`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`
`ROKU, INC. and VIZIO, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2021-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941
`_____________________
`
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY
`TRIAL DUE DATES 2-4
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941
`Petitioner, Roku, Inc. and Vizio, Inc., and Patent Owner, Ancora
`
`
`
`Technologies, Inc., have conferred and jointly agree to modify DUE DATES 2-4,
`
`as set in the February 22, 2022 Scheduling Order (Paper 11). Prior authorization
`
`for this Stipulation was provided in the Scheduling Order, Paper 11, 7-8, and in the
`
`Decision Granting Requests for Changing Oral hearing Date and Due Dates, Paper
`
`23, 6.
`
`Specifically, Petitioner and Patent Owner have agreed to extend DUE
`
`DATES 2-4 as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE
`DUE DATE 2: Petitioner’s
`Reply to Patent Owner’s
`Response to Petition
`DUE DATE 3: Patent
`Owner’s Sur-Reply to Reply
`DUE DATE 4: Request for
`Oral Argument
`
`Original Date
`
`Newly Stipulated Date
`
`July 12, 2022
`
`July 22, 2022
`
`August 19, 2022
`
`August 29, 2022
`
`August 15, 2022
`
`September 5, 2022
`
`There is no pending motion to amend claims, so this stipulation only affects
`
`the portion of DUE DATE 2 related to Petitioner’s Reply and the portion of DUE
`
`DATE 3 related to Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply. All other due dates or portions of
`
`due dates in the Scheduling Order remain the same. It is not believed that any other
`
`action, by the parties or by the Board, is required to put the requested schedule
`
`modification into effect.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jon E. Wright/
`
`Jon E. Wright (Reg. No. 50,720)
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP
`
`/David A. Gosse/
`
`David A. Gosse (Reg. No. 61,511)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Date: June 13, 2022
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`Date: June 13, 2022
`120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2100
`Chicago, Illinois 60603
`(312) 577-7000
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-01406
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
`
`
`
`foregoing NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY TRIAL DUE
`
`DATES 2-4 was served electronically via e-mail on June 13, 2022, in its entirety
`
`on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
` David A. Gosse
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Karen J. Wang
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP
`ancora-ipr@fitcheven.com
`dgosse@fitcheven.com
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`kwang@fitcheven.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`Date: June 13, 2022
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`18023489
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jon E. Wright/
`
`Jon E. Wright (Reg. No. 50,720)
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
