throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 1 of 7
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00034-ADA
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG
`ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00034-ADA
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 2 of 7
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 32), Plaintiff Ancora Technologies, Inc. and
`
`Defendants LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., the Parties in the above captioned actions, submit this Joint
`
`Claim Construction Statement.
`
`I.
`
`AGREED CLAIM TERMS
`
`Claim Term
`“a computer including an erasable, non-volatile
`memory area of a BIOS of the computer, and a
`volatile memory area”
`
`Agreed Construction
`The parties agree that this portion of the
`preamble is limiting.
`
`(Claim 1 Preamble)
`“non-volatile memory”
`
`(Claims 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, 16)
`“using the key”
`
`(Claim 8)
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS1
`
`“memory whose data is maintained when the
`power is removed”
`
`“using a pseudo-unique key”
`
`Claim Term
`
`“license”
`
`(Claim 1 preamble)
`
`Ancora’s Proposed
`Construction
`The portion of the preamble
`reciting “A method of
`restricting software operation
`within a license…” is non-
`limiting, and the term
`“license” thus does not need to
`be construed.
`
`If the preamble is held to be
`limiting, “license” means
`“authorization or verification
`to run.”
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`The entire preamble of the
`claim is limiting.
`
`“license” means “a legal
`contract between a software
`provider and a user that
`specifies the rights of the user
`to use, distribute or resell the
`software”
`
`“license record”
`
`(Claims 1, 3, 6, 8-9, 14, 16)
`
`“a record associated with a
`licensed program with
`information for verifying that
`
`“a record associated with a
`program with information for
`verifying that the program is
`
`1 For terms whose constructions are similar, the Parties have underlined the portions of the
`constructions that differ.
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`2
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`
`
`“volatile memory”
`
`(Claims 1, 6, 9, 11)
`
`BIOS
`
`(Claims 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, 16)
`
`“non-volatile memory of the
`BIOS”
`[Plaintiff]
`
`“memory of the BIOS”
`[Defendants]
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`“program”
`
`(Claims 1, 3, 6, 9-10, 14, 16)
`
`“selecting a program residing
`in the volatile memory”
`
`(Claims 1, 6)
`
`“using an agent to set up a
`verification structure in the
`erasable, non-volatile memory
`of the BIOS”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`
`
`Ancora’s Proposed
`Construction
`licensed program”
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`licensed”
`
`“memory whose data is not
`maintained or becomes
`inaccessible when the power
`is removed”
`
`“An acronym for Basic Input/
`Output System. It is the set of
`essential startup operations
`that run when a computer is
`turned on, which test
`hardware, starts the operating
`system, and support the
`transfer of data among
`hardware devices.”
`
`This term does not require
`separate construction.
`
`“memory whose data is not
`maintained when the power is
`removed”
`
`“An acronym for Basic Input /
`Output System. It is the set of
`essential startup operations
`stored in ROM that run
`automatically when a
`computer is turned on, which
`test hardware, starts the
`operating system, and support
`the transfer of data among
`hardware devices.”
`
`“a memory that: (i) stores the
`BIOS; (ii) is not recognized by
`an operating system as a
`storage device; and (iii) does
`not have a file system”
`
`“a set of instructions for a
`computer”
`
`“a set of instructions that can
`be executed by a computer”
`
`plain and ordinary meaning
`
`“running a program in the
`volatile memory”
`
`plain and ordinary meaning
`
`“agent” means “a software
`program or routine”
`
`This limitation is a means plus
`function limitation governed
`by pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶
`6.
`
`Function: “set up a
`verification structure in the
`erasable, non-volatile memory
`of the BIOS”
`
`Structure: Algorithm found at
`6:18-28; if not, indefinite due
`to a lack of corresponding
`structure
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`3
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`“set up a verification
`structure”
`
`(Claims 1, 3, 7, 14)
`
`Ancora’s Proposed
`Construction
`plain and ordinary meaning
`
`“verifying the program using
`at least the verification
`structure”
`
`“confirming whether a
`program is licensed using at
`least the verification structure”
`
`plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Also, “the verification” means
`“verifying the program using
`at least the verification
`structure from the erasable
`nonvolatile memory of the
`BIOS”
`
`
`
`The “verifying a program”
`step cannot be completed until
`the “selecting a program” and
`“using an agent” steps have
`been completed, and the
`“acting on the program” step
`cannot be completed until the
`“verifying” step has been
`completed.
`
`plain and ordinary meaning
`
`(Claims 1, 9, 16)
`
`“acting on the program
`according to the verification”
`
`(Claims 1, 10)
`
`Order of the Claim 1 Steps
`
`“first non-volatile memory
`area of the computer”
`
`(Claim 7)
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“forming a structure by
`encrypting a license record
`using a pseudo-unique key for
`each computer”
`
`“confirming through an
`operating system (OS) level
`application whether a program
`is licensed using at least the
`verification structure”
`
`“(i) allowing the use of the
`program if licensed or (ii)
`restricting the program’s
`operation if not licensed, using
`an operating system (OS)
`level application”
`
`The antecedent basis for “the
`verification” is the earlier step
`of “verifying the program
`using at least the verification
`structure from the erasable
`nonvolatile memory of the
`BIOS”
`
`The “verifying the program”
`step and “acting on the
`program” step of claim 1 must
`occur, in order, after the
`“selecting a program” step and
`“using an agent” step
`
`“read only memory area of the
`computer”2
`
`
`
`
`2 Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. do not join
`Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. in the construction of this term.
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`4
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`Date: May 1, 2020
`
`/s/ Andres Healy
`Charles Ainsworth
`State Bar No. 00783521
`Robert Christopher Bunt
`State Bar No. 00787165
`PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.
`100 E. Ferguson, Suite 418
`Tyler, TX 75702
`903/531-3535
`charley@pbatyler.com
`rcbunt@pbatyler.com
`
`Lexie G. White (Texas 24048876)
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Tel: (713) 651-9366
`Fax: (713) 654-6666
`lwhite@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Andres Healy (pro hac vice)
`Steven M. Seigel (pro hac vice)
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, Washington 98101
`Tel: (206) 516-3880
`Fax: 206-516-3883
`ahealy@susmangodfrey.com
`sseigel@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Zachary B. Savage (pro hac vice)
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, New York 10019
`Tel: (212) 336-8330
`Fax: (212) 336-8340
`zsavage@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Counsel For Plaintiff Ancora Technologies,
`Inc.
`
`/s/ Collin W. Park
`Winstol D. Carter, Jr.
`Texas Bar No. 03932950
`winn.carter@morganlewis.com
`Thomas R. Davis
`Texas Bar No. 24055384
`thomas.davis@morganlewis.com
`Elizabeth M. Chiaviello
`Texas Bar No. 24088913
`elizabeth.chiaviello@morganlewis.com
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000
`Houston, Texas 77002-5006
`T. 713.890.5000
`F. 713.890.5001
`
`Collin W. Park (admitted pro hac vice)
`collin.park@morganlewis.com
`District of Columbia Bar No. 470486
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20004-2541
`T. 202.739.3000
`F. 202.739.3001
`
`Attorneys for Defendants LG Electronics
`Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas State Bar No. 24001351
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Phone: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`
`Robert T. Haslam (rhaslam@cov.com)
`Anupam Sharma (asharma@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`5
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Phone: (650) 632-4700
`Fax: (650) 632-4800
`
`Richard L Rainey (rrainey@cov.com)
`Jared Frisch (jfrisch@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4956
`Phone: (202) 662.6000
`Fax: (202) 662-6291
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc.
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`6
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00034-ADA Document 56 Filed 05/01/20 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 1st day of May, 2020, with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`/s/ Steven M. Seigel
`Steven M. Seigel
`
`7304966v1/102891
`
`7
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2017, Page 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket