throbber
Case 6:19-cv-00236-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/21/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 6:19-cv-00236-ADA
`
`v.
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., and
`SONY CORPORATION,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`On December 6, 2019, the Court conducted a conference in the above entitled and numbered
`
`case. All parties appeared through counsel. As a result of such hearing, and pursuant to Rule 16,
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ORDERS that the following schedule will govern
`
`deadlines up to and including the trial of this matter:
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`Tuesday, November 26,
`2019
`
`Plaintiff serves preliminary infringement contentions1 in the
`form of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s)
`each element of the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall
`also identify the earliest priority date (i.e. the earliest date of in-
`vention) for each asserted claim and produce: (1) all documents
`evidencing conception and reduction to practice for each
`claimed invention, and (2) a copy of the file history for each pa-
`tent in suit.
`
`1 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary infringement in-
`validity contentions without leave of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reason-
`able efforts to prepare its preliminary contentions and the amendment is based on material
`identified after those preliminary contentions were served and should do so reasonably upon
`identifying any such material. Any amendment to add claims requires leave of court so that the
`Court can address any scheduling issues.
`
`1
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00236-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/21/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`Friday, December 20, 2019 Deadline for Motions to Transfer
`
`Friday, January 24, 2020
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the form
`of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification
`of any limitations the Defendant contends are indefinite or lack
`written description under section 112, and (3) an identification
`of any claims the Defendant contends are directed to ineligible
`subject matter under section 101. Defendant shall also produce
`(1) all prior art referenced in the invalidity contentions, (2) tech-
`nical documents, including software where applicable, sufficient
`to show the operation of the accused product(s), and (3) sum-
`mary, annual sales information for the accused product(s) for the
`prior two years, unless the parties agree to some other
`timeframe.
`
`Friday, February 7, 2020
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`Friday, February 21, 2020
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`Friday, February 28, 2020
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness
`they may rely upon with respect to claim construction or indefi-
`niteness. With respect to any expert identified, the parties shall
`also provide a summary of the witness’s expected testimony in-
`cluding the opinions to be expressed and a general description of
`the basis and reasons therefore. A failure to summarize the po-
`tential expert testimony in a good faith, informative fashion may
`result in the exclusion of the proffered testimony. With respect to
`items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify each such
`item by production number or produce a copy of any such item
`if not previously produced.
`
`Friday, March 6, 2020
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and ex-
`change revised list of terms/constructions.
`
`Friday, March 13, 2020
`
`Parties file Opening claim construction briefs, including any ar-
`guments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`
`Friday, April 3, 2020
`
`Parties file Responsive claim construction briefs.
`
`Friday, April 17, 2020
`
`Parties file Reply claim construction briefs.
`
`Friday, April 24, 2020
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement and consoli-
`dated briefing collated by Opening, Response, and Reply in Mi-
`crosoft Word format. Absent agreement of the parties, the
`Plaintiff shall be responsible for the timely submission of this
`and other Joint filings.
`
`2
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00236-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/21/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`Friday, May 22, 2020
`
`Markman Hearing at 9:00 a.m.
`
`Friday, May 29, 2020
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per
`Rule 26(a).
`
`Monday, July 6, 2020
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Friday, July 17, 2020
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Friday, August 14, 2020
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless
`the amendment adds patents or claims.
`
`Friday, October 30, 2020
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`Friday, November 6, 2020 Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Friday, December 4, 2020 Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Wednesday, December 23,
`2020
`
`Friday, January 8, 2021
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to discuss narrowing the number of
`claims asserted and prior art references at issue. The parties shall
`file a report within 5 business days regarding the results of the
`meet and confer.
`
`Friday, January 15, 2021
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`Friday, January 29, 2021
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, wit-
`ness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`Friday, February 12, 2021
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`Friday, February 19, 2021
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`
`Friday, February 26, 2021
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instruc-
`tions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition des-
`ignations); file oppositions to motions in limine.
`
`Friday, March 5, 2021
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`
`3 business days before
`Final Pretrial Conference.
`
`
`
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial dis-
`closures and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set the Pretrial
`Conference within 2-4 weeks of the trial date.
`
`3
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00236-ADA Document 59 Filed 12/21/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`
`
`SIGNED this day of _________________________, 20____.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`ALAN D. ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. V. SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`IPR2020-01055
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket