throbber
Clinical and laboratorv studies
`
`Topical photodynamic therapy with endogenous
`porphyrins after application of 5-aminolevulinic acid
`
`An alternative treatment modality for solar keratoses, superficial
`squamous cell carcinomas, and basal cell carcinomas?
`
`Peter Wolf, MD, Edgar Rieger, MD, and Helmut Ked, MD Graz, Austria
`
`Background: Topical photodynamic therapy with endogenous porphyrins consists of irradi(cid:173)
`ation of a tumor with visible light after the application of exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid.
`Objective: To assess the effectiveness of this modality, patients with precancerous conditions
`and various skin cancers were treated.
`Methods: Thirteen patients with 70 skin lesions were enrolled. Standard treatment involved
`the topical application of 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid in an oil-in-water emulsion. The emul(cid:173)
`sion was applied under an occlusive dressing for 4 to 8 hours before exposure to photoacti(cid:173)
`vating light.
`Results: We observed a complete response after a single treatment for all 9 solar keratoses,
`5 of 6 early invasive squamous cell carcinomas, and 36 of 37 superficial basal cell carcino(cid:173)
`mas. Only 1 of 10 noduloulcerative basal cell carcinomas completely resolved. Eight cutane(cid:173)
`ous metastases of malignant melanoma were therapeutic failures.
`Conclusion: Topical photodynamic therapy with endogenous porphyrins is effective for su(cid:173)
`perficial epithelial skin tumors.
`(J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1993;28:17-21.)
`
`Photodynamic therapy (PDT), also known as
`photochemotherapy or photoradiation therapy, is
`effective for many forms of malignant
`tumors,
`including skin cancers. 1-6 Photoactivation of photo(cid:173)
`sensitizing porphyrins, which selectively accumulate
`in malignant cells, leads to the release of cytotoxic
`substances and causes tumor destruction with min(cid:173)
`imal damage to surrounding normal tissue. I-3 Un(cid:173)
`fortunately, when given systemically in PDT, the
`porphyrin compounds, hematoporphyrin derivative
`(HPD), or a mixture of its active components, com(cid:173)
`mercially known as Photofrin II, lead to generalized
`skin photosensitivity for at least 4 weeks.3,4, 7 The
`risk of serious accidental phototoxic reactions is the
`main reason that PDT by intravenous injection of
`porphyrins is not used much more widely.
`Recently, Kennedy et a1.8 described a novel
`method oftopical PDT and showed favorable results
`in the treatment of selected superficial nonmela-
`
`From the Department of Dermatology, University of Graz.
`Accepted for publication May 20, 1992.
`Reprint requests: Helmut Kerl, MD, Department of Dermatology,
`University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 8, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
`16/1/39537
`0190-9622/93/$1.00 + .10
`
`noma skin cancers. 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5·ALA)
`was used, which is a precursor of endogenous
`porphyrins in the biosynthetic pathway for heme.9
`Topically applied to skin cancers, 5-ALA in aqueous
`solution passes readily through abnormal keratin
`and is metabolized by the tumor cells to photosen(cid:173)
`sitizing concentrations of porphyrins.8 The 5-ALA(cid:173)
`induced photosensitivity is restricted to the abnor(cid:173)
`mal epidermis. Subsequent exposure to photoacti(cid:173)
`vating light selectively destroys skin cancers.
`We describe our evaluation of the effectiveness of
`PDT after topical application of 5-ALA to epithelial
`precancerous lesions and various skin cancers.
`
`PATIENTS
`Thirteen patients (3 women and 10 men) between 39
`and 89 years ofage (average 66 years) participated in this
`study after giving signed informed consent. Patients with
`multiple skin lesions were preferentially enrolled. There
`were 70 lesions including 37 superficial basal cell carci(cid:173)
`nomas in 4 patients, 34 lesions on the trunk and 3 on the
`face; 10 noduloulcerative basal cell carcinomas in 5
`patients, 8 lesions on the face and 2 on the trunk; 9 solar
`keratoses in 3 patients, all on the face or scalp; 6 early in(cid:173)
`vasive squamous cell carcinomas (superficial squamous
`17
`
`

`

`18 Wolf et a1.
`
`cell carcinomas with focal invasion of the papillary der(cid:173)
`mis) in 3 patients, 3 on the face of 1patient, 20n the trunk
`of a patient with Bowen's disease, 1 on the back of the
`hand of a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP); 8
`cutaneous metastases in 1 patient with advanced malig(cid:173)
`nant melanoma, 5 melanotic and 3 amelanotic lesions, all
`on the left leg.
`The greatest diameter of the lesions ranged from 0.5 to
`3.0 em for superficial basal cell carcinomas, from 0.5 to
`5.0 em for noduloulcerative basal cell carcinomas, from
`1 to 2 em for solar keratoses, from 1 to 6 em for early in(cid:173)
`vasive squamous cell carcinomas, and from 0.1 to 1 em for
`cutaneous metastases of malignant melanoma.
`Biopsies were always performed on single lesions before
`the treatment but, if the patient had more than two, bi(cid:173)
`opsy was done on only a representative lesion.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`Therapeutic light source
`
`A Leitz Pradovit slide projector (Leitz, Wetzlar, Ger(cid:173)
`many) equipped with a Philips 250 W lamp (24 Y, Phil(cid:173)
`ips, Germany) provided the source of irradiation. The to(cid:173)
`tal irradiance (i.e., full emitted spectrum before filtration)
`at 10 cm and 30 em from the lens as measured by a cal(cid:173)
`ibrated photodiode BPW 34 was 100 and 50 mWjcm2,
`respectively. Certain irradiations were performed with a
`Schott RG 570 long-wave-pass red color glass filter to
`eliminate wavelengths less than 570 nm.
`
`Procedure
`Standard treatment involved the topical application of
`20% 5-ALA (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland)
`dissolved in Doritin (Chemofux, Vienna, Austria), a pro(cid:173)
`prietary oil-in-water emulsion. The emulsion was applied
`under occlusive dressing to the tumors and approximately
`1em of adjacent skin to allow penetration of 5-ALA into
`the tissue and synthesis of endogenous porphyrins. The
`presence of endogenous porphyrins in the tumors was es(cid:173)
`timated by the visual evaluation of the characteristic red
`fluorescence of porphyrins under Wood's light in a dark(cid:173)
`ened room. Fluorescence of the tumors could be observed
`as early as 1 hour after application of 5-ALA, but the in(cid:173)
`tensity of the fluorescence was maximal at 4 to 6 hours,
`and then gradually decreased. Most tumors were exposed
`to photoactivating light 4 hours after application of 5(cid:173)
`ALA. The remainder were irradiated at 6 or 8 hours af(cid:173)
`ter application. Exposure times for solar keratoses and
`superficial basal cell carcinomas were either 5 minutes at
`100 mWj crn2 or its equivalent, 10 minutes at 50 mW/
`cm2, to unfiltered light (dosage 30 joules/cm2) or 10 or
`20 minutes, respectively, to red light (produced by filtra(cid:173)
`tion through RG 570). For two solar keratoses a dose as
`high as 100 joules/cm2 of unilltered light was given.
`Noduloulcerative basal cell carcinomas and squamous
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`cell carcinomas and metastases of malignant melanoma
`were exposed either 15 minutes at 100 mWjcm2 to un(cid:173)
`filtered light (dosage 90 joules/cm2) or 30 minutes to red
`light at 100 mW/cm2 (before filtration).
`Photographs were taken of all lesions before and after
`treatment. Tumor response was evaluated at 4 and/or 8
`weeks after treatment. Complete tumor response was de(cid:173)
`fined as absence of clinically evident tumor at the site of
`treatment. In cases in which the clinical assessment was
`uncertain, punch biopsies were performed. A partial tu(cid:173)
`mor response was defined as marked reduction in tumor
`size as determined by clinical evaluation.
`
`SELECTED CASE REPORTS
`Case 1 (see also Wolf and Kerl lO). A 47-year-old
`woman with XP had a hyperkeratotic plaque of 1.5 em
`in diameter on the dorsum of her left hand (Fig. 1, A). A
`biopsy specimen indicated superficial squamous cell car(cid:173)
`cinoma. The lesion was exposed 30 minutes to red light
`at 100 mWjcm2 4 hours after application of 5-ALA.
`Peak erythema and edema of the exposed area were ab(cid:173)
`normally delayed (72 hours, normal 8 to 24 hours).
`Erythema persisted for more than 2 weeks. The reaction
`on the adjacent skin was unusually strong with blistering.
`Four weeks later there was no sign of residual tumor.
`Erythema ofthe adjacent skin gradually resolved, leaving
`residual hyperpigmentation. There was no clinical evi(cid:173)
`dence of tumor recurrence 6 months later (Fig. 1, B).
`Case 2. A 59-year-old man, occupationally exposed to
`arsenic, had 32 superficial basal cell carcinomas on the
`trunk. In addition, he had a 1 em ulcerative basal cell
`carcinoma on the right cheek. Biopsies were performed on
`two representative lesions on the lower back, two on the
`chest, and the lesion on the right cheek before therapy
`(Fig. 2, A). All tumors were exposed to 30 joulesJcm2 of
`unfiltered light 6 hours after application of 5-ALA. Im(cid:173)
`mediately after exposure, the lesions became erythema(cid:173)
`tous and edematous. Within 2 days the lesions developed
`a thin crust. Adjacent normal skin showed only moderate
`erythema. When the patient was reexamined 4 weeks
`later, there were only slight residual erythema or hypo(cid:173)
`pigmented spots but no evidence of tumor in the treated
`areas. Three biopsies were performed on the back at the
`site of treated tumors. Histologic examination revealed
`fibrosis with an inflammatory cell
`infiltrate and no
`evidence of residual basal cell carcinoma (Fig. 2, B). Af(cid:173)
`ter 8 weeks complete healing of all lesions with good cos(cid:173)
`metic results had occurred.
`
`RESULTS
`Clinical response
`The treatment was well tolerated by all patients
`without local anesthetics. Mild to strong stinging or
`burning was always said to occur at the site of pho-
`
`

`

`Volume 28
`Number 1
`January 1993
`
`Topical photodynamic therapy 19
`
`Fig. 1. Case 1. A, Superficial squamous cell carcinoma
`on back of left hand of patient with xeroderma pigmen(cid:173)
`tosum. B, Six months after therapy.
`
`Fig. 2. Case 2. A, Photomicrograph of superficial basal
`cell carcinoma on back before therapy. B, Complete re(cid:173)
`gression of tumor 4 weeks after therapy.
`
`toirradiated areas during but not after exposure to
`photoactivating light. Pain was diminished when
`tumors were treated with r~d light. The treated le(cid:173)
`sions normally became erythematous, edematous or
`vesiculated during or immediately after therapy and
`later crusted with healing in 2 to 4 weeks. In general,
`the exposed areas of adjacent skin showed only a
`mild reaction to the treatment. However, patients
`with extensive sun-damaged skin on the face and the
`patient with XP had an unusually strong reaction in
`adjacent skin. Only limited areas were treated in
`these patients at one time, to minimize the skin re(cid:173)
`action.
`The response of the tumors to the topical PDT
`after application of 5-ALA is summarized in Table
`I. When examined 4 to 8 weeks after a single treat(cid:173)
`ment a complete response was observed for all solar
`keratoses, 5 of 6 early invasive squamous cell carci(cid:173)
`nomas, 36 of 37 superficial basal cell carcinomas,
`but only 1 of 10 noduloulcerative basal cell carcino(cid:173)
`mas. Partial tumor response was observed for all
`
`other nonmelanoma skin cancers. There was no ob(cid:173)
`servable difference in tumor response with 100
`illW / cm2 irradiance for 5 or 10 minutes or 50
`illW / cm2 for 10 or 20 minutes. In some cases of
`partial tumor response after a single PDT weekly
`repeated treatments were performed up to 3 times.
`However, only in one case (superficial basal cell
`carcinoma on the abdomen) was a partial tumor re(cid:173)
`sponse followed by complete tumor eradication.
`In amelanotic cutaneous metastases of malignant
`melanoma only superficial tumor necrosis was ob(cid:173)
`served in posttreatment biopsy specimens; in melan(cid:173)
`otic metastases the treatment was ineffective (both
`types were exposed to the same dose of red light).
`The nonresponding tumors were excised or treated
`with radiotherapy.
`
`Follow-up
`The longest available follow-up is with the first
`two patients who entered the study. They have
`reached 12 months of follow-up; the median fol-
`
`

`

`20 Wolf et al.
`
`Table I. Tumor response to topical photodynamic
`therapy with unfiltered visible light (full
`spectrum) and red light
`
`TuDHlf type
`
`Superficial BCC
`Noduloulcerative BCC
`Solar keratosis
`Superficial SCC
`Metastases of MM
`
`Unfiltered
`light
`
`32 (32)*
`I (5)
`9 (9)
`4 (5)
`
`Red
`light
`
`4 (5)
`0(5)
`
`1 (1)
`0(8)
`
`Bee, Basalcell carcinoma; MM, malignantmelanoma;See, squamous
`cell carcinoma.
`"Numbers indicate complete tumor responses; numbers in parentheses
`indicate total of treated tumors.
`
`low-up in all patients is 7 months (range 3 to 12).
`There was one recurrent superficial basal cell carci(cid:173)
`noma; no recurrence was observed in the other
`tumors.
`
`DISCUSSION
`This study suggests that superficial epithelial car(cid:173)
`cinomas of the skin are highly sensitive to PDT af(cid:173)
`ter topical application of 5-ALA. A complete re(cid:173)
`sponse was observed for all treated solar keratoses,
`5 of 6 early invasive squamous cell carcinomas, and
`36 of 37 superficial basal cell carcinomas. Neither
`generalized photosensitivity nor other severe adverse
`reactions were noted and the patients' acceptance of
`the treatment modality was good. There was only
`one recurrent tumor (superficial basal cell carcino(cid:173)
`ma).
`Noduloulcerative basal cell carcinomas did not
`respond well to the therapy. Only 1 of 10 tumors
`completely resolved. The results of our clinical trial
`are in agreement with the study of Kennedy et al. 8
`They also observed complete response for nearly all
`treated superficial lesions, including solar keratoses,
`selected superficial basal cell carcinomas, and either
`in situ or early invasive squamous cell carcinomas,
`but only partial response for most noduloulcerative
`basal cell and thick squamous cell carcinomas. The
`ineffectiveness of the treatment in noduloulcerative
`basal cell carcinomas and cutaneous metastases of
`malignant melanoma may be because these lesions
`were partly or completely covered by normal epi(cid:173)
`dermis that did not allow penetration of 5-ALA and
`subsequent production of endogenous porphyrins. In
`melanotic metastases, pigment within the lesions
`may also have prevented adequate light penetra(cid:173)
`tion.11-13
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`In the biosynthetic pathway for heme, 5-ALA is
`a precursor of photoactivable porphyrins, including
`uroporphyrins, coproporphyrins, and protoporphy(cid:173)
`rins.9, 14 However, protoporphyrin IX CPp IX) has
`been shown to be the main active photosensitizer
`after treatment with exogenous 5-ALA.8, 15-17 Red
`fluorescence and phototoxic damage is characteris(cid:173)
`tic for tissues accumulating 5-ALA-induced Pp IX
`when exposed to appropriate wavelengths of photo(cid:173)
`activating light.8, 14, 15, 17
`PDT normally includes the intravenous adminis(cid:173)
`tration of a photosensitizer and the subsequent ex(cid:173)
`posure of tumors to appropriate wavelengths of
`light.1-6 Unfortunately, the photosensitizers in com(cid:173)
`mon use, HPD or Photofrin II, persist in the skin for
`several weeks to several months after injection,
`which results in generalized photosensitivity. 1, 3, 4, 7
`In contrast, the skin photosensitivity caused by top(cid:173)
`ical application of 5-ALA is restricted to the tumor
`and vanishes within 24 hours after treatment. 15
`Most clinical applications of PDT have used red
`light (630 nm) to treat tumors because of the in(cid:173)
`creased ability of longer wavelengths to penetrate
`tissues compared with shorter wavelengths of visible
`light, that is, the optical penetration depth is about
`8 to 10 mm at 630 nm compared with 1 to 2 mm at
`400 to 500 nm. I-6 However, 5-ALA-induced pho(cid:173)
`tosensitivity has a porphyrin-like spectrum with
`maximum excitation at 410 nm (Soret band) and
`three smaller peaks in the visible range (at 510,545,
`and 580 nm).16 Because for thin skin lesions the
`depth of penetration of shorter wavelengths of visi(cid:173)
`ble light was effective,3 most superficial skin tumors
`in our study were treated by full-spectrum visible
`light (400 to 760 nm) rather than by red light with
`wavelengths longer than 570 nm (produced through
`the Schott RG 570 filter). In the treatment of
`superficial basal cell carcinomas, full-spectrum vis(cid:173)
`ible light was effective in all 32 lesions, and red light
`in 4 of 5 treated lesions (see Table I); however,
`shorter exposure times could be given with full(cid:173)
`spectrum visible light. Both were ineffective in the
`treatment of nodulou1cerative basal cell carcinomas.
`Phototoxic damage in PDT is believed to be me(cid:173)
`diated via cytotoxic substances, mainly excited sin(cid:173)
`glet oxygen. 2, 3 The main targets of PDT are cell
`membranes.2,3 However, the mechanism of tissue
`destruction in topical PDT with endogenous por(cid:173)
`phyrins may be different from the mechanism in
`PDT after the intravenous injection of HPD or
`Photofrin II. In addition to direct tumor cell cyto-
`
`

`

`Volume 28
`Number 1
`January 1993
`
`toxicity and inflammatory response, vascular effects
`including endothelial cell damage, blood cell aggre(cid:173)
`gation, reduction and/or cessation ofblood flow, and
`hemorrhage are believed to contribute to the effec(cid:173)
`tiveness of the latter treatment. 2 In 5-ALA-induced
`PDT, however, we observed in posttreatment biopsy
`specimens (24 and 48 hours after treatment) epi(cid:173)
`dermal necrosis and acute dermal inflammation and
`edema, but vascular damage was not noted.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. DoughertyTJ, Kaufmann JE, Goldfarb A. Photoradiation
`therapy for the treatment of malignant tumors. Cancer Res
`1978;38:2628-35.
`2/ Dougherty TJ. Photosensitizers: therapy and detection of
`malignant tumors. Photochem PhotobioI1987;45:879-89.
`3. Henderson B. Photodynamic therapy-coming of age.
`Photodermatology 1989;6:200-11.
`4. Manyak MJ, Russo A, Smith PD, et al. Photodynamic
`therapy. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:380-91.
`5. Waldow SM, Lobraico RV, Kohler IK, et al. Photody(cid:173)
`namic therapy for treatment of malignant cutaneous le(cid:173)
`sions. Lasers Surg Moo 1987;7:451-6.
`6. Robinson PJ, Carruth JAS, Fairris GM. Photodynamic
`therapy: a better treatment for widespread Bowen's disease.
`Br J Dermatol 1988;119:59-61.
`7. Zalar GL, Poh-Fitzpatrick M, Krohn DL, et al. Induction
`of drug photosensitization in man after parenteral exposure
`to hematoporphyrin. Arch DermatoI1977;1l3:1392-7.
`8. Kennedy JC, Pottier RH, Pross DC. Photodynamic ther-
`
`Topical photodynamic therapy 21
`
`apy with endogenous protoporphyrin IX: basic principles
`and present clinical experience. J Photochem Photobiol B
`Bioi 1990;6:143-8.
`9. Berlin NI, Neuberger A, Scott JJ. The metabolism of del(cid:173)
`ta-aminolaevulinic acid. 1. Normal pathways, studied with
`the aid of 15N. Biochemistry 1956;64:80-90.
`10. WolfP, Ked H. Photodynamic therapy in a patient with
`xeroderma pigmentosum [Letter]. Lancet 1991;337:
`1613-4.
`11. Carruth JAS. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of
`diseases of the skin. Lasers Med Sci 1990;5:199-201.
`12. Bernstein EF, Thomas GF, Smith PD, et al. Response of
`black and white guinea pig skin to photodynamic treatment
`using 514-nm light and dihematoporphyrin ether. Arch
`DermatoI1990;126:1303-7.
`/
`13. Nelson JS, McCullough JL, Berns MW. PhotOdynamic
`therapy of human malignant melanoma xenografts in
`athymic nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:56.60.
`14. Malik Z, Lugaci H. Destruction of erythroleukaemic cells
`by photoactivation of endogenous porphyrins. Br J Cancer
`1987;56:589-95.
`15. Divaris DXG, Kennedy JC, Pottier RH. Phototoxic dam(cid:173)
`age to sebaceous glands and hair follicles of mice after sys(cid:173)
`temic administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid correlates
`with localized Protoporphyrin IX fluorescence. Am J
`PathoI1990;136:891-7.
`16. Pottier RH, Chow YFA, LaPlante J-P, et al. Non-invasive
`technique for obtaining fluorescence excitation and emis(cid:173)
`sion spectra in vivo. Photochem PhotobioI1986;44:679-87.
`17. Malik Z, Ehrenberg B, Faraggi A. Inactivation of erythro(cid:173)
`cytic, lymphocytic and myelocytic leukemic cells by photo(cid:173)
`excitation of endogenous porphyrins. J Photochem Photo(cid:173)
`bioi B Bioi 1989;4:195-205.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket