throbber
Paper 14
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: March 15, 2021
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ABILITY OPTO-ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LARGAN PRECISION CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2020-01339, Patent 8,988,796 B21
`IPR2020-01345, Patent 8,395,691 B2
`
`
`
`Before MINN CHUNG, NORMAN H. BEAMER, and
`JOHN D. HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial and
`Granting Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01339, Patent 8,988,796 B2
`IPR2020-01345, Patent 8,395,691 B2
`
`On March 8, 2021, the parties filed, with our authorization, in each of
`
`the proceedings (i) a Joint Motion to Terminate Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317
`and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.71(a), and 42.74 (Paper 12,2 “Joint Motion to
`Terminate”); (ii) written settlement materials (Ex. 1050); and (iii) a Joint
`Request to File Settlement Materials as Business Confidential Information
`and to Maintain Said Materials Separate From the Public File Pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 13, “Joint Request”).
`
`The parties indicate that they have settled their dispute concerning
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,988,796 B2 and 8,395,691 B2 (“the ’796 and ’691
`patents”), and that the parties have agreed to terminate these proceedings.
`Joint Motion to Terminate 1–2. The parties state in each Joint Motion to
`Terminate that they “certify that they are concurrently filing a true and
`complete copy of their confidential written settlement materials
`(Confidential Exhibit 1050) in connection with this matter as required by
`statute.” Id. at 1.
`
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`filing of a settlement agreement. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) (“An inter partes
`review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any
`petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner,
`unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request
`for termination is filed.”); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72 (“The Board may terminate a
`trial without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including
`. . . pursuant to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. 317(a) . . . .”); see also Patent
`
`
`2 The parties filed substantially identical papers pertaining to this
`termination in both IPR2020-01339 and IPR2020-01345. We cite to the
`papers in IPR2020-01339.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01339, Patent 8,988,796 B2
`IPR2020-01345, Patent 8,395,691 B2
`
`Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (Nov. 2019) at
`86, available at https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/
`tpgnov.pdf (“The Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`filing of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the
`merits of the proceeding.” (citing 35 U.S.C. §§ 317(a), 327)).
`
`We instituted a trial in each of these proceedings on February 22,
`2021. We have not yet decided the merits of the proceedings, and final
`written decisions have not been entered. Notwithstanding that the
`proceedings have moved beyond the preliminary stage, the parties have
`shown adequately that terminating the proceedings is appropriate.
`Accordingly, we are persuaded that, under these circumstances, it is
`appropriate to terminate these proceedings as to all parties.
`
`Additionally, we grant the parties’ Joint Request in each proceeding to
`treat their settlement materials as business confidential information and to
`keep the materials separate from the files of the ’796 and ’691 patents. Joint
`Request 1–2; see 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) (“At the request of a party to the
`proceeding, the agreement or understanding shall be treated as business
`confidential information, shall be kept separate from the file of the involved
`patents, and shall be made available only to Federal Government agencies
`on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause.”); see also
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (same).
`
`This Decision does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate is granted in
`each of these proceedings;
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01339, Patent 8,988,796 B2
`IPR2020-01345, Patent 8,395,691 B2
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request is granted in
`
`each of these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the written settlement materials (Exhibit
`1050) be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the
`files of the ’796 and ’691 patents, and made available only to Federal
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of
`good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that these proceedings are terminated.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01339, Patent 8,988,796 B2
`IPR2020-01345, Patent 8,395,691 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Matthew W. Johnson
`John A. Marlott
`JONES DAY
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`jamarlott@jonesday.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph F. Edell
`Adam A. Allgood
`FISCH SIGLER LLP
`joe.edell.IPR@fischllp.com
`adam.allgood@fischllp.com
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket