`571-272-7822
`
` Paper 35
`Entered: January 30, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-00118
`Patent 10,804,740 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before, JAMESON LEE, KARL D. EASTHOM, and
`BRIAN J. McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`CORRECTED REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00118
`Patent 10,804,740 B2
`
`
`A. BACKGROUND
`On May 12, 2022 we entered a Decision to Institute and a Scheduling
`Order setting February 9, 2023 for oral argument, if requested, in this
`proceeding. Papers 9, 10. On August 4, 2022 Patent Owner filed a Motion
`to Amend requesting Preliminary Guidance. Paper 16. On October 28,
`2022, Petitioner filed an Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend.
`Paper 22. On November 23, 2022, we entered Preliminary Guidance
`concerning Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend. Paper 26. On December 8,
`2022 Patent Owner filed a Revised Motion to Amend. Paper 28.
`In view of Patent Owner’s Revised Motion to Amend, we entered a
`Revised Scheduling Order, and reset the hearing date to March 9, 2023.
`Paper 33. The Revised Scheduling Order, however, on page 2 mistakenly
`refers to March 16, 2023, as the hearing date. We enter this Corrected
`Revised Scheduling Order to make clear that the oral hearing is scheduled
`for March 9, 2023. The revised due dates are as found in the attached
`Revised Due Date Appendix.
`On December 29, 2022 Patent Owner requested an oral hearing to be
`conducted in-person. Paper 30. On December 29, 2022, Petitioner
`requested a video hearing. Paper 31. As both parties have not requested an
`in-person hearing, the hearing will be conducted by video. A corresponding
`Trial Hearing Order will be issued in due course.
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00118
`Patent 10,804,740 B2
`
`
`
`REVISED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`Revised Motion to Amend (RMTA) Pilot Program
`
`DUE DATE RMTA1 .................................................... January 26, 2023
`Petitioner’s opposition to the revised motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE RMTA2 .................................................. February 16, 2023
`Patent Owner’s reply to the opposition to the revised motion to
`amend
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................ February 23, 2023
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 6 ................................................................. March 2, 2023
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for pre-hearing conference
`
`DUE DATE 7 ................................................................. March 8, 2023
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to revised motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 8 ................................................................. March 9, 2023
`Oral Argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00118
`Patent 10,804,740 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Scott T. Jarratt
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`Calmann Clements
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`scott.jarratt.ipr@haynesboone.com
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`calmann.clements.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brett Cooper
`John Petrsoric
`BC LAW GROUP, P.C.
`bcooper@bc-lawgroup.com
`jpetrsoric@bc-lawgroup.com
`
`Antonio Papageorgiou
`Eric Huang
`LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP
`ap@lombardip.com
`ehuang@lombardip.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
