throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inhaled Prostacyclin and Iloprost in Severe Pulmonary
`Hypertension Secondary to Lung Fibrosis
`HORST OLSCHEWSKI, H. ARDESCHIR GHOFRANI, DIETER WALMRATH, RALPH SCHERMULY,
`BETTINA TEMMESFELD-WOLLBRÜCK, FRIEDRICH GRIMMINGER, and WERNER SEEGER
`
`Depatment of Internal Medicine II, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
`
`Pulmonary hypertension is a life-threatening complication of lung fibrosis. Vasodilator therapy is dif-
`ficult owing to systemic side effects and pulmonary ventilation–perfusion mismatch. We compared
`the effects of intravenous prostacyclin and inhaled NO and aerosolized prostacyclin in randomized
`order and, in addition, tested for effects of oxygen and systemic calcium antagonists (CAAs) in eight
`patients with lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Aerosolized prostaglandin (PG)I
` caused
`2
`⫾
`preferential pulmonary vasodilatation with a decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure from 44.1
`⫾
`⫾
`⫾
`⭈
`⭈
`4.2 to 31.6
` 3.1 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (R
`) from 810
` 226 to 386
` 69 dyn
`s
`L
`⫺
`5
`⬍
`cm
` (p
` 0.05, respectively). Systemic arterial pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and pulmonary
`right-to-left shunt flow, measured by multiple inert gas analysis, were not significantly changed. In-
`⫾
`haled NO similarly resulted in selective pulmonary vasodilatation, with R
` decreasing from 726
` 217
`L
`⫺
`5
`⫾
` ⭈
`⭈
`to 458
` 81 dyn
`s
`cm
`. In contrast, both intravenous PGI
` and CAAs were not pulmonary selective,
`2
`resulting in a significant drop in arterial pressure. In addition, PGI
` infusion caused a marked increase
`2
`in shunt flow. Long-term therapy with aerosolized iloprost (long-acting PGI
` analog) resulted in un-
`2
`equivocal clinical improvement from a state of immobilization and severe resting dyspnea in a pa-
`tient with decompensated right heart failure. We concluded that, in pulmonary hypertension second-
`ary to lung fibrosis, aerosolization of PGI
` or iloprost causes marked pulmonary vasodilatation with
`2
`maintenance of gas exchange and systemic arterial pressure. Long-term therapy with inhaled iloprost
`may be life saving in decompensated right heart failure from pulmonary hypertension secondary to
`lung fibrosis.
`Olschewski H, Ghofrani HA, Walmrath D, Schermuly R, Temmesfeld-Wollbrück B,
`Grimminger F, Seeger W. Inhaled prostacyclin and iloprost in severe pulmonary hypertension
`secondary to lung fibrosis.
`AM J RESPIR CRIT CARE MED 1999;160:600–607.
`
`severe systemic hypotension in these patients if cardiac output
`) Any systemic administration
`is not adequately increased. (
`2
`of vasodilators may increase the blood flow to low or nonven-
`tilated lung areas by interfering with the physiological hypoxic
`vasoconstrictor mechanism, thereby worsening preexistent
`·Q
`ventilation (
`)/perfusion (
`) mismatch and shunt (5), result-
`ing in arterial hypoxia and wasting of the small ventilatory re-
`serve of these patients.
`Selective pulmonary vasodilatation by inhalation of the va-
`sorelaxant agent is an appealing concept to circumvent some
`of the hazards inherent in systemic vasodilator therapy in pul-
`monary hypertension. The feasibility of this concept was dem-
`onstrated for inhalation of nitric oxide (NO) by children with
`persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (6–9), in
`the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (10), and also
`in scleroderma patients with “isolated” pulmonary hyperten-
`sion that is characterized by severe pulmonary hypertension
`without interstitial lung disease (11). By employing an aerosol
`technique, our group demonstrated that the concept of pulmo-
`nary selectivity may be extended to inhalation of aerosolized
`, PGI
`) (12, 13): in patients with
`prostacylin (prostaglandin I
`2
`2
` caused pulmo-
`ARDS both intravenous and aerosolized PGI
`2
`nary vasodilatation; however, the former deteriorated whereas
`the latter improved shunt flow and gas exchange. This corre-
`sponds to studies of experimental pulmonary hypertension,
`
`V·
`
`Lung fibrosis of various etiologies is often associated with pul-
`monary hypertension, which may become a major contributor
`to morbidity and mortality, or may even represent the major
`cause of death as in systemic sclerosis (1). In patients suffering
`from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), intravenous
`prostacyclin has been demonstrated to be a potent pulmonary
`vasodilator, and long-term infusion of the prostanoid was
`found to improve exercise tolerance and survival in these pa-
`tients (2–4). However, in the presence of lung fibrosis, any sys-
`temic vasodilator therapy may be hampered by two draw-
`) The percentage of increased pulmonary vascular
`backs. (
`1
`resistance that is due to fibrotic and thus “fixed” remodeling
`processes, compared with the percentage caused by vasocon-
`striction, is unknown. Systemic vasodilatation due to medica-
`tions in the absence of pulmonary vasodilatation may provoke
`
`)
`Received in original form October 2, 1998 and in revised form March 15, 1999
`(
`This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Klinische
`Forschergruppe Respiratorische Insuffizienz.
`Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Horst Ols-
`chewski, Department of Internal Medicine II, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstr.
`36, D-35392 Giessen, Germany. E-mail: horst.olschewski@innere.med. unigiessen.de
`Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 160. pp 600–607, 1999
`Internet address: www.atsjournals.org
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Olschewski, Ghofrani, Walmrath, et al.: Inhaled Prostanoids in Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension
`
`
`
`601
`
`) of 26% rel-
`tal capacity (VC) of 48% and CO-diffusing capacity (D
`CO
`ative to unaffected control patients. Significant arterial hypoxia under
`resting conditions was noted in seven patients, and these received
`long-term oxygen therapy. Seven patients were treated with steroids
`(mean dose, 21 mg of methylprednisolone per day). Two patients
`were treated with low-dose calcium antagonists (CAAs): patient B
`had received felodipine because of a right heart catheterization 7 mo
`before this study, and had subsequently recovered from a period of
`right heart decompensation. The other patient (patient H) had re-
`ceived low-dose diltiazem for several years, but validation of this ap-
`proach had never been performed. None of the patients were antico-
`agulated or treated with other vasodilatory agents. Underlying causes
`for pulmonary hypertension other than parenchymal lung diseases
`were excluded by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardio-
`⫽
` 8), ventilation and perfusion pulmonary nuclear scintig-
`graphy (n
`⫽
` 8), and pulmonary angiogram (patient F).
`raphy (n
`Seven patients were classified as stage III according to the New
`York Heart Association (NYHA) system of classification. Patient F,
`who later received long-term iloprost inhalation, presented with de-
`compensating right heart failure, unable to walk despite continuous
`nasal oxygen. This patient was a 27-yr-old woman with a history of dry
`cough and intermittent pleurisy for 4 yr. High-titer anti-nuclear, anti-
`DNA, and anti-skin-sensitizing antibodies, suggested collagen vascu-
`lar disease resulting in progressive lung fibrosis with continuous re-
`. Exercise tolerance had been declining more
`duction of VC and D
`CO
`rapidly in the previous 12 mo. She had been treated with high-dose
`corticosteroids and azathioprine, and subsequently with bolus applica-
`2
`, 4 wk apart) with-
`tion of cyclophosphamide (two boluses with 1 g/m
`out clinical benefit. Current therapy included high-dose corticoste-
`roids, continuous nasal oxygen, and diuretics.
`
`Study Protocol
`All patients gave informed written consent to participate in the test
`protocol, which was approved by the institutional ethics committee of
`the Justus-Liebig-University. A fiberoptic thermodilution pulmonary
`artery catheter (Edwards Swan-Ganz, 93A-754H-7.5F; Baxter Health-
`care, Irvine, CA) was inserted to measure central venous pressure (Pcv),
`pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa), pulmonary artery wedge pressure
`(Ppa,we), cardiac output ( ; thermodilution technique), right ventric-
`ular ejection fraction (RVEF), and central venous oxygen saturation
`). A femoral artery catheter was used to assess mean arterial
`(Sv
`O
`2
`pressure (
`) and to draw arterial blood samples. The pulmonary
`Pa
`shunt flow was measured by determining the retention and excretion
`values of sulfur hexafluoride (20) in all patients. In addition, in patient
`F, the retention and excretion values for ethane, cyclopropane, hal-
`othane, diethyl ether, and acetone were used to determine the pattern
`of ventilation and perfusion distributions (multiple inert gas elimina-
`tion technique, MIGET) as described in detail by Wagner and co-
`
`Q.
`
`wherein selective vasodilatation in the pulmonary vascular
` (14). Subsequent stud-
`bed was achieved by aerosolized PGI
`2
`ies in patients with ARDS and severe pneumonia demon-
` resulted in
`strated that inhalation of NO and aerosolized PGI
`2
`comparable hemodynamic and gas exchange effects (15, 16).
