`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00406
`U.S. Patent No. 10,716,793
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF MANDY KIM UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`IPR2021-00406
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, United Therapeutics Corp., respectfully requests that the Board
`
`recognize Mandy Kim, Esq., as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`Petitioner’s counsel do not oppose this Motion.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed in
`
`compliance with and pursuant to the Order—Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission in Case No. IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (“the Order”), and pursuant to the
`
`Board’s advanced authorization expressed in the Board’s Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response in this
`
`IPR dated February 3, 2021 (Paper No. 4).
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`As required by the Order, the following statement of facts shows that there is
`
`good cause for the Board to recognize Ms. Kim pro hac vice.
`
`Ms. Kim is a litigation attorney and has been involved in numerous complex
`
`litigations in state and federal courts. Ms. Kim’s biography is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 2092 to this Motion.
`
`Ms. Kim has reviewed U.S. Patent No. 10,716,793 and the Petition already
`
`filed in this proceeding. Further, Ms. Kim is counsel for United Therapeutics Corp.
`
`in the pending litigation between the parties involving U.S. Patent No. 10,716,793
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`IPR2021-00406
`
`before the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware entitled United
`
`Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-00755-
`
`RGA, and, as such, is familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`Therefore, Patent Owner respectfully submits that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Ms. Kim as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a
`
`Declaration of Mandy Kim, Esq. attached hereto as Exhibit 2093 as required by the
`
`Order.
`
`Date: Jan. 5, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Stephen B. Maebius/
`Stephen B. Maebius
`Registration No. 35,264
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20007
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`IPR2021-00406
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`
`MANDY KIM UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) is being served on Jan. 5, 2021 by
`
`filing this document through the PTAB E2E System as well as delivering copies
`
`via email to the following counsel for the Petitioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`zLiquidiaIPR@cooley.com
`ielrifi@cooley.com
`emilch@cooley.com
`dkannappan@cooley.com
`ssukduang@cooley.com
`
`/Stephen B. Maebius/
`Stephen B. Maebius
`Registration No. 35,264
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
