UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD., an Irish corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., a Korean
`corporation; LG ELECTRONICS, INC., a
`Korean corporation; and SONY
`CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO. 6:19-CV-00236-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`
`Defendant LG Display Co., Ltd. (“LG Display”) provides the following Initial Disclosures
`
`pursuant to the Order Governing Proceedings (Docket No. 50), and in satisfaction of Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(a)(1). LG Display makes these disclosures based on the information that is
`
`presently available. LG Display reserves the right to supplement or amend these disclosures
`
`based on further investigation and discovery conducted in this case, the Court’s claim
`
`construction, and any other reasons impacting the accuracy and completeness of these disclosures.
`
`By making these disclosures, LG Display does not waive its rights to object to the admissibility of
`
`any information disclosed herein.
`
`I.
`
`RULE 26(A)(1)(A)(I): IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE
`DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION
`
`Based on information presently available, LG Display provides the following disclosure of
`
`individuals described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(i):
`
`Name
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`
`Subject
`
`Solas OLED Ltd.
`
`4-5 Burton Hall Rd
`Sandyford
`Dublin 18
`Ireland
`
`Ownership of the patents-in-
`suit; conception and reduction
`to practice of the patents-in-
`suit; claim scope and
`interpretation; prosecution of
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 1
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Name
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`
`Subject
`
`the patents-in-suit; products or
`other embodiments of the
`patents-in-suit; public
`disclosures and sales or offers
`to sell products or other
`embodiments of the patents-
`in-suit; licenses to and efforts
`to license the patents-in-suit;
`valuation of the patents-in-
`suit; Solas’s business and
`business practices, and Solas’s
`finances, accounting,
`marketing, sales, manufacture,
`and business plans; prior art
`and the state of the art; and
`any basis for alleged damages.
`
`Knowledge of design,
`development, manufacture,
`marketing, sale, licensing,
`distribution, or operation of
`products that incorporate the
`alleged inventions of the
`patents-in-suit; knowledge of
`prior art, the conception and
`reduction to practice of
`inventions claimed in the ’137
`and ’068 patents, the
`prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents and related
`patents, and the assignment
`and ownership of the ’137 and
`’068 patents; licenses to and
`efforts to license the ’137 and
`’068 patents; public
`disclosures and sales or offers
`to sell products or other
`embodiments of the patents-
`in-suit.
`
`Knowledge of design,
`development, manufacture,
`marketing, sale, licensing,
`distribution, or operation of
`products that incorporate the
`alleged inventions of the
`patents-in-suit; knowledge of
`
`Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
`
`
`6-2, Hon-Machi 1-Chome
`Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo 151-8543
`Japan
`
`Universitaet Stutgart (Stuttgart
`University)
`
`
`Keplerstrasse 7
`Stuttgart 71065
`Germany
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 2
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Name
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`
`Subject
`
`prior art, the conception and
`reduction to practice of
`inventions claimed in the ’891
`patent, the prosecution of the
`’891 patent and related
`patents, and the assignment
`and ownership of the ’891
`patent; licenses to and efforts
`to license the ’891 patent;
`public disclosures and sales or
`offers to sell products or other
`embodiments of the patents-
`in-suit.
`
`Named inventor of the ’891
`patent; the alleged invention,
`conception and reduction to
`practice of the invention; prior
`art, invalidity,
`unenforceability, and claim
`scope; the prosecution of the
`’891 patent and related
`patents; and the assignment
`and ownership of the ’891
`patent; public disclosures and
`sales or offers to sell products
`or other embodiments of the
`patents-in-suit.
`
`Named inventor of the ’068
`patent; the alleged invention,
`conception and reduction to
`practice of the invention; prior
`art, invalidity,
`unenforceability, and claim
`scope; the prosecution of the
`’068 patent and related
`patents; and the assignment
`and ownership of the ’068
`patent; public disclosures and
`sales or offers to sell products
`or other embodiments of the
`patents-in-suit.
`
`Named inventor of the ’068
`and ’137 patents; the alleged
`invention, conception and
`
`Norbert Fruehauf
`
`
`Keplerstrasse 7
`Stuttgart 71065
`Germany
`
`Satoru Shimoda
`
`
`Fussa, Japan
`
`Tomoyuki Shirasaki
`
`
`Higashiyamato, Japan
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 3
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Name
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`
`Subject
`
`reduction to practice of the
`invention; prior art, invalidity,
`unenforceability, and claim
`scope; the prosecution of the
`’068 and ’137 patents and
`related patents; and the
`assignment and ownership of
`the ’068 and ’137 patents;
`public disclosures and sales or
`offers to sell products or other
`embodiments of the patents-
`in-suit.
`
`Named inventor of the ’068
`and ’137 patents; the alleged
`invention, conception and
`reduction to practice of the
`invention; prior art, invalidity,
`unenforceability, and claim
`scope; the prosecution of the
`’068 and ’137 patents and
`related patents; and the
`assignment and ownership of
`the ’068 and ’137 patents;
`public disclosures and sales or
`offers to sell products or other
`embodiments of the patents-
`in-suit.
`
`Named inventor of the ’068
`patent; the alleged invention,
`conception and reduction to
`practice of the invention; prior
`art, invalidity,
`unenforceability, and claim
`scope; the prosecution of the
`’068 patent and related
`patents; and the assignment
`and ownership of the ’068
`patent; public disclosures and
`sales or offers to sell products
`or other embodiments of the
`patents-in-suit.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Jun Ogura
`
`
`Fussa, Japan
`
`Minoru Kumagai
`
`
`Tokyo, Japan
`
`Richard Barth
`
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 4
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Name
`
`Marshall Chick
`
`
`David Dunbar
`
`
`Herbert Goodman
`
`
`Douglas Holtz
`
`
`Leonard Holtz
`
`
`Ian Volek
`
`
`Michael Messinger
`
`
`Khaled Shami
`
`
`Woonjim Nam
`
`
`Hak-Soo Kim
`
`
`
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`630 Ninth Avenue
`Suite 1010
`New York, NY 10036-3744
`
`1000 Wisconsin Ave. NW
`Suite 200
`Washington DC 20007
`
`1000 Wisconsin Ave. NW
`Suite 200
`Washington DC 20007
`
`Contact through counsel.
`
`Contact through counsel.
`
`Subject
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’137 and
`’068 patents.
`
`Prosecution of the ’891 patent.
`
`Prosecution of the ’891 patent.
`
`Development and operation of
`one or more of the Accused
`Products.
`
`Prior art, including prior art
`related to the ’891 patent.
`
`Any contact with LG Display’s employees listed above may be made only through LG
`
`Display’s counsel of record.
`
`In addition to the individuals listed above, LG Display incorporates into the list any authors
`
`of prior art that LG Display discloses in connection with its Invalidity Contentions and/or any inter
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 5
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 5
`
`

`

`partes review proceedings related to the patents-in-suit, as well as each individual identified on
`
`each of the references cited in Defendants’ Invalidity Disclosures and during the prosecution of
`
`the patents-in-suit and any foreign counterparts. Those individuals may have knowledge regarding
`
`the technology surrounding the patents-in-suit, prior art, product and other embodiments of the
`
`cited references, and the state of the art. Contact information for those individuals may be listed
`
`on the respective reference identifying those individuals.
`
`LG Display reserves the right to supplement or update the above list in view of subsequent
`
`investigation, new or amended pleadings, further discovery, further clarification of Plaintiff’s
`
`claims, or otherwise.
`
`II.
`
`RULE 26(A)(1)(A)(II): DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS
`
`Based on information presently available, LG Display provides the following description
`
`of documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that may be used by LG
`
`Display to support its claims and defenses:
`
` Research, development, design, or other documents sufficient to establish why the
`
`accused products do not practice any claim of the patents-in-suit;
`
` Marketing, sales, or financial documents and information sufficient to rebut
`
`Plaintiff’s damages contentions;
`
` The patents-in-suit and their prosecution histories;
`
` Documents related to the ownership and licensing of the patents-in-suit and related
`
`technology;
`
` Plaintiff’s documents concerning its decision to sue and any purported basis
`
`therefore;
`
` Plaintiff’s documents relating to its claim for damages;
`
` Plaintiff’s documents relating to its or others’ licensing of patents, know-how, and
`
`other intellectual property comparable to the patents-in-suit;
`
` Documents related to the sale, offer for sale, or other public disclosure of the subject
`
`matter of the patents-in-suit; and
`
` Prior art and other documents sufficient to establish that each asserted claim of the
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 6
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 6
`
`

`

`patents-in-suit is invalid.
`
`The foregoing documents are located at the offices of LG Display, at the offices of Latham
`
`& Watkins LLP, 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111; or are anticipated
`
`to be in the possession of Plaintiff or third parties. LG Display’s search for documents that it may
`
`use to support its claims or defenses is continuing. LG Display reserves the right to supplement
`
`this disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e).
`
`LG Display’s disclosure of these categories of documents is not an admission that any such
`
`documents are in fact relevant to any claim or defense in this action.
`
`LG Display reserves the right to supplement this list of documents in view of subsequent
`
`investigation, new or amended pleadings, further discovery, further clarification of Plaintiff’s
`
`claims, or otherwise.
`
`III. RULE 26(A)(1)(A)(III): COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES
`
`No damages are properly due or owing to Solas for any alleged patent infringement by LG
`
`Display. At this time, LG Display has incurred and continues to incur attorneys’ fees and expenses
`
`on a monthly basis in defense against this meritless litigation. Upon prevailing in this litigation,
`
`LG Display will seek its attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
`
`LG Display also reserves its right to supplement this disclosure and to provide additional
`
`information regarding damages at a later time after taking discovery of Plaintiff.
`
`IV. RULE 26(A)(1)(A)(IV): INSURANCE AGREEMENTS
`
`LG Display is not presently aware of any insurance agreements described in Fed. R. Civ.
`
`P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iv).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 7
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer H. Doan
`
`Jennifer H. Doan
`Texas Bar No. 08809050
`Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com
`Joshua R. Thane
`Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com
`Texas Bar No. 24060713
`J. Randy Roeser
`Email: rroeser@haltomdoan.com
`Texas Bar No. 24089377
`Cole A. Riddell
`Email: criddell@haltomdoan.com
`Texas Bar No. 24105423
`HALTOM & DOAN
`6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100
`Texarkana, TX 75503
`Tel: 903.255.1000
`Fax: 903.255.0800
`
`
`Douglas E. Lumish
`California State Bar No. 183863
`Email: doug.lumish@lw.com
`Gabriel S. Gross
`California State Bar No. 254672
`Email: gabe.gross@lw.com
`Andrew Max Goldberg
`California State Bar No. 307254
`Email: drew.goldberg@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`140 Scott Drive
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: 650.328.4600
`Fax: 650.463.2600
`
`Joseph H. Lee
`California State Bar No. 248046
`Email: joseph.lee@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
`Costa Mesa, CA 92626
`Tel: 714.540.1235
`Fax: 714.755.8290
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 8
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Blake R. Davis
`California State Bar No. 294360
`Email: blake.davis@lw.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: 415.391.0600
`Fax: 415.395.8095
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record were served with a copy of the
`
`foregoing document via electronic mail on this the 29th day of May, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer H. Doan
`Jennifer H. Doan
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES - Page 9
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2008
`Page 9
`
`