`By employing this approach in patients with PPH and ex-
`cessive pulmonary hypertension, we found that aerosolization
` or its stable analog, iloprost, effected equipotent pul-
`of PGI
`2
`monary vasodilatation to the maximum tolerable dose of in-
`travenous prostacyclin, but induced fewer systemic side effects
`(17). In these patients, prostacyclin appeared to be more po-
`tent than NO in decreasing pulmonary resistance, correspond-
`ing to other data (18, 19). On the other hand, inhaled NO,
`owing to its immediate inactivation by hemoglobin binding on
`entering the intravascular space, is strictly selective to the pul-
`monary vessels, whereas inhaled prostacyclin will have some
`systemic effects due to overspill into the systemic circulation. In
`this study, we examined the effects of the most important sys-
`temic and inhalative vasodilators, NO and intravenous and in-
` and systemic calcium
`haled prostacyclin, in comparison with O
`2
`antagonists in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension
`associated with interstitial lung diseases of differing etiologies.
`
`METHODS
`Patients
`Eight patients with lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension, who
`were referred to the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (De-
`partment of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen,
`Germany) between June 1995 and October 1996, were included in the
`study. Criteria for entry included a peak systolic pulmonary pressure
`⬎
` 50 mm Hg, as suggested by echocardiography or a resting pulmo-
`⬎
` 30 mm Hg as measured by catheter investiga-
`nary mean pressure
`tion, and the diagnosis of chronic fibrotic lung disease. The underlying
`diseases included extrinsic allergic alveolitis (two patients), systemic
`sclerosis, CREST syndrome (calcinosis, the Raynaud phenomenon,
`esophageal hypomotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia), collagen
`vascular overlap syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, postradia-
`tion lung fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (Table 1). The di-
`agnosis of these diseases was based on history, lung function testing,
`chest X-ray, and high-resolution computed tomography, which dem-
`onstrated at least medium-grade bilateral interstitial fibrosis in all pa-
`tients. Flexible bronchoscopy with biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage
`was performed in five patients. All suffered from significant lung re-
`striction or severe restriction in gas exchange capacity, with a mean vi-
`
`TABLE 1
`BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND LUNG FUNCTION
`
`Underlying
`Disease
`
`Sex
`
`EAA
`SS
`CREST
`EAA
`BPD
`CVOL
`PRT
`IPF
`
`F
`M
`M
`M
`F
`F
`F
`M
`
`Patient
`
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`F
`G
`H
`Mean
`
`Age
`(
`yr
`)
`
`30
`54
`59
`59
`38
`27
`25
`75
`45.9
`
`Height
`
`
`(cm)
`
`Weight
`
`
`(kg)
`
`VC
`
`Liters
`
`% pred
`
`156
`170
`174
`172
`160
`164
`162
`180
`167.3
`
`78
`51
`70
`76
`40
`65
`74
`79
`66.6
`
`1.25
`2.17
`3.19
`1.69
`0.68
`1.21
`1.52
`3.92
`2.0
`
`37.1
`51.5
`71.9
`40.2
`20.8
`32.3
`41.5
`87.6
`47.9
`
`1
`
`FEV
`
`(L
`)
`
`1.04
`1.68
`1.96
`1.52
`0.66
`1.16
`1.12
`2.27
`1.4
`
`c
`D
`CO
`(
`
`%)
`
`25.3
`17.1
`27.5
`13
`ND
`28.2
`61.6
`11.8
`26.4
`
`P
`O2
`(mm Hg
`
`
`
`)
`
`P
`CO2
`(mm Hg
`
`
`
`)
`
`59
`60
`58
`47.9
`45
`49.7
`75.4
`42
`54.6
`
`37.2
`31.1
`36.3
`37.6
`51.6
`28
`42.6
`36.7
`37.6
`
`⫽
`⫽
` bronchopulmonary dysplasia after premature birth and long-term ventilation; CREST
`Definition of abbreviations: BPD
`
` calcinosis, the
`⫽
`Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysfunction, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia; CVOL
` collagen vascular overlap syndrome (
`
`see text);
`D
`c, diffusion capacity for CO gas, corrected for the actual hemoglobin concentration, given as a percentage of predicted values, cor-
`CO
`⬎
` ⬍
`rected for age, sex, and body surface area (single-breath method in patients with VC
` 1.5 L and steady state in patients with VC
` 1.5 L);
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`EAA
` chronic extrinsic allergic alveolitis; F
` female; FEV
`
` forced expiratory volume within 1 s; IPF
` idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; M
`1
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`male; ND
` not determined; P
`and P
`
` resting arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide partial pressure during oxygen pause; PRT
` post-
`O
`CO
`2
`2
`radiation therapy presenting with lung fibrosis and kyphoscoliosis occurring after thoracic radiation during the first year of life and due to
`⫽
`⫽
`malignant neuroblastoma; SS
` systemic sclerosis; VC
` inspiratory vital capacity in liters and as a percentage of predicted values.
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`602
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 160 1999
`
`R
`/Rva
`L
`
`Shunt
`
`
`(%)
`
`TABLE 2
`BASELINE HEMODYNAMICS
`
`Q·
`
`
`
`(L/min)
`
`Ppa
`
`
`(mm Hg)
`
`Ppa,we
`
`(mm Hg
`)
`
`R
`L
`5
`⭈
`s)/cm
`[(dyn
`]
`
`
`
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`F
`G
`H
`Mean
`
`4.6
`3.5
`3.4
`7.5
`4.7
`2.7
`4.4
`7.4
`4.8
`
`36
`30
`51
`32
`50
`55
`38
`30
`40.2
`
`10
`4
`12
`5
`3
`6
`11
`5
`7.0
`
`457
`570
`931
`288
`800
`1,468
`488
`285
`660
`
`RVEF
`
`
`(%)
`
`31
`9
`8
`22
`30
`7
`30
`26
`20.4
`
`Pcv
`(mm Hg
`
`
`
`)
`
`HR
`⫺
`1
`(min
`)
`
`
`
`Pa
`
`
`(mm Hg)
`
`5
`5
`11
`3
`⫺
`3
`16
`5
`⫺
`1
`5.1
`
`55
`100
`82
`84
`96
`108
`103
`112
`92.5
`
`94
`68
`114
`115
`114
`117
`91
`60
`96.6
`
`0.292
`0.397
`0.379
`0.241
`0.402
`0.485
`0.314
`0.410
`0.365
`
`0.32
`4.8
`3.6
`26.4
`ND
`3.6
`ND
`9.9
`8.1
`
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`Ppa
` central venous pressure;
` mean systemic arterial pressure; Pcv
`
` heart rate;
`Definition of abbreviations: HR
`
`
` mean pulmonary
`Pa
`Q·
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`⫽
`artery pressure; Ppa,we
` pulmonary artery wedge pressure;
`
` cardiac output; R
`
` pulmonary vascular resistance; R
`/Rva
` R
`/Rva (sys-
`L
`L
`L
`⫽
`⫽
`temic vascular resistance) ratio; RVEF
` right ventricular ejection fraction, assessed by thermodilution; Shunt
` right-to-left shunt blood
`flow as a percentage of total pulmonary blood flow, assessed by MIGET analysis.
`
`workers (20). Concerning the patients with long-term CAA therapy,
`the agent was discontinued 48 h before the test in patient H and con-
`tinued in patient B, who had suffered from right ventricular decom-
`pensation before therapy with felodipine.
`
`Test Procedure
`In patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy (seven patients), cath-
`eterization was performed with ongoing nasal oxygen. Oxygen deliv-
`ery was then stopped for 20 min, and baseline values were deter-
`mined. Next, high-dose oxygen was administered (4–8 L/min) in order
`to increase arterial oxygen saturation above 95%, and measurements
`were performed. Subsequently, oxygen supply was titrated to main-
`tain baseline arterial oxygen saturation above 85% (0–4 L/min). This
`oxygen flow was kept constant throughout the following tests, which
`were performed in randomized order. Inhaled nitric oxide (15 to 80
`ppm; mean, 40 ppm) was titrated to achieve a maximum response of
`pulmonary artery pressure decrease without decline of arterial oxygen
`saturation, as assessed by fingertip oximetry. After 5 min on a con-
`stant dose, a complete set of hemodynamic measurements was per-
`formed. Intravenous prostacyclin (epoprostenol sodium; Wellcome
`Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent, UK) was increased in in-
`crements of 2 (ng/kg)/min until patients experienced discomfort (tho-
`
`racic oppression, heat, headache) or until mean arterial pressure de-
`creased to less than 70 mm Hg. The highest tolerated doses ranged
`from 5 to 16 (ng/kg)/min, with a mean of 8.0 (ng/kg)/min. Fifteen min-
`utes after finding the highest tolerated dose, during continuous PGI
`2
`infusion, a complete set of hemodynamic measurements was per-
`␮
`g/ml),
`formed. Aerosolized prostacyclin, diluted in glycine buffer (50
`was jet nebulized (Puritan-Bennett raindrop medication nebulizer)
`with room air at a pressure of 80 kPa (compressor from Pari Boy, Pari,
`Germany) (fluid flux, 0.09 ml/min; mass median aerodynamic diame-
`␮
`m; geometric SD of 2.6, ascertained by impactor
`ter of particles, 3.5
`technique) and delivered to a spacer connected to the afferent limb of
`a Y-valve mouthpiece. The total inhalation time was 12 to 15 min (to-
`␮
`g), depending on systemic pressure and
`tal nebulized dose, 54 to 68
`fingertip oximetry. Hemodynamic measurements were performed ev-
`ery 3 min and arterial and central venous blood samples were drawn
`before and during the last minute of inhalation. After each test, 1 h
`was allowed to pass to achieve a new baseline. After termination of
`the randomized trial period, calcium antagonists were given to six pa-
`tients. Nifedipine, 10 to 20 mg, was administered sublingually (pa-
`tients A, C, D, E, and F) and hemodynamic measurements were then
`performed 30 min after ingestion of this dose. In one patient (patient
`H), instead of nifedipine, diltiazem was applied corresponding to the
`preceding therapy. Diltiazem, 40 mg, was applied intravenously dur-
`
`TABLE 3
`ACUTE RESPONSE OF A PATIENT WITH DECOMPENSATED RIGHT HEART
`FAILURE TO VASODILATORY THERAPY*
`
`Ppa
`
`mm Hg)
`
`(
`
`R
`L
`⭈
`s)/cm
`[(dyn
`
`
`5
`]
`
`RVEF
`(
`
`%)
`
`Pcv
`(mm Hg
`
`
`
`)
`
`HR
`⫺
`1
`min
`)
`
`(
`
`Pa
`(mm Hg
`
`
`)
`
`Pa
`O2
`
`
`mm Hg)
`
`(
`
`Shunt
`
`
`(%)
`
`Q·
`
`(
`
`L/min
`
`)
`
`Before NO
`During NO
`, intravenous
`Before PGI
`2
`, intravenous
`During PGI
`2
`Before PGI
`, aerosolized
`2
`, aerosolized
`During PGI
`2
`Before nifedipine
`After nifedipine
`After 5 mo
`Before iloprost, aerosolized
`During iloprost, aerosolized
`After 12 mo
`Before iloprost, aerosolized
`During iloprost, aerosolized
`
`2.1
`5.0
`2.4
`6.0
`2.5
`4.7
`2.1
`3.3
`
`2.9
`5.3
`
`2.9
`4.1
`
`65
`44
`59
`42
`65
`45
`64
`51
`
`57
`44
`
`53
`50
`
`2,243
`774
`1,789
`470
`2,179
`644
`2,375
`955
`
`1,452
`604
`
`1,311
`882
`
`7
`15
`9
`20
`7
`20.5
`9
`10
`
`9
`24
`
`10
`19
`
`18
`10
`19
`10
`18
`9.5
`19
`16
`
`12
`3
`
`9
`2
`
`113
`90
`111
`102
`113
`93
`104
`108
`
`100
`90
`
`93
`92
`
`110
`120
`121
`105
`112
`113
`118
`94
`
`91
`84
`
`104
`97
`
`69.4
`88.6
`71.9
`62
`74.6
`81.5
`70.7
`74.5
`
`66
`73
`
`53
`58
`
`3.6
`6.3
`5.1
`23.1
`2.4
`5.6
`3.4
`3.7
`
`—
`—
`
`—
`—
`
`Definition of abbreviations: see Tables 1 and 2.
`
`
`
`* Response to NO, intravenous PGI
`, aerosolized PGI
`, and nifedipine during the first test trial and after 5 and 12 mo of iloprost inhala-
`2
`2
`tion in patient F. Measurements on the first day were performed during continuous oxygen flow (4 L/min); during subsequent trials, mea-
`surements were performed without nasal oxygen supply.
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Olschewski, Ghofrani, Walmrath, et al.: Inhaled Prostanoids in Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`603
`
`Figure 1. Acute responses to oxygen, NO, intravenously administered and inhaled prostacyclin (PGI i.v.
`and PGI aero, respectively) in eight patients, and to calcium antagonists (CAAs) in six patients. Dark col-
`umns and light columns give mean values ⫾ SE before and after drug administration, respectively, for arte-
`rial oxygen saturation (SaO2), right-to-left shunt flow (as a percentage of pulmonary blood flow; SHUNT),
`right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and central venous pressure (CVP). p ⫽ significance level for dif-
`ferences in the responses to the various agents (ANOVA for the intrapair differences); * ⫽ significant differ-
`ence pre- and postapplication, p ⬍ 0.05; ⫹ ⫽ significant linear contrast between responses to different
`agents (Scheffé test, p ⬍ 0.05).
`
`Oxygen
`During high-dose oxygen inhalation, PaO2 increased to an av-
`erage of 125 mm Hg (p ⬍ 0.01), with a corresponding increase
`in SaO2 (Figure 1). Heart rate decreased significantly from 92.5 ⫾
`6.1 to 85.3 ⫾ 6.3 min⫺1 (p ⬍ 0.05) and
` decreased from 40.1 ⫾
`Ppa
`3.4 to 37.5 ⫾ 3.9 mm Hg (p ⬍ 0.05; Figure 2). All other hemo-
`dynamic and gas exchange variables were not significantly al-
`tered. Continuous low-flow nasal oxygen was then administered
`to maintain baseline SaO2 values above 85% (see increased
`baseline SaO2 data in the following tests).
`NO
` from 39.8 ⫾ 4.3 to
`Ppa
`Inhaled NO significantly decreased
`31.9 ⫾ 3.2 mm Hg (p ⬍ 0.01), RL from 726 ⫾ 217 to 458 ⫾ 81
`dyn ⭈ s ⭈ cm⫺5 (p ⬍ 0.05), and the RL/Rva ratio from 0.389 ⫾
`0.026 to 0.289 ⫾ 0.030 (p ⬍ 0.05). RVEF was increased from
`20.5 ⫾ 3.9 to 24.4 ⫾ 4.4% (p ⬍ 0.05). All other hemodynamic
`and gas exchange variables were not significantly altered (see
`Figures 1 and 2).
`
`Intravenous PGI2
`·Q
` from 4.9 ⫾ 0.7 to 7.1 ⫾ 1.0
`Prostacyclin infusion increased
`L/min (p ⬍ 0.01) and significantly decreased both
`Ppa
` from
`39.6 ⫾ 4.9 to 33.6 ⫾ 3.0 and
` from 93.1 ⫾ 7.3 to 81.6 ⫾ 8.1
`Pa
`mm Hg (p ⬍ 0.05, respectively). Correspondingly, both RL
`and Rva were decreased by an average of 40%, resulting in an
`unchanged RL/Rva ratio. RVEF increased significantly from
`18.2 ⫾ 3.9 to 24.5 ⫾ 4.2%. A more than 2.5-fold increase in
`pulmonary shunt flow occurred, from an average of 7.0 ⫾ 1.9
`to 18.4 ⫾ 3.1% (see Figures 1 and 2). Owing to the increased
`central venous oxygen saturation (data not given), which re-
`·Q
`flected
` increase, this marked augmentation of shunt flow
`resulted in only a moderate decrease in SaO2.
`
`ing a 30-min infusion period. Measurements were performed 15 min
`after the end of infusion. Patient G refused to take calcium antago-
`nists owing to intolerance during preceding episodes of treatment
`with these drugs, and patient B was not included owing to continuous
`felodipine therapy.
`
`Statistics
`One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to evaluate
`changes in parameters during exposure to the different agents (pre-
`and postexposure percent differences for
`, pulmonary vascular resis-
`tance [RL], and systemic vascular resistance [Rva] and numerical dif-
`ferences for other parameters) and the Scheffé test was used as an a
`posteriori test for linear contrasts between these differences. The re-
`sponse to an agent was considered significant if the 95% confidence
`interval (p ⬍ 0.05) or the 99% confidence interval (p ⬍ 0.01) of the
`pre- and postexposure difference did not overlap with zero. The sig-
`nificance level for the Scheffé test was set at p ⫽ 0.05.
`
`Q.
`
`RESULTS
`Baseline Data
`Ppa
` and RL for all patients were significantly ele-
`Values of
`vated and scattered over a wide range (Table 2). Ppa,we was
`in the normal range, excluding left heart failure as the under-
`·Q
`lying cause of the pulmonary hypertension.
` values were in
`the normal or lower normal range in all patients, except in pa-
`tient F, who presented with low-output syndrome and decom-
`pensated right heart failure, and had elevated Pcv (Table 3).
`The RL/Rva ratio was increased and RVEF was decreased in
`all. Shunt flow was increased with great differences between
`individuals. Seven patients presented with significant arterial
`hypoxemia, whereas PCO2 values were slightly elevated in only
`one patient.
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 4
`
`

`

`604
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 160 1999
`
`Figure 2. Acute responses to oxygen, NO, intravenously administered and inhaled prostacyclin (PGI i.v.
`and PGI aero, respectively), and calcium antagonists (CAAs). Dark columns and light columns give mean
`values ⫾ SE before and after drug administration, respectively, for mean pulmonary artery pressure (
`),
`Ppa
`pulmonary vascular resistance (RL), ratio of pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance (RL/Rva), mean sys-
`Q·
`temic arterial pressure (
`), cardiac output (
`), and heart rate (HR). For statistics see Figure 1.
`Pa
`
`Inhaled PGI2
`Aerosolized PGI2 markedly decreased the pulmonary artery
`pressure from 44.1 ⫾ 4.2 to 31.6 ⫾ 3.1 mm Hg. This response
`was significantly greater than the response to intravenous
`PGI2 (Scheffé test). Most of the difference in these responses,
`however, resulted from increased preinhalation rather than
`decreased postinhalation pressures. In contrast, Pa values
`·Q
` increased from 5.1 ⫾ 0.8 to
`were not significantly reduced.
`6.4 ⫾ 0.8 L/min. Correspondingly, the RL values were reduced
`by about 50% (from 810 ⫾ 226 to 386 ⫾ 69) and the RL/Rva
`ratio was significantly decreased (from 0.456 ⫾ 0.034 to 0.319 ⫾
`0.022). RVEF was increased from 18 ⫾ 4.0 to 24.6 ⫾ 4.6%,
`and Pcv was significantly lowered from 6.3 ⫾ 2.6 to 3.4 ⫾ 2.0
`mm Hg. Shunt flow and heart rate did not change significantly.
`
`Calcium Antagonists
`Calcium antagonists significantly decreased Ppa and, more im-
`·Q
` increased from 4.3 ⫾ 0.8 to 5.4 ⫾
`pressively, Pa values.
`0.8 L/min and RVEF was increased from 18.6 ⫾ 4.5 to 22.8 ⫾
`5.9% on average (p ⬍ 0.05, respectively). Correspondingly,
`both RL and Rva were significantly reduced, with unchanged
`
`RL/Rva ratio. Shunt flow and arterial oxygenation were not
`significantly altered.
`
`Long-term Therapy
`On the basis of the results of the test trial, in three patients (A,
`C, and E), in whom nifedipine resulted in a substantial de-
`crease in Ppa and RL without systemic side effects, treat-
`ment with calcium antagonists was started and in patient H
`the CAA was withdrawn owing to decreased arterial oxygen
`pressure after the test dose. In the patient with immobilization
`due to decompensated right heart failure (patient F), calcium
`antagonists were not tolerated. This may be related to a nega-
`tive inotropic effect of the calcium antagonist suggested by the
`moderate Pcv decrease from 19 to 16 mm Hg despite an after-
`load reduction ⬎ 50% (see Table 3) in this patient; long-term
`therapy with repetitive aerosolization of iloprost, the stable
`analog of prostacyclin, was started. This decision was based on
`the fact that both PGI2 infusion and PGI2 inhalation markedly
`decreased the excessively high Ppa and RL values, with ap-
`·Q
`, but intravenous PGI2 drastically in-
`proximate doubling of
`creased the shunt flow in this patient (Figure 3), with concom-
`itant drop in arterial oxygenation, and a sensation of dyspnea
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Olschewski, Ghofrani, Walmrath, et al.: Inhaled Prostanoids in Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension
`
`605
`
`sistance and reduced right ventricular function, partly result-
`ing in reduced cardiac output. In contrast to previous investi-
`gations addressing pulmonary vasodilatation in pulmonary
`hypertension (2, 3, 11, 17, 18), all of our patients suffered from
`severe interstitial lung disease with severe gas exchange ab-
`normalities (mean CO diffusion capacity, ⬇ 26%). Seven of
`the eight patients were receiving long-term oxygen therapy
`(mostly 24 h/d). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
`investigation to compare the effects of different vasodilators
`in a population of patients with interstitial fibrosis accompa-
`nied by pulmonary hypertension.
`The contribution of increased right ventricular afterload to
`the reduction of exercise tolerance in the individual patient
`is difficult to assess, although pulmonary hypertension was
`found to be the most common cause of death in systemic scle-
`rosis (1). In our patient with decompensated right ventricular
`failure due to a collagen vascular disease, it was evident that
`restriction of circulation was predominant over the restriction
`of ventilation. On persistent reduction of the pulmonary vas-
`cular resistance with concomitant increase in cardiac output,
`this patient improved from a state of being confined to bed to
`a 6-min walking distance of 314 m, although lung restriction
`(reduced vital capacity, FEV1) and gas exchange abnormali-
`ties (CO diffusion) were entirely unchanged. This finding im-
`pressively supports the concept that lowering of the pulmo-
`nary resistance is a worthwhile goal in secondary pulmonary
`hypertension as long as arterial oxygenation and systemic
`pressure are not compromised.
`As anticipated for pulmonary hypertension secondary to
`lung parenchymal disease, nasal oxygen supply effected a
`moderate yet significant decrease in Ppa. A detailed analysis
`of the hemodynamic data did, however, disclose that this ef-
`fect was only partially due to a relaxation of the pulmonary
`vasculature, with RL values being only minimally lowered.
`More importantly, the relief of systemic hypoxia caused a sig-
`nificant decrease in heart rate, most probably reflecting re-
`duced sympathetic tone, with slightly decreased cardiac out-
`put. An “oxygen challenge” is thus clearly insufficient to
`discriminate between the reversible (vasoconstriction related)
`and the “fixed” component of the secondary pulmonary hy-
`pertension in lung fibrosis.
`Inhaled NO significantly reduced RL by ⬇ 25%, with a con-
`comitant Ppa decrease and increase in RVEF as a conse-
`·Q
`quence of reduced right ventricular load.
` was slightly in-
`creased and
` values were not significantly altered. This
`Pa
`corresponds to a profile of selective pulmonary vasodilatation,
`as anticipated for NO, and this was also reflected by the signif-
`icant decrease in the RL/Rva ratio. The response to NO in
`these patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension is thus
`similar to that in PPH patients (17, 18, 22) and in scleroderma
`patients suffering from “isolated” pulmonary hypertension
`(11). As reported from these previous investigations, the NO-
`induced changes in hemodynamics returned to baseline values
`within 2–5 min after cessation of inhalation.
`In contrast to NO, infused prostacyclin drastically reduced
`both RL and Rva, resulting in an unchanged RL/Rva ratio.
`Pa
`was significantly decreased, resulting in arterial baroreflex ac-
`·Q
`tivation with heart rate elevation and overshooting
` in-
`crease, which partially antagonized the Ppa decrease. Never-
`theless, improved right ventricular function was demonstrated
`by increased RVEF. Most disadvantageously, however, sys-
`temic prostacyclin administration caused a substantial in-
`crease in shunt flow in these patients with fibrosis-related sec-
`ondary pulmonary hypertension, with concomitant drop in
`PaO2 despite enhanced central venous oxygen saturation. As
`repetitive measurements to establish dose–effect curves for in-
`
`Figure 3. Dose–response curve of prostacyclin inhalation. PGI2 was
`continuously aerosolized at a rate of 4.5 ␮g/min. Hemodynamic
`measurements were performed before onset of nebulization and
`after 3, 6, and 9 min, i.e., at cumulative nebulized doses of 13.5,
`27, and 40.5 ␮g of PGI2. Aerosolization was terminated after 12–
`15 min, depending on individual side effects (mean arterial pres-
`sure and arterial oxygen saturation [fingertip oximetry] starting to
`decrease) and the final measurement was then immediately per-
`Q·
`formed. Mean values ⫾ SEM are given for eight patients for
`, RL,
`and
`.
`Ppa
`
`and anginal oppression (Table 3). In contrast, aerosolized
`PGI2, similar to NO, did not significantly increase shunt flow
`and increased PaO2 values. NO, however, was not employed
`owing to possible rebound pulmonary hypertensive crisis on
`abrupt cessation of the gas flow (21). Aerosolization of ilo-
`prost (13.5 ␮g within 15 min) exerted acute benefits on hemo-
`dynamics and gas exchange, comparable to those of inhaled
`PGI2 (Figure 4), but the effect lasted longer (⬇ 90 min). A
`daily total dose of 135 ␮g of iloprost, divided in nine aerosol
`applications (15 ␮g each) with two 4-h nocturnal intervals, was
`then continuously administered for 21 mo. The patient was
`discharged home after 4 wk, and is now performing light
`housework. Recatheterization after 5 and 12 mo showed a ten-
`dency toward improvement of baseline hemodynamics (as-
`sessed in the morning after a 6-h interval without nebuliza-
`tion), as well as a maintained acute response to the aerosolization
`of iloprost without any increase in dosage (Table 3). Exercise
`tolerance increased, and after 12 mo she performed a 6-min
`walk of 240 m just before and 314 m just after inhalation of
`iloprost. Interestingly, lung fibrosis did not progress further as
`assessed by VC, DCO, and chest X-ray.
`
`DISCUSSION
`In this study, systemic and inhaled vasodilators were applied
`to patients with significantly increased pulmonary vascular re-
`
`
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1023
`Page 6
`
`

`

`606
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 160 1999
`
`Q·
`Figur

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket