`
`
`
`Filed on behalf of
`
`Petitioners HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`By:
`Irfan A. Lateef
`
`Brian C. Claassen
`
`Daniel C. Kiang
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`Tel.: (949) 760-0404
`
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`
`Email:
`BoxHTCCOL056LP@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________
`
`HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00570
`U.S. Patent 6,411,941 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR REFUND OF
`POST-INSTITUTION PETITION FEES
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00570
`HTC Corp, et al. v. Ancora Techs.
`
`
`Pursuant to the Final Rule Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees (78 Fed. Reg.
`
`4232–4234), HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC” or
`
`“Petitioners”) respectfully requests a refund in the amount of $22,500 for post-
`
`institution filing fees paid in this proceeding to be credited to Deposit Account 11-
`
`1410 (Customer No. 20,995).
`
`On February 19, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for inter partes review of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941 which was assigned case number IPR2021-00570.
`
`Among the fees paid concurrently with filing the petition were $22,500 in post
`
`institution fees.
`
`On June 10, 2021, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board entered a decision
`
`denying institution of this inter partes review (Paper 17). Accordingly, Petitioner
`
`requests a refund in the amount of $22.500 for the post-institution fees paid in
`
`connection with this proceeding.
`
`Dated: July 8, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`
`
`By: /Daniel C. Kiang/
`Irfan A. Lateef (Reg. No. 51,922)
`Brian C. Claassen (Reg. No. 63,051)
`Daniel C. Kiang (Reg. No. 79,631)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00570
`HTC Corp, et al. v. Ancora Techs.
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of PETITIONER’S REQUEST
`
`FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION PETITION FEES is being served on
`
`July 8, 2021, via email pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), to counsel for Patent
`
`Owner as addressed below:
`
`John P. Rondini
`jrondini@brookskushman.com
`Marc Lorelli
`mlorelli@brookskushman.com
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`(248) 358-4400
`
`ANCC0122IPR@brookskushman.com
`
`Nicholas T. Peters
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`David A. Gosse
`dgosse@fitcheven.com
`Paul B. Henkelmann
`phenkelmann@fitcheven.com
`FITCH, EVEN, TABAN & FLANNERY LLP
`120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2100
`Chicago, IL 60603
`(312) 577-7000
`
`Ancora-ipr@fitcheven.com
`
`
`
`Dated: July 8, 2021
`
`
`
`35258051
`
`
`
`By: /Daniel C. Kiang/
`Irfan A. Lateef (Reg. No. 34,362)
`Brian C. Claassen (Reg. No. 63,051)
`Daniel C. Kiang (Reg. No. 79,631)
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
