`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00184
`U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00184
`U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent Owner Nanoco
`
`Technologies Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests oral argument in the
`
`above-identified proceedings. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), and without
`
`waiving the right to raise any additional issues not listed below, Patent Owner
`
`requests an oral hearing on the following issues:
`
`1. Any issues raised by Petitioner in this proceeding, including in the
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review and Replies in this proceeding, and
`
`including whether the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423 are
`
`patentable.
`
`2. Any issues raised by Patent Owner in this proceeding, including in Patent
`
`Owner’s Response and Patent Owner’s Sur-reply.
`
`3. Any additional issues raised by Petitioner in any Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`4. Any additional issues raised by the Board or Petitioner at oral argument.
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner and both parties request that the
`
`oral hearing for this proceeding be consolidated with the hearing scheduled for
`
`IPR2021-00182, IPR2021-00183, IPR2021-00185, and IPR2021-00186. Patent
`
`Owner and Petitioner have also conferred without agreement concerning the
`
`amount of time necessary for argument. Patent Owner believes that an allocation
`
`of ninety (90) minutes per side will be sufficient, with 60 minutes per side for
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00184
`U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423
`consolidated arguments in IPR2021-00183 through -00186, and 30 minutes per
`
`side in IPR2021-00182. Patent Owner also requests the opportunity to reserve a
`
`portion of its allocated time for sur-rebuttals.
`
`Should the hearing be conducted in person, Patent Owner requests the ability
`
`to use computers at the hearing, as well as audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for a
`
`PowerPoint presentation. Patent Owner requests that at least three spaces be
`
`reserved at the oral hearing.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2022
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00184
`U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Nanoco Technologies Ltd.,
`By its attorneys,
`
`
`/Peter J. Cuomo/
`William A. Meunier (Reg. No. 41,193)
`Peter J. Cuomo (Reg. No. 58,481)
`Michael C. Newman (pro hac vice)
`Thomas A. Wintner (pro hac vice)
`Matthew S. Galica (pro hac vice)
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Telephone: 617-348-1845
`Facsimile: 617-542-2241
`E-mails: WAMeunier@mintz.com
` PJCuomo@mintz.com
` MCNewman@mintz.com
` TWintner@mintz.com
` MSGalica@mintz.com
` NanocoIPRs@mintz.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00184
`U.S. Patent No. 7,803,423
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a copy of Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument is being
`
`served by electronic mail on the following counsel of record:
`
`Lead Counsel
`F. Christopher Mizzo, P.C.
`Reg. No. 73,156
`chris.mizzo@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301
`Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`Facsimile: (202)389-5200
`
`Dated: January 6, 2022
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Gregory S. Arovas, P.C.
`Reg. No. 38,818
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`Stefan Miller
`Reg. No. 57,623
`stefan.miller@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, N.Y. 10022
`Telephone: (212) 446-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
`
`W. Todd Baker
`Reg. No. 45,265
`todd.baker@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301
`Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington,
`D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`Facsimile: (202)389-5200
`
`
`/Peter J. Cuomo/
`Peter J. Cuomo (Reg. No. 58,481)
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY
`& POPEO, P.C.
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
