`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NINTENDO CO., LTD., and
`
`NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2021-01338
`Patent No. 6,411,941 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`158145318.1
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument
`PTAB Case No. IPR2021-01338
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 10),
`
`and the Joint Stipulation to Modify Due Dates (Paper 28), Petitioners Nintendo
`
`Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America Inc. respectfully request an oral hearing in this
`
`matter. The oral hearing is currently scheduled for October 3, 2022.
`
`Petitioners request that the oral hearing be held in-person at the USPTO
`
`headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. (See Scheduling Order at 6 (“Unless the
`
`Board notifies the parties otherwise, oral argument, if requested, will be held at the
`
`USPTO headquarters in Alexandria.”).)
`
`Petitioners request sixty (60) minutes of argument time per side to address
`
`the following issues:
`
`1. The patentability of challenged claims 1–3, 6–14, and 16 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,411,941 over all grounds asserted in the Petition;
`
`2. Response to any issues raised by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument or otherwise presented by the Patent Owner;
`
`3. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`Consistent with the Board’s explanation in the Order Dismissing Joint
`
`Motions to Consolidate (Paper 24), Petitioners request that the oral hearing for
`
`instant proceeding be held separately from any oral hearing that may be held in
`
`IPR2021-01406.
`
`158145318.1
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners request the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector, and screen for a
`
`PowerPoint display. In accordance with the Trial Practice Guide, Petitioners will
`
`contact the Board Trial Division paralegal to discuss this request.
`
`Dated: September 2, 2022
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 3rd Ave., #4900
`Seattle, WA 98101
`Telephone: 206-359-8664
`Facsimile: 206-359-9664
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`158145318.1
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Kyle R. Canavera /
`Back-up Counsels
`Kyle Canavera, Reg. No. 72,167
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jerry Riedinger, Reg. No. 30,582
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Jose Villarreal, Reg. No. 43,969
`Kyle Canavera, Reg. No. 72,167
`Theresa H. Nguyen, to be admitted pro hac
`vice
`Tara Kurtis, Reg. No. 74,846
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`I certify that the above-captioned PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR
`
`ORAL ARGUMENT was served in its entirety on September 2, 2022 upon the
`
`following parties via electronic mail:
`
`David A. Gosse
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Karen J. Wang
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP
`ancora-ipr@fitcheven.com
`dgosse@fitcheven.com
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`kwang@fitcheven.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 2, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Anita Chou/
`
`Anita Chou
`Paralegal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`158145318.1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
