throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 30
`Date: May 23, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`MILTENYI BIOMEDICINE GmbH and MILTENYI BIOTEC INC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2022-00855
`Patent 9,540,445 B2
`_______________
`
`Before ULRIKE W. JENKS, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial and
`Granting-in-part and Denying-in-part Joint Motion to Keep
`Settlement Agreement Separate and Confidential
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00855
`Patent 9,540,445 B2
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On May 16, 2023, and with our authorization (Ex. 3003), Petitioner
`and Patent Owner (collectively, “the Parties”) filed a joint motion to
`terminate the above-captioned inter partes review proceeding. Paper 28
`(“Joint Motion”). Along with the Joint Motion, the Parties filed a copy of a
`settlement and license agreement (Ex. 2083, “Settlement Agreement”), as
`well as a joint motion requesting that the Settlement Agreement be treated as
`business confidential information and kept it separate from the file of U.S.
`Patent No. 9,540,445 B2 (“the ’445 patent”). Paper 29 (“Joint Request”).
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`In the Joint Motion, the Parties represent that the Settlement
`Agreement resolves their underlying dispute involving the ’445 patent. Joint
`Motion 8. The Parties also represent that they have filed a true copy of the
`Settlement Agreement made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`termination of the above-captioned proceeding. Id. at 8–9. The Parties
`“certify that there are no other agreements, oral or written, between the
`Parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of
`the proceeding.” Id. at 11.
`We instituted trial for the above-captioned inter partes review
`proceeding on October 11, 2022. See Paper 10. We have not yet decided
`the merits of the proceeding, and a final written decision has not been
`entered. Notwithstanding that the proceeding has moved beyond the
`preliminary stage, the Parties have shown adequately that the termination of
`the proceeding is appropriate. Under these circumstances, we determine that
`good cause exists to terminate the proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00855
`Patent 9,540,445 B2
`
`
`The Parties also request that the Settlement Agreement be treated as
`business confidential information and kept separate from the file of the ’445
`patent. Joint Request 8. After reviewing the Settlement Agreement, we find
`that it contains confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. Thus, good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreement as
`business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Accordingly, we grant this portion of the Joint
`Request.
`However, we deny the portion of the Joint Request specifying that,
`should there be filed a request for access to the Settlement Agreement, “the
`Parties be given the opportunity to comment on the request before a decision
`is made with respect to whether it should be granted or denied.” Joint
`Request 8. The Parties’ request is not supported by stature nor rule.
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to terminate (Paper 28) is granted,
`and IPR2022-00855 is terminated with respect to Petitioner and Patent
`Owner; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request to treat the Settlement
`Agreement as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`(Paper 29) is granted-in-part and denied-in-part, in the manner noted above;
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement (Ex. 2083)
`shall be kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 9,540,445 B2, and
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00855
`Patent 9,540,445 B2
`
`made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or
`to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00855
`Patent 9,540,445 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Yite John Lu
`Gary Frischling
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ptabdocketl2y7@orrick.com
`ptabdocketg2f1@orrick.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brian Landry
`Kathryn Doyle
`Alireza Behrooz
`SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP
`blandry@saul.com
`kathryn.doyle@saul.com
`alireza.behrooz@saul.com
`
`Thomas Fletcher
`Jessamyn Berniker
`David Krinsky
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`tfletcher@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket