
`blood lymphocyte counts, and cytopenias.
`The subject was enrolled in MSKCC IRB
`protocol no. 05-077 and treated with six
`monthly cycles of combination therapy
`with pentostatin (4 mg/m2), cyclophos-
`phamide (600 mg/m2), rituximab (375
`mg/m2 given only on cycles 2–6), and
`mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2). The subject
`once more achieved a partial response.
`Two years later, the subject presented with
`a rapidly increasing peripheral blood lym-
`phocyte count, worsening cytopenias, and
`
`Table 1 Cyclophosphamide and T-cell doses in IRB protocol no. 06-138
`Step
`Cyclophosphamide
`CAR + T-cell dose
`No. of enrolled subjects
`1
`0
`3
`1.2–3.0 × 107/kg
`2
`1.5 g/m2
`1
`1.2–3.0 × 107/kg
`3.0 g/m2
`0
`1.2–3.0 × 107/kg
`MTD
`3
`0
`0.4–1.0 × 108/kg
`1.5 g/m2
`–1
`2
`4.0–10 × 106/kg
`CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; MTD, maximum-tolerated dose.
`
`666
`
`www.moleculartherapy.org vol. 18 no. 4 april 2010
`
`UPenn Ex. 2013
`Miltenyi v. UPenn
`IPR2022-00855
`
`

`

`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`Figure 1 Clinical assessment of subject 4 on IRB no. 06-138, NIH-RAC no. 0507-721,
`NCT00466531. Assessment of patient from the time of admission to the hospital before cyclo-
`phosphamide chemotherapy (–48 hours), through time of modified T-cell infusion (0 hours), to
`time of death (44 hours). Clinical status was assessed by routine vital sign parameters, including
`(a) temperature and systolic blood pressure, as well as by laboratory chemistry measurements,
`including (b) renal function as measured by creatinine, potassium, phosphorus, and uric acid con-
`centrations. Vital signs over time are consistent with a sepsis syndrome (fever with hypotension),
`whereas laboratory chemistry studies demonstrate an initial rise in creatinine coinciding with the
`patient’s anuric state, followed by rising potassium, phosphorus, and uric acid at concentrations
`that are consistent with tumor lysis but confounded by the antecedent acute renal failure. The
`vertical arrow indicates the time of T-cell infusion.
`
`increasing lymphadenopathy and he was
`enrolled in IRB protocol no. 06-138 (NIH-
`RAC no. 0507-721, NCT00466531). The
`subject was assessed and met all criteria
`for enrollment in this trial.
`Treatment course. For IRB proto-
`col no. 06-138, the subject underwent a
`leukapheresis procedure, and the product
`was processed and frozen. Subsequently,
`T cells were activated and retrovirally
`transduced with the 19-28z retroviral
`vector as described.6 The subject was
`then admitted and, per protocol, received
`tumor lysis prophylaxis with hydration
`and allopurinol followed by cyclophos-
`phamide (1.5 g/m2) infusion. He toler-
`ated therapy well, and twice-daily serum
`electrolyte studies revealed no evidence of
`tumor lysis. On the day of T-cell infusion,
`the subject’s tumor lysis laboratory results
`were unremarkable, with the exception
`of a mildly elevated phosphorus level (4.8
`mg/dl). His creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl.
`The T-cell infusion was completed over 3
`hours without complication. Twenty hours
`after modified T-cell infusion, the subject
`developed a fever, a transient finding
`observed in all three subjects treated on
`step 1 of this protocol; however, in con-
`trast to previously treated subjects, subject
`4’s fever persisted and was associated with
`concomitant hypotension (Figure 1a).
`At the same time, the subject developed
`
`respiratory distress despite a negative chest
`X-ray. After bacterial blood cultures had
`been obtained, the patient was started on
`broad-spectrum antibiotics (piperacil-
`lin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin) with
`pressor support. He was subsequently
`transferred to the intensive care unit.
`Laboratory studies obtained at 24 hours
`after T-cell infusion demonstrated an
`elevated creatinine concentration (2.2 mg/
`dl) and rising phosphorus (7.4 mg/dl),
`potassium (5.0 mEq/L), and uric acid (8.3
`mg/dl) concentrations.
`The subject became anuric, consistent
`with acute renal failure. In the intensive
`care unit, his blood pressure responded
`to inotropic support, from which he was
`successfully and fully weaned over the
`course of the day. However, he remained
`anuric with increasing serum potas-
`sium and phosphorus concentrations
`(Figure 1b). By the early evening, he once
`more became hypotensive, and inotropic
`support was restarted. A worsening
`respiratory status led to intubation and
`mechanical ventilation. Supportive care
`was withdrawn shortly thereafter at the
`request of the subject’s health-care proxy.
`The subject expired 44 hours after infusion
`of modified T cells. Laboratory studies
`just before his death demonstrated an
`increasing serum creatinine concentration
`at 3.7 mg/dl, as well as markedly elevated
`
`letters to the editor
`
`potassium and phosphorus concentrations
`at 9.1 mEq/L and 14.2 mg/dl, respectively
`(Figure 1b). The subject’s peripheral blood
`lymphocytosis remained generally stable
`over time, beginning with initial chemo-
`therapy and following modified T-cell
`infusion (data not shown).
`Postmortem pathology report. Both
`gross and histologic postmortem analyses
`of tissues from subject 4 revealed extensive
`CLL with diffuse bulky adenopathy, in-
`cluding a large abdominal tumor (2.5 kg)
`and associated increased mesentery
`lymphadenopathy. Microscopic evalua-
`tion revealed diffuse CLL involvement in
`multiple organs, including the liver, pan-
`creas, adrenal glands, and bone marrow,
`as well as the lymph nodes. Renal tissues
`were generally normal, other than scat-
`tered calcium crystals. Overall, these data
`fail to support a diagnosis of tumor lysis
`syndrome as the primary source of renal
`failure. Histology of the lung and cardiac
`tissues showed no significant pathology.
`Furthermore, initial blood cultures, as well
`as all subsequent cultures obtained after
`antibiotic administration, were negative.
`The infused cell product was sterile at the
`time of infusion, a result we reconfirmed
`after the occurrence of the serious adverse
`event (SAE).
`Analysis of serum cytokines. As
`stipulated in the protocol, serial serum
`samples were routinely obtained from
`all subjects before and after each stage
`of the treatment regimen. Analyses of
`these serum samples revealed a sig-
`nificant increase in the concentrations of
`interleukin (IL)-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-12
`cytokines following cyclophosphamide
`chemotherapy as compared with the
`pretreatment serum sample obtained 30
`days earlier (Figure 2). An interpretation
`implicating the cyclophosphamide chemo-
`therapy in this rise in serum cytokines is
`hampered by the 30-day time lag between
`obtaining the pre- and post-chemotherapy
`serum samples. Alternatively, the eleva-
`tion of these cytokines may have been
`secondary to a prior subacute infectious
`process that was subsequently exacerbated
`by cyclophos phamide-mediated immune
`suppression, resulting in the sepsis
`syndrome seen in this subject. Signifi-
`cantly, serum tumor necrosis factor-α and
`interferon-γ were unchanged immediately
`before and after T-cell infusion (Figure 2).
`
`www.moleculartherapy.org vol. 18 no. 4 april 2010
`
`667
`
`UPenn Ex. 2013
`Miltenyi v. UPenn
`IPR2022-00855
`
`

`

`letters to the editor
`
`Conclusion
`Etiology of SAE. Subject 4, a 69-year-old
`patient with bulky CLL, was the first to
`receive T cells following prior lympho-
`depleting chemotherapy (IRB protocol no.
`06-138, step 2, cohort 1). In the first co-
`hort (step 1), in which three subjects were
`treated with the lowest planned modified
`T-cell dose alone, all experienced tran-
`sient fevers following T-cell infusion but
`otherwise tolerated therapy well. These
`subjects had no evidence of hypotension,
`tumor lysis, or acute renal failure. In con-
`trast to subjects treated in the first cohort,
`subject 4 developed persistent fevers fol-
`lowing T-cell infusion, became hypoten-
`sive, and developed acute renal failure, all
`consistent with a clinical picture of sepsis.
`Significantly, acute renal failure developed
`in the absence of any clinical evidence
`suggestive of tumor lysis syndrome. A
`later rise in serum potassium, phospho-
`rus, and uric acid concentrations may
`be indicative of a subsequent incipient
`tumor lysis. This sequence of events thus
`suggests that the patient developed renal
`failure due primarily to hypotension as a
`consequence of sepsis-like syndrome, a
`conclusion supported by the postmortem
`examination of renal tissues.
`Although consistent with an infec-
`tious etiology, the subject’s blood cultures
`as well as postmortem cultures failed to
`detect any bacterial growth, noting that
`the latter may have been compromised by
`broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.
`Serum cytokine analysis revealed
`markedly elevated levels of the proinflam-
`matory and homeostatic cytokines IL-2,
`IL-7, IL-15, and IL-12 following cyclo-
`
`phosphamide chemotherapy and preced-
`ing the T-cell infusion. The etiology of this
`elevated cytokine profile remains unclear,
`because the pretreatment serum sample
`was obtained 30 days before chemothera-
`py. Nevertheless, regardless of the etiology,
`this cytokine milieu, highly favorable
`to T-cell persistence, activation, and
`proliferation, may account for the possible
`incipient tumor lysis seen in subject 4 but
`not in subjects 1–3.
`Combining this biological evidence
`with the unremarkable lung, heart, and
`kidney pathology, this SAE, despite
`negative blood cultures, is consistent
`with sepsis due to infection, leading to
`hypotension, leading to acute renal failure
`and, ultimately, death. This scenario is also
`consistent with infection as a prevalent
`and leading cause of morbidity and mor-
`tality in patients with advanced CLL.
`Consequent modification of clini-
`cal trial protocol. Our findings fail to
`directly attribute the SAE in subject 4
`(IRB protocol no. 06-138) to the modified
`T cells. Nevertheless, because of the tem-
`poral relationship of the autologous T-cell
`infusion to this SAE, we conservatively
`attributed infusion of modified T cells as
`a “possible” source contributing to this
`SAE. As stipulated in the protocol, we
`reduced the CAR+ T-cell dose in the next
`cohort of patients to the –1 dose (0.4–1
`× 107 modified T cells/kg, Table 1). As
`a further precaution to enhance patient
`safety, we modified the protocol by
`administering T cells as a split infusion,
`infusing one-third of the dose on day 2
`following cyclophosphamide therapy and,
`in the absence of evidence of tumor lysis,
`
`Figure 2 Serum cytokine concentrations measured in subject 4. Serum samples were obtained
`30 days before cyclophosphamide (–30 d), 2 hours before T-cell infusion (–2 h), and 4 and 26 hours
`after T-cell infusion (+4 h, +26 h, respectively). The –2-h sample is therefore post-cyclophosphamide
`but pre-T-cell infusion. Pretreatment tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) serum values were 200, 50,
`and 59 ng/ml in subjects 1, 2, and 3, respectively. IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin.
`
`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`hypotension, or renal failure, adminis-
`tering the remaining two-thirds of the
`planned T-cell dose on day 3 following
`cyclophosphamide therapy. Significantly,
`the subsequent subject treated on this
`trial under these modified conditions did
`not exhibit evidence of a “cytokine storm”
`following cyclophosphamide chemo-
`therapy and further tolerated infusion
`of modified T cells without any notable
`toxicities. We will continue to focus on
`analyses of serum cytokine studies before
`and following both cyclo phosphamide
`chemotherapy and modified T-cell
`infusion, with special attention to the
`conditioning-induced cytokine response
`and its relationship to post-T-cell
`infusion cytokine concentrations.
`
`Note
`Since the submission of this letter, we
`have treated a sixth subject at the −1 treat-
`ment dose (see Table 1). This subject ex-
`hibited a transient hypotensive episode 24
`hours after T-cell infusion that responded
`to increased intravenous hydration, ac-
`companied by a mild, transient fever. This
`episode rapidly resolved with no evidence
`of infectious etiology or renal compro-
`mise. Cytokine serum analyses were
`unremarkable.
`
`doi:10.1038/mt.2010.31
`
`Renier Brentjens,1 Raymond Yeh,1
`Yvette Bernal,1 Isabelle Riviere1
`and Michel Sadelain1
`1Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New
`York, New York, USA
`Correspondence: Michel Sadelain (m-sadelain@
`ski.mskcc.org)
`
`ReFeReNCeS
`1
`Sadelain, M, Rivière, I and Brentjens, R (2003).
`Targeting tumours with genetically enhanced T
`lymphocytes. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 35–45.
`2. Brentjens, RJ, Latouche, JB, Santos, E, Marti, F, Gong,
`MC, Lyddane, C et al. (2003). Eradication of systemic
`B-cell tumors by genetically targeted human T lym-
`phocytes co-stimulated by CD80 and interleukin-15.
`Nat Med 9: 279–286.
`3. Maher, J, Brentjens, R, Gunset, G, Rivière, I and
`Sadelain, M (2002). Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxic-
`ity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric
`TCRzeta /CD28 receptor. Nat Biotechnol 20: 70–75.
`4. Brentjens, RJ, Santos, E, Nikhamin, Y, Yeh, R, Matsush-
`ita, M, La Perle, K et al. (2007). Genetically targeted T
`cells eradicate systemic acute lymphoblastic leukemia
`xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 13: 5426–5435.
`5. Sadelain, M, Brentjens, R and Rivière, I (2009). The
`promise and potential pitfalls of chimeric antigen
`receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 21: 215–223.
`6. Hollyman, D, Stefanski, J, Przybylowski, M, Bartido,
`S, Borquez-Ojeda, O, Taylor, C et al. (2009). Manu-
`facturing validation of biologically functional T cells
`targeted to CD19 antigen for autologous adoptive
`cell therapy. J Immunother 32: 169–180.
`
`668
`
`www.moleculartherapy.org vol. 18 no. 4 april 2010
`
`UPenn Ex. 2013
`Miltenyi v. UPenn
`IPR2022-00855
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket