throbber
British Jour11al of Dermatology (1974) 91, 27.
`
`Percutaneous absorption and the surface area of
`occluded skin
`
`A SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY
`
`DAVID R.HAR RIS*, C H RISTOPHER M.PAPA AND
`RAYMOND ST ANTON
`
`Letterman Army Institute of Research, Presidio of San Francisco, and t Dermat0log1cal Division, Johnson and
`Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, and Rutgers Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, U.S.A.
`
`Accepted for publication 12 October 1973
`
`S UM.MARY
`
`Scanning electron microscopy of samples of human skin occluded for 72 h, revealed that the hydrated
`stratum corneum not only swells, but develops multiple folds. Surface area estimations of such
`stratum corneum, utilizing stereo pairs of the photomicrographs, indicated a 37° 11 increase over the
`normal, non-occluded horny layer values. It is speculated that rhe increase in absorptive area contri(cid:173)
`butes to the increa ed , kin permeability following ocdu!>ion.
`
`The most widely used method of increasing percutaneous absorption of topically applied therapeutic
`agents is by the use of occlusive plastic films (Garb, 1960; Hall-Smith, 1962; Scholtz, 1961; Sulz(cid:173)
`berger & Witten, 1961). With this technique, absorption of some substances can be increa~ed by as
`much as 100 times, in addition co the formation of a long-lasting reservoir within the stratum cor(cid:173)
`neum (Bettley, 1970). Fritsch & Stoughcon (1963) have shown Lhat, in occlusive environments
`approaching 10011
`11 relative humidity, increa~ed penetrability is due almost enLirely to the hydration of
`the stratum corneum.
`ln the course of srudie~ in which skin wac; occluded for 72 h and prepared for examination with the
`scanning electron microscope (SEM), the present authors noted remarkable altcratiom. in the appear(cid:173)
`ance of the horny layer of the occluded skin. The possible influence of such changes on percutaneous
`absorption seemed obvious, since the area of the absorptive surface was apparently increased. The
`potential increment was assessed using SEM photomicrographs and mathematical estimation tech(cid:173)
`niques.
`
`• Present address : Chief of Dermatology Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, California, and
`Assistant Professor of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medkioe, U.S.A.
`Reprint requests to : Christopher M. Papa, M .D ., 501 George Street, New Bruni;wick, Ne\\ Jersey 08903,
`U.S.A.
`
`

`

`David R.Harris, Clzrisropher M.Papa and Raymond Seamon
`
`a
`FIG u RE r. Diagrammatic representation of the principle of phorogrammctric cstunation, where two
`photographs of the same object taken at different angles are used to calculate measurements of
`height.
`
`- - -H-
`---
`F I Gu RE 2. Simplified diagram or a plammetric technique where the photographic series is arranged
`in such a way that the intersections or perpendicular lines through known points completes a
`topographical profile.
`
`

`

`Percuraneous absorption and skin surface area
`
`29
`
`Subjects
`Ten healthy male volunteers were included, none of whom had previous skin disease.
`
`METHODS
`
`Histological preparations
`Two 3 mm dermal punch biopsies were taken from each subject; one from a site occluded for 72 h
`with firmly affixed polyethylene film, and one from an un-occluded r:.ite. The specimens were dehy-
`
`PIG URE 3. Skin occluded for 72 h. The horny layer is swollen and thrown into folds. Jndividual,
`desquamating celJs are difficult ro visualize. The oval structure in the centre of the field is an eccrinc
`sweat pore ( x 500).
`
`drated in graded alcohols, air dried and fixed to mounting blocks with the horny layer surfaces
`facing upward. The tissues were coated with gold-palladium in a vacuum evaporator and examined
`in a Jelco JSM-2 Scanning Electron Microscope. Photographs of the resulting images were taken of
`the samples at angles of o-, 5 , ro and r5 .
`
`Estimation of swf ace area
`The basic approach was to use two photographs of the same object taken from different angles (Fig. I)
`
`

`

`30
`
`David R.Harris, Christopher M.Papa and Raymond Stanton
`
`and geometrically calculate measurem ents of height from them. When making topographical maps,
`the photographs are taken from two different Jocarjons, usually from an aeroplane (Thompson, 1966).
`In our case, the camera was fixed and the prepared sample was rotated to obtain different views.
`
`F 1 Gu RE 4. Non-occluded skin. The relatively flat surface and shedding of stratum corneum cells
`is the normal picture. The central oval structure is an eccrine pore ( x 500).
`
`Resulting photographs were then used to plot a series of profiles or cross-sections taken through the
`sample perpendicular to the main plane of the surface. A line was drawn in the same place on each
`photograph through which a profile was to be made. These are shown as lines A 1-E 1 and A2-E2 • The
`photographs were laid out on a drawing board as shown in a simplified profile (Fig. 2), such that
`angles</> and Oare the same as cf, and O in Fig. I. Lines A 1-A 1
`1
`1 were
`1 to E2-E2
`1 to E 1-E 1
`, and Ai-A 2
`drawn perpendicular to the lines A 1- E 1 and A2-E2 • The point a on the profile is determined by the
`1
`1 and point bis determined by the intersection oflines B 1- B 1
`1 and A 2- A 2
`intersection oflines A 1-A1
`and B2-B2
`, ere. In this way, a series of known points on the profile were located. Using the photo-
`1
`
`

`

`Percutaneous absorption and ski11 surface a,-ea
`
`3r
`
`graphs as a reference, a line was then drawn which connects all the points, thus completing the profile
`(Thompson, 1966; Robinson, 1969).
`In the simplified example shown in Figs. 1 and 2, all profiles taken parallel to a-e would be identical,
`but with the more complicated surfaces of the stratum corncum samples, this was not the case.
`Therefore, !>everal different profiles were made. The length of the line forming each profile was
`measured and divided by the horizontal length (H ), giving a unit profile length (L ). An average L
`value for both the un-occluded and occluded samples was calculated. An approximation of the unit
`surface area was found by squaring the resulting average L values. The ratio of L 2 for occluded
`stratum corneum to L 2 for un-occluded stratum corneum would thus be an approximation of the
`ratio of the two areas.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Skin occluded for 72 h becomes swollen and thrown into undulating folds (Fig. 3). This picture is an
`obvious distortion of the normal, predominantly flat or plate-like, layered texture of the stratum
`corncum seen in SEM images of un-occluded skin (Fig. 4).
`The ratio (L 0 ) of the average surface area calculated for the occluded specimens compared to an
`ideal horizontal line (H) was 1·30. For the un-occluded specimens the ratio (L.,) was I ·II. The ratio of
`the!.e average L values r.302/r·n 2 was found to be 1·37. In.other words, according to these calcu(cid:173)
`lations, the occluded sites had 37° 0 more surface area than the un-occluded.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`When the stratum corneum becomes hydrated under an occlus ive dressing, che tissue changes from
`one containing little water (5-15° ,,) to one which may contain as much as 50" 0 water (Blank &
`Scheuplein, 1964). For the most part, the water is held in spaces between fibre bundles, swelling the
`interfibrillary structure of the stratum corneum, straightening the polar side-chains, and forming a
`more or Jess continuous aqueous pathway through part of it (Yates, 1971). Virtually all of the resulting
`increased rate of transport of water-soluble substances has been attributed to this internal change in
`the physical structure of the membrane (Fritsch & Stoughton, 1963; Blank & Schcuplein, 1964; Yate!.,
`1971).
`However, even cursory examination of the SEM images (Figs. 3 and 4) reveals that stratum
`corncum hydrated by polyethylene occlusion has a greater surface area than un-occludcd specimens.
`It is reasonable to assume that the increased surface area contributes to increased cutaneous pene(cid:173)
`trability which follows occlusion.
`It is worth noting that the simple, graded alcohol preparation of skin for SEM preserves the swollen,
`convoluted morphology of the occluded samples. The end point of preparation, dryness, does not
`restore their structure to the flat surfaces of non-occluded skin. As has been preYiously noted, the
`fixation which anends gradual dehydration of skin apparently minimizes the production of artifacts
`(Papa & Farber, 1971).
`Our mathematical determination of the relative increase in surface area of occluded skin is, at best,
`a crude estimate. Equipment similar to that used for converting aerial photographs of earth surface
`terrain into line topographical maps (stereo comparagraph) could be used to obtain more precise
`information.
`
`BETTUY, F.R. ( 1970) The epidermal barrier o.nd percuro.ncous absorption. In : An /111roduc1io11 to the Biology of
`the Skin (Ed. by R.H.Charnpion, T.Gillman, A.J.Rook and R.T.Sims), p. 342. Blackwell Scientific
`Publications, Oxford.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`

`

`David R.Harris, Chriszopher M.Papa and Raymond Stamon
`
`32
`BLANK, I.H. & ScHEUPLBIN, R.J. ( 1964) Percutaneous absorption and the epidermal barrier. I n: Progress in the
`Biological Sciences i11 Relation to Dennatolo;:y (Ed. by A.J.Rook and R. H .Champion), vol. 2, p. 247.
`Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
`FRITSCH, W.C. & STOUGHTON, R.B. ( 1963) The effect of temperature and humidity on the penetration of C 14
`acetylsalicylic acid in excised human skin.Journal of lnves1igative Dermatology, 41, 307.
`GARB, J. ( 1960) Nevus verrucosus unilateralis cured with podophyllin ointment. Archives of Den11a10/ogy, 8 1,
`6o6.
`HALL-SMITH, S.P. (1962) 'Polythene' coverings in dermatological treatment. Brimh Medical Journal, 2, 1233.
`PAPA, C.M. & FARBER, B. (1971) Direct scanning electron microscopy of human i;kin. Archives of Dermatology,
`104, 262.
`RoRrNSON, A.H. ( 1969) Elemenrs of Carrography, 3rd cdn, p. 141. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
`SCHOLTZ, J.R. ( 196r) Topical therapy of psoriasis with fluocinolonc acetonide. Archives of Dermarology, 84, 1029.
`SULZBERGER, M.B. & WITTEN, V.H. ( 1961) Thin plasuc films in topical dermatological therapy. Archi,m of
`Dennarolog_v, 84, 1027.
`THOMPSON, M.M. (Ed.) (1966) Ma1111al of Phorngrupl11c lwcrpreration, 3rd cdn, p. 19. American Society of
`Photogrametry. George Banta Co., Menasha, Wisconsin.
`YATES, J.R. ( 1971) Mechanism of water uptake by skin. In : Biophysical Properries of the Skin (Ed. by H.R.Elden),
`p. 485. lncersciencc, New York.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket