throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`ROKU, INC. and VIZIO, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`__________
`
`Case IPR2021-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941 B1
`
`____________________________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Ancora Technologies, Inc. (“Ancora”) hereby requests an oral
`
`hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`February 22, 2022 (paper 11), the Board’s Decision Granting Requests for Changing
`
`Oral Hearing and Due Dates dated May 4, 2022 (paper 23), and the Parties’ Joint
`
`Stipulation to Modify Due Dates 2–4 dated June 13, 2022 (paper 28). Oral hearing
`
`is currently scheduled for October 3, 2022. (See paper 23.) Ancora requests that the
`
`hearing be held in-person at the Alexandria USPTO Headquarters, or alternatively
`
`that hearing be held virtually if so ordered by the Board. Ancora intends to discuss
`
`the issues raised in the parties’ filings in the ongoing reviews, including but not
`
`limited to, the following items:
`
`1.
`
`Any issue properly raised by Petitioner, including the Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review and Reply in this proceeding, including the patentability of claims 1–
`
`3, 6–14, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941, titled “Method of Restricting Software
`
`Operation Within a License Limitation.”
`
`2.
`
`Any issues addressed by Ancora, including in Ancora’s Responses,
`
`Supplemental Response, and Sur-Replies.
`
`3.
`
`Rebuttal to issues properly raised by Petitioner, including in any
`
`Petition, Responses, Replies, motions to exclude or requests for oral argument.
`
`4.
`
`Any other issues related to invalidity that the Board deems necessary
`
`for issuing a final written decision.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Ancora requests that each side be given 45 minutes of total time to present its
`
`arguments. Ancora further requests that the oral hearing in this matter be
`
`consolidated with IPR2021-01338. Specifically, Ancora requests the sequence of
`
`argument to allow Petitioners in this case and in IPR2021-01338 to present their
`
`principal arguments (up to 45 minutes for each case), followed by Ancora’s rebuttal
`
`to both (up to 45 minutes for each case), followed by Petitioners’ respective sur-
`
`rebuttals (if time is reserved in one or both cases), followed by Ancora’s respective
`
`sur-sur-rebuttal. To be clear, Ancora requests time equal to the sum of time granted
`
`to Petitioners in this case and petitioner in IPR2020-01338. Given the similarity of
`
`issues in this case and IPR2021-01338, this sequencing would promote efficiency
`
`by avoiding repetition of arguments and ensure Petitioners in one or the other case
`
`do not get an unfair advantage based on observing Ancora’s arguments or the
`
`Board’s response thereto. Ancora proposed this arrangement to Petitioners, and they
`
`indicated that they oppose consolidating the hearings in this way. Ancora is available
`
`for a conference call with the Board at the Board’s convenience.
`
`Ancora also requests the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for demonstrative
`
`slides.
`
`Dated: September 2, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP
`By: /David A. Gosse/
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`David A. Gosse
`Reg. No. 61,511
`dgosse@fitcheven.com
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Reg. No. 53,456
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`Karen J. Wang
`Reg. No. 62,503
`kwang@fitcheven.com
`Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP
`120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2100
`Chicago, IL 60603
`(312) 577-7000
`(312) 577-7007 (fax)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 2, 2022, a complete and
`
`entire copy of the PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING, was
`
`served via electronic mail to the attorneys listed below at their respective electronic
`
`mail addresses:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jon Wright, Reg. No. 50,720
`jwright-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`(202) 772-8651
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`P.L.L.C
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Lestin Kenton, Reg. No. 72,314
`lkenton-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`(202) 772-8594
`
`Dohm Chankong, Reg. No. 72,314
`dchankong-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`(202) 772-8529
`
`Richard A. Crudo, Reg. No. 65,245
`rcrudo-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`(202) 772-8575
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`P.L.L.C
`
`
`
`Dated: September 2, 2022
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/David A. Gosse/
`David A. Gosse
`Reg. No. 61,511
`dgosse@fitcheven.com 
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket